MULTI ANALYSIS THROUGH SMARTPLS MEASURING OF ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE INTERPLAY

http://dx.doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2021(VI-II).23      10.31703/gssr.2021(VI-II).23      Published : Jun 2
Authored by : Syed Muhamad Basit RazaBukhari , Tasawar Javed , Aemin Nasir

23 Pages : 224-237

References

  • Abuaddous, H. Y., Al Sokkar, A. A., & Abualodous, B. I. (2018). The impact of knowledge management on organizational performance. International journal of advanced computer science and applications, 9(4), 204-208
  • Akter, S., Jamal, N., Ashraf, M. M., McCarthy, G., & Varsha, P. (2020). The rise of the social business in emerging economies: a new paradigm of development. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 11(3), 282-299.
  • Alaarj, S., Abidin-Mohamed, Z., & Bustamam, U. S. B. A. (2016). Mediating role of trust on the effects of knowledge management capabilities on organizational performance. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 235, 729-738.
  • Alvarez, S. A., & Busenitz, L. W. (2001). The entrepreneurship of resource-based theory. Journal of management, 27(6), 755-775.
  • Ardichvili, A., Cardozo, R., & Ray, S. (2003). A theory of entrepreneurial opportunity identification and development. Journal of Business venturing, 18(1), 105-123
  • Ashraf, S. F., Li, C., & Mehmood, B. (2017). A Study of Premium Price Brands with Special Reference to Willingness of Customer to Pay. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 7(7), 619-639.
  • Ashraf, S. F., Li, C., Butt, R., Naz, S., & Zafar, Z. (2019). Education as Moderator: Integrative Effect towards Succession Planning Process of Small Family Businesses. Pac. Bus. Rev. Int, 11, 107-123.
  • Atuahene-Gima, K. (2005). Resolving the capability-rigidity paradox in new product innovation. Journal of marketing, 69(4), 61- 83.
  • Augier, M., & Teece, D. J. (2009). Dynamic capabilities and the role of managers in business strategy and economic performance. Organization science, 20(2), 410-421.
  • Azaizah, N., Reychav, I., Raban, D. R., Simon, T., & McHaney, R. (2018). Impact of ESN implementation on communication and knowledge-sharing in a multi-national organization. International Journal of Information Management, 43, 284-294.
  • Becker, B., & Gerhart, B. (1996). The impact of human resource management on organizational performance: Progress and prospects. Academy of Management journal, 39(4), 779-801.
  • Božič, K., & Dimovski, V. (2019). Business intelligence and analytics use, innovation ambidexterity, and firm performance: A dynamic capabilities perspective. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 28(4), 101578.
  • Centobelli, P., Cerchione, R., & Esposito, E. (2019). Efficiency and effectiveness of knowledge management systems in SMEs. Production Planning & Control, 30(9), 779- 791.
  • Dada, O., & Fogg, H. (2016). Organizational learning, entrepreneurial orientation, and the role of university engagement in SMEs. International Small Business Journal, 34(1), 86-104.
  • Eikelenboom, M., & de Jong, G. (2019). The impact of dynamic capabilities on the sustainability performance of SMEs. Journal of cleaner production, 235, 1360- 1370
  • Falahat, M., Ramayah, T., Soto-Acosta, P., & Lee, Y.-Y. (2020). SMEs internationalization: The role of product innovation, market intelligence, pricing and marketing communication capabilities as drivers of SMEs' international performance. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 152, 119908.
  • Farzaneh, M., Ghasemzadeh, P., Nazari, J. A., & Mehralian, G. (2020). Contributory role of dynamic capabilities in the relationship between organizational learning and innovation performance. European Journal of Innovation Management, 24(3), 655-676. https://doi.org/10.1108/ejim-12-2019-0355.
  • Ferreira, J., & Coelho, A. (2020). Dynamic capabilities, innovation and branding capabilities and their impact on competitive advantage and SME's performance in Portugal: the moderating effects of entrepreneurial orientation. International Journal of Innovation Science, 12(3), 255-286. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijis- 10-2018-0108.
  • Ferreira, J., Cardim, S., & Coelho, A. (2021). Dynamic capabilities and mediating effects of innovation on the competitive advantage and firm's performance: the moderating role of organizational learning capability. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 12(2), 620-644.
  • García-Morales, V. J., Lloréns-Montes, F. J., & Verdú-Jover, A. J. (2008). The effects of transformational leadership on organizational performance through knowledge and innovation. British journal of management, 19(4), 299-319.
  • Giniuniene, J., & Jurksiene, L. (2015). Dynamic capabilities, innovation and organizational learning: Interrelations and impact on firm performance. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 213, 985-991.
  • González-Serrano, M. H., Añó Sanz, V., & González-García, R. J. (2020). Sustainable sport entrepreneurship and innovation: a bibliometric analysis of this emerging field of research. Sustainability, 12(12), 5209.
  • Grant, R. M. (1991). The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: implications for strategy formulation. California management review, 33(3), 114-135.
  • Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing theory and Practice, 19(2), 139- 152.
  • Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Hopkins, L., & G. Kuppelwieser, V. (2014). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS- SEM). European Business Review, 26(2), 106-121. https://doi.org/10.1108/ebr-10- 2013-0128.
  • Henseler, J., & Fassott, G. (2010). Testing moderating effects in PLS path models: An illustration of available procedures Handbook of partial least squares (pp. 713- 735): Springer.
  • Hermawan, I., Suharnomo, S., & Perdhana, M. S. (2021). Inimitable-based innovative entrepreneurship as mediation concepts of information technology roles on organizational performance. Business: Theory and Practice, 22(2), 380-391.
  • Hervás-Oliver, J.-L., Parrilli, M. D., Rodríguez- Pose, A., & Sempere-Ripoll, F. (2021). The drivers of SME innovation in the regions of the EU. Research Policy, 50(9), 104316.
  • Hsu, M.-H., Ju, T. L., Yen, C.-H., & Chang, C.-M. (2007). Knowledge sharing behavior in virtual communities: The relationship between trust, self-efficacy, and outcome expectations. International journal of human-computer studies, 65(2), 153-169.
  • Hurley, R. F., & Hult, G. T. M. (1998). Innovation, market orientation, and organizational learning: an integration and empirical examination. Journal of marketing, 62(3), 42-54.
  • Jantunen, A., Puumalainen, K., Saarenketo, S., & Kyläheiko, K. (2005). Entrepreneurial orientation, dynamic capabilities and international performance. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 3(3), 223- 243.
  • Jiang, W., Chai, H., Shao, J., & Feng, T. (2018). Green entrepreneurial orientation for enhancing firm performance: A dynamic capability perspective. Journal of cleaner production, 198, 1311-1323.
  • Khan, F., Xuehe, Z., Atlas, F., Khan, K., Pitafi, A., & Saleem, M. (2017). Impact of absorptive capacity and dominant logic on innovation performance of public sector organizations in Hefei (Anhui Province), China.
  • Kurniawan, P., Hartati, W., Qodriah, S., & Badawi, B. (2020). From knowledge sharing to quality performance: The role of absorptive capacity, ambidexterity and innovation capability in creative industry. Management Science Letters, 10(2), 433- 442.
  • Lam, L., Nguyen, P., Le, N., & Tran, K. (2021). The relation among organizational culture, knowledge management, and innovation capability: Its implication for open innovation. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 7(1), 66.
  • Li, C., Ashraf, S. F., Shahzad, F., Bashir, I., Murad, M., Syed, N., & Riaz, M. (2020). Influence of Knowledge Management Practices on Entrepreneurial and Organizational Performance: A Mediated-Moderation Model. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.577106
  • Li, H., Waqas, M., Tariq, H., Abena, A. A. N., Akwasi, O. C., & Ashraf, S. F. (2021). Corrigendum: I Will Hurt You for This, When and How Subordinates Take Revenge From Abusive Supervisors: A Perspective of Displaced Revenge. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 1527.
  • LIU, S.-M., HU, R., & KANG, T.-W. (2021). The effects of absorptive capability and innovative culture on innovation performance: Evidence from Chinese high-tech firms. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 8(3), 1153-1162.
  • Mangenda Tshiaba, S., Wang, N., Ashraf, S. F., Nazir, M., & Syed, N. (2021). Measuring the Sustainable Entrepreneurial Performance of Textile-Based Small-Medium Enterprises: A Mediation-Moderation Model. Sustainability, 13(19), 11050.
  • Marques, C. S., & Ferreira, J. (2009). SME innovative capacity, competitive advantage and performance in a'traditional'industrial region of Portugal. Journal of technology management & innovation, 4(4), 53-68.
  • Pavlou, P. A., & El Sawy, O. A. (2011). Understanding the elusive black box of dynamic capabilities. Decision sciences, 42(1), 239-273.
  • Setini, M., Yasa, N. N. K., Gede Supartha, I. W., Ketut Giantari, I., & Rajiani, I. (2020). The passway of women entrepreneurship: Starting from social capital with open innovation, through to knowledge sharing and innovative performance. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 6(2), 25.
  • Shu, H., Fei, W., & Chen, C. (2007). Knowledge Sharing, Absorptive Capacity and Innovation Capability: An Empirical Study of Taiwanese Knowledge-Intensive Industries. Journal of Information Science, 33(3), 340-359.
  • Singh, B., & Rao, M. (2016). Effect of intellectual capital on dynamic capabilities. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 29(2), 129-149.

References

  • Abuaddous, H. Y., Al Sokkar, A. A., & Abualodous, B. I. (2018). The impact of knowledge management on organizational performance. International journal of advanced computer science and applications, 9(4), 204-208
  • Akter, S., Jamal, N., Ashraf, M. M., McCarthy, G., & Varsha, P. (2020). The rise of the social business in emerging economies: a new paradigm of development. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 11(3), 282-299.
  • Alaarj, S., Abidin-Mohamed, Z., & Bustamam, U. S. B. A. (2016). Mediating role of trust on the effects of knowledge management capabilities on organizational performance. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 235, 729-738.
  • Alvarez, S. A., & Busenitz, L. W. (2001). The entrepreneurship of resource-based theory. Journal of management, 27(6), 755-775.
  • Ardichvili, A., Cardozo, R., & Ray, S. (2003). A theory of entrepreneurial opportunity identification and development. Journal of Business venturing, 18(1), 105-123
  • Ashraf, S. F., Li, C., & Mehmood, B. (2017). A Study of Premium Price Brands with Special Reference to Willingness of Customer to Pay. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 7(7), 619-639.
  • Ashraf, S. F., Li, C., Butt, R., Naz, S., & Zafar, Z. (2019). Education as Moderator: Integrative Effect towards Succession Planning Process of Small Family Businesses. Pac. Bus. Rev. Int, 11, 107-123.
  • Atuahene-Gima, K. (2005). Resolving the capability-rigidity paradox in new product innovation. Journal of marketing, 69(4), 61- 83.
  • Augier, M., & Teece, D. J. (2009). Dynamic capabilities and the role of managers in business strategy and economic performance. Organization science, 20(2), 410-421.
  • Azaizah, N., Reychav, I., Raban, D. R., Simon, T., & McHaney, R. (2018). Impact of ESN implementation on communication and knowledge-sharing in a multi-national organization. International Journal of Information Management, 43, 284-294.
  • Becker, B., & Gerhart, B. (1996). The impact of human resource management on organizational performance: Progress and prospects. Academy of Management journal, 39(4), 779-801.
  • Božič, K., & Dimovski, V. (2019). Business intelligence and analytics use, innovation ambidexterity, and firm performance: A dynamic capabilities perspective. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 28(4), 101578.
  • Centobelli, P., Cerchione, R., & Esposito, E. (2019). Efficiency and effectiveness of knowledge management systems in SMEs. Production Planning & Control, 30(9), 779- 791.
  • Dada, O., & Fogg, H. (2016). Organizational learning, entrepreneurial orientation, and the role of university engagement in SMEs. International Small Business Journal, 34(1), 86-104.
  • Eikelenboom, M., & de Jong, G. (2019). The impact of dynamic capabilities on the sustainability performance of SMEs. Journal of cleaner production, 235, 1360- 1370
  • Falahat, M., Ramayah, T., Soto-Acosta, P., & Lee, Y.-Y. (2020). SMEs internationalization: The role of product innovation, market intelligence, pricing and marketing communication capabilities as drivers of SMEs' international performance. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 152, 119908.
  • Farzaneh, M., Ghasemzadeh, P., Nazari, J. A., & Mehralian, G. (2020). Contributory role of dynamic capabilities in the relationship between organizational learning and innovation performance. European Journal of Innovation Management, 24(3), 655-676. https://doi.org/10.1108/ejim-12-2019-0355.
  • Ferreira, J., & Coelho, A. (2020). Dynamic capabilities, innovation and branding capabilities and their impact on competitive advantage and SME's performance in Portugal: the moderating effects of entrepreneurial orientation. International Journal of Innovation Science, 12(3), 255-286. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijis- 10-2018-0108.
  • Ferreira, J., Cardim, S., & Coelho, A. (2021). Dynamic capabilities and mediating effects of innovation on the competitive advantage and firm's performance: the moderating role of organizational learning capability. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 12(2), 620-644.
  • García-Morales, V. J., Lloréns-Montes, F. J., & Verdú-Jover, A. J. (2008). The effects of transformational leadership on organizational performance through knowledge and innovation. British journal of management, 19(4), 299-319.
  • Giniuniene, J., & Jurksiene, L. (2015). Dynamic capabilities, innovation and organizational learning: Interrelations and impact on firm performance. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 213, 985-991.
  • González-Serrano, M. H., Añó Sanz, V., & González-García, R. J. (2020). Sustainable sport entrepreneurship and innovation: a bibliometric analysis of this emerging field of research. Sustainability, 12(12), 5209.
  • Grant, R. M. (1991). The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: implications for strategy formulation. California management review, 33(3), 114-135.
  • Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing theory and Practice, 19(2), 139- 152.
  • Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Hopkins, L., & G. Kuppelwieser, V. (2014). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS- SEM). European Business Review, 26(2), 106-121. https://doi.org/10.1108/ebr-10- 2013-0128.
  • Henseler, J., & Fassott, G. (2010). Testing moderating effects in PLS path models: An illustration of available procedures Handbook of partial least squares (pp. 713- 735): Springer.
  • Hermawan, I., Suharnomo, S., & Perdhana, M. S. (2021). Inimitable-based innovative entrepreneurship as mediation concepts of information technology roles on organizational performance. Business: Theory and Practice, 22(2), 380-391.
  • Hervás-Oliver, J.-L., Parrilli, M. D., Rodríguez- Pose, A., & Sempere-Ripoll, F. (2021). The drivers of SME innovation in the regions of the EU. Research Policy, 50(9), 104316.
  • Hsu, M.-H., Ju, T. L., Yen, C.-H., & Chang, C.-M. (2007). Knowledge sharing behavior in virtual communities: The relationship between trust, self-efficacy, and outcome expectations. International journal of human-computer studies, 65(2), 153-169.
  • Hurley, R. F., & Hult, G. T. M. (1998). Innovation, market orientation, and organizational learning: an integration and empirical examination. Journal of marketing, 62(3), 42-54.
  • Jantunen, A., Puumalainen, K., Saarenketo, S., & Kyläheiko, K. (2005). Entrepreneurial orientation, dynamic capabilities and international performance. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 3(3), 223- 243.
  • Jiang, W., Chai, H., Shao, J., & Feng, T. (2018). Green entrepreneurial orientation for enhancing firm performance: A dynamic capability perspective. Journal of cleaner production, 198, 1311-1323.
  • Khan, F., Xuehe, Z., Atlas, F., Khan, K., Pitafi, A., & Saleem, M. (2017). Impact of absorptive capacity and dominant logic on innovation performance of public sector organizations in Hefei (Anhui Province), China.
  • Kurniawan, P., Hartati, W., Qodriah, S., & Badawi, B. (2020). From knowledge sharing to quality performance: The role of absorptive capacity, ambidexterity and innovation capability in creative industry. Management Science Letters, 10(2), 433- 442.
  • Lam, L., Nguyen, P., Le, N., & Tran, K. (2021). The relation among organizational culture, knowledge management, and innovation capability: Its implication for open innovation. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 7(1), 66.
  • Li, C., Ashraf, S. F., Shahzad, F., Bashir, I., Murad, M., Syed, N., & Riaz, M. (2020). Influence of Knowledge Management Practices on Entrepreneurial and Organizational Performance: A Mediated-Moderation Model. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.577106
  • Li, H., Waqas, M., Tariq, H., Abena, A. A. N., Akwasi, O. C., & Ashraf, S. F. (2021). Corrigendum: I Will Hurt You for This, When and How Subordinates Take Revenge From Abusive Supervisors: A Perspective of Displaced Revenge. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 1527.
  • LIU, S.-M., HU, R., & KANG, T.-W. (2021). The effects of absorptive capability and innovative culture on innovation performance: Evidence from Chinese high-tech firms. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 8(3), 1153-1162.
  • Mangenda Tshiaba, S., Wang, N., Ashraf, S. F., Nazir, M., & Syed, N. (2021). Measuring the Sustainable Entrepreneurial Performance of Textile-Based Small-Medium Enterprises: A Mediation-Moderation Model. Sustainability, 13(19), 11050.
  • Marques, C. S., & Ferreira, J. (2009). SME innovative capacity, competitive advantage and performance in a'traditional'industrial region of Portugal. Journal of technology management & innovation, 4(4), 53-68.
  • Pavlou, P. A., & El Sawy, O. A. (2011). Understanding the elusive black box of dynamic capabilities. Decision sciences, 42(1), 239-273.
  • Setini, M., Yasa, N. N. K., Gede Supartha, I. W., Ketut Giantari, I., & Rajiani, I. (2020). The passway of women entrepreneurship: Starting from social capital with open innovation, through to knowledge sharing and innovative performance. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 6(2), 25.
  • Shu, H., Fei, W., & Chen, C. (2007). Knowledge Sharing, Absorptive Capacity and Innovation Capability: An Empirical Study of Taiwanese Knowledge-Intensive Industries. Journal of Information Science, 33(3), 340-359.
  • Singh, B., & Rao, M. (2016). Effect of intellectual capital on dynamic capabilities. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 29(2), 129-149.

Cite this article

APA

    APA : Bukhari, S. M. B. R., Javed, T., & Nasir, A. (2021). Multi Analysis through Smart-PLS: Measuring of Organizational Performance Interplay. Global Social Sciences Review, VI(II), 224-237. https://doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2021(VI-II).23

CHICAGO

    CHICAGO : Bukhari, Syed Muhamad Basit Raza, Tasawar Javed, and Aemin Nasir. 2021. "Multi Analysis through Smart-PLS: Measuring of Organizational Performance Interplay." Global Social Sciences Review, VI (II): 224-237 doi: 10.31703/gssr.2021(VI-II).23

HARVARD

    HARVARD : BUKHARI, S. M. B. R., JAVED, T. & NASIR, A. 2021. Multi Analysis through Smart-PLS: Measuring of Organizational Performance Interplay. Global Social Sciences Review, VI, 224-237.

MHRA

    MHRA : Bukhari, Syed Muhamad Basit Raza, Tasawar Javed, and Aemin Nasir. 2021. "Multi Analysis through Smart-PLS: Measuring of Organizational Performance Interplay." Global Social Sciences Review, VI: 224-237

MLA

    MLA : Bukhari, Syed Muhamad Basit Raza, Tasawar Javed, and Aemin Nasir. "Multi Analysis through Smart-PLS: Measuring of Organizational Performance Interplay." Global Social Sciences Review, VI.II (2021): 224-237 Print.

OXFORD

    OXFORD : Bukhari, Syed Muhamad Basit Raza, Javed, Tasawar, and Nasir, Aemin (2021), "Multi Analysis through Smart-PLS: Measuring of Organizational Performance Interplay", Global Social Sciences Review, VI (II), 224-237

TURABIAN

    TURABIAN : Bukhari, Syed Muhamad Basit Raza, Tasawar Javed, and Aemin Nasir. "Multi Analysis through Smart-PLS: Measuring of Organizational Performance Interplay." Global Social Sciences Review VI, no. II (2021): 224-237. https://doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2021(VI-II).23