Glass Ceiling or Personal Barriers: A Study of Underrepresentation of Women in Senior Management
The glass ceiling has been termed the factor for underrepresentation of women in higher management positions. Pakistani society is believed to be dominated by men in all walks including positions in higher management. The purpose of this study is to explore whether it is the glass ceiling or the personal barriers that result in the underrepresentation phenomena of women in higher management. This exploratory study has surveyed, through a semi-structured interview, the middle and higher-level women manager from private organizations located in the twin cities of Rawalpindi and Islamabad. The findings suggest that it is not only glass ceiling barriers but also personal characteristics that hinder womens professional growth. The study also contributes to identifying personal and glass ceiling barriers and their relative importance.
-
(1) Marriam Ayub
Research Scholar, Department of Management Science, COMSATS University Islamabad, Pakistan.
(2) Rao Aamir Khan
Assistant Professor, Department of Management Science, COMSATS University Islamabad, Pakistan.
(3) Muhammad Khushnood
Assistant Professor,Institute of Business Studies,Kohat University of Science and Technology, Pakistan.
- Bain, O., & Cummings, W. (2000). Academe's glass ceiling: Societal, professional-organizational, and institutional barriers to the career advancement of academic women. Comparative Education Review, 44(4), 493-514.
- Bell, M. P., McLaughlin, M. E., & Sequeira, J. M. (2002). Discrimination, harassment, and the glass ceiling: Women executives as change agents. Journal of business ethics, 37(1), 65-76.
- Brower, R. L., Schwartz, R. A., & Bertrand Jones, T. (2019). 'Is it because I'ma woman?'Gender-based attributional ambiguity in higher education administration. Gender and Education, 31(1), 117-135.
- Cooper, J. J. (2001). Women middle managers' perception of the glass ceiling. Women in Management Review, 16(1), 30-41.
- Corbin, J. M., & Strauss, A. (1990). Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociology, 13(1), 3-21.
- Eyring, A., & Stead, B. A. (1998). Shattering the glass ceiling: Some successful corporate practices. Journal of business ethics, 17(3), 245-251.
- Hancock, M. G., & Hums, M. A. (2016). A
- Kay, F. M., & Brockman, J. (2000). Barriers to gender equality in the Canadian legal establishment. Feminist Legal Studies, 8(2), 169-198.
- Lemons, M. A. (2003). Contextual and cognitive determinants of procedural justice perceptions in promotion barriers for women. Sex Roles, 49(5-6), 247-264.
- Li, C. A., & Wearing, R. T. (2001). The glass ceiling and directors of large UK quoted companies: Department of Accounting, Finance and Management, University of Essex.
- Linehan, M., & Scullion, H. (2001). European female expatriate careers: Critical success factors. Journal of European Industrial Training, 25(8), 392-418
- Longman, K. (2018). Perspectives on Women's Higher Education Leadership from Around the World: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute.
- Mathur-Helm, B. (2006). Women and the glass ceiling in South African banks: an illusion or reality? Women in Management Review, 21(4), 311-326.
- Mattis, M. C. (2004). Women entrepreneurs: out from under the glass ceiling. Women in Management Review, 19(3), 154-163.
- Mirza, A. M. B., & Jabeen, N. (2011). Gender Stereotypes and Women in Management The Case of Banking Sector of Pakistan. South Asian Studies (1026-678X), 26(2).
- Morrison, A. M., White, R. P., & Van Velsor, E. (1987). Breaking The Glass Ceiling: Can Women Reach The Top Of America's Largestcorporations? : Pearson Education.
- Muhwezi, L., Acai, J., & Otim, G. (2014). An assessment of the factors causing delays on building construction projects in Uganda. International Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 3(1), 13-23
- Naff, K. C. (1994). Through the glass ceiling: Prospects for the advancement of women in the federal civil service. Public Administration Review, 507-514.
- Oakley, J. G. (2000). Gender-based barriers to senior management positions: Understanding the scarcity of female CEOs. Journal of business ethics, 27(4), 321-334.
- PBS. (2018). Labour Force Survey 2017-18 (Annual Report). Pakistan: Pakistan Bureau of Statistics
- Ragins, B. R., Townsend, B., & Mattis, M. (1998). Gender gap in the executive suite: CEOs and female executives report on breaking the glass ceiling. Academy of Management Perspectives, 12(1), 28-42.
- Shafiq, F. (2014). Glass ceiling effect: A focus on Pakistani women. International Journal of Science and Research, 3(1), 136-139.
- Shafiq, F. (2014). Glass ceiling effect: A focus on Pakistani women. International Journal of Science and Research, 3(1), 136-139.
- Shoaib, S., Khan, R. S., & Khan, S. A. (2010). The glass ceiling effect: A Pakistani perspective. Business Review, 5(1), 79-90.
- Somiah, M., Osei-Poku, G., & Aidoo, I. (2015). Relative importance analysis of factors influencing unauthorized siting of residential buildings in the Sekondi-Takoradi Metropolis of Ghana. Journal of Building Construction and Planning Research, 3(03), 117.
- Syed, J. (2009). Reconstruction of gender in Islamic thought: Iqbal's vision of equal opportunity. Paper presented at the Women's Studies International Forum.
- Tabak, F. (1997). Women's upward mobility in manufacturing organizations in Istanbul: A glass ceiling initiative? Sex roles, 36(1-2), 93-102.
- Tandrayen-Ragoobur, V., & Pydayya, R. (2015). Glass ceiling and sticky floors: Hurdles for Mauritian working women. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal, 34(5), 452-466.
- Tlaiss, H., & Kauser, S. (2010). Perceived organizational barriers to women's career advancement in Lebanon. Gender in Management: An International Journal, 25(6), 462-496
- Tracey, C. (2006). The glass ceiling in Irish healthcare: a nursing perspective. Journal of health organization and management, 20(6), 502-511.
- Walker, R. C., & Aritz, J. (2015). Women doing leadership: Leadership styles and organizational culture. International Journal of Business Communication, 52(4), 452-478.
- Weyer, B. (2007). Twenty years later: explaining the persistence of the glass ceiling for women leaders. Women in Management Review, 22(6), 482-496.
- Yusoff, I. Y. M., Kassim, Z. A., & Seenivasa, N. (2011). Perceived barriers for women's career progression and its impact towards job performance in multinational companies in Malaysia. Paper presented at the 2011 IEEE Symposium on Business, Engineering and Industrial Applications (ISBEIA).
Cite this article
-
APA : Ayub, M., Khan, R. A., & Khushnood, M. (2019). Glass Ceiling or Personal Barriers: A Study of Underrepresentation of Women in Senior Management. Global Social Sciences Review, IV(IV), 126-134. https://doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2019(IV-IV).17
-
CHICAGO : Ayub, Marriam, Rao Aamir Khan, and Muhammad Khushnood. 2019. "Glass Ceiling or Personal Barriers: A Study of Underrepresentation of Women in Senior Management." Global Social Sciences Review, IV (IV): 126-134 doi: 10.31703/gssr.2019(IV-IV).17
-
HARVARD : AYUB, M., KHAN, R. A. & KHUSHNOOD, M. 2019. Glass Ceiling or Personal Barriers: A Study of Underrepresentation of Women in Senior Management. Global Social Sciences Review, IV, 126-134.
-
MHRA : Ayub, Marriam, Rao Aamir Khan, and Muhammad Khushnood. 2019. "Glass Ceiling or Personal Barriers: A Study of Underrepresentation of Women in Senior Management." Global Social Sciences Review, IV: 126-134
-
MLA : Ayub, Marriam, Rao Aamir Khan, and Muhammad Khushnood. "Glass Ceiling or Personal Barriers: A Study of Underrepresentation of Women in Senior Management." Global Social Sciences Review, IV.IV (2019): 126-134 Print.
-
OXFORD : Ayub, Marriam, Khan, Rao Aamir, and Khushnood, Muhammad (2019), "Glass Ceiling or Personal Barriers: A Study of Underrepresentation of Women in Senior Management", Global Social Sciences Review, IV (IV), 126-134
-
TURABIAN : Ayub, Marriam, Rao Aamir Khan, and Muhammad Khushnood. "Glass Ceiling or Personal Barriers: A Study of Underrepresentation of Women in Senior Management." Global Social Sciences Review IV, no. IV (2019): 126-134. https://doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2019(IV-IV).17