References

• Bryman, A (2008) Social Research Methods (3rd edition, Oxford University Press) 515
• Campbell, C., & Wiles, P. (1979). law and Society (Barnes and Noble Imports 1979)
• Campbell, T. (1997). Technology, Multimedia, and Qualitative Research in Education. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 30(2), 122– 132. https://doi.org/10.1080/08886504.1 997.10782219
• Cane, P., & Krtizer, H. (2010) The Oxford Handbook of Empirical Legal Research (Oxford University Press) “See generally”
• Charmaz, K. (2001) ‘Grounded Theory’ in Robert Emerson (eds) Contemporary Field Research: Perspectives and Formulations (2nd edition, Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press)
• Charmaz, K. (2006) Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis (Thousand Oaks CA: Sage)
• Clont, J. (1992). ‘The Concept of Reliability as it Pertains to Data from Qualitative Studies’ (1992) Paper presented at the annual meeting of the South West Educational Research Association Houston TX
• Creswell, J. (2014). Research design Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th edition Sage Publications)
• Creswell, J. W., & Miller, D. L. (2000). Determining Validity in Qualitative Inquiry. Theory Into Practice, 39(3), 124– 130. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421ti p3903_2
• Davies D., & Dodd, J. (2002). ‘Qualitative Research and the Question of Rigour’ 12(2) Qualitative Health Research 279
• Hutchinson, T., & Duncan, N. (2012). Defining and Describing What We Do: Doctrinal Legal Research. Deakin Law Review, 17(1), 83. https://doi.org/10.21153/dlr2012vol1 7no1art70
• Eisner, E., (1991) The Enlightened Eye: Qualitative Inquiry and the Enhancement of Educational Practice (Macmillan Publishing Company)
• Flood, J. (2005). ‘Chapter 2 Socio-Legal Anthropology’ in Reza Banakar and Max Travers (eds), Theory and Method in Socio- Legal Research (Hart Publishing) 33
• Gary King et al. (1994). Designing Social Inquiry Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research (Princeton University Press) 3
• Gee et al., (1992). ‘Discourse Analysis’ in Le Compte et al (eds), The Hand Book of Qualitative Research in Education (San Diego CA: Academic Press) 227
• Genn, H. (1999). Paths to Justice: What Do People Think About Going To Law? (Hart Publishing 1999)
• Gibbs, G. (2007). Analysing Qualitative Data (Sage Publications Ltd) 38
• Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (2012). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research (Aldine 2012) 15
• Golafshani, N. (2003) ‘Understanding Reliability and Validity in Qualitative Research’ 8(4) The Qualitative Report 597 https://doi.org/10.46743/2160- 3715/2003.1870
• Healy, M. J., & Perry, C. (2000). Comprehensive criteria to judge validity and reliability of qualitative research within the realism paradigm. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 3(3), 118– 126. https://doi.org/10.1108/1352275001 0333861
• Kirk J., & Miller, M. (1986). Reliability and Validity in Qualitative Research (Sage Publications)
• Kritzer, H. M. (1996). The Data Puzzle: The Nature of Interpretation in Quantitative Research. American Journal of Political Science, 40(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111692
• Kritzer, H. (2009). ‘Conclusion: “Research is a Messy Business” An Archaeology of the Craft of socio-Legal Research’ in Simon Halliday and Patrick Schmidt (eds), Conducting Law and Society Research: Reflections on Methods and Practices (Cambridge University Press) 264
• Lincoln Y., & Guba, E. (1985) Naturalistic Inquiry (Beverly Hills CA: Sage) 290
• Lisa Webley. (2010). ‘Qualitative Approaches to Empirical Legal Research’ in Peter Cane and Herbert Kritzer (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Empirical Legal Research (Oxford University Press)
• Marc Bloch. (1992). The Historian’s Craft (transl. Peter Putnam, Manchester University Press) 91
• Martin Bauer. (2000). ‘Classical Content Analysis: A Review’ in Martin Bauer et al (eds), Qualitative Research with Text, Image and Sound A Practical Handbook (Sage Publications) 132
• May, T. (2001). Social Research: Issues Methods and Practices (3rd edition, Open University Press) 138
• McGregor, S. L. T., & Murnane, J. A. (2010). Paradigm, methodology and method: intellectual integrity in consumer scholarship. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 34(4), 419– 427. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1470- 6431.2010.00883.x
• Miles, M. B. (1979). Qualitative Data as an Attractive Nuisance: The Problem of Analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24(4), 590. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392365
• Patton, M. (2002). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods (3rd edition, Sage Publications) 4
• Pearce, D., et al., (1987). Australian Law Schools: A Discipline Assessment for the Commonwealth Tertiary Education Commission (Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service 1987) “See generally”
• Punch, K. (2005). Introduction to Social Research (2nd edition, Sage Publications) 139.
• Rosalind Gill. (2000). ‘Discourse Analysis’ in Martin Bauer et al (eds), Qualitative Researching with Text, Image and Sound A Practical Handbook (Sage Publications) 172
• Saldana, J. (2013). The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers (2nd edition, Sage Publications) 3
• Schreier, M. (2012). Qualitative Content Analysis in Practice (London: Sage) 20
• Seale, C. (1999). ‘Quality in Qualitative Research’ 5(4) Qualitative Inquiry 465
• Shenton, A. (2004). ‘Strategies for Ensuring Trustworthiness in Qualitative Research Projects’ 22 Education for Information 63, 64
• Silverman, D. (2011). Qualitative Research (3rd edition, Sage Publications) 77
• Smith, L. (2012). Decolonising Methodologies – Research and Indigenous People (2nd edition, Zed Books) 12
• Stenbacka, C. (2001). ‘Qualitative Research Requires Quality Concepts of its Own’ 39(7) Management Decision 551
• Webley, L. (2008). Adversarialism and Consensus? The Messages Professional Bodies Transmit About Professional Approach and Professional Identity to Solicitors and Family Mediators Undertaking Divorce Matters (IALS: London) “See generally”
• webley, L. (2010). ‘Qualitative Approaches to Empirical Legal Research’ in Peter Cane and Herbert Kritzer (eds) Oxford Handbook of Empirical Legal Research (Oxford University Press) 1