References

• Achen, M.R & Lumpkin, A. (2015). Evaluating Classroom Time through Systematic
• Adams S, & Burns, M. (1999). Connecting Student Learning and Technology, Retrievedon19/07/2014from http:/www.southsentralrtec.org/products/cslt.html.
• Al-shammari, M., & Mashi . (2012). Strategy on Active Learning , Trainer is An Expert in Natural Science Curriculum , First Edition 2012.
• Amirali, M & Halai, A. (2010). Teachers' knowledge about the nature of mathematics: A Survey of secondary school teachers in Karachi, Pakistan. Bulletin of Education and Research, 32 (2), 45-61.
• Analysis and Student Feedback. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning. 9(4). Retrieved on August 18, 2016 from https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2015.090204
• Biggs, J. & Tang, C. (2011) Teaching for Quality Learning at University: What the Student Does, 4th ed. Maidenhead: The Society for Research into Higher Education. Open University Press
• Bonwell, C. & Eison, J. (1991). Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom, ASHEERIC Higher Education Report No. 1. Washington, DC: The George Washington University, School of Education and Higher Education.
• Bressoud, D. (2016) Report on the MAA National Study of College Calculus. PowerPoint presentation at the Chicago Symposium Series, February 5, 2016.Availableat http://www.macalester.edu/~bressoud/talks/2016/ChicagoSymposium.pdf
• CBMS, (2016). Background to Active Learning in Post-Secondary Mathematics Education. Conference Board of the Mathematical Sciences. 1529 Eighteenth Street NW, Washington DC 20036. Retrieved on Jan 12, 2017 from www.cbmsweb.org
• Center for Educational Leadership (2012). 5D Teacher Evaluation Rubric, College of Education, University of Washington. Retrieved from on 12-03-2014. www.k-12leadership.org.com
• Coates, H.C. & Ainley, J. (2007) Graduate Course Experience, 2006: The Report of the Course Experience Questionnaire (CEQ). Parkville, Victoria, Australia: GCA.
• Collins, J. W., & O'Brien, N. P. (3rd Eds.).(2003). Greenwood Dictionary of Education. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
• Cothran, D. J. & Ennis, C. D. (2000). Building bridges to student engagement: Communicating respect and care for students in urban high schools. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 33(4), 106-117.
• Curtin, E. (2005). Instructional styles used by regular classroom teachers while teaching recently mainstreamed ESL students: Six urban middle school teachers in Texas share their experiences and perceptions
• Dalrymple, R., Kemp, C. & Smith, P. (2014) Characterizing work-based learning as a triadic learning endeavour. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 38 (1) 75-89
• Davies, L & Yamashita, H (2007). School Councils: School Improvement. School Councils UK. Retrieved on August 13, 2016 from www.schoolcouncils.org/scuk_content/training_and_resources/Resources/Research and reports/S chool Councils - School Improvement/
• Dewey, J. (1902). The child and the curriculum. Retrieved on Sep 12, 2015 from: http://books.google.com/books.
• Dunleavy, J. & Milton, P. (2009). What did you do in school today? Exploring the concept of Student Engagement and its implications for Teaching and Learning in Canada. Toronto: Canadian Education Association.
• Eggen, P. & Kauchak, D. (2001). Educational psychology: Windows on Classrooms. Fifth Edition. Educational Psychology. New Jersey: Merrill Prentice Hall.
• Evans, C. (2015a) Exploring the use of a deep approach to learning with students in the process of learning to teach. In: Gijbels, D., Donche, V., Richardson, J.T.E and Vermunt, J. Learning patterns in higher education. Dimensions and research perspectives. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 187-213.
• Feden, P. & Vogel, R. (2003). Methods of Teaching: Applying Cognitive Science to Promote Student Learning, McGraw Hill Higher Education.
• Fletcher, A. (2005). Meaningful Student Involvement: Guide to students as partners in school change. Soundout www.soundout.org/MSIGuide.pdf
• Fredricks, J.A, Blumenfeld, P.C & Paris, A.H. (2004). School Engagement: Potential of the Concept, State of the Evidence. Review of Educational Research.
• Freeman, S., Eddy, S., McDonough, M., Smith, M., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 111 (23) 8410-8415 http://www.pnas.org/content/111/23/8410.abstract
• Government of Pakistan (2009). National education policy. Ministry of Education, Islamabad
• Grouws, D. A. & Cebulla, K. J. (2000). Improving student achievement in mathematics. UNESCO, IBE: Geneva. Retrieve on August 2015 form http://www.ibe.unesco.org.
• Harris, L. R. (2008). A Phenomeno graphic Investigation of Teacher Conceptions of Student Engagement in Learning. The Australian Educational Researcher, 5(1), 57-79.
• Harris, L. R. (2008). A Phenomeno graphic Investigation of Teacher Conceptions of Student Engagement in Learning. The Australian Educational Researcher, 5(1), 57-79.
• Huitt, T.W., Killins, A. & Brooks, W.S. (2015) Team-Based learning in the gross anatomy laboratory improves academic performance and students' attitudes toward teamwork [online]. Anatomical Sciences Education, 8 (2) 95-103. Retrieved on 26 November 2015 from: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ase.1460/pdf
• Johnson, D.W. & Johnson, R.T. (2009). An educational psychology success story: Social interdependence theory and cooperative learning. Educational Researcher, 38(5): 365-79.
• Kuh, G.D., Kinzie, J., Buckley, J.A., Bridges, B.K. & Hayek, J.C. (2007). Piecing Together the Student Success Puzzle: Research, Propositions, and Recommendations. ASHE Higher Education Report.
• Leonard, J. & Martin, D. B. (Eds.). (2013). The brilliance of Black children in mathematics: Beyond the numbers and toward new discourse. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishers.
• Ma, X. (1999). A Meta-Analysis of the Relationship between Anxiety Toward Mathematics and Achievement in Mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30(5): 520-540.
• Macfarlane, B. (2015) Freedom to learn: the threat to student academic freedom and how it can be reclaimed. Abingdon: Routledge.
• Malik, S., & Janjua, F. (2011). International Journal of Academic Research, 963-967.
• Marks, H.M. (2000). Student engagement in instructional activity: Patterns in the elementary, middle and high school years. American Educational Research Journal, 37 (1), 153-84.
• Mocinic, SN. (2012). Active Teaching Strategies in Higher Education Metodickiobzori. 7 (2): 97-105
• Nedelsky, L. (1954). Absolute grading standards for objective tests. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 14, 3-19.
• Okereke, S. C. (2006). Effect of prior knowledge of implementing of mathematical tasks/concepts to career types and gender on students' achievement, interest and retention. In U. Nzewi (Ed) STAN Proceedings of the 47th Annual Conference, 253-259.
• Schlechty, P. (2001). Shaking up the school house: How to support and sustain educational innovation: San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
• Shah, I. H. (2016). A Study to Develop and Test Active Learning Model for Teaching Mathematics at Secondary Level. Un published Ph.D. thesis. Hazara University Mansehra, KP, Pakistan.
• Stahl, N., Simpson, M., & Hayes, C. (1992).Ten recommendations from research for teaching high-risk students. Journal of Developmental Education, 16(1), 2-10.
• Teo, R. & Wong, A. (2000),
• Trowler, V., & Trowler, P.(2010). Student engagement literature review. Retrieved: 10, May 2014 from http://www.heacademy.ac.uk /assets/documents/studentengagement/StudentEngagement LiteratureReview.pdf
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
• Waring, M. and Evans, C. (2015). Understanding pedagogy: developing a critical approach to teaching and learning. Abingdon: Routledge.
• Weimer, M. (2002). Learner-Centered Teaching: Five Keys Changes to Practice. USA: Jossey-Boss.
• WHO & UNICEF. (2009). WHO child growth standard and the identification of sever acute malnutrition in infant and children. WHO Press, World Health Organization, 20 Apia, 1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland.
• Willms, J. D. (2003). Student Engagement at School: A Sense of Belonging and Participation. Results from PISA 2000. Paris: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Accessed October 27, 2010 from http://www.unb.ca/crisp/pdf/0306.pdf
• Wlodkowski, R. & Ginsberg, M.B. (1995). Diversity and motivation: Culturally responsive teaching. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.