PEER TUTORING AN EFFECTIVE TECHNIQUE TO ENHANCE STUDENTS ENGLISH WRITING SKILLS

http://dx.doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2019(IV-III).39      10.31703/gssr.2019(IV-III).39      Published : Sep 3
Authored by : HumairAkhtar , MuhammadSaeedKhan , SaddafAyub

39 Pages : 299-305

References

  • Arreaga-Mayer, 0 C. 0 (1998). Increasing0 active0 student0 responding0 and0 0improving 0academic 0performance 0through 0classwide 0peer tutoring. 0Intervention 0in 0School and0 0Clinic, 034(2), 089-94.
  • Cho, 0 K., 0 & 0Schunn, C. 0 D. 0 (2007). 0 Scaffolded0 writing0 and0 rewriting0 in0 0the discipline: A webbased0 reciprocal0 peer0 review0 0system. 0Computers and0Education, 048(3), 0409-426.
  • Delquadri, 0 J., 0Greenwood, 0C. R., 0Whorton, D., 0Carta, 0J. J., & 0Hall, R. V. 0 (1986). 0Classwide 0peer 0tutoring. 0Exceptional 0children, 052(6), 0535-542
  • Dufrene, 0 B., 0Noell, G., 0 Gilbertson, 0 D., & 0Duhon, G. (2005). 0 Monitoring0 implementation of 0reciprocal 0peer tutoring: 0Identifying and 0intervening 0with 0students 0who 0do 0not 0maintain 0accurate implementation. 0School 0Psychology 0Review, 034(1), 074-86
  • Eze, N. J. (2015). Effects of Cloze Instructional Approach on Senior Secondary School Students' Achievement in Igbo Language Reading Comprehension. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(21), 13-20.
  • Ghani, M., & Din, M. (2017). The Effect of Teaching English through Literature on Creative Writing at HSSC Level in Pakistan. International Journal of English Linguistics, 7(2), 142-150.
  • Greenwood, 0 C.0 (1997). Classwide0 peer-tutoring0. Behavior0 and0 0Social Issues, 07(1), 53-57.
  • Kamps, 0 D. 0M., 0Barbetta, 0P. M., 0Leonard, B. R., & Delquadri, J. (1994). 0Classwide 0peer tutoring: An integration strategy to improve reading skills and promote peer interactions among students with autism and general education peers. Journal of applied behavior analysis, 27(1), 49-61.
  • Kapka, D., & 0Oberman, 0D. 0A. (2001). Improving0 student writing skills through the modeling of the writing process. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED453536.pdf
  • Mercer, C., & Mercer, A. (2005). Teaching Students with Learning Problems. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc.
  • Orion, N., & Fortner, R. W. (2003). Mediterranean models for integrating environmental education and earth sciences through earth systems education. Mediterranean Journal of Educational Studies, 8, 97-111.
  • Pajares, F. (2003). Self-efficacy beliefs, motivation, and achievement in writing: A review of the literature. Reading &Writing Quarterly, 19(2), 139-158. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10573560390143085.
  • Pigott, H. E., Fantuzzo, J. W., & Clement, P. W. (1986). The effects of reciprocal peer tutoring and group contingencies on the academic performance of elementary school children. Journal of applied behavior analysis, 19(1), 93-98.
  • Plutsky, S., & Wilson, B. A. (2004). Comparison of the three methods for teaching and evaluating writing: A quasiexperimental study. The Delta Pi Epsilon Journal, 46(1), 50−61. ISSN-0011-8052.
  • Richer, D. L. (1993). The effects of two feedback systems on first year college students' writing proficiency. Dissertation Abstract International, 53, p.2722.
  • Simmons, D. C., Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., & Hodge, J. P. (1994). Importance of instructional complexity and role reciprocity to classwide peer tutoring. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 9, 202-212.
  • Stevens, R. J., & Slavin, R. E. (1995). The cooperative elementary school: Effects on students' achievement, attitudes, and social relations. American educational research journal, 32(2), 321-351.
  • Topping, K. J. (2005). Trends in peer learning. Educational psychology, 25(6), 631-645.
  • Topping, K., Smith, F. F., Swanson, I., & Elliot, A. (2000). Formative peer assessment of academic writing between postgraduate students. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 25(2), 149−169. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/713611428.
  • Wakabayashi, R. (2013). The Effects of the Peer Feedback Process on Reviewers' Own Writing. English Language Teaching, 6(9), 177-192. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/elt.v6n9p177.
  • Ward, P. and Lee, M. (2005), Peer-assisted learning in physical education: a review of theory and research. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 24(3), 205-225.
  • Zhao, H. (2010). Investigating learners' use and understanding of peer and teacher feedback on writing: A comparative study in a Chinese English writing classroom. Assessing writing, 15(1), 3-17.
  • Arreaga-Mayer, 0 C. 0 (1998). Increasing0 active0 student0 responding0 and0 0improving 0academic 0performance 0through 0classwide 0peer tutoring. 0Intervention 0in 0School and0 0Clinic, 034(2), 089-94.
  • Cho, 0 K., 0 & 0Schunn, C. 0 D. 0 (2007). 0 Scaffolded0 writing0 and0 rewriting0 in0 0the discipline: A webbased0 reciprocal0 peer0 review0 0system. 0Computers and0Education, 048(3), 0409-426.
  • Delquadri, 0 J., 0Greenwood, 0C. R., 0Whorton, D., 0Carta, 0J. J., & 0Hall, R. V. 0 (1986). 0Classwide 0peer 0tutoring. 0Exceptional 0children, 052(6), 0535-542
  • Dufrene, 0 B., 0Noell, G., 0 Gilbertson, 0 D., & 0Duhon, G. (2005). 0 Monitoring0 implementation of 0reciprocal 0peer tutoring: 0Identifying and 0intervening 0with 0students 0who 0do 0not 0maintain 0accurate implementation. 0School 0Psychology 0Review, 034(1), 074-86
  • Eze, N. J. (2015). Effects of Cloze Instructional Approach on Senior Secondary School Students' Achievement in Igbo Language Reading Comprehension. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(21), 13-20.
  • Ghani, M., & Din, M. (2017). The Effect of Teaching English through Literature on Creative Writing at HSSC Level in Pakistan. International Journal of English Linguistics, 7(2), 142-150.
  • Greenwood, 0 C.0 (1997). Classwide0 peer-tutoring0. Behavior0 and0 0Social Issues, 07(1), 53-57.
  • Kamps, 0 D. 0M., 0Barbetta, 0P. M., 0Leonard, B. R., & Delquadri, J. (1994). 0Classwide 0peer tutoring: An integration strategy to improve reading skills and promote peer interactions among students with autism and general education peers. Journal of applied behavior analysis, 27(1), 49-61.
  • Kapka, D., & 0Oberman, 0D. 0A. (2001). Improving0 student writing skills through the modeling of the writing process. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED453536.pdf
  • Mercer, C., & Mercer, A. (2005). Teaching Students with Learning Problems. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc.
  • Orion, N., & Fortner, R. W. (2003). Mediterranean models for integrating environmental education and earth sciences through earth systems education. Mediterranean Journal of Educational Studies, 8, 97-111.
  • Pajares, F. (2003). Self-efficacy beliefs, motivation, and achievement in writing: A review of the literature. Reading &Writing Quarterly, 19(2), 139-158. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10573560390143085.
  • Pigott, H. E., Fantuzzo, J. W., & Clement, P. W. (1986). The effects of reciprocal peer tutoring and group contingencies on the academic performance of elementary school children. Journal of applied behavior analysis, 19(1), 93-98.
  • Plutsky, S., & Wilson, B. A. (2004). Comparison of the three methods for teaching and evaluating writing: A quasiexperimental study. The Delta Pi Epsilon Journal, 46(1), 50−61. ISSN-0011-8052.
  • Richer, D. L. (1993). The effects of two feedback systems on first year college students' writing proficiency. Dissertation Abstract International, 53, p.2722.
  • Simmons, D. C., Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., & Hodge, J. P. (1994). Importance of instructional complexity and role reciprocity to classwide peer tutoring. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 9, 202-212.
  • Stevens, R. J., & Slavin, R. E. (1995). The cooperative elementary school: Effects on students' achievement, attitudes, and social relations. American educational research journal, 32(2), 321-351.
  • Topping, K. J. (2005). Trends in peer learning. Educational psychology, 25(6), 631-645.
  • Topping, K., Smith, F. F., Swanson, I., & Elliot, A. (2000). Formative peer assessment of academic writing between postgraduate students. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 25(2), 149−169. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/713611428.
  • Wakabayashi, R. (2013). The Effects of the Peer Feedback Process on Reviewers' Own Writing. English Language Teaching, 6(9), 177-192. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/elt.v6n9p177.
  • Ward, P. and Lee, M. (2005), Peer-assisted learning in physical education: a review of theory and research. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 24(3), 205-225.
  • Zhao, H. (2010). Investigating learners' use and understanding of peer and teacher feedback on writing: A comparative study in a Chinese English writing classroom. Assessing writing, 15(1), 3-17.

Cite this article

    APA : Akhtar, H., Khan, M. S., & Ayub, S. (2019). Peer Tutoring: An Effective Technique To Enhance Students English Writing Skills. Global Social Sciences Review, IV(III), 299-305. https://doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2019(IV-III).39
    CHICAGO : Akhtar, Humair, Muhammad Saeed Khan, and Saddaf Ayub. 2019. "Peer Tutoring: An Effective Technique To Enhance Students English Writing Skills." Global Social Sciences Review, IV (III): 299-305 doi: 10.31703/gssr.2019(IV-III).39
    HARVARD : AKHTAR, H., KHAN, M. S. & AYUB, S. 2019. Peer Tutoring: An Effective Technique To Enhance Students English Writing Skills. Global Social Sciences Review, IV, 299-305.
    MHRA : Akhtar, Humair, Muhammad Saeed Khan, and Saddaf Ayub. 2019. "Peer Tutoring: An Effective Technique To Enhance Students English Writing Skills." Global Social Sciences Review, IV: 299-305
    MLA : Akhtar, Humair, Muhammad Saeed Khan, and Saddaf Ayub. "Peer Tutoring: An Effective Technique To Enhance Students English Writing Skills." Global Social Sciences Review, IV.III (2019): 299-305 Print.
    OXFORD : Akhtar, Humair, Khan, Muhammad Saeed, and Ayub, Saddaf (2019), "Peer Tutoring: An Effective Technique To Enhance Students English Writing Skills", Global Social Sciences Review, IV (III), 299-305
    TURABIAN : Akhtar, Humair, Muhammad Saeed Khan, and Saddaf Ayub. "Peer Tutoring: An Effective Technique To Enhance Students English Writing Skills." Global Social Sciences Review IV, no. III (2019): 299-305. https://doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2019(IV-III).39