References
- Abercrombie, D. (2000). Elements of general phonetics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
- Anderson, S. R. (1985). Phonology in the Twentieth Century: Theories of Rules and Theories of Representations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Blevins, J. (1995). The syllable in phonological theory. In Goldsmith, J. (Ed.), The handbook of phonological theory. (pp. 206-244). Oxford: Blackwell.
- Brockhaus, W., Durand, J., & Katamba, F. (Ed.). (1995). Skeletal and suprasegmental structure within Government Phonology. In Frontiers of Phonology: atoms, structures, derivations. (pp.180- 221). Harlow, Essex: Longman.
- Brook, G. L. (1979). Varieties of English. (2nd ed.). London: Macmillan.
- Carr, P. (1993). Phonology. London: The Macmillan Press Limited.
- Chomsky, N., & Halle, M. (1968). The sound Pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.
- Clark, J & Yallop, C. (1995). An Introduction to Phonetics and Phonology (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.
- Clements, N. & Keyser, J. (1983). CV-phonology: A generative theory of the syllable. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Duanmu, S., Kim, H. & Stiennon, N. (2005). Stress and Syllable Structure in English: Approaches to Phonological Variation. Taiwan Journal of Linguistics, 3(2), 45-78.
- Durand, J. (1990). Generative and non-linear phonology. London and New York: Longman.
- Everett, D. & Everett, K. (1984). On the relevance of syllable onsets to stress placement. Linguistic Inquiry, 15 (4), 705-711.
- Fallows, D. (1981). Experimental evidence for English syllabification and syllable structure. Journal of Linguistics, 17 (2), 309-17.
- Goedemans, R. & Hulst, H.G. van der (2005). Rhythm types. In Martin Haspelmath, Matthew Dryer, David Gil and Bernard Comrie (Eds.), The world atlas of linguistic structures, (pp. 74-77).
- Goldsmith, J. (1990). Autosegmental and Metrical Phonology. Oxford: Blackwell.
- Gordon, M. (2004). Syllable weight. In Phonetically based phonology. In Hayes, B., Kirchner, R & Steriade, D. (Eds.), (pp. 277-312). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
- Hammond, M. (1995). Metrical Phonology. Annual Review Anthropology, 24, 313-342
- Hammond, M. (1997). Vowel quality and syllabification in English. Language 73 (1), 1-17.
- Hansen, J.G. (2006). Acquiring a non-native phonology. London: Continuum.
- Hawkins, P. (1984). Introducing phonology. London: Hutchinson.
- Hayes, B. (1989). Metrics and phonological theory. In Newmeyer, F.J. (Ed.), Linguistics: The Cambridge Survey: Linguistic Theory: Extensions and Implications, (Vol. 2), (pp. 220-249). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
- Hogg, R. & McCully, C.B. (1987). Metrical Phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Hussain, S. (2010). Phonetic correlates of lexical stress in Urdu. Islamabad: National Language Authority.
- Itô, J. 1986. Syllable Theory in Prosodic Phonology. PhD, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
- Jenkins, J. (2000). The phonology of English as an International language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Jones, D. (1956). The pronunciation of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Katamba, F. (1989). An Introduction to Phonology. London and New York: Longman.
- Levelt, C.C & Vijver, R.V.D. (2004). Syllable types in cross-linguistic and developmental grammars. In Kager, R.; Pater, J.& Zonneveld, W. (Eds.), Constraints in phonological acquisition. (pp. 204-218). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Lodge, K. (2009). Fundamental Concepts in phonology: Sameness and difference. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
- Maddieson, I. (2005). Syllable structure. In M. Haspelmath, M. S. Dryer, D. Gil, & B. Comrie, (Eds.), World Atlas of Language Structures. (pp. 54-57). Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
- Marlett, S. (2001). An Introduction to phonological analysis. Summer Institute of Linguistics (SIL).
- McCarthy, J. J. (1979). On Stress and Syllabification. Linguistic Inquiry, 10 (3), 443-465. MIT Press.
- McMahon, A. (2002). Lexical phonology and the history of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Nesset, T. (2008). Abstract phonology in a concrete model: Cognitive linguistics and the morphology-phonology interface. Berlin: Mount de Gruyter
- O'Grady, W., Dobrovolsky, M. & Katamba, F. (Eds.). (1996). Contemporary Linguistic: An Introduction. London & New York: Longman
- Roca, I. & Johnson, W. (1999). A Course in Phonology. Oxford: Blackwell.
- Selkirk, E. (1982). The syllable. In Hulst, H. and Smith, N. (Eds.), The structure of phonological representations, Part 2: (pp. 337-383). Dordrecht: Foris.
- Selkirk, E. (1984). On the major class features and syllable theory. In Aronoff, M. & Oehrle, R. (Eds.), Language Sound Structures. (pp. 107-136). Cambridge: MIT Press.
- Tranel, B. (1991). CVC light syllable, Geminates and Moraic theory. Phonology 8, 291-302.
- Yule, G. (2010). The study of language. (4th ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Zec, D. (1995). The role of moraic structure in the distribution of segments within syllables. In Durand, J. & Katamba, F.(Eds.), Frontiers of Phonology: Atoms, Structures, Derivations. (pp.149-179). London, Longman.
- Abercrombie, D. (2000). Elements of general phonetics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
- Anderson, S. R. (1985). Phonology in the Twentieth Century: Theories of Rules and Theories of Representations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Blevins, J. (1995). The syllable in phonological theory. In Goldsmith, J. (Ed.), The handbook of phonological theory. (pp. 206-244). Oxford: Blackwell.
- Brockhaus, W., Durand, J., & Katamba, F. (Ed.). (1995). Skeletal and suprasegmental structure within Government Phonology. In Frontiers of Phonology: atoms, structures, derivations. (pp.180- 221). Harlow, Essex: Longman.
- Brook, G. L. (1979). Varieties of English. (2nd ed.). London: Macmillan.
- Carr, P. (1993). Phonology. London: The Macmillan Press Limited.
- Chomsky, N., & Halle, M. (1968). The sound Pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.
- Clark, J & Yallop, C. (1995). An Introduction to Phonetics and Phonology (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.
- Clements, N. & Keyser, J. (1983). CV-phonology: A generative theory of the syllable. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Duanmu, S., Kim, H. & Stiennon, N. (2005). Stress and Syllable Structure in English: Approaches to Phonological Variation. Taiwan Journal of Linguistics, 3(2), 45-78.
- Durand, J. (1990). Generative and non-linear phonology. London and New York: Longman.
- Everett, D. & Everett, K. (1984). On the relevance of syllable onsets to stress placement. Linguistic Inquiry, 15 (4), 705-711.
- Fallows, D. (1981). Experimental evidence for English syllabification and syllable structure. Journal of Linguistics, 17 (2), 309-17.
- Goedemans, R. & Hulst, H.G. van der (2005). Rhythm types. In Martin Haspelmath, Matthew Dryer, David Gil and Bernard Comrie (Eds.), The world atlas of linguistic structures, (pp. 74-77).
- Goldsmith, J. (1990). Autosegmental and Metrical Phonology. Oxford: Blackwell.
- Gordon, M. (2004). Syllable weight. In Phonetically based phonology. In Hayes, B., Kirchner, R & Steriade, D. (Eds.), (pp. 277-312). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
- Hammond, M. (1995). Metrical Phonology. Annual Review Anthropology, 24, 313-342
- Hammond, M. (1997). Vowel quality and syllabification in English. Language 73 (1), 1-17.
- Hansen, J.G. (2006). Acquiring a non-native phonology. London: Continuum.
- Hawkins, P. (1984). Introducing phonology. London: Hutchinson.
- Hayes, B. (1989). Metrics and phonological theory. In Newmeyer, F.J. (Ed.), Linguistics: The Cambridge Survey: Linguistic Theory: Extensions and Implications, (Vol. 2), (pp. 220-249). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
- Hogg, R. & McCully, C.B. (1987). Metrical Phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Hussain, S. (2010). Phonetic correlates of lexical stress in Urdu. Islamabad: National Language Authority.
- Itô, J. 1986. Syllable Theory in Prosodic Phonology. PhD, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
- Jenkins, J. (2000). The phonology of English as an International language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Jones, D. (1956). The pronunciation of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Katamba, F. (1989). An Introduction to Phonology. London and New York: Longman.
- Levelt, C.C & Vijver, R.V.D. (2004). Syllable types in cross-linguistic and developmental grammars. In Kager, R.; Pater, J.& Zonneveld, W. (Eds.), Constraints in phonological acquisition. (pp. 204-218). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Lodge, K. (2009). Fundamental Concepts in phonology: Sameness and difference. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
- Maddieson, I. (2005). Syllable structure. In M. Haspelmath, M. S. Dryer, D. Gil, & B. Comrie, (Eds.), World Atlas of Language Structures. (pp. 54-57). Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
- Marlett, S. (2001). An Introduction to phonological analysis. Summer Institute of Linguistics (SIL).
- McCarthy, J. J. (1979). On Stress and Syllabification. Linguistic Inquiry, 10 (3), 443-465. MIT Press.
- McMahon, A. (2002). Lexical phonology and the history of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Nesset, T. (2008). Abstract phonology in a concrete model: Cognitive linguistics and the morphology-phonology interface. Berlin: Mount de Gruyter
- O'Grady, W., Dobrovolsky, M. & Katamba, F. (Eds.). (1996). Contemporary Linguistic: An Introduction. London & New York: Longman
- Roca, I. & Johnson, W. (1999). A Course in Phonology. Oxford: Blackwell.
- Selkirk, E. (1982). The syllable. In Hulst, H. and Smith, N. (Eds.), The structure of phonological representations, Part 2: (pp. 337-383). Dordrecht: Foris.
- Selkirk, E. (1984). On the major class features and syllable theory. In Aronoff, M. & Oehrle, R. (Eds.), Language Sound Structures. (pp. 107-136). Cambridge: MIT Press.
- Tranel, B. (1991). CVC light syllable, Geminates and Moraic theory. Phonology 8, 291-302.
- Yule, G. (2010). The study of language. (4th ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Zec, D. (1995). The role of moraic structure in the distribution of segments within syllables. In Durand, J. & Katamba, F.(Eds.), Frontiers of Phonology: Atoms, Structures, Derivations. (pp.149-179). London, Longman.
Cite this article
-
APA : Kamran, U., Maqbool, S., & Umar, L. (2020). Syllable Structure of Pakistani English in Phonological Theory. Global Social Sciences Review, V(I), 300-312. https://doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2020(V-I).31
-
CHICAGO : Kamran, Umaima, Saira Maqbool, and Lubna Umar. 2020. "Syllable Structure of Pakistani English in Phonological Theory." Global Social Sciences Review, V (I): 300-312 doi: 10.31703/gssr.2020(V-I).31
-
HARVARD : KAMRAN, U., MAQBOOL, S. & UMAR, L. 2020. Syllable Structure of Pakistani English in Phonological Theory. Global Social Sciences Review, V, 300-312.
-
MHRA : Kamran, Umaima, Saira Maqbool, and Lubna Umar. 2020. "Syllable Structure of Pakistani English in Phonological Theory." Global Social Sciences Review, V: 300-312
-
MLA : Kamran, Umaima, Saira Maqbool, and Lubna Umar. "Syllable Structure of Pakistani English in Phonological Theory." Global Social Sciences Review, V.I (2020): 300-312 Print.
-
OXFORD : Kamran, Umaima, Maqbool, Saira, and Umar, Lubna (2020), "Syllable Structure of Pakistani English in Phonological Theory", Global Social Sciences Review, V (I), 300-312
-
TURABIAN : Kamran, Umaima, Saira Maqbool, and Lubna Umar. "Syllable Structure of Pakistani English in Phonological Theory." Global Social Sciences Review V, no. I (2020): 300-312. https://doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2020(V-I).31