ARTICLE

EVALUATION OF CHEMISTRY CURRICULUM AT SECONDARY LEVEL AND OBJECTIVES OF NATIONAL CURRICULUM OF CHEMISTRY 2006

08 Pages : 110 - 130

http://dx.doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2018(III-II).08      10.31703/gssr.2018(III-II).08      Published : Jun 2

Evaluation of Chemistry Curriculum at Secondary Level and Objectives of National Curriculum of Chemistry 2006

    The study evaluates chemistry curriculum at the secondary level. Chemistry is the science subject which help in technological advancement. It deals with the study of composition, structure, properties, and different changes which take place in matter. There are different careers in chemistry such as in food processing, industries, health etc. The progress of any country depends on the achievement in the field of chemistry. The successes of these reforms are associated with chemistry curriculum. Therefore, this study re-examines the objectives of National Chemistry Curriculum 2006 and identifies the nature of implementation of chemistry curriculum. Questionnaire based data from 138 chemistry teachers (male and female) teaching at secondary level in District Haripur determined that modern teaching techniques are required in teaching chemistry. So, it is recommended to improve curriculum at regular intervals according to global standards.

    Curriculum Objectives, Evaluate, Global needs
    (1) Batool Fatima
    M.Phil Scholar (Education), Department of Education, University of Haripur, KP, Pakistan.
    (2) Umbreen Ishfaq
    Assistant Professor, Department of Education, University of Haripur, KP, Pakistan.
    (3) Tehseen Tahir
    Assistant Professor, Department of Education, University of Haripur, KP, Pakistan.
  • Bloom, B. S. (2006). Taxonomy of educational objectives. Vol. 1: Cognitive domain. New York: McKay.
  • Breuer, S. (2002). Does chemistry have a future? University Chemistry Education, 21(3), 57-59.
  • Bruner, J. S. (2009). The process of education. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  • Chiu, M. H. (2005). A national survey of students' conceptions of chemistry in Taiwan. International Journal of Science Education, 29(4), 3-5.
  • Cronbach, L. J. (2003). Course improvement through evaluation models: Viewpoints on educational and human services. Boston: Kulwer Academic Publishers.
  • Gordon, P. (1981). The Study of Curriculum. Batsford Academic and Educational Press Ltd., London.Govt. of Pakistan. (2006). Revised chemistry curriculum for ix-x grade. National Bureau of Curriculum and Textbook, Ministry of Education, Islamabad.
  • Govt. of Pakistan. (2012). Report of the seminar on quality education at secondary level. Ministry of Education, Islamabad.
  • Hornby, A.S.,&Wehmeier, S.(2005).Oxford advanced learner's dictionary ( Vol 1428).Oxford:Oxford University Press.
  • IPCMF. (2003). The Programme for research in third level institutions. Higher Education Authority Dublin, Author.
  • Madaus,G.F.,& Stufflebeam,D.L(2000).Program Evaluation. Boston: Kulwer Academic Publisher.
  • Makau, P. M. (2000). Implementation of state science and mathematics curriculum policy for secondary schools: A comparative analysis. University of California, Berkeley.
  • McMillan, J. H., & Schumacher, S. (2001). Research in education: Evidencebased inquiry. Pearson Higher Ed. 11.
  • Osborne, J., Simon, S., & Collins, S. (2003). Attitudes towards science: A review of the literature and its implications. International Journal of Science Education, 25(9), 1049-1079.
  • Smith, B. O., Stanley, W. O., & Shores, J. H. (2007). Fundamentals of curriculum development. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.
  • Smith, L. (1986). Common‐core Curriculum: a Piagetian conceptualization. British Educational Research Journal, 12(1), 55-71.
  • Stufflebeam, D. L. (2003). The CIPP model for evaluation. International Handbook of Educational Evaluation. Springer Netherlands.
  • Trochim, W. M. (2006). Introduction to evaluation. Retrieved August 24, 2006, from http://www.socialresearchmethods.net/kb/intervai.

Cite this article

    APA : Fatima, B., Ishfaq, U., & Tahir, T. (2018). Evaluation of Chemistry Curriculum at Secondary Level and Objectives of National Curriculum of Chemistry 2006. Global Social Sciences Review, III(II), 110 - 130. https://doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2018(III-II).08
    CHICAGO : Fatima, Batool, Umbreen Ishfaq, and Tehseen Tahir. 2018. "Evaluation of Chemistry Curriculum at Secondary Level and Objectives of National Curriculum of Chemistry 2006." Global Social Sciences Review, III (II): 110 - 130 doi: 10.31703/gssr.2018(III-II).08
    HARVARD : FATIMA, B., ISHFAQ, U. & TAHIR, T. 2018. Evaluation of Chemistry Curriculum at Secondary Level and Objectives of National Curriculum of Chemistry 2006. Global Social Sciences Review, III, 110 - 130.
    MHRA : Fatima, Batool, Umbreen Ishfaq, and Tehseen Tahir. 2018. "Evaluation of Chemistry Curriculum at Secondary Level and Objectives of National Curriculum of Chemistry 2006." Global Social Sciences Review, III: 110 - 130
    MLA : Fatima, Batool, Umbreen Ishfaq, and Tehseen Tahir. "Evaluation of Chemistry Curriculum at Secondary Level and Objectives of National Curriculum of Chemistry 2006." Global Social Sciences Review, III.II (2018): 110 - 130 Print.
    OXFORD : Fatima, Batool, Ishfaq, Umbreen, and Tahir, Tehseen (2018), "Evaluation of Chemistry Curriculum at Secondary Level and Objectives of National Curriculum of Chemistry 2006", Global Social Sciences Review, III (II), 110 - 130
    TURABIAN : Fatima, Batool, Umbreen Ishfaq, and Tehseen Tahir. "Evaluation of Chemistry Curriculum at Secondary Level and Objectives of National Curriculum of Chemistry 2006." Global Social Sciences Review III, no. II (2018): 110 - 130. https://doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2018(III-II).08