ARTICLE

MULTI ANALYSIS THROUGH SMARTPLS MEASURING OF ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE INTERPLAY

  1. HOME
  2. ARTICLE

23 Pages : 224-237

http://dx.doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2021(VI-II).23      10.31703/gssr.2021(VI-II).23      Published : Jun 2

Multi Analysis through Smart-PLS: Measuring of Organizational Performance Interplay

Abstract

    This study investigated the role of dynamic capability as a mediator between knowledge management practices(KMPs) and organizational performance. Smart-Pls was used to test the proposed hypotheses through structural equation modeling on gathered data of 400 SME organizations of Pakistan. The findings show that knowledge sharing behavior and absorptive capacity has a positive impact on dynamic capabilities and organizational performance. Innovative capacity has an insignificant impact on organizational performance, and knowledge-sharing behavior has an insignificant impact on organizational performance through dynamic capabilities. This study will be prospectively helpful for academics,policymakers, economists, and managers. This study enlightens the performance.

    Organizational Performance (EP), Dynamic Capabilities (DC), Absorptive Capacity (AC), Innovative Capacity (IC), Knowledge Sharing Behavior (KSB)

    (1) Syed Muhamad Basit Raza Bukhari
    PhD, Management Science and Engineering, School of Management, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, China.
    (2) Tasawar Javed
    Assistant Professor, Institute of Business, Management and Administrative Sciences, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Punjab, Pakistan.
    (3) Aemin Nasir
    PhD, Management Science, School of Business Management, University Utara, Malaysia
Fulltext PDF

References

  • Abuaddous, H. Y., Al Sokkar, A. A., & Abualodous, B. I. (2018). The impact of knowledge management on organizational performance. International journal of advanced computer science and applications, 9(4), 204-208
  • Akter, S., Jamal, N., Ashraf, M. M., McCarthy, G., & Varsha, P. (2020). The rise of the social business in emerging economies: a new paradigm of development. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 11(3), 282-299.
  • Alaarj, S., Abidin-Mohamed, Z., & Bustamam, U. S. B. A. (2016). Mediating role of trust on the effects of knowledge management capabilities on organizational performance. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 235, 729-738.
  • Alvarez, S. A., & Busenitz, L. W. (2001). The entrepreneurship of resource-based theory. Journal of management, 27(6), 755-775.
  • Ardichvili, A., Cardozo, R., & Ray, S. (2003). A theory of entrepreneurial opportunity identification and development. Journal of Business venturing, 18(1), 105-123
  • Ashraf, S. F., Li, C., & Mehmood, B. (2017). A Study of Premium Price Brands with Special Reference to Willingness of Customer to Pay. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 7(7), 619-639.
  • Ashraf, S. F., Li, C., Butt, R., Naz, S., & Zafar, Z. (2019). Education as Moderator: Integrative Effect towards Succession Planning Process of Small Family Businesses. Pac. Bus. Rev. Int, 11, 107-123.
  • Atuahene-Gima, K. (2005). Resolving the capability-rigidity paradox in new product innovation. Journal of marketing, 69(4), 61- 83.
  • Augier, M., & Teece, D. J. (2009). Dynamic capabilities and the role of managers in business strategy and economic performance. Organization science, 20(2), 410-421.
  • Azaizah, N., Reychav, I., Raban, D. R., Simon, T., & McHaney, R. (2018). Impact of ESN implementation on communication and knowledge-sharing in a multi-national organization. International Journal of Information Management, 43, 284-294.
  • Becker, B., & Gerhart, B. (1996). The impact of human resource management on organizational performance: Progress and prospects. Academy of Management journal, 39(4), 779-801.
  • Božič, K., & Dimovski, V. (2019). Business intelligence and analytics use, innovation ambidexterity, and firm performance: A dynamic capabilities perspective. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 28(4), 101578.
  • Centobelli, P., Cerchione, R., & Esposito, E. (2019). Efficiency and effectiveness of knowledge management systems in SMEs. Production Planning & Control, 30(9), 779- 791.
  • Dada, O., & Fogg, H. (2016). Organizational learning, entrepreneurial orientation, and the role of university engagement in SMEs. International Small Business Journal, 34(1), 86-104.
  • Eikelenboom, M., & de Jong, G. (2019). The impact of dynamic capabilities on the sustainability performance of SMEs. Journal of cleaner production, 235, 1360- 1370
  • Falahat, M., Ramayah, T., Soto-Acosta, P., & Lee, Y.-Y. (2020). SMEs internationalization: The role of product innovation, market intelligence, pricing and marketing communication capabilities as drivers of SMEs' international performance. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 152, 119908.
  • Farzaneh, M., Ghasemzadeh, P., Nazari, J. A., & Mehralian, G. (2020). Contributory role of dynamic capabilities in the relationship between organizational learning and innovation performance. European Journal of Innovation Management, 24(3), 655-676. https://doi.org/10.1108/ejim-12-2019-0355.
  • Ferreira, J., & Coelho, A. (2020). Dynamic capabilities, innovation and branding capabilities and their impact on competitive advantage and SME's performance in Portugal: the moderating effects of entrepreneurial orientation. International Journal of Innovation Science, 12(3), 255-286. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijis- 10-2018-0108.
  • Ferreira, J., Cardim, S., & Coelho, A. (2021). Dynamic capabilities and mediating effects of innovation on the competitive advantage and firm's performance: the moderating role of organizational learning capability. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 12(2), 620-644.
  • García-Morales, V. J., Lloréns-Montes, F. J., & Verdú-Jover, A. J. (2008). The effects of transformational leadership on organizational performance through knowledge and innovation. British journal of management, 19(4), 299-319.
  • Giniuniene, J., & Jurksiene, L. (2015). Dynamic capabilities, innovation and organizational learning: Interrelations and impact on firm performance. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 213, 985-991.
  • González-Serrano, M. H., Añó Sanz, V., & González-García, R. J. (2020). Sustainable sport entrepreneurship and innovation: a bibliometric analysis of this emerging field of research. Sustainability, 12(12), 5209.
  • Grant, R. M. (1991). The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: implications for strategy formulation. California management review, 33(3), 114-135.
  • Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing theory and Practice, 19(2), 139- 152.
  • Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Hopkins, L., & G. Kuppelwieser, V. (2014). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS- SEM). European Business Review, 26(2), 106-121. https://doi.org/10.1108/ebr-10- 2013-0128.
  • Henseler, J., & Fassott, G. (2010). Testing moderating effects in PLS path models: An illustration of available procedures Handbook of partial least squares (pp. 713- 735): Springer.
  • Hermawan, I., Suharnomo, S., & Perdhana, M. S. (2021). Inimitable-based innovative entrepreneurship as mediation concepts of information technology roles on organizational performance. Business: Theory and Practice, 22(2), 380-391.
  • Hervás-Oliver, J.-L., Parrilli, M. D., Rodríguez- Pose, A., & Sempere-Ripoll, F. (2021). The drivers of SME innovation in the regions of the EU. Research Policy, 50(9), 104316.
  • Hsu, M.-H., Ju, T. L., Yen, C.-H., & Chang, C.-M. (2007). Knowledge sharing behavior in virtual communities: The relationship between trust, self-efficacy, and outcome expectations. International journal of human-computer studies, 65(2), 153-169.
  • Hurley, R. F., & Hult, G. T. M. (1998). Innovation, market orientation, and organizational learning: an integration and empirical examination. Journal of marketing, 62(3), 42-54.
  • Jantunen, A., Puumalainen, K., Saarenketo, S., & Kyläheiko, K. (2005). Entrepreneurial orientation, dynamic capabilities and international performance. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 3(3), 223- 243.
  • Jiang, W., Chai, H., Shao, J., & Feng, T. (2018). Green entrepreneurial orientation for enhancing firm performance: A dynamic capability perspective. Journal of cleaner production, 198, 1311-1323.
  • Khan, F., Xuehe, Z., Atlas, F., Khan, K., Pitafi, A., & Saleem, M. (2017). Impact of absorptive capacity and dominant logic on innovation performance of public sector organizations in Hefei (Anhui Province), China.
  • Kurniawan, P., Hartati, W., Qodriah, S., & Badawi, B. (2020). From knowledge sharing to quality performance: The role of absorptive capacity, ambidexterity and innovation capability in creative industry. Management Science Letters, 10(2), 433- 442.
  • Lam, L., Nguyen, P., Le, N., & Tran, K. (2021). The relation among organizational culture, knowledge management, and innovation capability: Its implication for open innovation. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 7(1), 66.
  • Li, C., Ashraf, S. F., Shahzad, F., Bashir, I., Murad, M., Syed, N., & Riaz, M. (2020). Influence of Knowledge Management Practices on Entrepreneurial and Organizational Performance: A Mediated-Moderation Model. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.577106
  • Li, H., Waqas, M., Tariq, H., Abena, A. A. N., Akwasi, O. C., & Ashraf, S. F. (2021). Corrigendum: I Will Hurt You for This, When and How Subordinates Take Revenge From Abusive Supervisors: A Perspective of Displaced Revenge. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 1527.
  • LIU, S.-M., HU, R., & KANG, T.-W. (2021). The effects of absorptive capability and innovative culture on innovation performance: Evidence from Chinese high-tech firms. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 8(3), 1153-1162.
  • Mangenda Tshiaba, S., Wang, N., Ashraf, S. F., Nazir, M., & Syed, N. (2021). Measuring the Sustainable Entrepreneurial Performance of Textile-Based Small-Medium Enterprises: A Mediation-Moderation Model. Sustainability, 13(19), 11050.
  • Marques, C. S., & Ferreira, J. (2009). SME innovative capacity, competitive advantage and performance in a'traditional'industrial region of Portugal. Journal of technology management & innovation, 4(4), 53-68.
  • Pavlou, P. A., & El Sawy, O. A. (2011). Understanding the elusive black box of dynamic capabilities. Decision sciences, 42(1), 239-273.
  • Setini, M., Yasa, N. N. K., Gede Supartha, I. W., Ketut Giantari, I., & Rajiani, I. (2020). The passway of women entrepreneurship: Starting from social capital with open innovation, through to knowledge sharing and innovative performance. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 6(2), 25.
  • Shu, H., Fei, W., & Chen, C. (2007). Knowledge Sharing, Absorptive Capacity and Innovation Capability: An Empirical Study of Taiwanese Knowledge-Intensive Industries. Journal of Information Science, 33(3), 340-359.
  • Singh, B., & Rao, M. (2016). Effect of intellectual capital on dynamic capabilities. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 29(2), 129-149.

Cite this article

APA

    APA : Bukhari, S. M. B. R., Javed, T., & Nasir, A. (2021). Multi Analysis through Smart-PLS: Measuring of Organizational Performance Interplay. Global Social Sciences Review, VI(II), 224-237. https://doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2021(VI-II).23

CHICAGO

    CHICAGO : Bukhari, Syed Muhamad Basit Raza, Tasawar Javed, and Aemin Nasir. 2021. "Multi Analysis through Smart-PLS: Measuring of Organizational Performance Interplay." Global Social Sciences Review, VI (II): 224-237 doi: 10.31703/gssr.2021(VI-II).23

HARVARD

    HARVARD : BUKHARI, S. M. B. R., JAVED, T. & NASIR, A. 2021. Multi Analysis through Smart-PLS: Measuring of Organizational Performance Interplay. Global Social Sciences Review, VI, 224-237.

MHRA

    MHRA : Bukhari, Syed Muhamad Basit Raza, Tasawar Javed, and Aemin Nasir. 2021. "Multi Analysis through Smart-PLS: Measuring of Organizational Performance Interplay." Global Social Sciences Review, VI: 224-237

MLA

    MLA : Bukhari, Syed Muhamad Basit Raza, Tasawar Javed, and Aemin Nasir. "Multi Analysis through Smart-PLS: Measuring of Organizational Performance Interplay." Global Social Sciences Review, VI.II (2021): 224-237 Print.

OXFORD

    OXFORD : Bukhari, Syed Muhamad Basit Raza, Javed, Tasawar, and Nasir, Aemin (2021), "Multi Analysis through Smart-PLS: Measuring of Organizational Performance Interplay", Global Social Sciences Review, VI (II), 224-237

TURABIAN

    TURABIAN : Bukhari, Syed Muhamad Basit Raza, Tasawar Javed, and Aemin Nasir. "Multi Analysis through Smart-PLS: Measuring of Organizational Performance Interplay." Global Social Sciences Review VI, no. II (2021): 224-237. https://doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2021(VI-II).23