ARTICLE

CONSTRUCTIVISM IN THE PEDAGOGICAL PRACTICES OF THE UNIVERSITY FACULTY

  1. HOME
  2. ARTICLE

23 Pages : 172-180

http://dx.doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2019(IV-I).23      10.31703/gssr.2019(IV-I).23      Published : Mar 1

Constructivism in the Pedagogical Practices of the University Faculty

Abstract

    The present research is aimed at assessing the extent to which university teachers employ student-centered learning, independent learners, higher order thinking, usability in real world and a conducive learning environment. Demographic differences like gender, age, experience and position differences in teachers’ usage of constructivist practices are explored. Six dimensions of the constructivist practices questionnaire are sorted through the use of exploratory factor analysis. It is identified that many teachers use the constructivist pedagogical practices at a moderate level. No significant difference is found in the use of constructivist practices of gender and experience strata, while significant difference is present in the constructivist practices of teachers in age and position strata.

    Constructivism, Pedagogical Practices, Constructivist

    (1) Hukam Dad Malik
    Associate Professor,Department of Education, National University of Modern Languages, Islamabad, Pakistan.
    (2) Marium Din
    Assistant Professor,Department of Education,National University of Modern Languages, Islamabad, Pakistan.
    (3) Samra Afzal
    Assistant Professor, Department of Education, National University of Modern Languages, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Fulltext PDF

References

  • Abdoli Sejzi, A. (2012). Virtual university in developed and developing countries towards providing a workable model of virtual university. Malaysia: University Technology Malaysia, Skudai.
  • Anderson, R. D. (1992) Perspectives on Complexity: an essay on curricular reform, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(8), pp. 861-876.
  • Brooks, J. G., & Brooks, M. G. (1993). In Search of Understanding: The Case for Constructivist Classrooms. Alexandria: Association for Supervision of Curriculum and Development.
  • Carr, M., Barker, M., Bell, B., Biddulph, F., Jones, A., Kirkwood, V., Pearson, J. & Symington, P. (1994) The Constructivist Paradigm and Some Implications for Science Content and Pedagogy, in P. Fensham, R. Gunstone & R. White (Eds) The Content of Science: a constructivist approach to its teaching and learning. London: Falmer Press.
  • Chow, P. M., Wu, S. W., Chan, S. Y., Leung, S. Y. & Fung, Y. Y. (1993) An Assessment of the Implementation of the Activity Approach in Hong Kong Primary Schools, Journal of Primary Education, 4(1), pp. 41-56. [In Chinese] Osborne, J. F. (1996). Beyond Constructivism, Science Education, 80(1), pp. 53-82.
  • Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and Education.
  • Driver, R. & Oldham, V. (1986) A Constructivist Approach to Curriculum Development in Science, Studies in Science Education, 13, pp. 105-122. Fox, R. (2001). Constructivism Examined. Oxford Review of Education, 27(1), 23-35.for change: Hong Kong experience. Journal of In-Service Education
  • Fung, Y.(Dec 2006). A constructivist strategy for developing teachers
  • Glasersfeld, V.E. (1995) A Constructivist Approach to Teaching, in L. P. Steffe & J. Gale (Eds) Constructivism in Education. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Heard,J. M(2007). My Experiences Incorporating Constructivist Teaching Strategies within an Art Education Classroom. Georgia State University
  • Kelly, G. A. (1970) A Brief Introduction to Personal Construct Theory, in D. Bannister (Ed.) Perspectives in Personal Construct Theory. London: Academic Press.
  • Kim, J.S. (2005). The Effects of a Constructivist Teaching Approach on Student Academic Achievement, Selfconcept, and Learning Strategies. Asia Pacific Education Review. Vol. 6, No. 1, 7-19
  • Mvududu, N. (2005). Constructivism in the Statistics Classroom: From Theory to Practice. Teaching Statistics, 27(2), 49-54.
  • Passman, R. (2001). Experiences with student-centered teaching and learning in high- stakes assessment environments, Education, 122(1), 189-199.
  • Pope, M. & Gilbert, J. K. (1983) Personal Experience and the Construction of Knowledge in Science, Science Education, 67(2), pp. 193-203.
  • Richardson, V. (2003). Constructivist pedagogy, Teachers College Record, 105(9), 1623- 1640.

Cite this article

APA

CHICAGO

    CHICAGO : Malik, Hukam Dad, Marium Din, and Samra Afzal. 2019. "Constructivism in the Pedagogical Practices of the University Faculty." Global Social Sciences Review, IV (I): 172-180 doi: 10.31703/gssr.2019(IV-I).23

HARVARD

    HARVARD : MALIK, H. D., DIN, M. & AFZAL, S. 2019. Constructivism in the Pedagogical Practices of the University Faculty. Global Social Sciences Review, IV, 172-180.

MHRA

    MHRA : Malik, Hukam Dad, Marium Din, and Samra Afzal. 2019. "Constructivism in the Pedagogical Practices of the University Faculty." Global Social Sciences Review, IV: 172-180

MLA

    MLA : Malik, Hukam Dad, Marium Din, and Samra Afzal. "Constructivism in the Pedagogical Practices of the University Faculty." Global Social Sciences Review, IV.I (2019): 172-180 Print.

OXFORD

    OXFORD : Malik, Hukam Dad, Din, Marium, and Afzal, Samra (2019), "Constructivism in the Pedagogical Practices of the University Faculty", Global Social Sciences Review, IV (I), 172-180

TURABIAN

    TURABIAN : Malik, Hukam Dad, Marium Din, and Samra Afzal. "Constructivism in the Pedagogical Practices of the University Faculty." Global Social Sciences Review IV, no. I (2019): 172-180. https://doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2019(IV-I).23