CONSTRUCTIVISM IN THE PEDAGOGICAL PRACTICES OF THE UNIVERSITY FACULTY

http://dx.doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2019(IV-I).23      10.31703/gssr.2019(IV-I).23      Published : Mar 1
Authored by : HukamDadMalik , MariumDin , SamraAfzal

23 Pages : 172-180

References

  • Abdoli Sejzi, A. (2012). Virtual university in developed and developing countries towards providing a workable model of virtual university. Malaysia: University Technology Malaysia, Skudai.
  • Anderson, R. D. (1992) Perspectives on Complexity: an essay on curricular reform, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(8), pp. 861-876.
  • Brooks, J. G., & Brooks, M. G. (1993). In Search of Understanding: The Case for Constructivist Classrooms. Alexandria: Association for Supervision of Curriculum and Development.
  • Carr, M., Barker, M., Bell, B., Biddulph, F., Jones, A., Kirkwood, V., Pearson, J. & Symington, P. (1994) The Constructivist Paradigm and Some Implications for Science Content and Pedagogy, in P. Fensham, R. Gunstone & R. White (Eds) The Content of Science: a constructivist approach to its teaching and learning. London: Falmer Press.
  • Chow, P. M., Wu, S. W., Chan, S. Y., Leung, S. Y. & Fung, Y. Y. (1993) An Assessment of the Implementation of the Activity Approach in Hong Kong Primary Schools, Journal of Primary Education, 4(1), pp. 41-56. [In Chinese] Osborne, J. F. (1996). Beyond Constructivism, Science Education, 80(1), pp. 53-82.
  • Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and Education.
  • Driver, R. & Oldham, V. (1986) A Constructivist Approach to Curriculum Development in Science, Studies in Science Education, 13, pp. 105-122. Fox, R. (2001). Constructivism Examined. Oxford Review of Education, 27(1), 23-35.for change: Hong Kong experience. Journal of In-Service Education
  • Fung, Y.(Dec 2006). A constructivist strategy for developing teachers
  • Glasersfeld, V.E. (1995) A Constructivist Approach to Teaching, in L. P. Steffe & J. Gale (Eds) Constructivism in Education. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Heard,J. M(2007). My Experiences Incorporating Constructivist Teaching Strategies within an Art Education Classroom. Georgia State University
  • Kelly, G. A. (1970) A Brief Introduction to Personal Construct Theory, in D. Bannister (Ed.) Perspectives in Personal Construct Theory. London: Academic Press.
  • Kim, J.S. (2005). The Effects of a Constructivist Teaching Approach on Student Academic Achievement, Selfconcept, and Learning Strategies. Asia Pacific Education Review. Vol. 6, No. 1, 7-19
  • Mvududu, N. (2005). Constructivism in the Statistics Classroom: From Theory to Practice. Teaching Statistics, 27(2), 49-54.
  • Passman, R. (2001). Experiences with student-centered teaching and learning in high- stakes assessment environments, Education, 122(1), 189-199.
  • Pope, M. & Gilbert, J. K. (1983) Personal Experience and the Construction of Knowledge in Science, Science Education, 67(2), pp. 193-203.
  • Richardson, V. (2003). Constructivist pedagogy, Teachers College Record, 105(9), 1623- 1640.
  • Abdoli Sejzi, A. (2012). Virtual university in developed and developing countries towards providing a workable model of virtual university. Malaysia: University Technology Malaysia, Skudai.
  • Anderson, R. D. (1992) Perspectives on Complexity: an essay on curricular reform, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(8), pp. 861-876.
  • Brooks, J. G., & Brooks, M. G. (1993). In Search of Understanding: The Case for Constructivist Classrooms. Alexandria: Association for Supervision of Curriculum and Development.
  • Carr, M., Barker, M., Bell, B., Biddulph, F., Jones, A., Kirkwood, V., Pearson, J. & Symington, P. (1994) The Constructivist Paradigm and Some Implications for Science Content and Pedagogy, in P. Fensham, R. Gunstone & R. White (Eds) The Content of Science: a constructivist approach to its teaching and learning. London: Falmer Press.
  • Chow, P. M., Wu, S. W., Chan, S. Y., Leung, S. Y. & Fung, Y. Y. (1993) An Assessment of the Implementation of the Activity Approach in Hong Kong Primary Schools, Journal of Primary Education, 4(1), pp. 41-56. [In Chinese] Osborne, J. F. (1996). Beyond Constructivism, Science Education, 80(1), pp. 53-82.
  • Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and Education.
  • Driver, R. & Oldham, V. (1986) A Constructivist Approach to Curriculum Development in Science, Studies in Science Education, 13, pp. 105-122. Fox, R. (2001). Constructivism Examined. Oxford Review of Education, 27(1), 23-35.for change: Hong Kong experience. Journal of In-Service Education
  • Fung, Y.(Dec 2006). A constructivist strategy for developing teachers
  • Glasersfeld, V.E. (1995) A Constructivist Approach to Teaching, in L. P. Steffe & J. Gale (Eds) Constructivism in Education. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Heard,J. M(2007). My Experiences Incorporating Constructivist Teaching Strategies within an Art Education Classroom. Georgia State University
  • Kelly, G. A. (1970) A Brief Introduction to Personal Construct Theory, in D. Bannister (Ed.) Perspectives in Personal Construct Theory. London: Academic Press.
  • Kim, J.S. (2005). The Effects of a Constructivist Teaching Approach on Student Academic Achievement, Selfconcept, and Learning Strategies. Asia Pacific Education Review. Vol. 6, No. 1, 7-19
  • Mvududu, N. (2005). Constructivism in the Statistics Classroom: From Theory to Practice. Teaching Statistics, 27(2), 49-54.
  • Passman, R. (2001). Experiences with student-centered teaching and learning in high- stakes assessment environments, Education, 122(1), 189-199.
  • Pope, M. & Gilbert, J. K. (1983) Personal Experience and the Construction of Knowledge in Science, Science Education, 67(2), pp. 193-203.
  • Richardson, V. (2003). Constructivist pedagogy, Teachers College Record, 105(9), 1623- 1640.

Cite this article

    CHICAGO : Malik, Hukam Dad, Marium Din, and Samra Afzal. 2019. "Constructivism in the Pedagogical Practices of the University Faculty." Global Social Sciences Review, IV (I): 172-180 doi: 10.31703/gssr.2019(IV-I).23
    HARVARD : MALIK, H. D., DIN, M. & AFZAL, S. 2019. Constructivism in the Pedagogical Practices of the University Faculty. Global Social Sciences Review, IV, 172-180.
    MHRA : Malik, Hukam Dad, Marium Din, and Samra Afzal. 2019. "Constructivism in the Pedagogical Practices of the University Faculty." Global Social Sciences Review, IV: 172-180
    MLA : Malik, Hukam Dad, Marium Din, and Samra Afzal. "Constructivism in the Pedagogical Practices of the University Faculty." Global Social Sciences Review, IV.I (2019): 172-180 Print.
    OXFORD : Malik, Hukam Dad, Din, Marium, and Afzal, Samra (2019), "Constructivism in the Pedagogical Practices of the University Faculty", Global Social Sciences Review, IV (I), 172-180
    TURABIAN : Malik, Hukam Dad, Marium Din, and Samra Afzal. "Constructivism in the Pedagogical Practices of the University Faculty." Global Social Sciences Review IV, no. I (2019): 172-180. https://doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2019(IV-I).23