THE TECHNOPEDAGOGICAL EXPERIENCE PROBING COMMUNICATIVE AFFORDANCE OF MOBILE PHONES IN PAKISTANS ACADEMIA

http://dx.doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2022(VII-I).44      10.31703/gssr.2022(VII-I).44      Published : Mar 1
Authored by : Madiha Maqsood , Aemen Khalid , Seemab Far Bukhari

44 Pages : 473-484

References

  • Asif, A. (2009). Analysis of Pakistani Media Consumers with regard to their participation to create an active society. (Unpublished dissertation of Master’s Thesis). Institute of Communication Studies, University of the Punjab, Lahore.
  • Boase, J. (2008). Personal networks and the personal communication system: Using multiple media to connect. Information, communication & society, 11(4), 490-508. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691180801999001
  • Baym, N. K., & Boyd, D. (2012). Socially mediated publicness: An introduction. Journal of broadcasting & electronic media, 56(3), 320- 329. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2012.705200
  • ernard, H. R., & Bernard, H. R. (2013). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Sage
  • Bradner, E. (2001, March). Social affordances: Understanding technology mediated social networks at work. In Extended Abstracts of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. https://doi.org/10.1145/634067.634111
  • Boyd, d. (2010). Social network sites as networked publics: Affordances, dynamics, and implications. In Z. Papacharissi (Ed.), Networked self: Identity, community, and culture on social network sites (39–58). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Ellison, N., & boyd, d. (2013). Sociality through social network sites. In W. H. Dutton (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of internet studies (151–172). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Ellison, N. B., & Vitak, J. (2015). Social network site affordances and their relationship to social capital processes. The handbook of the psychology of communication technology, 203-227. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118426456.ch9
  • Foti, M. K., & Mendez, J. (2014). Mobile learning: How students use mobile devices to support learning. Journal of Literacy and Technology 15(3), 58-78.
  • Frith, J. (2014). Communicating through location: The understood meaning of the Foursquare check-in. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19(4), 890–905. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12087
  • Campbell, S. W., & Park, Y. J. (2008). Social implications of mobile telephony: The rise of personal communication society. Sociology Compass, 2(2), 371–387 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.17519020.2007.00080.x
  • Chemero, A. (2018). An outline of a theory of affordances. In How Shall Affordances be Refined? Four Perspectives (181-195). Routledge.
  • Davis, J. L., & Chouinard, J. B. (2016). Theorizing affordances: From request to refuse. Bulletin of science, technology & society, 36(4), 241- 248. https://doi.org/10.1177/0270467617714944
  • Gaver, W. (1996). Affordances for interaction: The social is material for design. Ecological Psychology, 8(2), 111–129. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326969eco0802_2
  • Gibson, J. J. (1986). The ecological approach to visual perception. Hills-dale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Guma, A., Businge, P. M., Nkamwesiga, L., & Andogah, G. (2017). Use of mobile devices by students to support learning in universities: a case of Muni University . International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology (IJRET). 5. 69-80.
  • Hammond, M. (2010). What is an affordance and can it help us understand the use of ICT in education?. Education and Information Technologies, 15(3), 205-217. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-009-9106-z
  • Helles, R. (2013). Mobile communication and intermediality. Mobile Media & Communication, 1(1), 14-19. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157912459496
  • Hogan, B. J. (2009). Networking in everyday life. Toronto, ON, Canada: University of Toronto.
  • Humphreys, L. (2007). Mobile social networks and social practice: A case study of Dodgeball. Journal of Computer- Mediated Communication, 13(1), 341–360. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.10836101.2007.00399.x
  • Humphreys, L. (2011). Who's watching whom? A study of interactive technology and surveillance. Journal of Communication, 61(4), 575–595. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.14602466.2011.01570.x
  • Humphreys, L. (2012). Connecting, coordinating, cataloguing: Communicative practices on mobile social networks. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 56(4), 494– 510. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2012.732144
  • Hutchby, I., & Barnett, S. (2005). Aspects of the sequential organization of mobile phone conversation. Discourse studies, 7(2), 147- 171. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605050364
  • Hutchby, I. (2001). Technologies, texts and affordances. Sociology, 35(2), 441-456. https://doi.org/10.1177/S0038038501000219
  • Ito, M., Okabe, D., & Matsuda, M. (2005). Personal, portable, pedestrian: Mobile phones in Japanese life. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Johnson, S., & Radhakrishnan, N. (2017). Academic use of smart phones among the students of business schools in UAE-a study. KIIT Journal of library and Information Management, 4(1), 32-36.
  • Juris, J. S. (2016). Reflections on Occupy Everywhere: Social media, public space, and emerging logics of aggregation. In Youth, space and time (385-414). Brill. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.15481425.2012.01362.x
  • Karim, S. (2012). Dynamic assessment of L2 learners’ reading comprehension processes: A Vygotskian perspective. Science Direct, 321- 328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.01.047
  • Katz, J. E. (2007). Mobile media and communication: Some important questions. Communication Monographs, 74(3), 389– 394. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750701543519
  • Katz, J. E., & Aakhus, M. (2002). Perpetual contact: Mobile communication, private talk, public performance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Khan, J., Khan Malik, Z., & Amin, S. (2014). The impact of mobile phones on the performance of university students. Research Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 6, (1), 73-78. https://doi.org/10.5958/23215828.2015.00010.8
  • Lenhart, A., Ling, R., Campbell, S., & Purcell, K. (2010, April 20). Teens and Mobile Phones. http://www.pewInternet.org/2010/04/20/teens-and-mobile-phones
  • MacKenzie, D. (1985). The social shaping of technology: How the refrigerator got its hum. Milton Keynes, PA: Open University Press.
  • Majchrzak, A., Faraj, S., Kane, G. C., & Azad, B. (2013). The contradictory influence of social media affordances on online communal knowledge sharing. Journal of Computer- Mediated Communication, 19(1), 38-55. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12030
  • Mesgari, M., & Faraj, S. (2012). Technology affordances: the case of Wikipedia.
  • Meyrowitz, J. (1985). No Sense of Place: The Impact of Electronic Media on Social Behavior. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Michaels, C. F. (2003). Affordances: Four points of debate. Ecological psychology, 15(2), 135- 148. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326969ECO1502_3
  • Miakotko, L. (2017). The impact of smartphones and mobile devices on human health and life. http://www.nyu.edu/classes/keefer/waoe/miakotkol.pdf
  • Mpoza, A., & Maqsood, M. (2021). A Case for Incorporation of New Media Aspects in the Pakistan’s Mass Communication Curriculum. Journal of Media Studies, 36(1). http://111.68.103.26/journals/index.php/jms/article/view/4024
  • Oudshoorn, N., & Pinch, T. (2003). How users matter: the co-construction of users and technology (inside technology). the MIT Press.
  • Postigo, H. (2016). The socio-technical architecture of digital labor: Converting play into YouTube money. New Media & Society 18(2), 332–349. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814541527
  • Peters, J. D. (2011, June). Two cheers for technological determinism. In IKKM Annual Conferences 2011: Media History. Bauhaus- Universität Weimar.
  • Rajasingham, L. (2011). Will Mobile Learning Bring a Paradigm Shift in Higher Education?. Education Research International. https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/528495
  • Schrock, A. R. (2015). Communicative affordances of mobile media: Portability, availability, locatability, and multimediality. International Journal of Communication, 9(18),
  • Shraim, K., & Crompton, H. (2015). Perceptions of using smart mobile devices in higher education teaching: A case study from Palestine. Contemporary Educational Technology, 6(4), 301-318. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/6156
  • Treem, J. W., & Leonardi, P. M. (2013). Social media use in organizations: Exploring the affordances of visibility, editability, persistence, and association. Annals of the International Communication Association, 36(1), 143-189. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2013.11679130
  • Van Dijck, J. (2008). Digital photography: Communication, identity, memory. Visual Communication, 7(1), 57–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357207084865
  • Vyas, N., & Nirban, V. (2014). Students’ Perception on the Effectiveness of Mobile Learning in an Institutional Context. ELT Research Journal, 3 (1), 26-36. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/eltrj/issue/5481/74444
  • Vitak, J., & Ellison, N. B. (2012). 'There's a network out there you might as well tap': Exploring the benefits of and barriers to exchanging informational and support-based resources on Facebook. New Media & Society, 15(2), 243–259. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444812451566
  • Xiangming, L., & Song, S. (2018). Mobile technology affordance and its social implications: A case of “Rain Classroom”. British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(2), 276-291. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12586

References

  • Asif, A. (2009). Analysis of Pakistani Media Consumers with regard to their participation to create an active society. (Unpublished dissertation of Master’s Thesis). Institute of Communication Studies, University of the Punjab, Lahore.
  • Boase, J. (2008). Personal networks and the personal communication system: Using multiple media to connect. Information, communication & society, 11(4), 490-508. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691180801999001
  • Baym, N. K., & Boyd, D. (2012). Socially mediated publicness: An introduction. Journal of broadcasting & electronic media, 56(3), 320- 329. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2012.705200
  • ernard, H. R., & Bernard, H. R. (2013). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Sage
  • Bradner, E. (2001, March). Social affordances: Understanding technology mediated social networks at work. In Extended Abstracts of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. https://doi.org/10.1145/634067.634111
  • Boyd, d. (2010). Social network sites as networked publics: Affordances, dynamics, and implications. In Z. Papacharissi (Ed.), Networked self: Identity, community, and culture on social network sites (39–58). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Ellison, N., & boyd, d. (2013). Sociality through social network sites. In W. H. Dutton (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of internet studies (151–172). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Ellison, N. B., & Vitak, J. (2015). Social network site affordances and their relationship to social capital processes. The handbook of the psychology of communication technology, 203-227. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118426456.ch9
  • Foti, M. K., & Mendez, J. (2014). Mobile learning: How students use mobile devices to support learning. Journal of Literacy and Technology 15(3), 58-78.
  • Frith, J. (2014). Communicating through location: The understood meaning of the Foursquare check-in. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19(4), 890–905. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12087
  • Campbell, S. W., & Park, Y. J. (2008). Social implications of mobile telephony: The rise of personal communication society. Sociology Compass, 2(2), 371–387 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.17519020.2007.00080.x
  • Chemero, A. (2018). An outline of a theory of affordances. In How Shall Affordances be Refined? Four Perspectives (181-195). Routledge.
  • Davis, J. L., & Chouinard, J. B. (2016). Theorizing affordances: From request to refuse. Bulletin of science, technology & society, 36(4), 241- 248. https://doi.org/10.1177/0270467617714944
  • Gaver, W. (1996). Affordances for interaction: The social is material for design. Ecological Psychology, 8(2), 111–129. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326969eco0802_2
  • Gibson, J. J. (1986). The ecological approach to visual perception. Hills-dale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Guma, A., Businge, P. M., Nkamwesiga, L., & Andogah, G. (2017). Use of mobile devices by students to support learning in universities: a case of Muni University . International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology (IJRET). 5. 69-80.
  • Hammond, M. (2010). What is an affordance and can it help us understand the use of ICT in education?. Education and Information Technologies, 15(3), 205-217. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-009-9106-z
  • Helles, R. (2013). Mobile communication and intermediality. Mobile Media & Communication, 1(1), 14-19. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157912459496
  • Hogan, B. J. (2009). Networking in everyday life. Toronto, ON, Canada: University of Toronto.
  • Humphreys, L. (2007). Mobile social networks and social practice: A case study of Dodgeball. Journal of Computer- Mediated Communication, 13(1), 341–360. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.10836101.2007.00399.x
  • Humphreys, L. (2011). Who's watching whom? A study of interactive technology and surveillance. Journal of Communication, 61(4), 575–595. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.14602466.2011.01570.x
  • Humphreys, L. (2012). Connecting, coordinating, cataloguing: Communicative practices on mobile social networks. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 56(4), 494– 510. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2012.732144
  • Hutchby, I., & Barnett, S. (2005). Aspects of the sequential organization of mobile phone conversation. Discourse studies, 7(2), 147- 171. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605050364
  • Hutchby, I. (2001). Technologies, texts and affordances. Sociology, 35(2), 441-456. https://doi.org/10.1177/S0038038501000219
  • Ito, M., Okabe, D., & Matsuda, M. (2005). Personal, portable, pedestrian: Mobile phones in Japanese life. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Johnson, S., & Radhakrishnan, N. (2017). Academic use of smart phones among the students of business schools in UAE-a study. KIIT Journal of library and Information Management, 4(1), 32-36.
  • Juris, J. S. (2016). Reflections on Occupy Everywhere: Social media, public space, and emerging logics of aggregation. In Youth, space and time (385-414). Brill. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.15481425.2012.01362.x
  • Karim, S. (2012). Dynamic assessment of L2 learners’ reading comprehension processes: A Vygotskian perspective. Science Direct, 321- 328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.01.047
  • Katz, J. E. (2007). Mobile media and communication: Some important questions. Communication Monographs, 74(3), 389– 394. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750701543519
  • Katz, J. E., & Aakhus, M. (2002). Perpetual contact: Mobile communication, private talk, public performance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Khan, J., Khan Malik, Z., & Amin, S. (2014). The impact of mobile phones on the performance of university students. Research Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 6, (1), 73-78. https://doi.org/10.5958/23215828.2015.00010.8
  • Lenhart, A., Ling, R., Campbell, S., & Purcell, K. (2010, April 20). Teens and Mobile Phones. http://www.pewInternet.org/2010/04/20/teens-and-mobile-phones
  • MacKenzie, D. (1985). The social shaping of technology: How the refrigerator got its hum. Milton Keynes, PA: Open University Press.
  • Majchrzak, A., Faraj, S., Kane, G. C., & Azad, B. (2013). The contradictory influence of social media affordances on online communal knowledge sharing. Journal of Computer- Mediated Communication, 19(1), 38-55. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12030
  • Mesgari, M., & Faraj, S. (2012). Technology affordances: the case of Wikipedia.
  • Meyrowitz, J. (1985). No Sense of Place: The Impact of Electronic Media on Social Behavior. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Michaels, C. F. (2003). Affordances: Four points of debate. Ecological psychology, 15(2), 135- 148. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326969ECO1502_3
  • Miakotko, L. (2017). The impact of smartphones and mobile devices on human health and life. http://www.nyu.edu/classes/keefer/waoe/miakotkol.pdf
  • Mpoza, A., & Maqsood, M. (2021). A Case for Incorporation of New Media Aspects in the Pakistan’s Mass Communication Curriculum. Journal of Media Studies, 36(1). http://111.68.103.26/journals/index.php/jms/article/view/4024
  • Oudshoorn, N., & Pinch, T. (2003). How users matter: the co-construction of users and technology (inside technology). the MIT Press.
  • Postigo, H. (2016). The socio-technical architecture of digital labor: Converting play into YouTube money. New Media & Society 18(2), 332–349. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814541527
  • Peters, J. D. (2011, June). Two cheers for technological determinism. In IKKM Annual Conferences 2011: Media History. Bauhaus- Universität Weimar.
  • Rajasingham, L. (2011). Will Mobile Learning Bring a Paradigm Shift in Higher Education?. Education Research International. https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/528495
  • Schrock, A. R. (2015). Communicative affordances of mobile media: Portability, availability, locatability, and multimediality. International Journal of Communication, 9(18),
  • Shraim, K., & Crompton, H. (2015). Perceptions of using smart mobile devices in higher education teaching: A case study from Palestine. Contemporary Educational Technology, 6(4), 301-318. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/6156
  • Treem, J. W., & Leonardi, P. M. (2013). Social media use in organizations: Exploring the affordances of visibility, editability, persistence, and association. Annals of the International Communication Association, 36(1), 143-189. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2013.11679130
  • Van Dijck, J. (2008). Digital photography: Communication, identity, memory. Visual Communication, 7(1), 57–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357207084865
  • Vyas, N., & Nirban, V. (2014). Students’ Perception on the Effectiveness of Mobile Learning in an Institutional Context. ELT Research Journal, 3 (1), 26-36. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/eltrj/issue/5481/74444
  • Vitak, J., & Ellison, N. B. (2012). 'There's a network out there you might as well tap': Exploring the benefits of and barriers to exchanging informational and support-based resources on Facebook. New Media & Society, 15(2), 243–259. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444812451566
  • Xiangming, L., & Song, S. (2018). Mobile technology affordance and its social implications: A case of “Rain Classroom”. British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(2), 276-291. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12586

Cite this article

APA

    APA : Maqsood, M., Khalid, A., & Bukhari, S. F. (2022). The Techno-Pedagogical Experience: Probing Communicative Affordance of Mobile Phones in Pakistan's Academia. Global Social Sciences Review, VII(I), 473-484. https://doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2022(VII-I).44

CHICAGO

    CHICAGO : Maqsood, Madiha, Aemen Khalid, and Seemab Far Bukhari. 2022. "The Techno-Pedagogical Experience: Probing Communicative Affordance of Mobile Phones in Pakistan's Academia." Global Social Sciences Review, VII (I): 473-484 doi: 10.31703/gssr.2022(VII-I).44

HARVARD

    HARVARD : MAQSOOD, M., KHALID, A. & BUKHARI, S. F. 2022. The Techno-Pedagogical Experience: Probing Communicative Affordance of Mobile Phones in Pakistan's Academia. Global Social Sciences Review, VII, 473-484.

MHRA

    MHRA : Maqsood, Madiha, Aemen Khalid, and Seemab Far Bukhari. 2022. "The Techno-Pedagogical Experience: Probing Communicative Affordance of Mobile Phones in Pakistan's Academia." Global Social Sciences Review, VII: 473-484

MLA

    MLA : Maqsood, Madiha, Aemen Khalid, and Seemab Far Bukhari. "The Techno-Pedagogical Experience: Probing Communicative Affordance of Mobile Phones in Pakistan's Academia." Global Social Sciences Review, VII.I (2022): 473-484 Print.

OXFORD

    OXFORD : Maqsood, Madiha, Khalid, Aemen, and Bukhari, Seemab Far (2022), "The Techno-Pedagogical Experience: Probing Communicative Affordance of Mobile Phones in Pakistan's Academia", Global Social Sciences Review, VII (I), 473-484

TURABIAN

    TURABIAN : Maqsood, Madiha, Aemen Khalid, and Seemab Far Bukhari. "The Techno-Pedagogical Experience: Probing Communicative Affordance of Mobile Phones in Pakistan's Academia." Global Social Sciences Review VII, no. I (2022): 473-484. https://doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2022(VII-I).44