References

• Achebe, C. (1958). Things fall apart. London: Heinemann.
• Baker, M. (1992). In other words: A coursebook on translation. London: Routledge.
• Butt, D. et al. (2000). Using functional grammar: An explorer's guide. Sydney: Macquarie University
• Butt, M., & King, T. H. (2005). The status of case. In Veneeta Dayal & Anoop Mahajan (eds.), Clause structure in South Asian languages, 153-198. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
• Butt, M., & King, T. H. (2007). Urdu in a parallel grammar development environment. Language Resources and Evaluation 41(2). 191-207.
• Collins, P. (1991). Cleft and pseudo-cleft constructions in English. London: Routledge.
• Danes, F. (1974). Functional sentence perspective and the organization of the text. In Frantisek Danes (ed.), Papers on functional sentence perspective. 106-128. Prague: Academia /The Hague: Mouton.
• Downing, A. (2001). The theme-topic interface: Evidence from English. Amsterdam:Lohnnswert.
• Eggins, S. (2004). An introduction to systemic functional linguistics. New York: Continuum
• Erdmann, P. (1990). Discourse and grammar: Focussing and defocussing in English. Tiibingen: Newmeyer.
• Grabe, W., & Kaplan, R. B. (1996). Theory of practice of writing: An appliedlinguistic perspective. Harlow: Pearson Education.
• Halliday, M. (1967). Notes on transitivity and theme in English. Journal of Linguistics 3.199-244.
• Halliday, M. (1985). An introduction to functional grammar. London: Edward Arnold
• Halliday, M. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar. London: Edward Arnold
• Halliday, M., & Matthiessen, C. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar. London:Hodder Arnold.
• Hasan, R. (1984). Ways of saying, ways of meaning. In Robin P. Fawcett, Michael Halliday, Sydney Lamb & Adam Makkai (eds.), The semiotics of language andculture volume1: Language as social semiotic. London: Francis Pinter
• Huddleston, R. (1984). Introduction to the grammar of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Johansson, M. (2002). Clefts in contrast: A contrastive study of it clefts and wh clefts in English and Swedish texts and translations. Linguistics 39(3), 547-582.
• Katz, S. (2000). A functional approach to the teaching of the French c'est-cleft. French Review 74, 248-262.
• Kuswoyo, H. (2016). Thematic structure in Barack Obama's press conference: A systemic functional grammar study. Advances in Language and Literary Studies 7(2). Australian International Academic Centre, Australia.
• Lavid, J. (2010). Contrasting choices in clause- initial position in English and Spanish: Acorpus-based analysis. In Elizabeth Swain (ed.), Thresholds and potentialities ofsystemic functional linguistics: Multilingual, multimodal and other specializeddis courses. 49-68. Trieste: EUT
• Lavid, J., Arús, J., & Moratón, L. (2010a). Annotating thematic features in English and Spanish. In Maite Taboada, Susana Doval Suárez & Elsa González Álvarez (eds.),Contrastive discourse analysis. London, England: Equinox. 22, 94, 134.