ARTICLE

CYBERSECURITY A NEW FRAMEWORK FOR THE INFORMATION ECONOMY

  1. HOME
  2. ARTICLE

58 Pages : 462 - 466

http://dx.doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2019(IV-II).58      10.31703/gssr.2019(IV-II).58      Published : Jun 2019

Cybersecurity: A New Framework for the Information Economy

Abstract

    The government's role as a digital platform brings with it challenges including the possibility that the freedom of expression and the right to privacy conflict with each other in the digital space. The citizen's privacy becomes exposed to new vulnerabilities. A citizen's voice, vote and changes in status, can be stolen or sabotaged with catastrophic individual and national consequences. Individual digital identity also must fall under digital property laws. One citizen's exercise of free speech can be trespassing of digital space for another citizen. The jurisdiction of the state in digital space must be redefined. The writ of the state in digital space must be more pervasive, and yet more narrowly defined,to protect the rights of all citizens.

    (1) Muhammad Tehsin
    Assistant Professor, Department of Defence and Strategic Studies, Quaid-i- Azam University, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Fulltext PDF

References

  • Allcott, H., & Gentzkow, M. (2017). “Social Media and Fake News in the 2016 Election.” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31(2), 211-236. DOI: 10.1257/jep.31.2.211
  • Baumol, W. J. (1986). “Information Technology and the Service Sector: A Feedback Process?” (1986) in Faulhaber, Gerald, Noam, Eli, and R. Tasley, Eds. Services in Transition: The Impact of Information Technology on the Service Sector. pp. 183-199. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Publishing Co.
  • Chase, R. B., & Tansik, D. A. (1983). “The Customer Contact Model for Organization Design.” Management Science 29(4), 1037-1050
  • Coase, R. H. (1937). “The Nature of the Firm”. Economica. 4(16), 386–405
  • David, C. C., Pascual, M. R. S., & Torres, M. E. S. (2019). “Reliance on Facebook for news and its influence on political engagement.” PloS one, 14(3), e0212263. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0212263
  • Eisenhardt, & Kathleen, M. (1989). “Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review,” The Academy of Management Review 14(1), 57-74.
  • Etzioni, A. (1961). “A comparative Analysis of Complex Organizations: On Power, Involvement, and Their Correlates.” New York: Free Press of Glencoe . 379-381.
  • Kirk, & Andrew, (2002). “Machines of Loving Grace: Alternative Technology, Environment and the Counterculture,” in Braunstein, Peter and Doyle, Michael William, Eds. Imagine Nation: The American Counterculture of the 1960’s and 1970’s. 373-374. New York: Routledge.
  • Liljander, V., & Strandvik, T. (1993). “Estimating Zones of Tolerance in Perceived Service Quality and Perceived Service Value”, International Journal of Service Industry Management, 4(2) 6- 28 https://doi.org/10.1108/09564239310037909
  • Lovelock, C. H. (1985). “Developing and Managing the Customer-Service Function in the Service Sector.” in Czepiel, John A., Solomon, Michael R., and Carol F. Surprenant, Eds. The Service Encounter: Managing Employee/Customer Interaction in Service Businesses.” pp. 265-280. Lexington, Mass.: Lexington Books.
  • Magnusson, P. R., Matthing, J., & Kristensson, P. (2003). “Managing User Involvement in Service Innovation: Experiments with Innovating End Users,” Journal of Service Research, JSR 6(2), 111-124
  • Mills, P. K., & Margulies, N. (1980). “Towards a Core Typology of Service Organizations.” Academy of Management Review 5(2), 255-265.
  • Pugh, S. D. (2001). “Service with a Smile: Emotional Contagion in the Service Encounter.” The Academy of Management Journal 44(5), 1018-1027.
  • Sasser, W. E. (1976). “Match Supply and Demand in Service Industries.” Harvard Business Review 54(6), 133-140.
  • Shostack, G. L. (1987). “Service Positioning Through Structural Change.” Journal of Marketing 51(1), 34-43.
  • Thomas, D. R. E. (1978). “Strategy is Different in Service Businesses,” Harvard Business Review 56(4), 158-165.
  • Van Riper, P. P. (1966). “Organizations: Basic issues and a proposed typology.” in R. V. Bowers, Ed., Studies on Behavior in Organizations: A Research Symposium. Athens: University of Georgia Press.
  • Wemmerlov, U. (1990). “A Taxonomy for Service Processes and Its Implications for System Design.” International Journal of Service Industry Management 1(3), 20-40.
  • Williamson, O. E. (1981). “The Economics of Organization: The Transaction Cost Approach,” American Journal of Sociology 87(3), 548–577.

Cite this article

APA

CHICAGO

    CHICAGO : Tehsin, Muhammad. 2019. "Cybersecurity: A New Framework for the Information Economy." Global Social Sciences Review, IV (II): 462 - 466 doi: 10.31703/gssr.2019(IV-II).58

HARVARD

    HARVARD : TEHSIN, M. 2019. Cybersecurity: A New Framework for the Information Economy. Global Social Sciences Review, IV, 462 - 466.

MHRA

    MHRA : Tehsin, Muhammad. 2019. "Cybersecurity: A New Framework for the Information Economy." Global Social Sciences Review, IV: 462 - 466

MLA

    MLA : Tehsin, Muhammad. "Cybersecurity: A New Framework for the Information Economy." Global Social Sciences Review, IV.II (2019): 462 - 466 Print.

OXFORD

    OXFORD : Tehsin, Muhammad (2019), "Cybersecurity: A New Framework for the Information Economy", Global Social Sciences Review, IV (II), 462 - 466

TURABIAN