ARTICLE

IMPACT OF MULTIMEDIA ON THE ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE OF THE STUDENTS AT SECONDARY SCHOOL LEVEL

  1. HOME
  2. ARTICLE

24 Pages : 249-259

http://dx.doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2020(V-II).24      10.31703/gssr.2020(V-II).24      Published : Jun 2020

Impact of Multimedia on the Academic Performance of the Students at Secondary School Level

Abstract

    Multimedia equipment is part of ICT facilities. The study aims to find out the impact of multimedia on the academic performance of the students at secondary level of Peshawar District. The main objectives of the study were (i) to find out Impact of multimedia on the academic performance of the students at secondary level. (ii) to assess the application of multimedia during the class and their impact on the student academic performance. The research was descriptive in nature. All the Secondary School of Peshawar district were population. The research sample included 20 public schools from the Peshawar District, 20 heads, 40 teachers and 40 secondary school students in the Peshawar District. The questionnaire was used as a research instrument. It was concluded that, given the lack of multimedia at school, it is recommended that the government provide multimedia services to the school.

    (1) Anila Fatima Shakil
    Associate Professor, Department of Education, Jinnah University for Women Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan.
    (2) Waqar Un Nisa Faizi
    Assistant Professor, Department of Education, Islamia College Peshawar, KP, Pakistan.
    (3) Muhammad Nisar Ul Haq
    Assistant Professor, Department of Educational Development, Karakoram International University, Gilgit – Baltistan, Pakistan.
Fulltext PDF

References

  • Akkoyunlu B, Yilmaz M (2005) Türetimci Çoklu Öğrenme Kuramı. Hacettepe Ãœniversitesi EÄŸitim Fakültesi Dergisi 28:9-18.
  • Albirini AA (2006) Teachers' attitude towards information communication technology. Journal of computers and education 47: 373-398.
  • Aloraini, S. (2005). Distant education. Riyadh: King Fahd's National library.
  • Altherr, S., Wagner, A., Eckert, B., & Jodl, H. J. (2004). Multimedia material for teaching physics (search, evaluation, and examples). European Journal of Physics, 25, 7-14.
  • Badarch, D. (2013). Information and communication technologies in education: monograph. Moscow: Institute of UNESCO on information technologies in education, RL: . pd f (date of the application: 20.11. 2017). http://iite. unesco. org/pics/publications/ru/files/3214728
  • Bagui, S. (1998). Reasons for increased learning using multimedia. Journal of educational multimedia and hypermedia, 7, 3-18.
  • Cunningham GB (2006) The relationships among commitment to change, coping with change and turnover intention. European Journal of work and organizational psychology 15: 29-45.
  • Daniels, S. (1995). Can Pre-school Education Affect Children's Achievement in Primary School?. Oxford Review of Education, 21(2), 163-178.
  • Dwyer, C. A. (1993). Innovation and reform: Examples from teacher assessment. Construction versus choice in cognitive measurement: Issues in constructed response, performance testing, and portfolio assessment, 265-289.
  • Fari SA (2010) Application of ICTs in Information Sharing Among Academics in Nigeria. UMYU Journal of Educational Research 2: 185-190.
  • Gay, L. R. (2009). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and application (5th ed.). Islamabad: National Book Foundation.
  • Inceday, N. (2018). The impact of using multimedia technologies on students' academic achievement in the Bakirköy Final College. International Journal of Humanities Social Sciences and Education (IJHSSE), 5(1), 40-47.
  • Junaidu, S. (2008). Effectiveness of multimedia in learning & teaching data structures online. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 9(4), 97-107.
  • Maddux, C., Cummings, R., Liu, L., & Newman, J. (2005). Aids and cautions in planning, developing, and delivering online instruction in higher education. Innovate: Journal of Online Education, 1(4), 6.
  • Mayer, R. E. (2005a). Cognitive theory of multimedia learning. In R. Mayer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 31-48). New York, N.Y.: Cambridge University Press.
  • Mayer, R. E. (2005b). Principles for managing essential processing multimedia learning: Segmenting, pre training, and modality principles. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 169-182). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Mayer, R. E. (2005c). Introduction to multimedia learning. In R. Mayer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 1-16). New York, N.Y.: Cambridge University Press.
  • Ololube NP (2007) The relationship between funding, ICT, selection processes, administration Planning and the standard of science teacher education in Nigeria. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching V: 8.
  • Osu SR, Udosen IR, Akpan BP (2010) Resources Availability and Level of Preparedness of Biology Teachers. Journal of Education Research and Policies 5: 22-25.
  • Phillips, R. (1997). The developer's handbook to interactive multimedia: A practical guide for educational applications. London: Kogan Page.
  • Rolfe, E. V., & Gray, D. (2011). Are multimedia resources effective in life science education? A metaanalysis. Bioscience Education, 18(3). http://www.bioscience.heacademy.ac.uk/journal/vol18/beej-18-3.pdf
  • Schulmeister, R. (2003). Taxonomy of multimedia component interactivity. A contribution to the current metadata debate. Studies in Communication Sciences. Studi di scienze della communicazione, 3(1), 61-80.
  • Semerci A (1999) Ögretim Amaçlı Bir Çoklu Ortam Yazılımı Gelistirilmesi, Uygulanmasıve Degerlendirilmesi (YayınlanmamışYüksek Lisans Tezi). Ankara Üniversitesi, Ankara.
  • Singh, V. K. (2003). Does multimedia treally improve learning effectiveness? Paper presented at The Asia Pacific Conference on Education: Re-envisioning Education: Innovation and Diversity. Retrieved from http://www.youblisher.com/p/34202
  • Yünkül E, Er KO (2014) The Effect of Multimedia Software Course on Student Attitudes. Eġitimde Kuramve Uygulama 10: 316-330.

Cite this article

APA

    APA : Shakil, A. F., Faizi, W. U. N., & Haq, M. N. U. (2020). Impact of Multimedia on the Academic Performance of the Students at Secondary School Level. Global Social Sciences Review, V(II), 249-259. https://doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2020(V-II).24

CHICAGO

    CHICAGO : Shakil, Anila Fatima, Waqar Un Nisa Faizi, and Muhammad Nisar Ul Haq. 2020. "Impact of Multimedia on the Academic Performance of the Students at Secondary School Level." Global Social Sciences Review, V (II): 249-259 doi: 10.31703/gssr.2020(V-II).24

HARVARD

    HARVARD : SHAKIL, A. F., FAIZI, W. U. N. & HAQ, M. N. U. 2020. Impact of Multimedia on the Academic Performance of the Students at Secondary School Level. Global Social Sciences Review, V, 249-259.

MHRA

    MHRA : Shakil, Anila Fatima, Waqar Un Nisa Faizi, and Muhammad Nisar Ul Haq. 2020. "Impact of Multimedia on the Academic Performance of the Students at Secondary School Level." Global Social Sciences Review, V: 249-259

MLA

    MLA : Shakil, Anila Fatima, Waqar Un Nisa Faizi, and Muhammad Nisar Ul Haq. "Impact of Multimedia on the Academic Performance of the Students at Secondary School Level." Global Social Sciences Review, V.II (2020): 249-259 Print.

OXFORD

    OXFORD : Shakil, Anila Fatima, Faizi, Waqar Un Nisa, and Haq, Muhammad Nisar Ul (2020), "Impact of Multimedia on the Academic Performance of the Students at Secondary School Level", Global Social Sciences Review, V (II), 249-259

TURABIAN

    TURABIAN : Shakil, Anila Fatima, Waqar Un Nisa Faizi, and Muhammad Nisar Ul Haq. "Impact of Multimedia on the Academic Performance of the Students at Secondary School Level." Global Social Sciences Review V, no. II (2020): 249-259. https://doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2020(V-II).24