ARTICLE

HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT PRACTICES AND FACULTY DEVELOPMENT A REVIEW IN THE CONTEXT OF PAKISTANI UNIVERSITIES

38 Pages : 563-574

http://dx.doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2018(III-IV).38      10.31703/gssr.2018(III-IV).38      Published : Dec 2018

Human Resource Development Practices and Faculty Development: A Review in the Context of Pakistani Universities

    Human resource has been the pivotal factor for sustainable development of any organization. The study aims at finding the effects of institutional activities of human resource development currently in place in the public and private universities in Pakistan and to develop an appropriate faculty development framework/model to improve current level of performance. The research was limited to the Punjab province. The sample of the study included executive and administrative heads, HR mangers and faculty members of social sciences department of ten randomly selected universities of Punjab. Data from was gathered through a self-developed and piloted questionnaire HRDAS and analyzed using statistical software (AMOS) version 21 and a Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) framework/model. The results reflect that the formation and recruitment process for human capital, training and development, compensation and profit and mentoring, contribute significantly to the growth of faculties and organizations. The suggested model will improve faculty and institutional performance.

    (1) Shehzad Ahmed
    Assistant Professor, Department of Education, University of Okara, Punjab, Pakistan.
    (2) Muhammad Tahir Khan Farooqi
    Assistant Professor, Department of Education, University of Okara, Punjab, Pakistan.
    (3) Abdul Shakoor
    PhD Scholar, University of Education, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan.
  • Abbas, Q., & Yaqoob, S. (2009) Effect of leadership development on employee performance in Pakistan. Pakistan Economic and Social Review, 47(2), 269-292.
  • Abdullah, H. (2009). Major challenges to the effective management of human resource training and development activities. Journal of International Social Research, 2(8), 11-25.
  • Arshad, M. (2003). Attitude of teachers of higher education towards their profession. (M.Phil.thesis). Allama Iqbal Open University, Islamabad.
  • Arshad, M. (2003). Attitude of teachers of higher education towards their profession. (M.Phil.thesis). Allama Iqbal Open University, Islamabad.
  • Boxall, P., & Purcell, J. (2003). Strategy and Human Resource Management Hampshire Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Bozeman, B., & Feeney, M. K. (2007). Toward a useful theory of mentoring: A conceptual analysis and critique. Administration & Society, 39(6), 719- 739.
  • Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit In: Bollen KA, Long JS, editors. Testing structural equation models. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 111-135.
  • Cascio, W. F. (2006). Managing Human Resources: productivity, quality of work life, profits 7th Edition Tata McGraw-Hill. Abnormal and Social Psychology, 62, 401-407.
  • Chenevert, D., & Tremblay, M. (2009). Fits in strategic human resource management and methodological challenge: Empirical evidence of influence of empowerment and compensation practices on human resource performance in Canadian firms. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 20(4), 738-770.
  • Dessler, G. (2006). A framework for human resource management. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Prentice Hall. Determinants. Journal of Financial Research, 27(1), 31-54.
  • Evans, A.; Chun, E. (2012) Creating a Tipping Point: Strategic Human Resources in Higher Education, ASHE Higher Education Report, 38 (1), pp, 1-143.
  • Frye, M. B. (2004). Equity-based compensation for employees: firm performance and determinants, The Journal of Financial Research, 27(1), pp. 31-54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6803.2004.00076.x
  • Ginns, P., Kitay, J., and Prosser, M., (2010)
  • Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural equation modeling: A multidisciplinary journal, 6(1), 1-55.
  • Kuldeep, S. (2004). Impact of HR practices on perceived firm performance in India. Asia Pacific. Journal of Human Resources, 42(3), 301-317.
  • Malhotra, N. K., & Dash, S. (2011). Marketing Research: An Applied Orientation (pp. 552-582).
  • McLean, G. N., & McLean, L. (2001). If we can't define HRD in one country, how can we define it in an international context? Human Resource Development International, 4(3), pp. 313-326.
  • Mondy, R. W (2010). Human resource management (11th e.d.). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey; Pearson/Prentice Hall.
  • Parsloe, E., & Leedham, M. (2009). Coaching and mentoring: Practical conversations to improve learning. Kogan Page Publishers.
  • Pellert, A. (2007) Human Resource Management at Universities. In: Pellert, A. /Pausits, A. (eds.): Higher Education Management and Development in Central, Southern and Eastern Europe, Waxmann.
  • Raykov, T., & Marcoulides, G. A. (2006). Estimation of generalizability coefficients via a structural equation modeling approach to scale reliability evaluation. International Journal of Testing, 6(1), 81-95.
  • Raza, S. A., and Naqvi, S. A., (2011),
  • Saleem, S., and Amin, S., (2013)
  • Summers, J., & Hyman, J. (2005). Employee Participation and Company Performance, Joseph Rowntree Foundation, pp. 90-100
  • Weeratunga, L., 2009. C3 Managing Human Resource, (3 ed.), Islamabad: Allama Iqbal Open University.
  • Weil, A., & Woodall, J. (2005). HRD in France: the corporate perspective. Journal of European Industrial Training, 29 (7), 529-540.
  • Werner, J. M., & DeSimone, R. L. (2012). Human Resource Development. 6th International Edition. South-Western, Cengage Learning.
  • Williams, C. (2005). Management. (3rd ed.). United State of America: South Western, Thomson Learning.
  • Williams, C., & Gulati, G. (2008). What is a social network worth? Face book and vote share in the 2008 presidential primaries. American Political Science Association

Cite this article

    APA : Ahmed, S., Farooqi, M. T. K., & Shakoor, A. (2018). Human Resource Development Practices and Faculty Development: A Review in the Context of Pakistani Universities. Global Social Sciences Review, III(IV), 563-574. https://doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2018(III-IV).38
    CHICAGO : Ahmed, Shehzad, Muhammad Tahir Khan Farooqi, and Abdul Shakoor. 2018. "Human Resource Development Practices and Faculty Development: A Review in the Context of Pakistani Universities." Global Social Sciences Review, III (IV): 563-574 doi: 10.31703/gssr.2018(III-IV).38
    HARVARD : AHMED, S., FAROOQI, M. T. K. & SHAKOOR, A. 2018. Human Resource Development Practices and Faculty Development: A Review in the Context of Pakistani Universities. Global Social Sciences Review, III, 563-574.
    MHRA : Ahmed, Shehzad, Muhammad Tahir Khan Farooqi, and Abdul Shakoor. 2018. "Human Resource Development Practices and Faculty Development: A Review in the Context of Pakistani Universities." Global Social Sciences Review, III: 563-574
    MLA : Ahmed, Shehzad, Muhammad Tahir Khan Farooqi, and Abdul Shakoor. "Human Resource Development Practices and Faculty Development: A Review in the Context of Pakistani Universities." Global Social Sciences Review, III.IV (2018): 563-574 Print.
    OXFORD : Ahmed, Shehzad, Farooqi, Muhammad Tahir Khan, and Shakoor, Abdul (2018), "Human Resource Development Practices and Faculty Development: A Review in the Context of Pakistani Universities", Global Social Sciences Review, III (IV), 563-574
    TURABIAN : Ahmed, Shehzad, Muhammad Tahir Khan Farooqi, and Abdul Shakoor. "Human Resource Development Practices and Faculty Development: A Review in the Context of Pakistani Universities." Global Social Sciences Review III, no. IV (2018): 563-574. https://doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2018(III-IV).38