References

• Abiddin, N.Z., Ismail, A., & Ismail. (2011). Effective supervisory approach in enhancing postgraduate research studies. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 1(2), 206-217.
• Ali, J., Ullah, H., & Sanauddin, N. (2019). Postgraduate research supervision: Exploring the lived experience of Pakistani postgraduate students. FWU Journal of Social Sciences, 13(1), 14- 25
• Amzat, I. H.,Yusuf, M., & Kayode, K.B. (2010). Quality research supervision in some Malaysian Public Universities: Supervisees' expectations and challenges. International Journal of Sustainable Development, 1(5), 17-23.
• Attwood, R. (2009). Taught postgrads speak their mind. Retrieved on 30th October 2019 from http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/story.asp?storycode=408841
• Bitchener, J., Basturkmen, H., & East, M. (2011). The focus of supervisor written feedback to thesis/dissertation students. International Journal of English Studies, 10 (2), 79-97
• Calma, A. (2007). Postgraduate supervision in Philippines: setting the research agenda. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 16 (1), 91-100.
• Costea, D. A. (2007). Meeting students' and supervisors' expectations - findings from a pilot study done at Centre for International Health, University of Bergen.
• Engebretson, K., Smith, K., McLaughlin, D., Seibold, C. Teret, G., & Ryan, E. (2008). The changing reality of research education in Australia and implications for supervision: A review of the literature. Teaching in Higher Education,13(1),1-15.
• Engebretson, K., Smith, K., McLaughlin, D., Seibold, C. Teret, G., & Ryan, E. (2008). The changing reality of research education in Australia and implications for supervision: A review of the literature. Teaching in Higher Education,13(1),1-15.
• Exley, K., & O' Malley, C. (1999). Supervising PhDs in science and engineering. In Wisker, N (Ed.), Good Practice in Postgraduate Supervision. SEDA.
• Grant, B. M. (2005). The Pedagogy of Graduate Supervision: Figuring the relations between supervisor and student, PhD thesis, University of Auckland, Aotearoa, New Zealand.
• Ives, G., & Rowley, G. (2005). Supervisor selection or allocation and continuity of supervision: PhD students' progress and outcomes. Studies in Higher Education, 30(5), 535-555.
• Kandlbinder, P. & Peseta, T. (2001). In supervisor's words: An insider's view of postgraduate supervision. Institute for Teaching and Learning, The University of Sydney.
• Kumar, V., & Huat, B.B. K. (2011). A handbook for postgraduate supervision. Ministry of Higher Education, 1-112.
• Lee, A. (2007). Developing effective supervisors: Concepts of research supervision. South African Journal of Higher Education, 21(4), 680-693.
• Marsh, H. W., Rowe, K. J., Martin, A., (2002). PhD students' evaluations of research supervision. The Journal of Higher Education, 73(3), 313-348
• Mouton, J. (2001). How to succeed in your master's and doctoral studies: A South African guide and resource book. Paarl: Van Schaik.
• Murphy, N., Bain, J. D., & Conrad, L. (2007). Orientations to research higher degree supervision. Higher Education, 53,209-234.
• Nakabugo, M. G & Sebunga M. C. (2004). Supervisor-Supervisee relationship: A rose without thorns? Maicibi, A. and Kahwa, Y (Eds.) Graduate studies at Mackerel University: A book of readings.
• Pearson, M. & Kayrooz, C. (2004). Enabling critical reflection on research supervisory practice. International Journal for Academic Development, 9(1), 99-116.
• Scott, I. (2009). Academic development in South African higher education. In: E. Bitzer (Ed.). Higher education in South Africa: A scholarly look behind the scenes. Stellenbosch: Sun Media, pp.21-49.
• Sidhu, G. K., Kaur, S., Fook, C. W., & Yunus, F. W. (2013). Postgraduate supervision: Exploring Malaysian students' experiences. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 90,133-141
• Sidhu, G. K., Kaur, S., Fook, C. W., & Yunus, F. W. (2014). Postgraduate supervision: Comparing student perspectives from Malaysia and the United Kingdom. Social and Behavioral Sciences,123, 151 -159
• Sze, D. (2008). Effective student-centered PhD Supervision from a social constructivist viewpoint. Development program for research higher degree supervision. Sydney: University of Sydney, Institute for Teaching and Learning.
• Thompson, D. R., Kirkman, S., Watson, R. & Stewart, S. (2005). Improving research supervision in nursing. Nurse Education Today, 25, 283-290.
• Vilkinas, T. (2008). An exploratory study of the supervision of Ph.D. research students' theses. Innovative Higher Education, 32, 297-311.
• Wang, T. & Li, L. Y. (2008). Understanding international postgraduate research students' challenges and pedagogical needs in thesis writing. International Journal of Pedagogies and Learning, 4 (2), 88-96.
• Whitelock, D., Faulkner, D. & Miell, D. (2008). Promoting creativity in PhD supervision: Tensions and dilemmas. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 3, 143-153.
• Wisker, G., Robinson, G., Trafford, V., Warnes, M., & Creighton, E. (2003). From supervisory dialogues to successful PhDs: Strategies supporting and enabling the learning conversations of staff and students at postgraduate level. Teaching in Higher Education, 8, 383-397.
• Woolhouse, M. (2002). Supervising dissertation projects, expectations of supervisors and students. Innovations in Education and Training International, 39, 137-144.