References

• Abbas, Q., Zia, T., & Khan, A. N. (2014). Syntactic and semantic analysis of Urdu modal verbs using XLE parser. International Journal of Computer Applications, 107(10),39-46.doi:10.5120/18791-0127
• Abedi, F., Moinzadeh, A., & Gharaei, Z. (2012). WH-movement in English and Persian within the Framework of Government and Binding Theory. International Journal of Linguistics, 4(3), 419-432. doi:10.5296/ijl.v4i3.2325
• Ahmed, M. (1999). Case grammar and its implications to developing writing skills. Revue Sciences Humaines, (11), 53-62.
• Batet, M. C. (1993). Children's Yes-No and Wh-Questions. Atlantis,15(1/2), 35- 59. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/41054706
• Bird, C. M. (2005). How I stopped dreading and learned to love transcription. Qualitative inquiry, 11(2), 226-248.
• Btoosh, M. (2010). Wh-movement in standard Arabic: An optimality-theoretic account. PoznaÅ„ Studies in Contemporary Linguistics, 46(1), 1-26. doi:10.2478/v10010-010-0001-y
• Burt, M. K. (1975). Error analysis in the adult EFL classroom. Tesol Quarterly,9(1), 53-63.doi:10.2307/3586012
• Bybee, J. L., & Hopper, P. J. (Eds.). (2001). Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure:Introduction to frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure 45. doi:10.1075/tsl.45.01byb
• Chomsky, N., & Collins, C. (2001). Beyond explanatory adequacy,20. 1-28. MITWPL.
• Crowhurst, M. (1980). Syntactic complexity in narration and argument at three grade levels. Canadian Journal of Education,5(1), 6-13. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/149464
• Gahl, S., & Garnsey, S.M. (2004). Knowledge of grammar, knowledge of usage: Syntactic probabilities affect pronunciation variation. Language,80(4), 748-775. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/4489780
• Hornstein, N., Nunes, J., & Grohmann, K. K. (2005). Understanding Minimalism. UK: Cambridge University Press.
• Hyland, K. (2009).Academic Discourse. London: Continuum
• Leech, G. (2000). Grammars of spoken English: New outcomes of corpus‐ oriented research. Language learning, 50(4), 675-724.
• Levelt, W. J. (2001). Spoken word production: A theory of lexical access. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 98(23), 13464- 13471.
• Lockwood, D. G. (2002). Synatctic Analysis and Description, A Constructional Approach. New York: Continuum.
• Lunsford, W. A. (2001). An overview of linguistic structures in Torwali, a language of northern Pakistan (Doctoral dissertation). University of Texas, Arlington.
• McSpadden, G. E. (1950). The Problem of Teaching Spanish Syntax. Hispania, 33(4), 347-349.Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/333998
• Mellish, C., & Ritchie, G. The Grammatical Analysis of Sentences.Retrieved from http://homepages.abdn.ac.uk/advaith/pages/teaching/CS4025/inform ation/gram.pdf
• Ngangbam, H. (2016). An analysis of syntactic errors committed by students of English language class in the written composition of Mutah University: A case study. European Journal of English Language, Linguistics and Literature, 3(1), 1-13.
• Parvaiz, A., & Khan, M. K. (2010). Syntactic errors made by science students at the graduate level in Pakistan-Causes and Remedies. Language in India, 10(9).
• PătruÅ£, B. (2012). Syntactic analysis based on morphological characteristic features of the Romanian language.International Journal on Natural Language Computing, 1(4).
• Perreira, F., & Warren, D. (1986). Definite clause grammars for language analysis. Readings in Natural Language Processing (101-124).San Francisco, US: Morgan Kaufmann.
• Pirie, S. E. (1996). Classroom Video-Recording: When, Why and How Does It Offer a Valuable Data Source for Qualitative Research?Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp.2-14). Panama
• Radford, A. (2009a). Analysing English Sentences: A Minimalist Approach. New York, US: Cambridge University Press.
• Radford, A. (2009b). An Introduction to English Sentence Structure. New York, US: Cambridge University Press.
• Rahman, T. (2003). Language policy, multilingualism and language vitality in PakistanUnpublished Manuscript, Quaid-i-Azam University Islamabad, Pakistan.
• Rose, A. T. (2000). Syntax error analysis as a problem solving technique. 30th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference Buildng on A Century of Progress in Engineen'ag Education Conference Proceedings (pp. F4B-8). Kansas: Stipes Publishing L.L.C.
• Sanders, R. (1989). Analysis of students' errors is parser-based writing students of language, Computer Assisted Language Instruction Consortium Journal, 9(1), 72-89.
• Sultan, S. (2015). Syntactic Errors in Pakistani Undergraduate Students' Written English. Journal of Education & Social Sciences, 3(2), 245-259.
• Tallerman, M. (2009). Phrase structure vs. dependency: The analysis of Welsh syntactic soft mutation1. Journal of Linguistics, 45(1), 167-201.
• Zanuttini, R., Pak, M., & Portner, P. (2012). A syntactic analysis of interpretive restrictions on imperative, promissive, and exhortative subjects. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 30(4), 1231-1274. doi:10.1007/s11049- 012-9176-2