Archaeometallurgy examines the manufacture, practice, and technical development of ancient metals. This investigation middles on the elemental analysis of Late Kushan copper coins from Pakistan, applying X-ray fluorescence (XRF) Spectroscopy, a non-destructive method to discover their metallurgical alignment. The sample consisted of 22 Late Kushan copper coins, from the Islamabad Museum's reserve collection, chosen for comprehensive research. The main working technique was the XRF study, expected to classify alloying elements, minting approaches, and metallurgical performances from the Kushan period. The coins were generally struck relatively than cast, reflecting the invitation of modern minting methods. Elemental analysis identified notable quantities of tin, lead, and nickel. The sign of sulfide ores along with crusts such as silica, iron, and Sulphur facts to less advanced smelting methods. The coins exhibit a single-phase copper with impurities of Si, Ni, P, and Ag, as well as black inclusions of copper sulfide in the inner cores.

Non-destructive, Longevity, X-Ray Fluorescence, Spectroscopy, Inclusion, Poling, Striations

Archaeometallurgy is the study of metalworking structures, tools, waste products, and finished metal artifacts, from the Bronze Age to the recent past. There are various scientific techniques used in the elemental analysis of archaeological artifacts. Some of the techniques are destructive, while others are non-destructive and safe for valuable objects like coins. These techniques help us to understand the elemental composition of the objects reported from the archaeological context of these objects for a longer period (Rehren, 1994). 

The use of analytical methods for archaeometric analysis poses a main problem when dealing with objects of high value such as coins. Due to the distinctive character and infrequency of some coins, any kind of investigation should be enhanced non-destructive, which means that neither unique sample material can be taken nor any kind of modi?cation is permitted (Volpi, et. al, 2023). 

Newly, with the development of numerous spectroscopic and microscopic methods, the research of archaeologically important copper coins developed very attractive for getting many chemical compositions at the microscopic measure. Evaluating the chemical composition of ancient coins offers appreciated understanding to archaeologists and numismatists, enlightening information about manufacturing procedures, age, monetary status, minting locations, and validity. These coins, made from many metal alloys through different eras in Indian history, reveal the development of metallurgy. They also deal with pieces of evidence about ore origins and manufacturing approaches (Upadhyay, et. al, 2024).

Elemental analysis of the Late Kushan copper coins at the Islamabad Museum has been carried out through material science, numismatic literature, and archaeometallurgical observations. The elemental analysis of the metal artifacts is an important mechanism with the help of which we can understand the elemental composition of metal and the technological advancement of the past. Elemental studies of coins result in valuable information about metal combinations used in the manufacture of coins (Manfred, 1858). Laboratory techniques such as XRF provide additional information about the metal contents, and ores, and the way to identify the various mints, when more than one, from the composition of metals. The relative proportion of the contents of the main elements provides valuable information about, the inflation of, money, economic growth or deprecation, and political conditions of that period. The connection between microstructure and mechanical properties enables the materials scientist to surmise the use of processes such as hammering, heating, and quenching used in ancient times. 

The decision to use pure copper instead of common alloys like bronze or brass underscores economic considerations and resource management strategies within the Kushan Empire. The research concludes that the distinctive characteristics of these coins, including their composition and fabrication, reflect the regional diversity in ancient coinage practices and the Kushan Empire's adaptive responses to economic challenges.

The study approach adopted in this research played an essential part in confirming its whole achievement, with specific importance on the particular performance of fieldwork and the following scientific analysis. The fieldwork stage was important, placing the basis for a systematic and disciplined analysis of the collected documents.

Ensuing the field examination, a complete scientific analysis was passed out using a variety of progressive procedures and methods. This stage was noticeable through a high level of accuracy, strict devotion to scientific procedures, and the usage of cutting-edge tools and skills. The addition of vigorous fieldwork with particular scientific investigation allowed the research to attain a nuanced and in-depth consideration of the inquiry subject, thus contribution appreciated helps to the larger field of data.

Essential to the research was the study of the elemental composition of Late Kushan copper coins. Through exploring their metallurgical possessions, the investigation aimed to expose an understanding of the materials and manufacturing methods used throughout the Late Kushan era. This investigation not only improves our understanding of Kushan numismatics but also sheds light on the scientific abilities and metallurgical performance of the period. Eventually, the study procedure helped as the keystone of the learning, emphasizing its integrity, intellectual accuracy, and historical significance.

Learning the elemental composition of coins is an essential feature in archaeology. It offers a valuable understanding of mining and metallurgy applications, minting methods, and the monetary and political situations of a specific region at a particular time. Old-style physicochemical investigation, yet, frequently contains destructive techniques. To report this, nondestructive approaches of atomic spectroscopy have been employed, allowing the resolution of elemental composition without affecting harm to the sample. So, they can be used on archaeological objects (Trela et. al, 2025).

This study's objective is to examine and assess the most operative methods for examining the elemental composition of ancient copper coins from the Late Kushan period, presently housed at the Islamabad Museum. Essential to this research is the application of X-ray Fluorescence (XRF) a non-destructive radiation-based method accomplished as long as surface composition data with a diffusion penetration usually extending from a small number of micrometers to a few tens of micrometers (Marussi, et. al, 2024).

However, the study recognizes convinced limits intrinsic to XRF, mainly the probable for surface changes such as vigorous erosion enhancement to alter the outcomes. These changes might reason for differences between the slow surface composition and the true loose composition of the coins (Mamaniaa and Singhb, 2019).

XRF works by pointing an X-ray beam on top of a sample, which at that time emits distinguishing fluorescent X-rays. These productions are taken and examined by means of either an energy-dispersive or wavelength-dispersive detector. The qualitative investigation is based on the identification of precise wavelengths released by the elements extant, even though the quantitative examination is determined through the strength of these emissions. While chiefly a surface inquiry tool, XRF can suggest bulk study up to a depth of 1 cm, depending on both the model composition and the energy of the emitted X-rays. Its capability to notice elements extending from sodium to uranium makes it an extremely multipurpose technique, extensively useful in corrections such as cultural heritage preservation, environmental science, and materials investigation (Ibid).

In this research, a portable XRF device was used to examine 22 copper coins from the Late Kushan period. The study took place at the Experimental Archaeology Lab, Department of Archaeology, Hazara University, Mansehra. The procedure of a portable XRF system permitted for non-invasive, on-site examination, conserving the physical reliability of these culturally important objects though yielding dangerous compositional facts. This applied use highlights the importance of portable XRF devices in archaeological study, and contributes a stability between analytical accuracy and conservation (Paulo et al., 2009).

Specified the incomplete documentation existing on the metallurgical composition of Late Kushan copper coinage, this research fills a significant gap in the works. XRF was useful to both the obverse and reverse sides of the coins to attain a further complete study. This dual-sided method improves the consistency and understanding of the data, causal to a deeper appreciation of the alloying performance and metallurgical methods working throughout the Late Kushan era.

Experimental Results of X-ray Fluorescence (XRF) Spectroscopy

The Energy Dispersive X-ray Fluorescence (EDXRF) has been performed on 22 Late Kushan copper coins described above. Analysis by WD-XRF. The copper coin under study is the major elements identified in these coins are Cu and Si, whereas P, S, Co, Ni, Ag, and Pb are present in trace quantities in Late Kushan copper coins. The chemical composition of the coins derived from sensitive WD-XRF is shown in Table 3.11. As the coins are not much corroded, the WD-XRF was targeted on non corroded surfaces on a larger surface area. The copper percentage on the obverse side varied between 77.339 to 98.629% (Table 3.11). On the reverse side, the percentage of copper varied between 75.916 to 91.769%, showing copper as the main constituent of the Late Kushan copper coins. Except for coin No. 313, none of the copper coins showed the presence of any Cobalt (Co) on the exterior surfaces. Coin No. 313 shows variations of sulfur from 0.169% on the obverse to 0.145% on the reverse side. None of the coins showed any traces of iron on the external surfaces wherein iron was noticed through RBS analysis before conservation of coin No. 340 from traces to as high as 2.64%. All the copper coins are free from the presence of any chloride, K, Na, and iron on the external surfaces. The elements Co (No. 313), Pb (No. 5), and Ag (No. 5) are present in traces on the surface. Ni is present in traces (0.12%) on the obverse and reverse side of the majority of coins which may be impurity/contaminated during smelting. The obverse/ reverse composition of all the coins shows the presence of silica in major quantities from 0.821 to 17.305%. Probably, silica could not be removed during the metallurgical process, which points towards poor workmanship for this hoard. Phosphorus in traces (0.021 to 0.025%) is present in all the studied coins. 

Obverse and Reverse view of the Late Kushan copper coins for XRF analysis    

Figure 1

coin 1

Figure 2

coin 5

Figure 3

coin 7

Figure 4

coin 26

Figure 5

coin 27

Figure 6

coin 36

Figure 7

coin 40

Figure 8

coin 56

Figure 9

coin 81

Figure 10

coin 98

Figure 11

coin 109

Figure 12

coin 12

Figure 13

coin 134

Figure 14

coin 184

Figure 15

coin 237

Figure 16

coin 245

Figure 17

coin 253  

Figure 18

coin 259

Figure 19

coin 265  

Figure 20

coin 302

Figure 21

coin 313

Figure 22

coin 335

X-Ray Fluorescence Spectroscopy Results of Late Kushan Copper Coins

Table 1

Elemental Analysis (mas. %) by WD-XRF of Late Kushan Copper Coins from Obverse and Reverse View

No	Element		Cu	Si	P	S	Ni	Pb	Ag	Co
1	Coin 1	Obverse Reverse	98.692 90.632	0.821 8.88	0.025 0.023	0.058 0.095	_ _	_ _	_ _	_ _
2	Coin 5	Obverse Reverse	77.339 75.916	15.591 15.668	0.021 0.021	0.101 0.105	0.022 0.037	0.135 0.273	4.768 5.014	_ _
3	Coin 7	Obverse Reverse	95.404 87.298	3.813 11.648	0.024 0.022	0.023 0.072	_ 0.001	_ _	_ _	_ _
4	Coin 26	Obverse Reverse	98.568 79.713	0.873 18.0	0.025 0.02	0.06 0.089	_ _	_ _	_ _	_ _
5	Coin 27	Obverse Reverse	98.386 86.509	0.924 12.587	0.025 0.022	0.036 0.069	_ 0.004	_ _	_ _	_ _
6	Coin 36	Obverse Reverse	98.594 89.277	0.893 10.032	0.025 0.022	0.035 0.166	_ _	_ _	_ _	_ _
7	Coin 40	Obverse Reverse	90.228 90.518	9.255 8.684	0.023 0.023	0.177 0.169	0.002 0.005	_ _	_ _	_ _
8	Coin 56	Obverse Reverse	81.671 77.721	14.578 17.305	0.021 0.021	0.121 0.094	0.043 0.044	_ _	_ _	_ _
9	Coin 81	Obverse Reverse	98.69 88.638	0.852 10.691	0.025 0.022	0.02 0.041	_ _	_ _	_ _	_ _
10	Coin 98	Obverse Reverse	94.934 84.648	4.088 14.431	0.024 0.021	0.045 0.02	_ _	_ _	_ _	_ _
11	Coin 109	Obverse Reverse	84.868 87.399	14.051 11.815	0.021 0.022	0.123 0.159	_ _	_ _	_ _	_ _
12	Coin 129	Obverse Reverse	97.18 90.358	2.067 8.404	0.024 0.062	0.054 0.068	_ _	_ _	_ _	_ _
13	Coin 134	Obverse Reverse	95.113 88.464	3.749 10.42	0.024 0.022	0.052 0.105	0.001 _	_ _	_ _	_ _
14	Coin 184	Obverse Reverse	97.956 87.661	0.967 11.345	0.025 0.022	0.02 0.087	_ _	_ _	_ _	_ _
15	Coin 237	Obverse Reverse	95.033 85.799	4.277 13.584	0.024 0.022	0.033 0.048	0.001 _	_ _	_ _	_ _
16	Coin 245	Obverse Reverse	97.548 86.28	1.691 12.955	0.025 0.022	0.039 0.051	_ _	_ _	_ _	_ _
17	Coin 253	Obverse Reverse	90.898 91.769	8.747 7.806	0.023 0.023	0.048 0.018	0.004 0.001	_ _	_ _	_ _
18	Coin 259	Obverse Reverse	96.284 90.321	3.008 8.689	0.024 0.023	0.058 0.106	0.006 0.004	_ _	_ _	_ _
19	Coin 265	Obverse Reverse	89.849 91.419	8.978 7.389	0.023 0.023	0.124 0.14	_ _	_ _	_ _	_ _
20	Coin 302	Obverse Reverse	96.608 89.47	2.862 9.963	0.024 0.022	0.031 0.092	_ 0.002	_ _	_ _	_ _
21	Coin 313	Obverse Reverse	95.806 90.628	3.223 8.486	0.024 0.023	0.05 0.094	0.05 0.043	_ _	_ _	0.169 0.145
22	Coin 335	Obverse Reverse	86.62 92.35	12.95 7.046	0.022 0.023	0.06 0.102	_ _	_ _	_ _	_ _

Figure 23obverse spectrum of coin 1

Figure 24

reverse spectrum of coin 1

Figure 25

obverse spectrum of coin 5

Figure 26

reverse spectrum of coin 5

Figure 27

obverse spectrum of coin 7

Figure 28

the reverse spectrum of coin 7

Figure 29

the obverse spectrum of coin 26

Figure 30

reverse spectrum of coin 26

Figure 31

obverse spectrum of coin 27

Figure 32

the reverse spectrum of coin 27

Figure 33

the obverse spectrum of coin 36

Figure 34

reverse spectrum of coin 36

Figure 35

the obverse spectrum of coin 40

Figure 36

reverse spectrum of coin 40

Figure 37

the obverse spectrum of coin 56

Figure 38

the reverse spectrum of coin 56

Figure 39

the obverse spectrum of coin 81

Figure 40

reverse spectrum of coin 81

Figure 41

the obverse spectrum of coin 98

Figure 42

the reverse spectrum of coin 98

Figure 43

the obverse spectrum of coin 109

Figure 44

the reverse spectrum of coin 109

Figure 45

the obverse spectrum of Coin 129

Figure 46

the reverse spectrum of coin 129

Figure 47

the obverse spectrum of coin 134

Figure 48

the reverse spectrum of coin 134

Figure 49

the obverse spectrum of coin 184

Figure 50

reverse spectrum of coin 184

Figure 51

the obverse spectrum of coin 237  

Figure 52

reverse spectrum of coin 237

Figure 53

the obverse spectrum of coin 245

Figure 54

reverse spectrum of coin 245

Figure 55

the obverse spectrum of coin 253

Figure 56

reverse spectrum of coin 253

Figure 57

the obverse spectrum of Coin 259

Figure 58

reverse spectrum of coin 259

Figure 59

the obverse spectrum of coin 26

Figure 60

reverse spectrum of coin 265

Figure 61

reverse spectrum of coin 302

Figure 62

the obverse spectrum of coin 302

Figure 63

the obverse spectrum of coin 313

Figure 64

reverse spectrum of coin 313

Figure 65

the obverse spectrum of coin 335