References
- ARI, T. (2018, October ). Theories of International Relations 1. FACULTY OF OPEN EDUCATION PUBLICATIONS NO.2621, 3.
- Buzan, B., Jones, C. A., & Little, R. (1993). The Logic of Anarchy: Neorealism to Structuralism. New York.
- Carr, E. H. (1981). THe Twenty Years Criss 1919-1939: An Introduction to hte study of International Relations, . (2. n. Edition, Ed.)
- Donnelly, J. (2000). Realsim and International Relations . Cambridge University Press.
- Donnelly, J. (2005). Theories of International Relations. In 3. Edition (Ed.). New York: Palgrave, Macmillan, Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire RG21 6XS and 175 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY. 10010.
- Grieco, J. M. (2015).
- Herz, J. H. (1951). Politcal Realism and Political Idealism. Chicago University Press.
- Herz, J. H. (1976). The Nation-State and the Crisis of World Politcs: Essays on International Politics in the Twenthieth Century. New York.
- John, M. J. (1994).
- Kegley, C. W. (1993). The Neoidealist Moment in International Studies ? Realist Myths and the New International Realities. 37(2), pp. 131-146.
- Mearsheimer, J. (1995). 'A Realist Reply'. International Security, 20.
- Morgenthau, H. J. (1997). politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace.
- Schweller, R. L. (1994). 'Bandwagoning for Profit: Bringing the Revisionist State Back In',. International Security , 19.
- Schweller, R. L., & D, P. (1997). 'A Tale of Two Realisms: Expanding the Institutions Debate. Mershon International Studies Review, 41.
- Shimko, K. (1992). Realism, Neorealism and American Liberalism. The Review of Politics.
- Synder, G. H. (1971, March ).
- Viotti, P. R., & Kauppi, M. V. (2012). International Relations Theory (5th ed.). U.S: Pearson .
- Waltz, K. (1991). The Assumption of Anarchy in International Relations Theory:A Critique. Review of International Studies, 29.
- Waltz, K. (1997, December). Evaluating Theories. Retrieved August 01, 2014, from DOI: http://doi.org/102307/2952173
- ARI, T. (2018, October ). Theories of International Relations 1. FACULTY OF OPEN EDUCATION PUBLICATIONS NO.2621, 3.
- Buzan, B., Jones, C. A., & Little, R. (1993). The Logic of Anarchy: Neorealism to Structuralism. New York.
- Carr, E. H. (1981). THe Twenty Years Criss 1919-1939: An Introduction to hte study of International Relations, . (2. n. Edition, Ed.)
- Donnelly, J. (2000). Realsim and International Relations . Cambridge University Press.
- Donnelly, J. (2005). Theories of International Relations. In 3. Edition (Ed.). New York: Palgrave, Macmillan, Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire RG21 6XS and 175 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY. 10010.
- Grieco, J. M. (2015).
- Herz, J. H. (1951). Politcal Realism and Political Idealism. Chicago University Press.
- Herz, J. H. (1976). The Nation-State and the Crisis of World Politcs: Essays on International Politics in the Twenthieth Century. New York.
- John, M. J. (1994).
- Kegley, C. W. (1993). The Neoidealist Moment in International Studies ? Realist Myths and the New International Realities. 37(2), pp. 131-146.
- Mearsheimer, J. (1995). 'A Realist Reply'. International Security, 20.
- Morgenthau, H. J. (1997). politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace.
- Schweller, R. L. (1994). 'Bandwagoning for Profit: Bringing the Revisionist State Back In',. International Security , 19.
- Schweller, R. L., & D, P. (1997). 'A Tale of Two Realisms: Expanding the Institutions Debate. Mershon International Studies Review, 41.
- Shimko, K. (1992). Realism, Neorealism and American Liberalism. The Review of Politics.
- Synder, G. H. (1971, March ).
- Viotti, P. R., & Kauppi, M. V. (2012). International Relations Theory (5th ed.). U.S: Pearson .
- Waltz, K. (1991). The Assumption of Anarchy in International Relations Theory:A Critique. Review of International Studies, 29.
- Waltz, K. (1997, December). Evaluating Theories. Retrieved August 01, 2014, from DOI: http://doi.org/102307/2952173
Cite this article
-
APA : Tariq, M., Rizwan, M., & Ahmad, M. (2018). Human Nature, Anarchy, and Hierarchy as Determining Factors of Realism. Global Social Sciences Review, III(III), 477-487. https://doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2018(III-III).27
-
CHICAGO : Tariq, Muhammad, Muhammad Rizwan, and Manzoor Ahmad. 2018. "Human Nature, Anarchy, and Hierarchy as Determining Factors of Realism." Global Social Sciences Review, III (III): 477-487 doi: 10.31703/gssr.2018(III-III).27
-
HARVARD : TARIQ, M., RIZWAN, M. & AHMAD, M. 2018. Human Nature, Anarchy, and Hierarchy as Determining Factors of Realism. Global Social Sciences Review, III, 477-487.
-
MHRA : Tariq, Muhammad, Muhammad Rizwan, and Manzoor Ahmad. 2018. "Human Nature, Anarchy, and Hierarchy as Determining Factors of Realism." Global Social Sciences Review, III: 477-487
-
MLA : Tariq, Muhammad, Muhammad Rizwan, and Manzoor Ahmad. "Human Nature, Anarchy, and Hierarchy as Determining Factors of Realism." Global Social Sciences Review, III.III (2018): 477-487 Print.
-
OXFORD : Tariq, Muhammad, Rizwan, Muhammad, and Ahmad, Manzoor (2018), "Human Nature, Anarchy, and Hierarchy as Determining Factors of Realism", Global Social Sciences Review, III (III), 477-487
-
TURABIAN : Tariq, Muhammad, Muhammad Rizwan, and Manzoor Ahmad. "Human Nature, Anarchy, and Hierarchy as Determining Factors of Realism." Global Social Sciences Review III, no. III (2018): 477-487. https://doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2018(III-III).27