Defence of Insanity: Its Scope and Application in English law
English Law of Insanity proceeds in making assessments of the legal wrongfulness of an accused by fitting the circumstances within four slots established in line with M’Naghten case.During this process, the judges’ role becomes more robust than the jury as technical and medico legal issues are beyond the grasp of lay jury members.So we offered a critical appraisal of the approach adopted in English Law to fit the psychological science' in legal moulds through vast discretion vested in judges to deal with the defense of insanity. For this purpose, the authors extracted various pieces of information from case laws, books, law commission reports, Acts, statutes, and research articles published related to the subject matter and developed a synthesis to reach a conclusion. Our findings suggest the trial judge decides the extent and types of evidence to be induced for resolving the issues in contention regarding insanity and to be decided by the jury. Some issues pertaining to insanity are too difficult for the trial judge to decide, which requires expert evidence. The application of defense of insanity rests with the evaluation to see whether the judge's discretion has proved a right mechanism to plug medico legal gaps in this process or not.
-
Insanity- M’Naghten Rules- English Law- Criminal Law
-
(1) Muhammad Amjad Naeem
Department of Law, University of Northumbria, United Kingdom/Advocate High Court, Pakistan.
(2) Hamid Mukhtar
School of Law, University of Okara, Okara, Punjab, Pakistan
(3) Kashif Mahmood Saqib
School of Law, University of Okara, Okara, Punjab, Pakistan
- Alan, R., & Michael, B. (2014).
- Andrew, A. (2015). 'Criminal Law', Ch- Defences, OUP 2015, 4th Ed.
- Andrew, A., (2015). Criminal Law, fourth ed. Oxford University
- Banakar, R., & Travers, M. (2005). Theory and method in socio-legal research. Bloomsbury Publishing, UK.
- Bratty v AG for NI [1963] AC 386,
- Christina McElhone and Natalie Wortley,
- Christina, M., & Natalie, W. (2016). Criminal Law, fourth ed. Sweet and Maxwell.
- Clarkson, C. M. V., Keating, H. M., & Cunningham, S. R. (2007). Clarkson and Keating Criminal Law: Text and Materials, sixth ed. Sweet & Maxwell.
- Clarkson, C. M. V., Keating, H. M., Kyd, S., & Clarkson, C. M. V. (2010). Clarkson and Keating Criminal Law. Text and materials, sixth ed. Sweet & Maxwell.
- DPP v Harper [1997]. 1 WLR. 1406-1410
- Goldstein, J., & Katz, J. (1963). Abolish the Insanity Defence-why not? Yale Law J. 72(5), 853-876.
- Hage, & Jaap. (2014). Comparative law as method and the method of comparative law. The method and culture of comparative law 1(4), 37-52.
- Hallmark, A., & Ronald F. W. (2008). Systematic content analysis of judicial opinions. Calif. L. Rev. 96, 63-75.
- Howard, H. (2003). Reform of the Insanity Defence: Theoretical Issues. The J. Crim. Law 67(1), 51.
- Jacqueline, M., & Tony, S.
- Jeremy, H.
- Jonathan, H. (2003). Criminal Law: Texts, Cases and Materials, sixth ed. Commentary on case R v John. EWCA Crim. 3452, Oxford University Press.
- Jonathan, H. (2019).
- Jones, T. H. (1995).
- Loughnan, A. (2007). Manifest Madness: Towards a New Understanding of the Insanity Defence. Mod. Law Rev. 70(3): 379- 401.
- Mackay, I. (1992). The Sleepwalker is Not Insane. The Mod. Law Rev. 55(5), 714-720.
- Mackay, M., & Howe, 'Yet more facts about the Insanity Defence' [2006] Crim LR 399
- Mackay, R. (2009). Righting the Wrong? Some Observations on the Second Limb of the M'Naghten Rules. Crim. Law Rev., 1, 80-89.
- Mental Health Act. (2007). CPS guidelines on defence of insanity, published on 12th March 2019, CPS public archive.
- Ormerod, D. (2009). Smith and Hogan Criminal Law: Cases and Materials, tenth ed. Oxford University Press.
- Paul Roberts & Adrian Zukerman, Criminal Evidence, 3rd Ed. 2017
- Paul, R., & Adrian, Z. (2017). Criminal Evidence, Third Ed. Oxford University Press.
- Quick [1973] 3 WLR 26
- R v Bailey [1983] Crim. LR. 353
- R v Bingham [1991] Crim. LR. 43
- R v Burgess [1991] 2 WLR. 1206
- R v Clarke [1972] 1 All ER 219
- R v Codere [1917] 12 Cr App R 21
- R v Codere [1917] 12 Cr App R 21
- R v Dennis J Baker, 2016. Textbook of Criminal Law, fourth ed. On M'Naghten Rules, M'Naghten [1843] UKHL J16. Oxford University Press
- R v Hennessy [1989] 1 WLR. 287
- R v Johnson [2007] EWCA Crim 1978
- R v Johnson [2007] EWCA Crim 1978
- R v Johnson [2007] EWCA Crim 1978
- R v M'Naghten [1843] UKHL J16
Cite this article
-
APA : Naeem, M. A., Mukhtar, H., & Saqib, K. M. (2021). Defence of Insanity: Its Scope and Application in English law. Global Social Sciences Review, VI(II), 311-317. https://doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2021(VI-II).31
-
CHICAGO : Naeem, Muhammad Amjad, Hamid Mukhtar, and Kashif Mahmood Saqib. 2021. "Defence of Insanity: Its Scope and Application in English law." Global Social Sciences Review, VI (II): 311-317 doi: 10.31703/gssr.2021(VI-II).31
-
HARVARD : NAEEM, M. A., MUKHTAR, H. & SAQIB, K. M. 2021. Defence of Insanity: Its Scope and Application in English law. Global Social Sciences Review, VI, 311-317.
-
MHRA : Naeem, Muhammad Amjad, Hamid Mukhtar, and Kashif Mahmood Saqib. 2021. "Defence of Insanity: Its Scope and Application in English law." Global Social Sciences Review, VI: 311-317
-
MLA : Naeem, Muhammad Amjad, Hamid Mukhtar, and Kashif Mahmood Saqib. "Defence of Insanity: Its Scope and Application in English law." Global Social Sciences Review, VI.II (2021): 311-317 Print.
-
OXFORD : Naeem, Muhammad Amjad, Mukhtar, Hamid, and Saqib, Kashif Mahmood (2021), "Defence of Insanity: Its Scope and Application in English law", Global Social Sciences Review, VI (II), 311-317
-
TURABIAN : Naeem, Muhammad Amjad, Hamid Mukhtar, and Kashif Mahmood Saqib. "Defence of Insanity: Its Scope and Application in English law." Global Social Sciences Review VI, no. II (2021): 311-317. https://doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2021(VI-II).31