A Comparative Exploration of the Effect of Differentiated Teaching Method vs. Traditional Teaching Method on Students Learning at A level
This study explores the effect of differentiated teaching method vs. traditional teaching method on students’ learning at ‘A’ level. It is an experimental research, conducted in Aitchison College. By applying simple random sampling technique, 70 students are selected as a sample from the population. Pre-test and post-test are conducted for data collection. Research investigates, how differentiated method of teaching effects learners’ academic achievement. The retention level of the students who are taught via differentiated teaching and traditional teaching method is. After conducting a posttest, data is analyzed with pair-sample and independent sample t-test by using SPSS. Analysis shows that the students taught via differentiated teaching have more power of retention than the students taught via traditional teaching methods. The control group perform up to application level while experimental group perform up to evaluation level of cognitive domain.
-
(1) Muhammad Kamran
PhD Scholar, The University of Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan.
(2) Namra Munir
Assistant Professor, Department of Education,The University of Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan.
(3) Rashid Minas Wattoo
Assistant Professor, Department of Education,The University of Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan.
- Admins, S., M. (2011). Teachers tailor their instruction to meet a variety of students' needs. Journal of Staff Development, pg. 22(2) 1-5
- Hestenes, D., & Halloun, I. (2014). Modeling Instruction in Mechanics. American Journal of Physics, pp. 55, 455- 462
- Kareem, L., O. (2013). Effects of audio-graphic self-instructional packages on senior secondary school students' performance in biology. Unpublished PhD Thesis University of Ilorin, pp. 76-81
- Koeze, P., A. (2008). Differentiated Instruction: The Effect on Student Achievement in an Elementary School. Master's Theses and Doctoral Dissertations, Eastern Michigan University, pp. 56-59
- Ugbaja, et al. (2011). Effects of audio-graphic self-instructional packages on senior secondary school students' performance in biology in rural area in Nigeria. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Ilorin.
Cite this article
-
APA : Kamran, M., Munir, N., & Wattoo, R. M. (2019). A Comparative Exploration of the Effect of Differentiated Teaching Method vs. Traditional Teaching Method on Students Learning at A level. Global Social Sciences Review, IV(I), 61-66. https://doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2019(IV-I).08
-
CHICAGO : Kamran, Muhammad, Namra Munir, and Rashid Minas Wattoo. 2019. "A Comparative Exploration of the Effect of Differentiated Teaching Method vs. Traditional Teaching Method on Students Learning at A level." Global Social Sciences Review, IV (I): 61-66 doi: 10.31703/gssr.2019(IV-I).08
-
HARVARD : KAMRAN, M., MUNIR, N. & WATTOO, R. M. 2019. A Comparative Exploration of the Effect of Differentiated Teaching Method vs. Traditional Teaching Method on Students Learning at A level. Global Social Sciences Review, IV, 61-66.
-
MHRA : Kamran, Muhammad, Namra Munir, and Rashid Minas Wattoo. 2019. "A Comparative Exploration of the Effect of Differentiated Teaching Method vs. Traditional Teaching Method on Students Learning at A level." Global Social Sciences Review, IV: 61-66
-
MLA : Kamran, Muhammad, Namra Munir, and Rashid Minas Wattoo. "A Comparative Exploration of the Effect of Differentiated Teaching Method vs. Traditional Teaching Method on Students Learning at A level." Global Social Sciences Review, IV.I (2019): 61-66 Print.
-
OXFORD : Kamran, Muhammad, Munir, Namra, and Wattoo, Rashid Minas (2019), "A Comparative Exploration of the Effect of Differentiated Teaching Method vs. Traditional Teaching Method on Students Learning at A level", Global Social Sciences Review, IV (I), 61-66
-
TURABIAN : Kamran, Muhammad, Namra Munir, and Rashid Minas Wattoo. "A Comparative Exploration of the Effect of Differentiated Teaching Method vs. Traditional Teaching Method on Students Learning at A level." Global Social Sciences Review IV, no. I (2019): 61-66. https://doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2019(IV-I).08