ARTICLE

IMPACT OF SERVANT LEADERSHIP AND ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE ON WORK ENGAGEMENT AN EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS

03 Pages : 23 - 33

http://dx.doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2022(VII-II).03      10.31703/gssr.2022(VII-II).03      Published : Jun 2022

Impact of Servant Leadership and Organizational Culture on Work Engagement: An Empirical Analysis

    The study's goal is to see how servant leadership and corporate culture affect work engagement. While leadership has been proven to have an impact, the effect and procedure underlying work engagement has attracted scant attention. Despite the fact that servant leadership followers are more inclined to be involved, this is especially relevant of servant leadership. We investigate the role organizational culture plays like a potential mediator in the study below, seeking to discover whether servant leadership builds organizational culture that, as a result, enhances work engagement. Overall,we find strong evidence suggesting servant leadership can forecast organizational culture along with the other extensions related to job engagement which include dedication, absorption and vigor, while organizational culture, undermines the effect of servant leadership style. Lastly,all three components of work engagement are positively related to an organization's culture.

    Organizational Culture, Servant Leadership, Employee Performance
    (1) Muhammad Zia-ur-Rehman
    Associate Professor, Department of Leadership and Management Studies, National Defence University, Islamabad, Pakistan.
    (2) Syeda Unzilla Shah
    Research Scholar, National Defence University, Islamabad, Pakistan.
    (3) Arif Masih Khokhar
    Iqra University, Islamabad, Pakistan.
  • lafeshat, R., & Aboud, F. (2019). Servant leadership impact on organizational performance: The mediating role of employee engagement. International Journal of Human Resource Studies, 9(3), 3.
  • Albrecht, S. L., Bakker, A. B., Gruman, J. A., Macey, W. H., & Saks, A. M. (2015). Employee engagement, human resource management practices and competitive advantage: An integrated approach. Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Performance, 2(1), 7–35.
  • Avolio, B. J., Walumbwa, F. O., & Weber, T. J. (2009). Leadership: Current theories, research, and future directions. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 421-449.
  • Bakker, A. B. & Leiter, M. P. (2010). Work Engagement: A Handbook of Essential Theory and Research. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
  • Beck, C. D. (2014). Antecedents of servant leadership a mixed methods study. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 21(3), 299–314.
  • Bierly, P. E., Kessler, E. H., & Christensen, E. W. (2000). Organizational learning, knowledge and wisdom. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 13, 595-618.
  • Byrne, B. M. (2010). Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge Taylor Francis Group.
  • Chen, C. F., & Kao, Y. L. (2012). Moderating effects of work engagement and job tenure on burnout–performance among flightattendants. Journal of Air Transport Management, 25, 61-63.
  • Chen, C.-Y., Chen, C.-H., & Li, C.-I. (2013). The influence of leader’s spiritual values of servant leadership on employee motivational autonomy and eudaemonic well-Being. Journal of Religion and Health, 52(2), 418- 438.
  • Coetzee, M., Schreuder, D., & Tladinyane, R. (2014). Employees’ work engagement and job commitment: The moderating role of career anchors. SA Journal of Human Resource Management, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.4102/sajhrm.v12i1.572
  • Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • De sousa mjc., & van dierendonck d. (2014). Servant leadership and engagement in a merge process under high uncertainty. Journal of Organizational Change Management 27(6), 877-899.
  • Ivancevich, J., Konopaske, R., & Matteson, M. (2008). Organizational behavior and management. Eighth edition. Boston: McGraw-Hill/Irwin; 2008.
  • Laub, J. (1999). Assessing the servant organization: Development of the servant organizational leadership assessment (SOLA) instrument. A&I database. The University of Queensland; 1999.
  • Macey, W. H., & Schneider, B. (2008). The Meaning of Employee Engagement. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 1(1), 3–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754- 9434.2007.0002.x

Cite this article

    APA : Zia-ur-Rehman, M., Shah, S. U., & Khokhar, A. M. (2022). Impact of Servant Leadership and Organizational Culture on Work Engagement: An Empirical Analysis. Global Social Sciences Review, VII(II), 23 - 33. https://doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2022(VII-II).03
    CHICAGO : Zia-ur-Rehman, Muhammad, Syeda Unzilla Shah, and Arif Masih Khokhar. 2022. "Impact of Servant Leadership and Organizational Culture on Work Engagement: An Empirical Analysis." Global Social Sciences Review, VII (II): 23 - 33 doi: 10.31703/gssr.2022(VII-II).03
    HARVARD : ZIA-UR-REHMAN, M., SHAH, S. U. & KHOKHAR, A. M. 2022. Impact of Servant Leadership and Organizational Culture on Work Engagement: An Empirical Analysis. Global Social Sciences Review, VII, 23 - 33.
    MHRA : Zia-ur-Rehman, Muhammad, Syeda Unzilla Shah, and Arif Masih Khokhar. 2022. "Impact of Servant Leadership and Organizational Culture on Work Engagement: An Empirical Analysis." Global Social Sciences Review, VII: 23 - 33
    MLA : Zia-ur-Rehman, Muhammad, Syeda Unzilla Shah, and Arif Masih Khokhar. "Impact of Servant Leadership and Organizational Culture on Work Engagement: An Empirical Analysis." Global Social Sciences Review, VII.II (2022): 23 - 33 Print.
    OXFORD : Zia-ur-Rehman, Muhammad, Shah, Syeda Unzilla, and Khokhar, Arif Masih (2022), "Impact of Servant Leadership and Organizational Culture on Work Engagement: An Empirical Analysis", Global Social Sciences Review, VII (II), 23 - 33
    TURABIAN : Zia-ur-Rehman, Muhammad, Syeda Unzilla Shah, and Arif Masih Khokhar. "Impact of Servant Leadership and Organizational Culture on Work Engagement: An Empirical Analysis." Global Social Sciences Review VII, no. II (2022): 23 - 33. https://doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2022(VII-II).03