References

• Abramo, G., d'Angelo, C. A., & Costa, F. D. (2010). Citations versus journal impact factor as proxy of quality: Could the latter ever be preferable? Scientometrics, 84(3), 821-833.
• Ahmad, S. (2017). Productivity in higher education: Research insights for universities and governments in Asia. Asian Productivity Organization, Japan.
• Alghanim, S. A., &Alhamali, R. M. (2011). Research productivity among faculty members at medical and health schools in Saudi Arabia: Presence, obstacles, and associated factors. Saudi Medical Journal, 32(12), 1297-1303.
• Alhija, F. M. N., & Majdob, A. (2017). Predictors of teacher educators ' research productivity. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 42(11), 34-51. https://doi.org/. http://dx.doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2017v42n11.3
• Angaiz, D. (2015). An investigation of teachers' education faculty research productivity in public sector universities of Pakistan. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Dowling College, New York, USA.
• Bailey, T. G. (1992). Faculty research productivity. Minneapolis, MN: Association for the Study of Higher Education Annual Meeting. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED352895).
• Bamigboye, O. B. (2015). Correlational analysis of demographic factors, self-concept and research productivity of librarians in public universities in South-West, Nigeria. International Journal of Library Science, 4(3), 43-52.
• Batool, A., Hussain, A., & Ahmed, S. (2018). Identification of institutional factors of research productivity of public universities teachers. Journal of Educational Research, 21(2), 13-29.
• Blackburn, T, Bieber, J, Lawrence, J & Trautvetter, L. (1991). Faculty at work: focus on research, scholarship and service, Research in Higher Education, ( 32) 4, 385.
• Bland, C., & Berquist, W., (1997). The vitality of senior faculty members. Snow on the roof-fire in the furnace. (ERIC Document Reproduction No. ED 415733).
• Butt, I. H., & Shamas, J. A. (2013). Master in Education student attitudes towards research : A comparison between two public sector universities in Punjab. South Asian Studies, 28(1), 97-105.
• Changsrisang. (2008). Factors that influence research productivity of faculties at nursing colleges of the Ministry of Defense and the National Police Bureau. Higher Education, 43, 553-569.
• Creamer, E (1998). Assessing faculty publication productivity: issues of equity, The George Washington University, USA.
• Creswell. (1986). Measuring faculty research performance. Jossey-Bass Inc, San FranciscoEloy, J. A., Svider, P. F., Cherla, D. V., Diaz, L., Kovalerchik, O., Mauro, K. M., Baredes, S., Chandrasekhar, S. S. (2013). Gender disparities in research productivity among 9952 academic physicians. The Laryngoscope, 123, 1865-1875. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.24039
• Fawzi, H., & Al-Hattami, A. (2017). Faculty production of research papers : Challenges and recommendations. International Journal of Humainities and Social Sciences, 7(2), 221-228.
• Feyera, T., Atelaw, H., Hassen, N. A., & Fufa, G. (2017). Publication productivity of academics in Jigjiga University, Ethiopia. Educational Research and Reviews, 12(9), 559- 568.
• Gorman, A.M., & Scruggs, M.M. (1984). Characteristics of home economics researchers. Home Economics Research Journal, 12(4), 461-69.
• Hadjinicola, C. G. & Soteriou, C. A. (2005). Factors affecting research productivity of production and operations management groups: an empirical study. Journal of Applied Mathematics and Decision Sciences. 21(2), 25-40.
• Hoffmann, K., Berg, S., &Koufogiannakis, D. (2014). Success in research: Factors that contribute to increased research productivity across librarianship and other disciplines. Paper presented at the 42ndAnnual Conference of CAIS, Canadian Association for Information Science, Brock University - St. Cathartines, Ontario, May 28- 30, 2014. Retrieved from http://www.lirgjournal.org.uk/lir/ojs/index.php/lir/article/viewFile/639/659.
• Im, J. & Hartman, S. (1997). The role of research in MIS Faculty performance evaluation: An exploratory study. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 37(3), 37-40.
• Iqbal, Z., & Azhar, M. (2015). Factors related to low research productivity at higher education level. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v7n2p188
• Jung, J. (2012). Faculty research productivity in Hong Kong across academic discipline. Higher Education Studies, 2 (4), 1-13. DOI:10.5539/hes.v2n4p1.
• Kaya, N., &Weber, M.(2003). Faculty research productivity: Gender and discipline differences. Journal of Family and Consumer Sciences, 95(4), 46-52.
• Kendagor, S. T, Kosgei D, Tuitoek D., and Chelangat S. (2012). Factors affecting research productivity in public universities of Kenya: The case of Moi University, Eldoret. Journal of Emerging Trends in Economics and Management Sciences, 3(5),475-484.
• Khan, S., Shah, M., & Khan, T. M. (2018). An investigation of attitudes towards the research activities of university teachers. Bulletin of Education and Research, 40(1), 215-230.
• Kotrlik, J. W., Bartlett, J. E., Higgins, C. C., & Williams, H. A. (2002). Factors associated with research productivity of agricultural education faculty. Journal of Agricultural Education, 43(3), 1-10.
• Krokfors, L, Heikki, K., Katariina, S., Auli, T., Katriina, M., Riitta. J., Reijo B., & Pertti, K. (2011). Investigating Finnish teacher educators' views on research-based teacher education. Teaching Education, 22(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1080/10476210.2010.542559
• Kyvik, S., & Teigen, M. (1996). Childcare, research, collaboration, and gender differences in scientific productivity. Science Technology Human Values,21(54), 54-71. https://doi.org/10.1177/016224399602100103
• Lalrindika, R. & Shukla, A. (2019). Research output of faculty members of Mizoram University: CrossSectional Evaluation. In Jain, P. K. et al. (Eds.), 6th International Conference of Asian Libraries (ICoASL-2019) on
• Lertputtarak, S. (2008). An investigation of factors related to research productivity in a public university in Thailand: A Case Study. Ph.D. dissertation submitted at Victoria University, Melbourne, Australia.
• Maharaj, R., & Ramnundlall, J. (2016). Publication challenges of lecturers in private higher education. International Journal of Business Management and Economics Research, 3(1), 1-10
• Mantikayan, J. M., & Abdulgani, M. A. (2018). Factors affecting faculty research productivity: Conclusions from a critical review of the literature. JPAIR Multidisciplinary Research, 31, 1-21.
• Mehmood, K. (2016). Overall assessment of the higher education sector. Higher Education Commission (HEC) https://hec.gov.pk/english/universities/projects/TESP/Documents /FR-Assessment HE Sector.pdf
• Mehta, S., Mehta, D., & Kikani, K. (2017). The attitudes and practices of faculties towards research. Panacea Journal of Medical Sciences,7(2), 83-88. https://doi.org/10.18231/2348-7682.2017.0023
• Navidad, F. (n.d.). Educators ' attitude and barriers toward educational research : A basis for research policies and guideline. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-5317-5.ch010
• Nygaard, L. P. (2015). Publishing and perishing: an academic literacies framework for investigating research productivity. Studies in Higher Education. DOI: 10.1080/03075079.2015.1058351
• Okendo, O. E. (2018). Constraints of research productivity in universities in Tanzania: a case of Mwenge Catholic University, Tanzania. International Journal of Education and Research, 6(3), 201-210.
• Okiki, O. C. (2015). Research Productivity of Teaching Faculty Members in Nigerian Federal Universities : An Investigative Study Research Productivity of Teaching Faculty Members in Nigerian Federal Universities: An Investigative Study. Chinese Librarianship: An International Electronic Journal, 36(3), 99-118.
• Oloruntoba, A., Ajayi, M. T. (2006). Gender and research attainment in Nigerian agricultural universities. JHEA/RESA, 4(2), 83-98.
• Patchawong, P., Wangpa, C., & Ounjit, W. (2012). Factors affecting research development and production of academic work amongst lecturers of Mahasarakham University in moving forward as a research university. In International Conference on Management and Education Innovation (Vol. 37, pp. 37- 41). Singapore.
• Pfeffer, J., & Langton, N. (1993). The effect of wage dispersion on satisfaction, productivity, and working collaboratively: Evidence from college and university faculty. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, 382.
• Print, M., & Hattie, J. (1997). Measuring quality in universities: An approach to weighting research activity. Higher Education, 33, 453-469.
• Prozesky, H. (2008). A career-history analysis of gender differences in publication productivity among South African academics. Science Studies, 21(2), 47-67.
• Read, W., Rae, D., & Raughunandan, K. (1998). Are publication requirements for accounting faculty promotion still increasing? Accounting Education, 13(2),327-339.
• Robinson, G., & Gould, M. (2000). What are the attitudes of general practitioners towards research? British Journal of General Practice, 50(454), 390-392.
• Salazar-Clemeña, R.M., &Almonte-Acosta, S.A. (2007). Developing research culture in philippine higher education institutions: Perspectives of university faculty. Paper presented at the Competition, Cooperation and Change in the Academic Profession: Shaping Higher Education's Contribution to Knowledge and Research.
• Shin, J. C., & Cummings, W. K. (2010). Multi-level analysis of academic publishing across discipline: Research performance, collaboration, and time on research. Scientometrics, 85(2), 582-594. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-010-0236-2.
• Sridhar S., Dias, B., & Sequeira, A. H. (2010). Measuring faculty productivity - a conceptual review. St Aloysius College-AIMIT Working Paper Series 1(1), 2-25.
• Suitor, J. J, Mecom, D., & Feld, I. S. (2001). Gender, household labor, and scholarly productivity among university professors. Gender Issues, 19, 50-67.
• Ulla, M. B., Barrera, K., & Acompanado, M. M. (2017). Philippine classroom teachers as researchers : Teachers ' perceptions , motivations , and challenges. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 42(11), 52-64.
• Vasil, L. (1992). Self-efficacy expectations and causal attributions for achievement among male and female university faculty. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 41(3), 259-269.
• Vilhjálmsson, R. (2016). Research productivity among university faculty: Contributing factors and consequences. In Presentation at Nordiskt universitetslärarmöte
• Waterworth, P. G. (2015). The academy of research: Creating a sustainable future through research and understanding the challenges in research. In The 1st International Conference on Research in Education, Arts, Management, and Science. (I-CREAMS 2015) November 24th-26th, 2015; Roi Et Rajabhat University (pp. 48-57).
• Webber, K. L. (2011). Factors related to faculty research productivity and implications for academic planners, Planning for Higher Education, 39(4), 32-43.
• Williams, H. A. (2003). A mediated hierarchical regression analysis of factors related to research productivity of human resource development postsecondary faculty. Unpublished PhD thesis, Louisiana State University, USA. Retrieved from http://etd.lsu.edu/docs/available/etd-0326103-212409/.
• Williams, R., & Van.Dyke, N. (2008). Reputation and reality: ranking major disciplines in Australian Universities. Journal of High Education, 56, 1-28.
• Williams, W. W., & Ceci, S. J. (2012). When scientists choose motherhood: A single factor goes a long way in explaining the dearth of women in math-intensive fields. How can we address it? American Scientist, 100(2), 138.
• Zhang, X. (2014). Factors that motivate academic staff to conduct research and influence research productivity in Chinese project 211 universities.
• Zhou, J. (2014) Problems teachers face when doing action research and finding possible solutions. Chinese Education & Society, 45(4), 68-80. doi.org/10.2753/CED1061-1932450405.