ARTICLE

THE IMPACT OF MERGER AND ACQUISITION ON BANK PERFORMANCE A CASE OF PAKISTANI BANKING SECTOR

51 Pages : 396-402

http://dx.doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2019(IV-I).51      10.31703/gssr.2019(IV-I).51      Published : Mar 2019

The Impact of Merger and Acquisition on Bank Performance: A Case of Pakistani Banking Sector

    Merger and acquisition is the strategy used by banks to expand its development process. In the current study operating and market performance has been assessed of the Banks exercised the M&A by taking the data from 2005-17. The main focus of the study is to evaluate the Banks performance using data collected from nine banks gone through the merger and acquisition strategy with the help of ordinary least square model. The results show significant relationship operating performance but insignificant relation with market performance. Findings provided an opportunity for the Banks to study and utilize the M&A strategy for capturing market share and further development in the competitive market. Furthermore, a glimpse for potential investors has been provided who want to create a profitable portfolio according to market concentration. The implications demands that proper improvement should be considered for the mechanism and regulatory policies to ensure the security of Banks.

    (1) Muttalib
    MS Management Sciences, Institute of Business Studies and Leadership, Abdul Wali Khan University Mardan, KP, Pakistan.
    (2) Muhammad Faizan Malik
    Assistant Professor, Institute of Business Studies and Leadership, Abdul Wali Khan University Mardan, KP, Pakistan.
    (3) Shehzad khan
    Assistant Professor, Institute of Business Studies and Leadership, Abdul Wali Khan University Mardan, KP, Pakistan.
  • Silveira, A. M., & Dias Jr. A. L. (2010). What is the impact of bad governance practices in a concentrated ownership environment? International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, 7, 70-91.
  • Reese, W., & M, W. (2002). Protection of Minority Shareholder Interests: Cross listings in the United States, and Subsequent Equity Offerings. Journal of Finance, 52, 65-104.
  • Sarkar, J., & Sarkar, S. (2000). Large shareholder activism in corporate governance in developing countries: Evidence from India. International Review of Finance, 1, 161-194.
  • Adams, R. B., Almeida, H., & Ferreira, D. (2005).Powerful CEOs and their impact on corporate performance. Review of Financial Studies, 18: 1403-1432.
  • Ahmed, Muhammad; Ahmed, Zahid; (2014). Mergers and Acquisitions: Effect on Financial Performance of Manufacturing Banks of Pakistan. Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research 21 (4), 689699.
  • BEN-AMAR, WALID; and ANDRE, PAUL; (2006). Separation of Ownership from Control and Acquiring Bank Performance: The Case of Family Ownership in Canada. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 33(3) & (4), 517-543.
  • C, R., ANDERSON, & REEB, D. M. (JUNE 2003). Founding-Family Ownership and Bank Performance: Evidence from the S&P 500. THE JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 58, 1301-1328.
  • Gaspar, Jose' Miguel; Massa, Massimo; Matos, Pedro; (2005).Shareholder investment horizons and the market for corporate control. Journal of Financial Economics 76, 135-165.
  • Goranova, Maria; Dharwadkar, Ravi; Brandes, Pamela; (2010). Owners on both sides of the deal: Mergers and Acquisitions and Overlapping Institutional Ownership. Strategic Management Journal, 31, 1114-1135.
  • Guest, P. M. (2008). The determinants of board size and composition: Evidence from the UK. Journal of Corporate Finance 14, 51-72.
  • Heracleous, L. (2001). What is the impact of corporate governance on organizational performance? An International Review, 9, 165-173.
  • Hermalin, B. E., &Weisbach, M. S. (2003). Boards of directors as an endogenously determined institution: A survey of the economic literature. FRBNY Economic Policy Review, 4, 7-26.
  • Jackling, B., &Johl, S. (2009). Board Structure and Bank Performance: Evidence from India's Top Banks. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17, 492-505.
  • Mak, Y. T., &Yuanto, K. (2005). Size really matters: Further evidence on the negative relationship between board size and bank value. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal 13, 301- 318.
  • Ng, C. (2005).An Empirical Study on the Relationship between Ownership and Performance in a FamilyBased Corporate Environment.Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, 20, 121-146.
  • Oduro, Isaac Marfo; Agyei, Samuel Kwaku; (Vol.4, No.7, 2013). Mergers & Acquisition and Bank Performance: Evidence from the Ghana Stock Exchange. Research Journal of Finance and Accounting.
  • Raheja, C. G. (2005). Determinants of Board Size and Composition: A Theory of Corporate Boards. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 40, 1-38.
  • Romano, R. (1992). A guide to takeovers theory, evidence, regulations. The Yale Journal on Regulation, 9, pp. 119-180.
  • Weston, J.F., Mitchel, M.L., Mulherin, J.H. and Salwan, P. (2010). Takeovers, restructuring, and corporate governance. Fourth ed. Delhi: Pearson Education.
  • Wolfe, M., Stressman, S. and Manfredo, M. (2011). The acquisition of IBP by Tyson foods in 2001: pre and post merger financial performance. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 93(2), pp. 1-6.
  • Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360.
  • Myers, S. C., & Majluf, N. S. (1984). Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have. Journal of financial economics, 13(2), 187-221.
  • Vogt, S. C. (1994). The role of internal financial sources in firm financing and investment decisions. Review of Financial Economics, 4(1), 1-24.
  • Boyan, J and Rouseau, P (2002), The Q-Theory of Mergers, Technological change, 92(2).
  • Faizan, M, Suresh, R and Shahzad, K, (2017) Mergers and Acquisstions: Analysis of Banking sector of Pakistan, Journal of computational and Theoretical Nanoscience 23(9): 8947-8950

Cite this article

    APA : Muttalib., Malik, M. F., & khan, S. (2019). The Impact of Merger and Acquisition on Bank Performance: A Case of Pakistani Banking Sector. Global Social Sciences Review, IV(I), 396-402. https://doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2019(IV-I).51
    CHICAGO : Muttalib, , Muhammad Faizan Malik, and Shehzad khan. 2019. " The Impact of Merger and Acquisition on Bank Performance: A Case of Pakistani Banking Sector." Global Social Sciences Review, IV (I): 396-402 doi: 10.31703/gssr.2019(IV-I).51
    HARVARD : MUTTALIB., MALIK, M. F. & KHAN, S. 2019. The Impact of Merger and Acquisition on Bank Performance: A Case of Pakistani Banking Sector. Global Social Sciences Review, IV, 396-402.
    MHRA : Muttalib, , Muhammad Faizan Malik, and Shehzad khan. 2019. " The Impact of Merger and Acquisition on Bank Performance: A Case of Pakistani Banking Sector." Global Social Sciences Review, IV: 396-402
    MLA : Muttalib, , Muhammad Faizan Malik, and Shehzad khan. " The Impact of Merger and Acquisition on Bank Performance: A Case of Pakistani Banking Sector." Global Social Sciences Review, IV.I (2019): 396-402 Print.
    OXFORD : Muttalib, , Malik, Muhammad Faizan, and khan, Shehzad (2019), " The Impact of Merger and Acquisition on Bank Performance: A Case of Pakistani Banking Sector", Global Social Sciences Review, IV (I), 396-402
    TURABIAN : Muttalib, , Muhammad Faizan Malik, and Shehzad khan. " The Impact of Merger and Acquisition on Bank Performance: A Case of Pakistani Banking Sector." Global Social Sciences Review IV, no. I (2019): 396-402. https://doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2019(IV-I).51