DEFENCE OF INSANITY ITS SCOPE AND APPLICATION IN ENGLISH LAW

http://dx.doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2021(VI-II).31      10.31703/gssr.2021(VI-II).31      Published : Jun 2
Authored by : Muhammad Amjad Naeem , Hamid Mukhtar , Kashif Mahmood Saqib

31 Pages : 311-317

References

  • Alan, R., & Michael, B. (2014).
  • Andrew, A. (2015). 'Criminal Law', Ch- Defences, OUP 2015, 4th Ed.
  • Andrew, A., (2015). Criminal Law, fourth ed. Oxford University
  • Banakar, R., & Travers, M. (2005). Theory and method in socio-legal research. Bloomsbury Publishing, UK.
  • Bratty v AG for NI [1963] AC 386,
  • Christina McElhone and Natalie Wortley,
  • Christina, M., & Natalie, W. (2016). Criminal Law, fourth ed. Sweet and Maxwell.
  • Clarkson, C. M. V., Keating, H. M., & Cunningham, S. R. (2007). Clarkson and Keating Criminal Law: Text and Materials, sixth ed. Sweet & Maxwell.
  • Clarkson, C. M. V., Keating, H. M., Kyd, S., & Clarkson, C. M. V. (2010). Clarkson and Keating Criminal Law. Text and materials, sixth ed. Sweet & Maxwell.
  • DPP v Harper [1997]. 1 WLR. 1406-1410
  • Goldstein, J., & Katz, J. (1963). Abolish the Insanity Defence-why not? Yale Law J. 72(5), 853-876.
  • Hage, & Jaap. (2014). Comparative law as method and the method of comparative law. The method and culture of comparative law 1(4), 37-52.
  • Hallmark, A., & Ronald F. W. (2008). Systematic content analysis of judicial opinions. Calif. L. Rev. 96, 63-75.
  • Howard, H. (2003). Reform of the Insanity Defence: Theoretical Issues. The J. Crim. Law 67(1), 51.
  • Jacqueline, M., & Tony, S.
  • Jeremy, H.
  • Jonathan, H. (2003). Criminal Law: Texts, Cases and Materials, sixth ed. Commentary on case R v John. EWCA Crim. 3452, Oxford University Press.
  • Jonathan, H. (2019).
  • Jones, T. H. (1995).
  • Loughnan, A. (2007). Manifest Madness: Towards a New Understanding of the Insanity Defence. Mod. Law Rev. 70(3): 379- 401.
  • Mackay, I. (1992). The Sleepwalker is Not Insane. The Mod. Law Rev. 55(5), 714-720.
  • Mackay, M., & Howe, 'Yet more facts about the Insanity Defence' [2006] Crim LR 399
  • Mackay, R. (2009). Righting the Wrong? Some Observations on the Second Limb of the M'Naghten Rules. Crim. Law Rev., 1, 80-89.
  • Mental Health Act. (2007). CPS guidelines on defence of insanity, published on 12th March 2019, CPS public archive.
  • Ormerod, D. (2009). Smith and Hogan Criminal Law: Cases and Materials, tenth ed. Oxford University Press.
  • Paul Roberts & Adrian Zukerman, Criminal Evidence, 3rd Ed. 2017
  • Paul, R., & Adrian, Z. (2017). Criminal Evidence, Third Ed. Oxford University Press.
  • Quick [1973] 3 WLR 26
  • R v Bailey [1983] Crim. LR. 353
  • R v Bingham [1991] Crim. LR. 43
  • R v Burgess [1991] 2 WLR. 1206
  • R v Clarke [1972] 1 All ER 219
  • R v Codere [1917] 12 Cr App R 21
  • R v Codere [1917] 12 Cr App R 21
  • R v Dennis J Baker, 2016. Textbook of Criminal Law, fourth ed. On M'Naghten Rules, M'Naghten [1843] UKHL J16. Oxford University Press
  • R v Hennessy [1989] 1 WLR. 287
  • R v Johnson [2007] EWCA Crim 1978
  • R v Johnson [2007] EWCA Crim 1978
  • R v Johnson [2007] EWCA Crim 1978
  • R v M'Naghten [1843] UKHL J16
  • Alan, R., & Michael, B. (2014).
  • Andrew, A. (2015). 'Criminal Law', Ch- Defences, OUP 2015, 4th Ed.
  • Andrew, A., (2015). Criminal Law, fourth ed. Oxford University
  • Banakar, R., & Travers, M. (2005). Theory and method in socio-legal research. Bloomsbury Publishing, UK.
  • Bratty v AG for NI [1963] AC 386,
  • Christina McElhone and Natalie Wortley,
  • Christina, M., & Natalie, W. (2016). Criminal Law, fourth ed. Sweet and Maxwell.
  • Clarkson, C. M. V., Keating, H. M., & Cunningham, S. R. (2007). Clarkson and Keating Criminal Law: Text and Materials, sixth ed. Sweet & Maxwell.
  • Clarkson, C. M. V., Keating, H. M., Kyd, S., & Clarkson, C. M. V. (2010). Clarkson and Keating Criminal Law. Text and materials, sixth ed. Sweet & Maxwell.
  • DPP v Harper [1997]. 1 WLR. 1406-1410
  • Goldstein, J., & Katz, J. (1963). Abolish the Insanity Defence-why not? Yale Law J. 72(5), 853-876.
  • Hage, & Jaap. (2014). Comparative law as method and the method of comparative law. The method and culture of comparative law 1(4), 37-52.
  • Hallmark, A., & Ronald F. W. (2008). Systematic content analysis of judicial opinions. Calif. L. Rev. 96, 63-75.
  • Howard, H. (2003). Reform of the Insanity Defence: Theoretical Issues. The J. Crim. Law 67(1), 51.
  • Jacqueline, M., & Tony, S.
  • Jeremy, H.
  • Jonathan, H. (2003). Criminal Law: Texts, Cases and Materials, sixth ed. Commentary on case R v John. EWCA Crim. 3452, Oxford University Press.
  • Jonathan, H. (2019).
  • Jones, T. H. (1995).
  • Loughnan, A. (2007). Manifest Madness: Towards a New Understanding of the Insanity Defence. Mod. Law Rev. 70(3): 379- 401.
  • Mackay, I. (1992). The Sleepwalker is Not Insane. The Mod. Law Rev. 55(5), 714-720.
  • Mackay, M., & Howe, 'Yet more facts about the Insanity Defence' [2006] Crim LR 399
  • Mackay, R. (2009). Righting the Wrong? Some Observations on the Second Limb of the M'Naghten Rules. Crim. Law Rev., 1, 80-89.
  • Mental Health Act. (2007). CPS guidelines on defence of insanity, published on 12th March 2019, CPS public archive.
  • Ormerod, D. (2009). Smith and Hogan Criminal Law: Cases and Materials, tenth ed. Oxford University Press.
  • Paul Roberts & Adrian Zukerman, Criminal Evidence, 3rd Ed. 2017
  • Paul, R., & Adrian, Z. (2017). Criminal Evidence, Third Ed. Oxford University Press.
  • Quick [1973] 3 WLR 26
  • R v Bailey [1983] Crim. LR. 353
  • R v Bingham [1991] Crim. LR. 43
  • R v Burgess [1991] 2 WLR. 1206
  • R v Clarke [1972] 1 All ER 219
  • R v Codere [1917] 12 Cr App R 21
  • R v Codere [1917] 12 Cr App R 21
  • R v Dennis J Baker, 2016. Textbook of Criminal Law, fourth ed. On M'Naghten Rules, M'Naghten [1843] UKHL J16. Oxford University Press
  • R v Hennessy [1989] 1 WLR. 287
  • R v Johnson [2007] EWCA Crim 1978
  • R v Johnson [2007] EWCA Crim 1978
  • R v Johnson [2007] EWCA Crim 1978
  • R v M'Naghten [1843] UKHL J16

Cite this article

    CHICAGO : Naeem, Muhammad Amjad, Hamid Mukhtar, and Kashif Mahmood Saqib. 2021. "Defence of Insanity: Its Scope and Application in English law." Global Social Sciences Review, VI (II): 311-317 doi: 10.31703/gssr.2021(VI-II).31
    HARVARD : NAEEM, M. A., MUKHTAR, H. & SAQIB, K. M. 2021. Defence of Insanity: Its Scope and Application in English law. Global Social Sciences Review, VI, 311-317.
    MHRA : Naeem, Muhammad Amjad, Hamid Mukhtar, and Kashif Mahmood Saqib. 2021. "Defence of Insanity: Its Scope and Application in English law." Global Social Sciences Review, VI: 311-317
    MLA : Naeem, Muhammad Amjad, Hamid Mukhtar, and Kashif Mahmood Saqib. "Defence of Insanity: Its Scope and Application in English law." Global Social Sciences Review, VI.II (2021): 311-317 Print.
    OXFORD : Naeem, Muhammad Amjad, Mukhtar, Hamid, and Saqib, Kashif Mahmood (2021), "Defence of Insanity: Its Scope and Application in English law", Global Social Sciences Review, VI (II), 311-317
    TURABIAN : Naeem, Muhammad Amjad, Hamid Mukhtar, and Kashif Mahmood Saqib. "Defence of Insanity: Its Scope and Application in English law." Global Social Sciences Review VI, no. II (2021): 311-317. https://doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2021(VI-II).31