ARTICLE

DEMARCATION AND PRESERVATION OF INDIGENOUS KNOWLEDGE AND CULTURE A DECONSTRUCTIVE STUDY OF MAD BEAR

21 Pages : 222-232

http://dx.doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2021(VI-I).21      10.31703/gssr.2021(VI-I).21      Published : Mar 1

Demarcation and Preservation of Indigenous Knowledge and Culture. A Deconstructive Study of Mad Bear

    Literary studies have historically focused on Native American literature as a reflection of the cultural and cultural history that underpins anthropological research. However, recent studies in Indigenous studies call for the themes and perspectives that see Indigenous past and present writers working on the idea of a state of dissolution that will work to regain ancestral memory and recognition with hegemonic trends of Euro Americans among other things. This paper attempts to clear the obscurity that Indians and Euro Americans are happily merged now having their hybridized identities and culture. BOYD wrote a cohesive, or national, life narrative that works on the concept of storytelling and ancestral memory that revives the historical narrative surrounding the tribal-centric mission and contributes to the re-interpretation of the monarchy and colonial practices by Euro Americans.

    Separation, Preservation, Nationalistic Approach, Essentialist, Swerve, Ancestral Memory, Desecration, Tribal Centric, Transgression
    (1) Sanniya Sara Batool
    Lecturer, Department of English, Riphah International University Faisalabad, Punjab, Pakistan.
    (2) Shahbaz Khalid
    MPhil English. Department of English, Riphah International University Faisalabad, Punjab, Pakistan.
    (3) Nafees Parvez
    Ph.D. Scholar, Department of English, Government College University, Faisalabad, Punjab, Pakistan.
  • Adamson, J. (2001). American Indian literature, environmental justice, and ecocriticism the middle place. Tucson: University of Arizona Press
  • Azad, S. (2013). Ecocriticism and American Indian biographies. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 9(6), 1-06.
  • Bhatti, S. A. (2014). Healing and the Environment in American Indian Biographies. European Scientific Journal, 10(8), 287-296.
  • Boyd, D. (1994). Mad Bear. New York: Simon& Schuster.
  • Clemmer, R. O. The Pinon-Pine: Old ally or new pest? Western Shoshone Indians vs. the Bureau of Land Management in Nevada.
  • Coltelli, L. (1992). Winged words: American Indian authors speak. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
  • Csordas, T. J. (2000). The Navajo healing project. Medical Anthropology Quarterly 14(4), 463-475.
  • Deloria, V. (2006). The world we used to live in: Remembering the powers of the medicine men. USA: Colorado: Fulcrum Publishing
  • Doug, B. (1974). Rolling Thunder. NY: Random House.
  • Doug, B. (1994). MAD BEAR. NY: Simon & Schuster. Print
  • Environmental review: n. pag. JSTOR. Web. 18 Jan. 2011.
  • Kent, A. A. (2007). African, Native, and Jewish American literature and the reshaping of modernism. New York: McMillan.
  • Krupat, A. (1996). The turn to the native. Lincoln and London: University of Nebraska Press.
  • Lee, I. (2010). Cherokee healing: myth, Dreams, and medicine. American Indian Quarterly: n. pag. JSTOR. Web. 18 Nov.
  • Murtaza, G., &' Bhatti, S. A. (2016). Sherman Alexie's Discursive Reconstruction of the Native American Subject, Journal of Critical Inquiry, 14(I), 163-201.
  • Smith, Jr, William, F. (2010). American Indian Autobiographies. American Indian Quarterly: n. pag. JSTOR. Web. 10 Nov
  • Thomas, J. (2011). The Navajo healing project. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, New Series, 14(4), pp. 463-475.
  • Zinn, H. (1980). People's history of the United States: 1492-present. New York: HarperCollins.

Cite this article

    APA : Batool, S. S., Khalid, S., & Parvez, N. (2021). Demarcation and Preservation of Indigenous Knowledge and Culture. A Deconstructive Study of Mad Bear. Global Social Sciences Review, VI(I), 222-232. https://doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2021(VI-I).21
    CHICAGO : Batool, Sanniya Sara, Shahbaz Khalid, and Nafees Parvez. 2021. "Demarcation and Preservation of Indigenous Knowledge and Culture. A Deconstructive Study of Mad Bear." Global Social Sciences Review, VI (I): 222-232 doi: 10.31703/gssr.2021(VI-I).21
    HARVARD : BATOOL, S. S., KHALID, S. & PARVEZ, N. 2021. Demarcation and Preservation of Indigenous Knowledge and Culture. A Deconstructive Study of Mad Bear. Global Social Sciences Review, VI, 222-232.
    MHRA : Batool, Sanniya Sara, Shahbaz Khalid, and Nafees Parvez. 2021. "Demarcation and Preservation of Indigenous Knowledge and Culture. A Deconstructive Study of Mad Bear." Global Social Sciences Review, VI: 222-232
    MLA : Batool, Sanniya Sara, Shahbaz Khalid, and Nafees Parvez. "Demarcation and Preservation of Indigenous Knowledge and Culture. A Deconstructive Study of Mad Bear." Global Social Sciences Review, VI.I (2021): 222-232 Print.
    OXFORD : Batool, Sanniya Sara, Khalid, Shahbaz, and Parvez, Nafees (2021), "Demarcation and Preservation of Indigenous Knowledge and Culture. A Deconstructive Study of Mad Bear", Global Social Sciences Review, VI (I), 222-232
    TURABIAN : Batool, Sanniya Sara, Shahbaz Khalid, and Nafees Parvez. "Demarcation and Preservation of Indigenous Knowledge and Culture. A Deconstructive Study of Mad Bear." Global Social Sciences Review VI, no. I (2021): 222-232. https://doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2021(VI-I).21