References

• Abercrombie, D. (2000). Elements of general phonetics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
• Anderson, S. R. (1985). Phonology in the Twentieth Century: Theories of Rules and Theories of Representations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Blevins, J. (1995). The syllable in phonological theory. In Goldsmith, J. (Ed.), The handbook of phonological theory. (pp. 206-244). Oxford: Blackwell.
• Brockhaus, W., Durand, J., & Katamba, F. (Ed.). (1995). Skeletal and suprasegmental structure within Government Phonology. In Frontiers of Phonology: atoms, structures, derivations. (pp.180- 221). Harlow, Essex: Longman.
• Brook, G. L. (1979). Varieties of English. (2nd ed.). London: Macmillan.
• Carr, P. (1993). Phonology. London: The Macmillan Press Limited.
• Chomsky, N., & Halle, M. (1968). The sound Pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.
• Clark, J & Yallop, C. (1995). An Introduction to Phonetics and Phonology (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.
• Clements, N. & Keyser, J. (1983). CV-phonology: A generative theory of the syllable. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Duanmu, S., Kim, H. & Stiennon, N. (2005). Stress and Syllable Structure in English: Approaches to Phonological Variation. Taiwan Journal of Linguistics, 3(2), 45-78.
• Durand, J. (1990). Generative and non-linear phonology. London and New York: Longman.
• Everett, D. & Everett, K. (1984). On the relevance of syllable onsets to stress placement. Linguistic Inquiry, 15 (4), 705-711.
• Fallows, D. (1981). Experimental evidence for English syllabification and syllable structure. Journal of Linguistics, 17 (2), 309-17.
• Goedemans, R. & Hulst, H.G. van der (2005). Rhythm types. In Martin Haspelmath, Matthew Dryer, David Gil and Bernard Comrie (Eds.), The world atlas of linguistic structures, (pp. 74-77).
• Goldsmith, J. (1990). Autosegmental and Metrical Phonology. Oxford: Blackwell.
• Gordon, M. (2004). Syllable weight. In Phonetically based phonology. In Hayes, B., Kirchner, R & Steriade, D. (Eds.), (pp. 277-312). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
• Hammond, M. (1995). Metrical Phonology. Annual Review Anthropology, 24, 313-342
• Hammond, M. (1997). Vowel quality and syllabification in English. Language 73 (1), 1-17.
• Hansen, J.G. (2006). Acquiring a non-native phonology. London: Continuum.
• Hawkins, P. (1984). Introducing phonology. London: Hutchinson.
• Hayes, B. (1989). Metrics and phonological theory. In Newmeyer, F.J. (Ed.), Linguistics: The Cambridge Survey: Linguistic Theory: Extensions and Implications, (Vol. 2), (pp. 220-249). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
• Hogg, R. & McCully, C.B. (1987). Metrical Phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Hussain, S. (2010). Phonetic correlates of lexical stress in Urdu. Islamabad: National Language Authority.
• Itô, J. 1986. Syllable Theory in Prosodic Phonology. PhD, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
• Jenkins, J. (2000). The phonology of English as an International language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Jones, D. (1956). The pronunciation of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Katamba, F. (1989). An Introduction to Phonology. London and New York: Longman.
• Levelt, C.C & Vijver, R.V.D. (2004). Syllable types in cross-linguistic and developmental grammars. In Kager, R.; Pater, J.& Zonneveld, W. (Eds.), Constraints in phonological acquisition. (pp. 204-218). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Lodge, K. (2009). Fundamental Concepts in phonology: Sameness and difference. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
• Maddieson, I. (2005). Syllable structure. In M. Haspelmath, M. S. Dryer, D. Gil, & B. Comrie, (Eds.), World Atlas of Language Structures. (pp. 54-57). Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
• Marlett, S. (2001). An Introduction to phonological analysis. Summer Institute of Linguistics (SIL).
• McCarthy, J. J. (1979). On Stress and Syllabification. Linguistic Inquiry, 10 (3), 443-465. MIT Press.
• McMahon, A. (2002). Lexical phonology and the history of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Nesset, T. (2008). Abstract phonology in a concrete model: Cognitive linguistics and the morphology-phonology interface. Berlin: Mount de Gruyter
• O'Grady, W., Dobrovolsky, M. & Katamba, F. (Eds.). (1996). Contemporary Linguistic: An Introduction. London & New York: Longman
• Roca, I. & Johnson, W. (1999). A Course in Phonology. Oxford: Blackwell.
• Selkirk, E. (1982). The syllable. In Hulst, H. and Smith, N. (Eds.), The structure of phonological representations, Part 2: (pp. 337-383). Dordrecht: Foris.
• Selkirk, E. (1984). On the major class features and syllable theory. In Aronoff, M. & Oehrle, R. (Eds.), Language Sound Structures. (pp. 107-136). Cambridge: MIT Press.
• Tranel, B. (1991). CVC light syllable, Geminates and Moraic theory. Phonology 8, 291-302.
• Yule, G. (2010). The study of language. (4th ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Zec, D. (1995). The role of moraic structure in the distribution of segments within syllables. In Durand, J. & Katamba, F.(Eds.), Frontiers of Phonology: Atoms, Structures, Derivations. (pp.149-179). London, Longman.