PERCEPTIONS OF SUPERVISORS AND SUPERVISEES ABOUT SUPERVISOR ROLE AND RESPONSIBILITIES IN STUDENT RESEARCH WORK

http://dx.doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2019(IV-II).46      10.31703/gssr.2019(IV-II).46      Published : Jun 2019
Authored by : Shumaila Shahzad , Muhammad ShabbirAli , Umair Ayub

46 Pages : 356-363

References

  • Abiddin, N. Z., Ismail, A., & Ismail, A. (2011). Effective supervisory approach in enhancing postgraduate research studies. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 1(2), 206-217.
  • Alam, F., Alam, Q., & Rasul, M. G. (2013). A pilot study on postgraduate supervision. Procedia Engineering, 56, 875-881.
  • Ali, P. A., Watson, R., & Dhingra, K. (2016). Postgraduate research students' and them supervisors' attitudes towards supervision. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 11, 227-241. Retrieved from
  • Al-Muallem, A., Elzubeir, M., Roberts, C., & Magzoub, M. (2016). Development and initial testing of an instrument for evaluating needs and inferring readiness of research supervisors: A mixed methods approach. Health Professions Education, 2(2), 138-147.
  • Aman, K. (2011). Role of HEC in Promoting and Facilitating Educational Research in Pakistani Universities (Unpublished master's dissertation). Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
  • Baptista, A. V. (2015). Mature students' voices on the ideal and the reality of doctoral supervisorsr' role and practice. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 191, 1544-1551.
  • Calma, A. (2007). Postgraduate supervision in Philippines: setting the research agenda. AsiaPacific Education Researcher, 16 (1), 91-100.
  • Chikte, U., & Chabilall, J. (2016). Exploration of supervisor and student experiences during master's studies in a Health Science Faculty. South African Journal of Higher, 30(1), 57-79. Retrieved from
  • City University London. (2017). Roles and responsibilities of student and supervisor. Retrieved January 4, 2018, from
  • Delamont, S., Atkinson, P., & Parry, O. (2004). Supervising the PhD: A Guide to Success. 2nd Edition. Buckingham: Open University Press and Society for Research into Higher Education.
  • DoÄŸan, N., & Bıkmaz, Ö. (2015). Expectation of students from their thesis supervisor. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 3730-3737.
  • Eley, A. & Murray, R. (2009). How to Be an Effective Supervisor. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
  • Guerin, C. & Green, I. (2015). 'They're the bosses': feedback in team supervision. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 39(3), 320-35.
  • Heath, T. (2002). A quantitative analysis of PhD students' views of supervision. Higher Education Research & Development, 21(1), 41- 53.
  • Hockey, J. (1994). Establishing boundaries: Problems and solutions in managing the PhD supervisor's role. Cambridge Journal of Education, 24(2), 293-305.
  • Hockey, J. (1996). Strategies and tactics in the supervision of UK social science PhD students. Qualitative Studies in Education, 9(4), 481-500.
  • Holbrook, A., Shaw, K., Scevak, J., Bourke, S., Cantwell, R. & Budd, J. (2014). PhD candidate expectations: Exploring mismatch with experience. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 9, 329-346.
  • Ismail, A., Abiddin, N.Z., & Hassan, A. (2011). Improving the development of postgraduates' research and supervision. International Education Studies, 4(1), p. 78- 89.
  • Ismail, H. M., Majid, F. A., & Ismail, I. S. (2013).
  • Kiley, M. (2009). Identifying threshold concepts and proposing strategies to support doctoral candidates. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 46(3), 293-304.
  • Lahenius, K. & Ikavalko, H. (2014). Joint supervision practices in doctoral education - A student experience. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 38(3), 427-66
  • Lee, N. J. (2009). Professional doctorate supervision: Exploring student and supervisor experiences. Nurse Education Today, 29(6), 641-648.
  • Lekalakala-Mokgele, S. (2008). Expectations of postgraduate nursing students: an inquiry. Curationis, 31(3), 44- 50.
  • Lessing, A. C., & Schulze, S. (2002). Graduate supervision and academic support: Students' perceptions. South African Journal of Higher Education, 16(2), 139-149.
  • Lessing, N., & Lessing, A. C. (2004). The supervision of research for dissertations and theses. Acta Commercil, 4, 73-89.
  • London School of Economics. (2016). PhD supervision : Roles and responsibilities. Retrieved from

Cite this article

APA

    APA : Shahzad, S., Ali, M. S., & Ayub, U. (2019). Perceptions of Supervisors and Supervisees about Supervisor Role and Responsibilities in Student Research Work. Global Social Sciences Review, IV(II), 356-363. https://doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2019(IV-II).46

CHICAGO

    CHICAGO : Shahzad, Shumaila, Muhammad Shabbir Ali, and Umair Ayub. 2019. "Perceptions of Supervisors and Supervisees about Supervisor Role and Responsibilities in Student Research Work." Global Social Sciences Review, IV (II): 356-363 doi: 10.31703/gssr.2019(IV-II).46

HARVARD

    HARVARD : SHAHZAD, S., ALI, M. S. & AYUB, U. 2019. Perceptions of Supervisors and Supervisees about Supervisor Role and Responsibilities in Student Research Work. Global Social Sciences Review, IV, 356-363.

MHRA

    MHRA : Shahzad, Shumaila, Muhammad Shabbir Ali, and Umair Ayub. 2019. "Perceptions of Supervisors and Supervisees about Supervisor Role and Responsibilities in Student Research Work." Global Social Sciences Review, IV: 356-363

MLA

    MLA : Shahzad, Shumaila, Muhammad Shabbir Ali, and Umair Ayub. "Perceptions of Supervisors and Supervisees about Supervisor Role and Responsibilities in Student Research Work." Global Social Sciences Review, IV.II (2019): 356-363 Print.

OXFORD

    OXFORD : Shahzad, Shumaila, Ali, Muhammad Shabbir, and Ayub, Umair (2019), "Perceptions of Supervisors and Supervisees about Supervisor Role and Responsibilities in Student Research Work", Global Social Sciences Review, IV (II), 356-363

TURABIAN

    TURABIAN : Shahzad, Shumaila, Muhammad Shabbir Ali, and Umair Ayub. "Perceptions of Supervisors and Supervisees about Supervisor Role and Responsibilities in Student Research Work." Global Social Sciences Review IV, no. II (2019): 356-363. https://doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2019(IV-II).46