ARTICLE

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS NONMARKET CONSIDERATIONS AND FOREIGN R AND D INVESTMENTS

  1. HOME
  2. ARTICLE

20 Pages : 202 - 211

http://dx.doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2022(VII-I).20      10.31703/gssr.2022(VII-I).20      Published : Mar 2022

Intellectual Property Rights, Non-Market Considerations and Foreign R and D Investments

Abstract

    This study focuses on how businesses can depend upon non-market elements, gain privileged handling from hosting governmental bodies, and safeguard the intellectual property in other states. This study interrogates different non-market elements; one is at the national level, while the other is at the corporate level, i.e., to influence where businesses focus their innovative efforts. It uses the qualitative method to analyse statutes, local and international laws, protocols, conventions, etc. The findings highlight the importance of intellectual property, which is the creation of the mind, innovation or innovative activities. Internationally these are fully protected by law under Intellectual property rights. Previous studies also consider other relevant factors like the political or governmental role in protecting overseas R and D investments by Intellectual property rights (IPR) regulations. Further, it concluded that the laws related to IPR and non-market factors safeguard company invention from piracy and make states more appealing for innovation-based activity.

    (1) Naheeda Ali
    Assistant Professor, Department of Law, The University of the Punjab, Gujranwala Campus, Gujranwala, Punjab, Pakistan.
    (2) Kanwal Iqbal Khan
    Assistant Professor, Institute of Business and Management, University of Engineering and Technology Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan.
Fulltext PDF

References

  • Albino-Pimentel, J., Dussauge, P., & El Nayal, O. (2022). Intellectual property rights, non- market considerations and foreign R&D investments. Research Policy, 51(2), 104-442.
  • Ali, N., & Khan, K. I. (2021). Legal framework for compulsory licensing: a solution to the conflict of intellectual property rights and intellectual monopoly. International Journal of Public Law and Policy, 7(2), 122-133. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijplap.2021.115930
  • Anttonen, M., Halme, M., Houtbeckers, E., & Nurkka, J. (2013). The other side of sustainable innovation: is there a demand for innovative services?. Journal of Cleaner Production, 45, 89-103.
  • Baudenbacher, C., Baudenbacher, C., & Seyfried. (2019). Judicial Independence. Springer International Publishing.
  • Bell, R. G., Filatotchev, I., & Rasheed, A. A. (2012). The liability of foreignness in capital markets: Sources and remedies. Journal of International Business Studies, 43(2), 107-122.
  • Betts, A. (2015). The normative terrain of the global refugee regime. Ethics & International Affairs, 29(4), 363-375.
  • Butler, D. M., & Broockman, D. E. (2011). Do politicians racially discriminate against constituents? A field experiment on state legislators. American Journal of Political Science, 55(3), 463-477.
  • Chaudhry, P. E., & Zimmerman, A. (2009). The economics of counterfeit trade: Governments, consumers, pirates and intellectual property rights. Springer Science & Business Media.
  • Chams, N., & García-Blandón, J. (2019). Sustainable or not sustainable? The role of the board of directors. Journal of Cleaner Production, 226, 1067-1081.
  • Connaghan, K. P., Wertheim, C., Laures-Gore, J. S., Russell, S., & Patel, R. (2021). An exploratory study of student, speech–language pathologist and emergency worker impressions of speakers with dysarthria. International Journal of Speech- Language Pathology, 23(3), 265-274.
  • De Salvo, M., & Signorello, G. (2015). Non- market valuation of recreational services in Italy: A meta-analysis. Ecosystem Services, 16, 47-62.
  • Guthrie, J. W. (1990). The evolution of educational management: Eroding myths and emerging models. Teachers College Record, 91(6), 210-231.
  • Grare, F. (2013). Pakistan's foreign and security policies after the 2013 general election: the judge, the politician and the military. International Affairs, 89(4), 987- 1001.
  • Gruber, H. (2017). Innovation, skills and investment: A digital industrial policy for Europe. Economia e Politica Industriale, 44(3), 327-343.
  • Howse, R. (2002). From politics to technocracy— and back again: the fate of the multilateral trading regime. American Journal of International Law, 96(1), 94-117.
  • Kennedy, S. (2007). Transnational political alliances: An exploration with evidence from China. Business & Society, 46(2), 174-200.
  • Khan, K. I., & Mushtaq, A. (2020). Corporate social responsibility and firms credibility: A comparative study of family and non-family firms; Evidence from Pakistan stock exchange, Review of Socio-Economic Perspectives, 5(2), 59-86.
  • Khan, K. I., Naqvi, S. M., Ghafoor, M. M., & Nayab, G. (2020). Effect of reward system on innovative work behaviour through temporary organizational commitment and proficiency: Moderating role of multiculturalism, International Journal of Management Research and Emerging Sciences, 10(2), 96-108.
  • Kulkarni, S. R. (2015). Intellectual Property Rights-Protection and Regulation.In Advances in Bioprocess Technology (pp. 475-519). Springer, Cham.
  • Mahmood, S., Sheeraz, M., Aslam, S., Tanweer, M., & Khan, K. I. (2017). Intellectual capital and market performance: Testing the mediating mechanism of organizational learning. Journal of Managerial Sciences, 11(2), 303-322.
  • Naseem, A., Spielman, D. J., & Omamo, S. W. (2010). Private‐sector investment in R&D: a review of policy options to promote its growth in developing‐country agriculture. Agribusiness, 26(1), 143-173.
  • Parkinson, J. (2003). Disclosure and corporate social and environmental performance: competitiveness and enterprise in a broader social frame. Journal of Corporate Law Studies, 3(1), 3-39.
  • Pietrobelli, C., Marin, A., & Olivari, J. (2018). Innovation in mining value chains: New evidence from Latin America. Resources Policy, 58, 1-10.
  • Poisson-de Haro, S., & Bitektine, A. (2015). Global sustainability pressures and strategic choice: The role of firms’ structures and non-market capabilities in selection and implementation of sustainability initiatives. Journal of World Business, 50(2), 326-341.
  • Porter, M. E., & Heppelmann, J. E. (2015). How smart, connected products are transforming companies. Harvard Business Review, 93(10), 96-114.
  • Rao, Y. V., & Srirekha, G. (2018). Intellectual property rights in business organizations. International Journal of Engineering and Management Research (IJEMR), 8(1), 118-124.
  • Rizopoulos, Y. A., & Sergakis, D. E. (2010). MNEs and policy networks: Institutional embeddedness and strategic choice. Journal of World Business, 45(3), 250-256.
  • Sarkar, K. R. (2010). Assessing insider threats to information security using technical, behavioural and organisational measures. I nformation Security Technical Report, 15(3), 112-133.
  • Vaughan, R. E. (1995). Defining Terms in the Intellectual Property Protection Debate: Are the North and South Arguing Past Each Other When We Say Property-A Lockean, Confucian, and Islamic Comparison. ILSA Journal of International & Comparative Law, 2, 307.
  • Wu, C., & Liu, Z. (2012). A tiger without teeth? Regulation of administrative monopoly under China’s Anti-Monopoly Law. Review of Industrial Organization, 41(1), 133-155.

Cite this article

APA

    APA : Ali, N., & Khan, K. I. (2022). Intellectual Property Rights, Non-Market Considerations and Foreign R and D Investments. Global Social Sciences Review, VII(I), 202 - 211. https://doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2022(VII-I).20

CHICAGO

    CHICAGO : Ali, Naheeda, and Kanwal Iqbal Khan. 2022. "Intellectual Property Rights, Non-Market Considerations and Foreign R and D Investments." Global Social Sciences Review, VII (I): 202 - 211 doi: 10.31703/gssr.2022(VII-I).20

HARVARD

    HARVARD : ALI, N. & KHAN, K. I. 2022. Intellectual Property Rights, Non-Market Considerations and Foreign R and D Investments. Global Social Sciences Review, VII, 202 - 211.

MHRA

    MHRA : Ali, Naheeda, and Kanwal Iqbal Khan. 2022. "Intellectual Property Rights, Non-Market Considerations and Foreign R and D Investments." Global Social Sciences Review, VII: 202 - 211

MLA

    MLA : Ali, Naheeda, and Kanwal Iqbal Khan. "Intellectual Property Rights, Non-Market Considerations and Foreign R and D Investments." Global Social Sciences Review, VII.I (2022): 202 - 211 Print.

OXFORD

    OXFORD : Ali, Naheeda and Khan, Kanwal Iqbal (2022), "Intellectual Property Rights, Non-Market Considerations and Foreign R and D Investments", Global Social Sciences Review, VII (I), 202 - 211

TURABIAN

    TURABIAN : Ali, Naheeda, and Kanwal Iqbal Khan. "Intellectual Property Rights, Non-Market Considerations and Foreign R and D Investments." Global Social Sciences Review VII, no. I (2022): 202 - 211. https://doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2022(VII-I).20