References
- Bangert-Drowns, R. L., Kulik, C. L. C., Kulik, J. A., & Morgan, M. (1991). The instructional effect of feedback in test-like events. Review of Educational Research, 61(2), 213-238.
- Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998b). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 80(2), 139-148.
- Chance, B. L. (1997). Experiences with authentic assessment techniques in an introductory statistics course. Journal of Statistics Education, 5(3), 1-15.
- Chin, C. (2006). Classroom interaction in science: Teacher questioning and feedback to students' responses. International Journal of Science Education, 28(11), 1315-1346.
- Corbett, A. T., & Anderson, J. R. (1990, July). The effect of feedback control on learning to program with the LISP tutor. In Proceedings of the Twelfth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 796-803). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Elbaum Associates.
- Cowie, B., & Bell, B. (1999). A model of formative assessment in science education. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 6(1), 101-116.
- Crooks, T. J. (1988). The impact of classroom evaluation practices on students. Review of Educational Research, 58(4), 438-481.
- Francis, D., Mahlomaholo, S., & Nkoane, M. (Eds.). (2010). Praxis towards sustainable empowering learning environments in South Africa. AFRICAN SUN MeDIA
- Gibbs, G., & Simpson, C. (2005). Conditions under which assessment supports students' learning. Learning and Teaching in Higher Education, (1), 3-31.
- Gronlund, N. E., & Linn, R. L. (1990). Measurement and evaluation in teaching (6th ed.). New York: Macmillan
- Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81-112
- Heller, S. B. (2004). The art of grading papers quickly and effectively. English Journal, 94(1), 115.
- Heritage, M. (2007). Formative assessment: What do teachers need to know and do?. Phi Delta Kappan, 89(2), 140- 145.
- Higgins, R., Hartley, P., & Skelton, A. (2002). The conscientious consumer: Reconsidering the role of assessment feedback in student learning. Studies in Higher Education, 27(1), 53-64
- Hodes, C. L. (1985). Relative effectiveness of corrective and non-corrective feedback in computer assisted instruction on learning and achievement. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 13(4), 249-254.
Cite this article
-
APA : Batool, T., & Akhter, M. (2019). Feedback Effect on Secondary School Students Achievement in Mathematics. Global Social Sciences Review, IV(III), 88-95. https://doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2019(IV-III).12
-
CHICAGO : Batool, Tahira, and Mumtaz Akhter. 2019. "Feedback Effect on Secondary School Students Achievement in Mathematics." Global Social Sciences Review, IV (III): 88-95 doi: 10.31703/gssr.2019(IV-III).12
-
HARVARD : BATOOL, T. & AKHTER, M. 2019. Feedback Effect on Secondary School Students Achievement in Mathematics. Global Social Sciences Review, IV, 88-95.
-
MHRA : Batool, Tahira, and Mumtaz Akhter. 2019. "Feedback Effect on Secondary School Students Achievement in Mathematics." Global Social Sciences Review, IV: 88-95
-
MLA : Batool, Tahira, and Mumtaz Akhter. "Feedback Effect on Secondary School Students Achievement in Mathematics." Global Social Sciences Review, IV.III (2019): 88-95 Print.
-
OXFORD : Batool, Tahira and Akhter, Mumtaz (2019), "Feedback Effect on Secondary School Students Achievement in Mathematics", Global Social Sciences Review, IV (III), 88-95
-
TURABIAN : Batool, Tahira, and Mumtaz Akhter. "Feedback Effect on Secondary School Students Achievement in Mathematics." Global Social Sciences Review IV, no. III (2019): 88-95. https://doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2019(IV-III).12