COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF RESEARCH SUPERVISION PRACTICES IN UNIVERSITIES OF KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA

http://dx.doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2020(V-I).45      10.31703/gssr.2020(V-I).45      Published : Mar 1
Authored by : MuhammadNaeemAbbasi , SaddafAyubRaja , UmbreenIshfaqSatti

45 Pages : 438-449

References

  • Abiddin, N. Z. (2006). Graduate Research Student Policy: A Study of United Kingdom Universities' Practices. European Journal of Social Sciences, 4(2), 127-136.
  • Abiddin, N. Z., & West, M. (2007). Supervision Practices for Foreign Graduate Research Student. American Journal of Applied Sciences, 4(6), 362-370. http://dx.doi.org/10.3844/ajassp.2007.362.370
  • Ali, Z. (1998). Study of Researches Completed by the Social Scientists of Peshawar University (Doctoral dissertation, University of Peshawar).
  • Beach, D. M., & Reinhartz, J. (2000). Supervisory leadership: Focus on instruction. Allyn & Bacon.
  • Beasley, N. (1999). Staff development to support research supervision. In G. Wisker & N. Sutcliffe (Eds.), Good practice in postgraduate supervision (pp. 129-138).
  • Doers chuck, P. (2004, October). A research and mentoring program for undergraduate women in computer science. In 34th Annual Frontiers in Education, 2004. FIE 2004. (pp. S2H-7). IEEE.
  • Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American journal of theoretical and applied statistics, 5(1), 1-4.
  • Harmin, M. (1994). Inspiring active learning: A handbook for teachers. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, 1250 North Pitt Street, Alexandria, VA 22314.
  • Hounsell, D. (2003). Student feedback, learning and development. Higher education and the lifecourse, 67-78.
  • James, R and Baldwin, G. (1999) Eleven practices of effective postgraduate supervisors. Centre for the Study of Higher Education and The School of Graduate Studies. University of Melbourne, Australia.
  • Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1999). Making cooperative learning work. Theory into practice, 38(2), 67-73.
  • Kiley, M. (2009). Identifying threshold concepts and proposing strategies to support doctoral candidates. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 46(3), 293-304.
  • Kiley, M., & Wisker, G. (2009). Threshold concepts in research education and evidence of threshold crossing. Higher Education Research and Development, 28(4), 431-441.
  • Kilminster, S., Cottrell, D., Grant, J., & Jolly, B. (2007). AMEE Guide No. 27: Effective educational and clinical supervision. Medical teacher, 29(1), 2-19.
  • Lindenmayer, D. B., & Likens, G. E. (2009). Adaptive monitoring: a new paradigm for long-term research and monitoring. Trends in ecology & evolution, 24(9), 482-486
  • Pearson, M., & Kayrooz, C. (2005). Enabling critical reflection on supervisory practice. International Journal of Academic Development, 9, 99-116.
  • Sankaran, S. (2009). Reflective Practice in Improving Doctoral Supervision Skills. Traversing the marshes: bridging theory and practice in experience-based learning
  • Svinicki, M. D. (2001). Encouraging your students to give feedback. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2001(87), 17-24.
  • Vilkinas, T. (2008). An exploratory study of the supervision of Ph. D./research students' theses. Innovative Higher Education, 32(5), 297-311.
  • Abiddin, N. Z. (2006). Graduate Research Student Policy: A Study of United Kingdom Universities' Practices. European Journal of Social Sciences, 4(2), 127-136.
  • Abiddin, N. Z., & West, M. (2007). Supervision Practices for Foreign Graduate Research Student. American Journal of Applied Sciences, 4(6), 362-370. http://dx.doi.org/10.3844/ajassp.2007.362.370
  • Ali, Z. (1998). Study of Researches Completed by the Social Scientists of Peshawar University (Doctoral dissertation, University of Peshawar).
  • Beach, D. M., & Reinhartz, J. (2000). Supervisory leadership: Focus on instruction. Allyn & Bacon.
  • Beasley, N. (1999). Staff development to support research supervision. In G. Wisker & N. Sutcliffe (Eds.), Good practice in postgraduate supervision (pp. 129-138).
  • Doers chuck, P. (2004, October). A research and mentoring program for undergraduate women in computer science. In 34th Annual Frontiers in Education, 2004. FIE 2004. (pp. S2H-7). IEEE.
  • Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American journal of theoretical and applied statistics, 5(1), 1-4.
  • Harmin, M. (1994). Inspiring active learning: A handbook for teachers. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, 1250 North Pitt Street, Alexandria, VA 22314.
  • Hounsell, D. (2003). Student feedback, learning and development. Higher education and the lifecourse, 67-78.
  • James, R and Baldwin, G. (1999) Eleven practices of effective postgraduate supervisors. Centre for the Study of Higher Education and The School of Graduate Studies. University of Melbourne, Australia.
  • Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1999). Making cooperative learning work. Theory into practice, 38(2), 67-73.
  • Kiley, M. (2009). Identifying threshold concepts and proposing strategies to support doctoral candidates. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 46(3), 293-304.
  • Kiley, M., & Wisker, G. (2009). Threshold concepts in research education and evidence of threshold crossing. Higher Education Research and Development, 28(4), 431-441.
  • Kilminster, S., Cottrell, D., Grant, J., & Jolly, B. (2007). AMEE Guide No. 27: Effective educational and clinical supervision. Medical teacher, 29(1), 2-19.
  • Lindenmayer, D. B., & Likens, G. E. (2009). Adaptive monitoring: a new paradigm for long-term research and monitoring. Trends in ecology & evolution, 24(9), 482-486
  • Pearson, M., & Kayrooz, C. (2005). Enabling critical reflection on supervisory practice. International Journal of Academic Development, 9, 99-116.
  • Sankaran, S. (2009). Reflective Practice in Improving Doctoral Supervision Skills. Traversing the marshes: bridging theory and practice in experience-based learning
  • Svinicki, M. D. (2001). Encouraging your students to give feedback. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2001(87), 17-24.
  • Vilkinas, T. (2008). An exploratory study of the supervision of Ph. D./research students' theses. Innovative Higher Education, 32(5), 297-311.

Cite this article

    APA : Abbasi, M. N., Raja, S. A., & Satti, U. I. (2020). Comparative Analysis of Research Supervision Practices in Universities of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. Global Social Sciences Review, V(I), 438-449. https://doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2020(V-I).45
    CHICAGO : Abbasi, Muhammad Naeem, Saddaf Ayub Raja, and Umbreen Ishfaq Satti. 2020. "Comparative Analysis of Research Supervision Practices in Universities of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa." Global Social Sciences Review, V (I): 438-449 doi: 10.31703/gssr.2020(V-I).45
    HARVARD : ABBASI, M. N., RAJA, S. A. & SATTI, U. I. 2020. Comparative Analysis of Research Supervision Practices in Universities of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. Global Social Sciences Review, V, 438-449.
    MHRA : Abbasi, Muhammad Naeem, Saddaf Ayub Raja, and Umbreen Ishfaq Satti. 2020. "Comparative Analysis of Research Supervision Practices in Universities of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa." Global Social Sciences Review, V: 438-449
    MLA : Abbasi, Muhammad Naeem, Saddaf Ayub Raja, and Umbreen Ishfaq Satti. "Comparative Analysis of Research Supervision Practices in Universities of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa." Global Social Sciences Review, V.I (2020): 438-449 Print.
    OXFORD : Abbasi, Muhammad Naeem, Raja, Saddaf Ayub, and Satti, Umbreen Ishfaq (2020), "Comparative Analysis of Research Supervision Practices in Universities of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa", Global Social Sciences Review, V (I), 438-449
    TURABIAN : Abbasi, Muhammad Naeem, Saddaf Ayub Raja, and Umbreen Ishfaq Satti. "Comparative Analysis of Research Supervision Practices in Universities of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa." Global Social Sciences Review V, no. I (2020): 438-449. https://doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2020(V-I).45