MUCH OF A MUCHNESS THE ROLE OF GENDER SIMILARITY IN A RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN LMX AND OCB

http://dx.doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2018(III-IV).19      10.31703/gssr.2018(III-IV).19      Published : Dec 2018
Authored by : Bushra Ghaus , Ishrat Lodhi , Muhammad Shakir

19 Pages : 284-308

References

  • Allen, T. D., Poteet, M. L., & Russell, J. E. A. (2000). Proteg' e selection by mentors: What makes the difference? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21, 271-282
  • Asad, N., & Allana, A. A. (2015). Gender Research in Pakistan: A Scoping Review. European Scientific Journal, ESJ, 11(3).
  • Avolio, B. J., Walumbwa, F.O., & Weber. T.J. (2009). Leadership: Current theories, research, and future directions. Annual review of psychology, 60 (2009): 421-449.
  • Bakar, H. A., Jian, G., & Fairhurst, G. (2014). Where do I stand? The interaction of leader-member exchange and performance ratings. Asian Business & Management, 13(2), 143-170.
  • Bauer, T. N., & Erdogan, B. (Eds.). (2015). The Oxford handbook of leadermember exchange. Oxford University Press
  • Bauer, T. N., & Green, S. G. (1996). Development of leader-member exchange: A longitudinal test. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 1538-1567.
  • Berkovich, I. (2018). Effects of Principal-Teacher Gender Similarity on Teacher's Trust and Organizational Commitment. Sex Roles, 78(7-8), 561-572.
  • Bhal, K. T., Ansari, M. A., & Aafaqi, R. (2007). The role of gender match, LMX tenure, and support in leader-member exchange. International Journal of Business and Society, 8(2), 63-80.
  • Bogler, R., & Somech, A. (2004). Influence of teacher empowerment on teachers' organizational commitment, professional commitment and organizational citizenship behavior in schools. Teaching and teacher education, 20(3), 277-289.
  • Bolino, M. C., Hsiung, H. H., Harvey, J., & LePine, J. A. (2015).
  • Borman, W. C., & Motowidlo, S. M. (1993). Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance. Personnel Selection in Organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Brownell, J. (2010). Leadership in the service of hospitality. Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, 51(3), 363-378
  • Chen, Z., Lam, W., & Zhong, J. A. (2007). Leader-member exchange and member performance: a new look at individual-level negative feedback-seeking behavior and team-level empowerment climate. Journal of applied psychology, 92(1), 202.
  • Chua, R.Y.J., Ingram, P., & Morris, M.W. (2008). From the head and the heart: Locating cognition- and affect-based trust in managers' professional networks. Academy of Management Journal, 51, 436-452.
  • Cohen, P. N., Huffman, M. L. (2007). Working for the woman? Female managers and the Gender Wage Gap. American Sociological Review, 7(72), 681- 704.
  • Cropanzano, R., & Mitchell, M. S. (2005). Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of management, 31(6), 874-900.
  • Day, D. V. (2014). The Oxford handbook of leadership and organizations. NY: Oxford Library of Psychology
  • Eagly, A. H., Johannesen-Schmidt, M.C., & van Engen, M.L. (2003), Transformational, transactional, and laissez-faire leadership styles: A meta-analysis comparing women and men. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 569-591.
  • Ehrhart, M. G., Bliese, P. D., & Thomas, J. L. (2006). Unit-level OCB and unit effectiveness: Examining the incremental effect of helping behavior. Human Performance, 19(2), 159-173.
  • Epitropaki, O., & Martin, R. (1999). The impact of relational demography on the quality of leader‐ member exchanges and employees' work attitudes and well‐ being. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 72(2), 237-240.
  • Estiri, M., Amiri, N. S., Khajeheian, D., & Rayej, H. (2018). Leader-member exchange and organizational citizenship behavior in hospitality industry: a study on effect of gender. Eurasian Business Review, 8(3), 267-284.
  • Evans, W. R., & Davis, W. D. (2005). High-performance work systems and organizational performance: The mediating role of internal social structure. Journal of management, 31(5), 758-775.
  • Farrell, S. K., & Finkelstein, L. M. (2007). Organizational citizenship behavior and gender: Expectations and attributions for performance. North American Journal of Psychology, 9(1).
  • Feingold, A. (1994), Gender differences in personality: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 429-456.
  • Gaertner, S. L., Dovidio, J. F., Guerra, R., Rebelo, M., Monteiro, M. B., Riek, B. M., et al. (2008). The common in-group identity model. In S. R. Levy & M. Killen (Eds.), Intergroup attitudes and relations in childhood through adulthood (pp. 204-219). New York: Oxford University Press
  • Goertzen, B. J., & Fritz, S. (2004). Does sex of dyad members really matter? A review of leader-member exchange. Faculty Publications: Agricultural Leadership, Education & Communication Department, 26.
  • Graen, G. B., & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. The leadership quarterly, 6(2), 219-247.
  • Graves, L. M., & Powell, G. N. (1995). The effect of same sex similarity on recruiters' evaluation of actual applicants: A test of the similarityattraction paradigm. Personnel Psychology, 48(1), 85-98.
  • Green, S. G., Anderson, S. E., & Shivers, S. L. (1996). Demographic and organizational influences on leader-member exchange and related work attitudes. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 66(2), 203-214.
  • Hackett, R. D., Farh, J. L., Song, J. L., & Lapierre, L. M. (2003). LMX and organizational citizenship behavior: Examining links within and across Western and Chinese samples. In G. B. Graen (Ed.), Dealing with diversity (pp. 219 -264). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
  • Harris, K. J., Kacmar, K. M., & Witt, L. A. (2005). An examination of the curvilinear relationship between leader-member exchange and intent to turnover. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(4), 363-378.
  • Harrison, D. A., Price, K. H., & Bell, M. P. (1998). Beyond relational demography: Time and the effects of surface- and deep-level Sex Roles diversity on work group cohesion. Academy of Management Journal, 41(1), 96-107
  • Hofstede, G. (2011). Dimensionalizing cultures: The Hofstede model in context. Online readings in psychology and culture, 2(1), 8.
  • Ilies, R., Nahrgang, J. D., & Morgeson, F. P. (2007). Leader-member exchange and citizenship behaviors: A meta-analysis. Journal of applied psychology, 92(1), 269.
  • Islam, N. (2004). Sifarish, sycophants, power and collectivism: Administrative culture in Pakistan. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 70(2), 311-330.
  • Joseph, D. L., Newman, D. A., & Sin, H. P. (2011). Leader-Member Exchange (LMX) measurement: evidence for consensus, construct breadth, and discriminant validity. In Building methodological bridges (pp. 89-135). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
  • Karadal, H. & Saygin, Y. M. (2013). The Relationship between Social Loafing and Organizational Citizenship among School Managers. Paper presented in the 2nd International Conference on the Reform of Curriculum and Teaching and Teacher Development, 22-24 March 2013, Hangzhou Normal University, Zhejiang, China.
  • Liden, R. C., & Maslyn, J. M. (1998). Multidimensionality of leader-member exchange: An empirical assessment through scale development. Journal of management, 24(1), 43-72.
  • Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., & Stilwell, D. (1993). A longitudinal study of the early development of leader-member exchanges. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 662-674.
  • Lo, M. C., Ramayah, T., & de Run, E. C. (2009). Leader-Member Exchange, gender and influence tactic. A test on multinational companies in Malaysia. Problems and perspectives in management, 7(1), 49-56.

Cite this article

APA

    APA : Ghaus, B., Lodhi, I., & Shakir, M. (2018). Much of a Muchness? The Role of Gender Similarity in a Relationship between LMX and OCB. Global Social Sciences Review, III(IV), 284-308. https://doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2018(III-IV).19

CHICAGO

    CHICAGO : Ghaus, Bushra, Ishrat Lodhi, and Muhammad Shakir. 2018. "Much of a Muchness? The Role of Gender Similarity in a Relationship between LMX and OCB." Global Social Sciences Review, III (IV): 284-308 doi: 10.31703/gssr.2018(III-IV).19

HARVARD

    HARVARD : GHAUS, B., LODHI, I. & SHAKIR, M. 2018. Much of a Muchness? The Role of Gender Similarity in a Relationship between LMX and OCB. Global Social Sciences Review, III, 284-308.

MHRA

    MHRA : Ghaus, Bushra, Ishrat Lodhi, and Muhammad Shakir. 2018. "Much of a Muchness? The Role of Gender Similarity in a Relationship between LMX and OCB." Global Social Sciences Review, III: 284-308

MLA

    MLA : Ghaus, Bushra, Ishrat Lodhi, and Muhammad Shakir. "Much of a Muchness? The Role of Gender Similarity in a Relationship between LMX and OCB." Global Social Sciences Review, III.IV (2018): 284-308 Print.

OXFORD

    OXFORD : Ghaus, Bushra, Lodhi, Ishrat, and Shakir, Muhammad (2018), "Much of a Muchness? The Role of Gender Similarity in a Relationship between LMX and OCB", Global Social Sciences Review, III (IV), 284-308

TURABIAN

    TURABIAN : Ghaus, Bushra, Ishrat Lodhi, and Muhammad Shakir. "Much of a Muchness? The Role of Gender Similarity in a Relationship between LMX and OCB." Global Social Sciences Review III, no. IV (2018): 284-308. https://doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2018(III-IV).19