AN ANALYSIS OF THE NEW TRENDS IN NATIONAL CURRICULUM OF PHYSICS AT THE SECONDARY LEVEL

http://dx.doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2018(III-I).10      10.31703/gssr.2018(III-I).10      Published : Mar 1
Authored by : TariqMehmud , MuhammadIqbal

10 Pages : 141-159

References

  • Ali, S. (2013). Pakistan: Target revision in education policy. In M.-e.-R. Ahmed (Ed.), Education in West Central Asia (pp. 163-177). London: Bloomsbury.
  • Akhtar, M. (2004). Unpublished thesis of PhD Education: analysis of curriculum process and development of a model for Secondary level in Pakistan. Retrieved on July, 17, 2012 from http://eprints.hec.gov.pk/580/1/292.html.htm
  • Avotri, R., Owusu-Darko, L., Eghan, H. and Ocansey, S. (2000). Partnership for strategic resource planning for girls education in Africa: Gender and primary schooling in Ghana. Forum for African Women Educationalists. Institute of Development Studies. England, Brighton, Sussex BN1 9RE.
  • Bhatti, M. A. (1987). Secondary Education in Pakistan: Perspective Planning. National Education Council. Islamabad: Pakistan.
  • Brown, D. F. (2006). It's the curriculum, stupid: There's something wrong with it. Phi Delta Kappan, 87(10), 777-783.
  • Chen, Y.-U. H. (2007). The role of culture in an EFL curriculum of the 21st century. Selected Papers from the Sixteenth International Symposium on English Teaching (pp. 119-129). Taipei, Taiwan: Crane.
  • Creswell (2003). Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioral Research. Edited by Abbas Tashakkori, Charles Teddlie. Sage publications,Inc.2455 Teller Road Thousand
  • Fensham, P. J. (2008). Science Education for Policy-makers: 11 emerging issues. Paris: UNESCO. Holbrook, J. & Rannikmae, M. (2007). Nature of Science Education for Enhancing Scientific Literacy. International Journal of Science Education, 29(11) 1347-1362
  • Ireson, G. (2000). The quantum understanding of pre-university Physics students. Physics Education.
  • Kelly, A.V. The Curriculum; Theory and Practice (4th Ed.). London, UK; Paul Chapman Publishing Ltd.
  • Kendall, J. S. & Marzano, R. J. (2000). Content Knowledge: A Compendium of Standards and Benchmarks for K-12 Education, 3rd Edition
  • Khan, H.A. (2007). A Needs Analysis of Pakistan State Boarding Schools Secondary Level Students for Adoption of Communicative Language Teaching.Dissertation to the School of Arts & Education of Middlesex University London: Published.
  • Kober, N. (1993). What we know about science teaching and learning. Council for Educational Development and Research, Washington, DC.
  • Linn, M.C & Hsi, S. (2000). Computers, teachers, peers : science learning partners Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • McNeil, J. D. (2006). Contemporary Curriculum in Thought and Action. John. USA: Wiley & Sons, Inc
  • Ostermann, F. and M.A. Moreira (2000). Uma revisão bibliográfica sobre a área de pesquisa
  • Shami, P. A. (2005). Education in Pakistan: Policies and Policy Formulation. National Book Foundation, Ministry of Education, Islamabad, Pakistan. Shaver, J., &. Berlak, H. (1968). Democracy, pluralism, and the social studies. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
  • Siddique, T. and Sultan, I. F. (2008). School curriculum. Majeed Book Depot. Lahore, Pakistan. P-97
  • Silva, E. (2009). Measuring skills for 21st-century learning. Phi Delta Kappan, 90(9), 630.
  • Steiny, J. (2001). Putting Science on the Map. Providence Journal.
  • Tahir, M. S. A. (2007). Understanding Pakistan. International Influences on Education Policy Making. SPO Discussion Paper Series. Strengthening Participatory Organization.
  • Wynbrandt, J. (2009). A Brief History of Pakistan. An Imprint of In-foBase Publishing. New York, USA.
  • Wilson, S., Shulman, L., & Richert, A. (1987). 150 different ways of knowing: Representations of knowledge in teaching. Exporing teachers' thinking, 104- 124.
  • Ali, S. (2013). Pakistan: Target revision in education policy. In M.-e.-R. Ahmed (Ed.), Education in West Central Asia (pp. 163-177). London: Bloomsbury.
  • Akhtar, M. (2004). Unpublished thesis of PhD Education: analysis of curriculum process and development of a model for Secondary level in Pakistan. Retrieved on July, 17, 2012 from http://eprints.hec.gov.pk/580/1/292.html.htm
  • Avotri, R., Owusu-Darko, L., Eghan, H. and Ocansey, S. (2000). Partnership for strategic resource planning for girls education in Africa: Gender and primary schooling in Ghana. Forum for African Women Educationalists. Institute of Development Studies. England, Brighton, Sussex BN1 9RE.
  • Bhatti, M. A. (1987). Secondary Education in Pakistan: Perspective Planning. National Education Council. Islamabad: Pakistan.
  • Brown, D. F. (2006). It's the curriculum, stupid: There's something wrong with it. Phi Delta Kappan, 87(10), 777-783.
  • Chen, Y.-U. H. (2007). The role of culture in an EFL curriculum of the 21st century. Selected Papers from the Sixteenth International Symposium on English Teaching (pp. 119-129). Taipei, Taiwan: Crane.
  • Creswell (2003). Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioral Research. Edited by Abbas Tashakkori, Charles Teddlie. Sage publications,Inc.2455 Teller Road Thousand
  • Fensham, P. J. (2008). Science Education for Policy-makers: 11 emerging issues. Paris: UNESCO. Holbrook, J. & Rannikmae, M. (2007). Nature of Science Education for Enhancing Scientific Literacy. International Journal of Science Education, 29(11) 1347-1362
  • Ireson, G. (2000). The quantum understanding of pre-university Physics students. Physics Education.
  • Kelly, A.V. The Curriculum; Theory and Practice (4th Ed.). London, UK; Paul Chapman Publishing Ltd.
  • Kendall, J. S. & Marzano, R. J. (2000). Content Knowledge: A Compendium of Standards and Benchmarks for K-12 Education, 3rd Edition
  • Khan, H.A. (2007). A Needs Analysis of Pakistan State Boarding Schools Secondary Level Students for Adoption of Communicative Language Teaching.Dissertation to the School of Arts & Education of Middlesex University London: Published.
  • Kober, N. (1993). What we know about science teaching and learning. Council for Educational Development and Research, Washington, DC.
  • Linn, M.C & Hsi, S. (2000). Computers, teachers, peers : science learning partners Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • McNeil, J. D. (2006). Contemporary Curriculum in Thought and Action. John. USA: Wiley & Sons, Inc
  • Ostermann, F. and M.A. Moreira (2000). Uma revisão bibliográfica sobre a área de pesquisa
  • Shami, P. A. (2005). Education in Pakistan: Policies and Policy Formulation. National Book Foundation, Ministry of Education, Islamabad, Pakistan. Shaver, J., &. Berlak, H. (1968). Democracy, pluralism, and the social studies. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
  • Siddique, T. and Sultan, I. F. (2008). School curriculum. Majeed Book Depot. Lahore, Pakistan. P-97
  • Silva, E. (2009). Measuring skills for 21st-century learning. Phi Delta Kappan, 90(9), 630.
  • Steiny, J. (2001). Putting Science on the Map. Providence Journal.
  • Tahir, M. S. A. (2007). Understanding Pakistan. International Influences on Education Policy Making. SPO Discussion Paper Series. Strengthening Participatory Organization.
  • Wynbrandt, J. (2009). A Brief History of Pakistan. An Imprint of In-foBase Publishing. New York, USA.
  • Wilson, S., Shulman, L., & Richert, A. (1987). 150 different ways of knowing: Representations of knowledge in teaching. Exporing teachers' thinking, 104- 124.

Cite this article

    APA : Mehmud, T., & Iqbal, M. (2018). An Analysis of the New Trends in National Curriculum of Physics at the Secondary Level. Global Social Sciences Review, III(I), 141-159. https://doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2018(III-I).10
    CHICAGO : Mehmud, Tariq, and Muhammad Iqbal. 2018. "An Analysis of the New Trends in National Curriculum of Physics at the Secondary Level." Global Social Sciences Review, III (I): 141-159 doi: 10.31703/gssr.2018(III-I).10
    HARVARD : MEHMUD, T. & IQBAL, M. 2018. An Analysis of the New Trends in National Curriculum of Physics at the Secondary Level. Global Social Sciences Review, III, 141-159.
    MHRA : Mehmud, Tariq, and Muhammad Iqbal. 2018. "An Analysis of the New Trends in National Curriculum of Physics at the Secondary Level." Global Social Sciences Review, III: 141-159
    MLA : Mehmud, Tariq, and Muhammad Iqbal. "An Analysis of the New Trends in National Curriculum of Physics at the Secondary Level." Global Social Sciences Review, III.I (2018): 141-159 Print.
    OXFORD : Mehmud, Tariq and Iqbal, Muhammad (2018), "An Analysis of the New Trends in National Curriculum of Physics at the Secondary Level", Global Social Sciences Review, III (I), 141-159
    TURABIAN : Mehmud, Tariq, and Muhammad Iqbal. "An Analysis of the New Trends in National Curriculum of Physics at the Secondary Level." Global Social Sciences Review III, no. I (2018): 141-159. https://doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2018(III-I).10