POTENTIAL BENEFITS OF BILINGUAL TEACHING IN LEARNING HISTORY

http://dx.doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2020(V-I).50      10.31703/gssr.2020(V-I).50      Published : Mar 1
Authored by : SaraSehar , S. KhurramKhanAlwi , MohammadShaiq

50 Pages : 490-499

References

  • Alanis, I., & Rodriguez, M. A. (2008). Sustaining a dual language immersion program: Features of success. Journal of Latinos and Education, 7(4), 305-319.
  • Baker, C. (2001). Foundations of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism Third Edition. Bilingual Education and Bilingualism.
  • Bialystok, E. (1986). Children's concept of word. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 15(1), 13-32.
  • Cohen, A. D. (1975). A Sociolinguistic Approach to Bilingual Education: Experiments in the American Southwest.
  • Creese, A., & Blackledge, A. (2010). Translanguaging in the bilingual classroom: A pedagogy for learning and teaching. The modern language journal, 94(1), 103-115.
  • Coleman, H. (2010). Teaching and learning in Pakistan: The role of language in education. Islamabad: The British Council, 148-157.
  • Cummins, J. (1984). Bilingualism and cognitive functioning. S. Shapson &, 500, 55-70.
  • Cummins, J. (2014). To what extent are Canadian second language policies evidence-based? Reflections on the intersections of research and policy. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 358.
  • Daby, P. (2015). The effectiveness of a mother tongue-based education to improve learning outcomes and second language acquisition in public primary schools of Zone 3, Mauritius. The Bridge: Journal of Educational Research-Informed Practice, 2(3), 24-41.
  • Echevarria, J., Short, D., & Powers, K. (2006). School reform and standards-based education: A model for English-language learners. The Journal of Educational Research, 99(4), 195-211.
  • English-more than a subject. (2014, March 27). Retrieved March 30, 2018, from https://www.dawn.com/news/1095878
  • Grundy, S. (1994). Action research at the school level: Possibilities and problems. Educational Action Research, 2(1), 23-37.
  • Gulzar, M. A., & Qadir, S. A. (2010). Issues of Language (s) Choice and Use: A Pakistani Perspective. Pakistan Journal of Social Sciences (PJSS), 30(2).
  • Hajer, M. (2000). Creating a language-promoting classroom: Content-area teachers at work. Second and foreign language learning through classroom interaction, 265-285.
  • Hammond, J., & Gibbons, P. (2005). Putting scaffolding to work: The contribution of scaffolding in articulating ESL education.
  • Hornberger, N. H., & Link, H. (2012). Translanguaging in today's classrooms: A biliteracy lens. Theory into practice, 51(4), 239-247.
  • Kleyn, T., & García, O. (2019). Translanguaging as an Act of Transformation: Restructuring Teaching and Learning for Emergent Bilingual Students. The Handbook of TESOL in K-12, 69-82.
  • Kocakulah, S., Ustunluoglu, E., & Kocakulah, A. (2005, December). The effect of teaching in native and foreign language on students' conceptual understanding in science courses. In Asia-Pacific forum on science learning and Teaching (Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 1-30). The Education University of Hong Kong, Department of Science and Environmental Studies.
  • Menken, K., & Solorza, C. (2014). No child left bilingual: Accountability and the elimination of bilingual education programs in New York City schools. Educational Policy, 28(1), 96-125.
  • Nelson, A. J. (2003). The effect of ESL instruction on student achievement.
  • Rodríguez-Valls, F., Solsona-Puig, J., & Capdevila-Gutiérrez, M. (2017). Teaching social studies in Spanish in dual immersion middle schools: A biliterate approach to history. Cogent Education, 4(1), 1326202.
  • Schunk, D. H. (1991). Self-efficacy and academic motivation. Educational psychologist, 26(3-4), 207- 231.
  • Shamim, F. (2011). English as the language for development in Pakistan: Issues, challenges and possible solutions. Dreams and realities: Developing countries and the English language, 291-310.
  • Short, D. J., Fidelman, C. G., & Louguit, M. (2012). Developing academic language in English language learners through sheltered instruction. Tesol Quarterly, 46(2), 334-361.
  • Suwanarak, A. P. D. K. (2014). Bilingual Learning and its Effects on Students' Communicative Competence. In Proceedings of The International Conference on Language and Communication 2013: Innovative Inquiries and Emerging Paradigms in Language, Media and Communication (Bangkok, Thailand,) (pp. 179-89).
  • Yamat, H., Maarof, N., Maasum, T. N. T. M., Zakaria, E., & Zainuddin, E. (2011). Teacher's codeswitching as scaffolding in teaching content area subjects. World Applied Sciences Journal, 15(1), 18-22.
  • Alanis, I., & Rodriguez, M. A. (2008). Sustaining a dual language immersion program: Features of success. Journal of Latinos and Education, 7(4), 305-319.
  • Baker, C. (2001). Foundations of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism Third Edition. Bilingual Education and Bilingualism.
  • Bialystok, E. (1986). Children's concept of word. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 15(1), 13-32.
  • Cohen, A. D. (1975). A Sociolinguistic Approach to Bilingual Education: Experiments in the American Southwest.
  • Creese, A., & Blackledge, A. (2010). Translanguaging in the bilingual classroom: A pedagogy for learning and teaching. The modern language journal, 94(1), 103-115.
  • Coleman, H. (2010). Teaching and learning in Pakistan: The role of language in education. Islamabad: The British Council, 148-157.
  • Cummins, J. (1984). Bilingualism and cognitive functioning. S. Shapson &, 500, 55-70.
  • Cummins, J. (2014). To what extent are Canadian second language policies evidence-based? Reflections on the intersections of research and policy. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 358.
  • Daby, P. (2015). The effectiveness of a mother tongue-based education to improve learning outcomes and second language acquisition in public primary schools of Zone 3, Mauritius. The Bridge: Journal of Educational Research-Informed Practice, 2(3), 24-41.
  • Echevarria, J., Short, D., & Powers, K. (2006). School reform and standards-based education: A model for English-language learners. The Journal of Educational Research, 99(4), 195-211.
  • English-more than a subject. (2014, March 27). Retrieved March 30, 2018, from https://www.dawn.com/news/1095878
  • Grundy, S. (1994). Action research at the school level: Possibilities and problems. Educational Action Research, 2(1), 23-37.
  • Gulzar, M. A., & Qadir, S. A. (2010). Issues of Language (s) Choice and Use: A Pakistani Perspective. Pakistan Journal of Social Sciences (PJSS), 30(2).
  • Hajer, M. (2000). Creating a language-promoting classroom: Content-area teachers at work. Second and foreign language learning through classroom interaction, 265-285.
  • Hammond, J., & Gibbons, P. (2005). Putting scaffolding to work: The contribution of scaffolding in articulating ESL education.
  • Hornberger, N. H., & Link, H. (2012). Translanguaging in today's classrooms: A biliteracy lens. Theory into practice, 51(4), 239-247.
  • Kleyn, T., & García, O. (2019). Translanguaging as an Act of Transformation: Restructuring Teaching and Learning for Emergent Bilingual Students. The Handbook of TESOL in K-12, 69-82.
  • Kocakulah, S., Ustunluoglu, E., & Kocakulah, A. (2005, December). The effect of teaching in native and foreign language on students' conceptual understanding in science courses. In Asia-Pacific forum on science learning and Teaching (Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 1-30). The Education University of Hong Kong, Department of Science and Environmental Studies.
  • Menken, K., & Solorza, C. (2014). No child left bilingual: Accountability and the elimination of bilingual education programs in New York City schools. Educational Policy, 28(1), 96-125.
  • Nelson, A. J. (2003). The effect of ESL instruction on student achievement.
  • Rodríguez-Valls, F., Solsona-Puig, J., & Capdevila-Gutiérrez, M. (2017). Teaching social studies in Spanish in dual immersion middle schools: A biliterate approach to history. Cogent Education, 4(1), 1326202.
  • Schunk, D. H. (1991). Self-efficacy and academic motivation. Educational psychologist, 26(3-4), 207- 231.
  • Shamim, F. (2011). English as the language for development in Pakistan: Issues, challenges and possible solutions. Dreams and realities: Developing countries and the English language, 291-310.
  • Short, D. J., Fidelman, C. G., & Louguit, M. (2012). Developing academic language in English language learners through sheltered instruction. Tesol Quarterly, 46(2), 334-361.
  • Suwanarak, A. P. D. K. (2014). Bilingual Learning and its Effects on Students' Communicative Competence. In Proceedings of The International Conference on Language and Communication 2013: Innovative Inquiries and Emerging Paradigms in Language, Media and Communication (Bangkok, Thailand,) (pp. 179-89).
  • Yamat, H., Maarof, N., Maasum, T. N. T. M., Zakaria, E., & Zainuddin, E. (2011). Teacher's codeswitching as scaffolding in teaching content area subjects. World Applied Sciences Journal, 15(1), 18-22.

Cite this article

    CHICAGO : Sehar, Sara, S. Khurram Khan Alwi, and Mohammad Shaiq. 2020. "Potential Benefits of Bilingual Teaching in Learning History." Global Social Sciences Review, V (I): 490-499 doi: 10.31703/gssr.2020(V-I).50
    HARVARD : SEHAR, S., ALWI, S. K. K. & SHAIQ, M. 2020. Potential Benefits of Bilingual Teaching in Learning History. Global Social Sciences Review, V, 490-499.
    MHRA : Sehar, Sara, S. Khurram Khan Alwi, and Mohammad Shaiq. 2020. "Potential Benefits of Bilingual Teaching in Learning History." Global Social Sciences Review, V: 490-499
    MLA : Sehar, Sara, S. Khurram Khan Alwi, and Mohammad Shaiq. "Potential Benefits of Bilingual Teaching in Learning History." Global Social Sciences Review, V.I (2020): 490-499 Print.
    OXFORD : Sehar, Sara, Alwi, S. Khurram Khan, and Shaiq, Mohammad (2020), "Potential Benefits of Bilingual Teaching in Learning History", Global Social Sciences Review, V (I), 490-499
    TURABIAN : Sehar, Sara, S. Khurram Khan Alwi, and Mohammad Shaiq. "Potential Benefits of Bilingual Teaching in Learning History." Global Social Sciences Review V, no. I (2020): 490-499. https://doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2020(V-I).50