DEMARCATION AND PRESERVATION OF INDIGENOUS KNOWLEDGE AND CULTURE A DECONSTRUCTIVE STUDY OF MAD BEAR

http://dx.doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2021(VI-I).21      10.31703/gssr.2021(VI-I).21      Published : Mar 1
Authored by : Sanniya Sara Batool , Shahbaz Khalid , Nafees Parvez

21 Pages : 222-232

References

  • Adamson, J. (2001). American Indian literature, environmental justice, and ecocriticism the middle place. Tucson: University of Arizona Press
  • Azad, S. (2013). Ecocriticism and American Indian biographies. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 9(6), 1-06.
  • Bhatti, S. A. (2014). Healing and the Environment in American Indian Biographies. European Scientific Journal, 10(8), 287-296.
  • Boyd, D. (1994). Mad Bear. New York: Simon& Schuster.
  • Clemmer, R. O. The Pinon-Pine: Old ally or new pest? Western Shoshone Indians vs. the Bureau of Land Management in Nevada.
  • Coltelli, L. (1992). Winged words: American Indian authors speak. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
  • Csordas, T. J. (2000). The Navajo healing project. Medical Anthropology Quarterly 14(4), 463-475.
  • Deloria, V. (2006). The world we used to live in: Remembering the powers of the medicine men. USA: Colorado: Fulcrum Publishing
  • Doug, B. (1974). Rolling Thunder. NY: Random House.
  • Doug, B. (1994). MAD BEAR. NY: Simon & Schuster. Print
  • Environmental review: n. pag. JSTOR. Web. 18 Jan. 2011.
  • Kent, A. A. (2007). African, Native, and Jewish American literature and the reshaping of modernism. New York: McMillan.
  • Krupat, A. (1996). The turn to the native. Lincoln and London: University of Nebraska Press.
  • Lee, I. (2010). Cherokee healing: myth, Dreams, and medicine. American Indian Quarterly: n. pag. JSTOR. Web. 18 Nov.
  • Murtaza, G., &' Bhatti, S. A. (2016). Sherman Alexie's Discursive Reconstruction of the Native American Subject, Journal of Critical Inquiry, 14(I), 163-201.
  • Smith, Jr, William, F. (2010). American Indian Autobiographies. American Indian Quarterly: n. pag. JSTOR. Web. 10 Nov
  • Thomas, J. (2011). The Navajo healing project. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, New Series, 14(4), pp. 463-475.
  • Zinn, H. (1980). People's history of the United States: 1492-present. New York: HarperCollins.

References

  • Adamson, J. (2001). American Indian literature, environmental justice, and ecocriticism the middle place. Tucson: University of Arizona Press
  • Azad, S. (2013). Ecocriticism and American Indian biographies. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 9(6), 1-06.
  • Bhatti, S. A. (2014). Healing and the Environment in American Indian Biographies. European Scientific Journal, 10(8), 287-296.
  • Boyd, D. (1994). Mad Bear. New York: Simon& Schuster.
  • Clemmer, R. O. The Pinon-Pine: Old ally or new pest? Western Shoshone Indians vs. the Bureau of Land Management in Nevada.
  • Coltelli, L. (1992). Winged words: American Indian authors speak. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
  • Csordas, T. J. (2000). The Navajo healing project. Medical Anthropology Quarterly 14(4), 463-475.
  • Deloria, V. (2006). The world we used to live in: Remembering the powers of the medicine men. USA: Colorado: Fulcrum Publishing
  • Doug, B. (1974). Rolling Thunder. NY: Random House.
  • Doug, B. (1994). MAD BEAR. NY: Simon & Schuster. Print
  • Environmental review: n. pag. JSTOR. Web. 18 Jan. 2011.
  • Kent, A. A. (2007). African, Native, and Jewish American literature and the reshaping of modernism. New York: McMillan.
  • Krupat, A. (1996). The turn to the native. Lincoln and London: University of Nebraska Press.
  • Lee, I. (2010). Cherokee healing: myth, Dreams, and medicine. American Indian Quarterly: n. pag. JSTOR. Web. 18 Nov.
  • Murtaza, G., &' Bhatti, S. A. (2016). Sherman Alexie's Discursive Reconstruction of the Native American Subject, Journal of Critical Inquiry, 14(I), 163-201.
  • Smith, Jr, William, F. (2010). American Indian Autobiographies. American Indian Quarterly: n. pag. JSTOR. Web. 10 Nov
  • Thomas, J. (2011). The Navajo healing project. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, New Series, 14(4), pp. 463-475.
  • Zinn, H. (1980). People's history of the United States: 1492-present. New York: HarperCollins.

Cite this article

APA

    APA : Batool, S. S., Khalid, S., & Parvez, N. (2021). Demarcation and Preservation of Indigenous Knowledge and Culture. A Deconstructive Study of Mad Bear. Global Social Sciences Review, VI(I), 222-232. https://doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2021(VI-I).21

CHICAGO

    CHICAGO : Batool, Sanniya Sara, Shahbaz Khalid, and Nafees Parvez. 2021. "Demarcation and Preservation of Indigenous Knowledge and Culture. A Deconstructive Study of Mad Bear." Global Social Sciences Review, VI (I): 222-232 doi: 10.31703/gssr.2021(VI-I).21

HARVARD

    HARVARD : BATOOL, S. S., KHALID, S. & PARVEZ, N. 2021. Demarcation and Preservation of Indigenous Knowledge and Culture. A Deconstructive Study of Mad Bear. Global Social Sciences Review, VI, 222-232.

MHRA

    MHRA : Batool, Sanniya Sara, Shahbaz Khalid, and Nafees Parvez. 2021. "Demarcation and Preservation of Indigenous Knowledge and Culture. A Deconstructive Study of Mad Bear." Global Social Sciences Review, VI: 222-232

MLA

    MLA : Batool, Sanniya Sara, Shahbaz Khalid, and Nafees Parvez. "Demarcation and Preservation of Indigenous Knowledge and Culture. A Deconstructive Study of Mad Bear." Global Social Sciences Review, VI.I (2021): 222-232 Print.

OXFORD

    OXFORD : Batool, Sanniya Sara, Khalid, Shahbaz, and Parvez, Nafees (2021), "Demarcation and Preservation of Indigenous Knowledge and Culture. A Deconstructive Study of Mad Bear", Global Social Sciences Review, VI (I), 222-232

TURABIAN

    TURABIAN : Batool, Sanniya Sara, Shahbaz Khalid, and Nafees Parvez. "Demarcation and Preservation of Indigenous Knowledge and Culture. A Deconstructive Study of Mad Bear." Global Social Sciences Review VI, no. I (2021): 222-232. https://doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2021(VI-I).21