References

• Ahmed, S. & Malik, S. (2011). Examination Scheme at Secondary School Level in Pakistan: Composite vs Split. Canadian Social Science, 7(1): 130-139.
• Ali, A.A. and Reid, N. (2012). Understanding Mathematics: Some Key Factors, European Journal of Educational Research, 1(3),( 283-299).
• Agarwal & A.K. (2006). Beyond examination reforms. University news, Volume 44 No: (28), 10-16.s
• Ahmed, M. (2009). Comparative Perspectives on Initial Primary Teacher Education and Training in England and Pakistan. PhD Thesis: University of Hull, UK
• Ahmed, M. (2012), Factors Affecting Initial Teacher Education in Pakistan: Historical Analysis of Policy Network. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, (13) (2, 104-113).
• Aslam, H. D., Younis, A., Sheik, A. A., Maher, M., & Abbasi, Z. A. (2012),
• Batool, Z & Qureshi, R.H. (2007) quality assurance manual for higher education in Pakistan, Higher Education Commission, Pakistan.
• Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment, Phi Delta Kappan
• Brooks, J., & Brooks, M. (1999). In search of understanding: The case for constructivist classrooms. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
• Christie, T. & Khushk, A. (2004) Perceived consequences of syllabus innovation in the Pakistan Secondary School Certificate Examination. Paper presented at third ACEAB Conference. Nadi, Fiji.in Education and their Implications,2(2) Pp.(58-75).
• Grant, T.J. (1996). Pre-service teacher planning: A study of the journey from learning to teacher in mathematics and social studies. Paper presented at a conference, New York.
• Jamil, B.R. (2004). Teacher education in Pakistan: A (draft) Position Paper presented at the national Conference on teacher education held from December 20, 2004. Academy for Educational Development (AED).JBIC Today, November 2004, , retrieved on May 30, 2008. http://www.jbic.go. jp/english /base/publish/today/pdf/td_2004nov.pdf
• Jamil, B.R. (2009) Curriculum Reforms in Pakistan. Paper presented at the seminar on School Curriculum Policies and Practices in South Asian Countries
• Jadoon, Z. I. & Jabeen, N. (2006).human resource management and quality assurance in Public sector universities of Pakistan: the case of Punjab University. Lahore: The University of Punjab.
• Jadoon, J.I., Jabeen, N., & Zeba, F. (2012), http://www.icaqhe2010.org/
• Khattak, S.G. (2012). Assessment in schools in Pakistan. South Asian education Journal. (9)2
• Khan, S. H. & Saeed, M. (2009). Effectiveness of Pre-service Teacher Education Programme (B.Ed) in Pakistan: Perceptions of Graduates and their Supervisors' Bulletin Of Education and Research,( 31, 83-98).
• KAMRANI, S. (2010) Future of Pakistan in respect of Education, Islamabad: Aziz Publishers.
• Khan, I. (2011) Reading Assessment Techniques among selected Secondary School Teachers in Pakistan.
• Khan, S. (2006) An evaluation of the exercises provided in the English compulsory textbook for class X, [MA dissertation] Faculty of English Linguistics, University of Karachi.
• Kotler, P., & Keller, K.L. (2006). Marketing Management, Published by Prentice Hall.
• Memon, G.R., G.R., Joubish, M.F., & Khurram, A.K., (2010). Education in Pakistan: The Key Issues, Problems and the New Challenges. Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research, 6 (6): 672-677, 2010.
• Malik et al. (2006). Comparative analysis of M.A. English result under annual and semester system: Quality Assurance in Pakistan.
• Mirza, M. (1999), 'Examination System and Teaching and Practice of Teachers at Secondary, Higher Secondary and O' Level'. Bulletin of Education and Research, 1. Lahore: Institute of Education and Research, University of the Punjab
• Mirza, M., Nosheen M., & Masood. (1999) Impact of Examination System on Teaching Styles of Teachers at Secondary and Higher Secondary Classes, Lahore: Institute of Education and Research, University of the Punjab.
• Majeed, A. (2009). Key aspects of New National Curricula. Retrieved at: [Accessed on: 20 November, 2011]. www.nbf.org.pk/.../key Aspects curricula 2006.pdf
• Munshi, D., Javed, M., & Hussain, I. (2011-2012). Examination In Semester System: What Is Observation of Faculty and Students? The S.U. Jour. of Ed, 41(2011-2012), .76-92.
• Ministry of Education (1998). National Education Policy, (1998-2010). Islamabad: Government of Pakistan
• Ministry of Education (2009a). National Education Policy. Islamabad: Government of Pakistan.
• Ministry of Education (2009b). National Professional Standards for Teachers in Pakistan. Policy and Planning Wing, Islamabad: Government of Pakistan. Assessment can be formative or summative (see the following URL: . Northern Illinois University, Faculty Development and Instructional Design Center facdev@niu.edu, , 815.753.0595 http://facdev.niu.edu http://www.provost.cmich.edu/assessment/toolkit/formativesummative.htm
• Naqvi, R. (2002) 'Opting for O and A levels', Daily Dawn 27th December 2002. Karachi. http://www.dawn.com/events/lifestyle2002/ls23.htm.
• Newman, W. J., Abell, S. K., Hubbard, P. D., Mcdonald, J., Otaala, J. and Martini, M. (2004). Dilemmas of Teaching Inquiry in Elementary Science Methods Journal of Science Teacher Education, (15).
• Teaching Inquiry in Elementary Science Methods Journal of Science Teacher Education, 15.
• Ovando, M. N. (1994), 'Constructive Feedback: A Key to Successful Teaching and Learning', International Journal of Educational Management, (8 )6, 19 - 22 Accessed online July( 4, 2012).
• Perveen, U., & Saeed, D. (2014). A Comparative Study of Examination Practices in Annual and Semester System in Public Sector Universities of the Punjab Pakistan. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 03(01), (243-254).
• Pathak T., & Rahman M.A. (2013). Perception of students and teachers towards semester system: A study in some selected degree colleges of Nagaon Town of Nagaon district of Assam. Journal of Education and Practice, 4(1), 84-88.
• Rehmani, A. (2011) Teachers' Conceptions of Teaching: Case Studies of Professional Development Teachers from Pakistan. Thesis submitted in fulfillment of the requirement of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, Department of Learning, Curriculum and Communication, Faculty of Culture and Pedagogy, Institute of Education University of London.
• Rodrigues, S. (2010). Exploring Talk: identifying register, coherence and cohesion, In: Rodrigues, S. (Ed.), Using analytical frameworks for classroom research, London: Routledge, (144-160).
• Rehmani, A. (2003) Impact of Public Examination System on Teaching and Learning in Pakistan, International Biannual Newslette, 8 (2), 3-7. Research in Science Education Classic and Contemporary Measurements, 3-44.
• Rojewski, J. (2002). Career assessment for adolescents with mild disabilities: Critical concern for transition planning. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 73-95.
• Simmons, H. (2002). School Self-evaluation in a Democracy, School-Based Evaluation in D. Nevo (ed.), School-based Evaluation: An International Perspective, JAI Press, Oxford, 17-34.
• Sarkees-Wircenski, M. & Scott, J.L. (1995). Vocational special needs (3rd Edition). Homewood, IL: American Technical.
• Sebatane, E.M. (1998) Assessment and classroom learning: a response to Black.
• Siddique, S. (2007). Rethinking Education in Pakistan: Perceptions, practices, and possibilities. Karachi-Lahore-Islamabad: Paramount Publishing Enterprise. In Assessment in the mathematics classroom (pp. 26-39). Reston: National Council of Teachers of mathematics.
• Shah, S. & Saleem, S. (2010) Factors Conducive for the Purposeful use of Libraries among University's Students In Pakistan, International Journal on New Trends in Education
• Shami, A. P (2005), Education in Pakistan: Policies and Policy Formulation. Ministry of Education Islamabad, Pakistan: National Book Foundation.
• Tribus, M. (1994).Total Quality Management in Education developing quality system in education.Edited by Geoffery D. Dohety. Routledge, London & New York.
• Traub, R. E. & MacRury, K. (1990) Multiple-choice vs. free response in the testing of scholastic achievement, in: K. Ingenkamp & R. S. Jager (Eds) Test und tends 8: jahrbuch der pädagogischendiagnostik (Weinheim und Base, Beltz Verlag), 128-159.
• UNESCO and USAID, (2006), Strategic Framework for Teacher Education and Professional Development, Islamabad: Pakistan.
• Van de Walle, J. A. (2001). Elementary and middle school mathematics. New York: Longman.
• Von Glasersfeld, E. (1995). Radical constructivism. London: The Falmer Press.