Abstract
The 9/11 was a paradigm shifting event in the international and global politics. On September 11, 2001, two jet planes hit the twin’s tower in United States of America (USA). US official authorities said that it is done by al-Qaeda. This event also changes Pakistan’s internal and foreign policies. The government of United States compel Afghan Taliban government to handover the master mind of 9/11 attack and their leader Osama bin Laden but the talks failed between the both governments. Therefore US government compel the government of Pakistan to give us Military bases and assistance against Afghan Taliban. Pakistan agreed with US as frontline ally of US in war on terror. The majority of Pakistani people were not happy with the decision, therefore, some non-state actors appeared in different part of the country especially in Malakand Division and FATA to support Taliban regime in Afghanistan. In Malakand Division Mulana Sufi Muhammad head of Tehrik Nifaz-e-Shariat-e-Muhammadi started a proper armed campaign for Afghan Taliban Support and sent thousands of people to Afghanistan support Taliban against US and their allied forces. It was a basic reason behind the emergence of terrorism in Malakand division KP but it did not played it role alone to cause terrorism in the region. Many other important factors i.e. weak political administration, unemployment, economic deprivation, socio-political instability constituted the main reason that opened room for non-state actors to consolidate their grip on the region.
Key Words
Afghanistan, Pakistan, United Sates of America, Al-Qaeda, Taliban, Malakand Division.
Introduction
Since the beginning Pakistan has remained a
security state. However, after September 11, 2001, Pakistan Army was ensuring
internal security and stability through tackling insurgency in the Federally
Administered Tribal Areas (FATA) and the Provincially Administered Tribal Areas
(PATA) of the country. FATA comprises seven agencies, i.e. Bajaur, Mohmand,
Orakzai, Khyber, Kurram, North Waziristan, and South Waziristan. PATA of Khyber
Pakhtunkhwa includes the districts of Swat, upper and lower Dir, Buner and
Shangla. Insurgency was one of the shocking challenges to the security, political,
social and economic prosperity of Pakistan. It was a challenge for political
government and Pakistan army that how to maintain peace and prosperity. However
in this regard, the army has launched some major and several minor military operations
against the insurgent, militant and terrorist groups.
Terrorist
actions of Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), Tehrik
Nifaz-e-Shariat-e-Muhammadi (TNSM), and other foreign-related elements are
matters of serious concern to Pakistan. The Pakistan army has used heavy ground
and air weapons during the operations. It has resulted in enormous and huge
collateral damages. The killing of civilians, innocent people, including women
and children, the destruction of schools, collages, civil institutions and
hospitals is the result of these operations. However Taliban also contributed a
lot in the destruction of Malakand Division and committed many brutal actions
against the innocent people. Thousands of casualties cause by suicide attacks and
have wide consequence and implications on internal security. The internal
socio-political circumstances and the economic situation in FATA and PATA-KP had
been collapsed as a consequence of all this. The vital objective of such
operations was to force the terrorists groups out of their strongholds and to wipe
out their power. To reinstate the government writ and military infrastructure
to stop non state armed actors from launching future attacks and terrorist
activities.
Table
01: List of Pak-Military Operations
S. No. |
Military Operation |
Launching Year |
Region of Occupation |
1 |
Operation
Enduring Freedom |
2001 |
Afghanistan/Pakistan |
2 |
Operation
Al Mizan |
2002 |
FATA |
3 |
Operation
Zalzala |
2008 |
South Waziristan |
4 |
Operation Rah-e-Haq |
2007 |
Malakand Division |
5 |
Operation Sher Dil |
2008 |
Bajaur Agency |
6 |
Operation Rah-e-Rast |
2009 |
Swat KP |
7 |
Operation Rah-e-Nijat |
2009 |
South Waziristan Agency |
8 |
Operation Black Thunderstorm |
2009 |
Malakand Division |
9 |
Operation Koh-e-Sufaid |
2011 |
Kurram Agency |
10 |
Operation Zarb-e-Azb |
2014 |
North Waziristan Agency |
Military Operation
Military operation is a planned and designed movement
by the equipped military forces in war and it may be used for training in war. Military actions and
operations is also use when a state wants to developing situation in response.
These are the actions designed by military plan to resolve any issue
and control the situation in the state's interests. These operations may be non-combat or of combat types (Glantz, 1991).
The military actions and operations have some code names for security purpose
and also general names for common usage i.e. Pakistan military operation Rah-e-Haq
or Zarb-e-Azb.
Similarly this structure of military actions are planned
in armed forces and that is use to conduct operations at different levels of
war. However it is a common relationship between the sizes of units, the area where
they need to operate, and the requirement or scope of mission they going to
perform. But the correlation is not considered absolute while it depends on
situation (Glantz, 1991).
Terrorism: Definitions
Terrorism is a complicated phenomenon with extensive wide history and diverse meanings. It depending on the context that when, where and who uses it. Walter Liqueur said terrorism represent the illegitimate and unlawful utilization of power to attain a political objective. He extended his definition that when innocent people are targeted for that goal is called terrorism (Laqueur, 2005). Brian Jenkins says Terrorism is the exercise of force planned to bring about political change. Terrorism also can be defined as Patrick O’Neil mention in his book “Essentials of Comparative Politics” Terrorism is the use of violence by non-state actors against the innocent people and civilians in commands to attain a political goal (O’Neil, 2007).
However as a result of brief study, some of my arguments may criticize these definitions. The terrorism is not like rebellion or insurgency. It is a crime like criminals do in any state or country. Terrorism is so different from rebellion and insurgency. The terrorists have no any solid arguments for their acts. Even they do not have any justification for their actions. If they had any argument (may be right or wrong) but they target the innocent people, they will be considered terrorists. No matter if they are individuals, groups or state, but when they target the innocent people we can call them terrorists. Definition of terrorism in own opinion is “it is an act to commit by non-state armed groups, state or criminals or anyone with a state or anti-state policies to target the innocent people to achieve his/her objectives or political and nonpolitical goals.” Even if they have any ideology mean that, they have any political or religious ideology and they are revolutionary groups, but if they commit a criminal offense to make disturbance for their own survivals. Though they will be consider as terrorist.
Terrorism in Malakand Division: A Brief Discussion
In 2009 some non-state actors in Malakand
Division demanded the government to implement Shariah in the region. These non-
state actors were locals and they show him, as a religious background. They
propagated their agenda and run their campaign through local radio station, so
their campaign had been very enthusiastic and appealing for the locals, hence
most of them joined these groupings (Islam, 2014).
Then government launched military
operation ‘Rah-e-Rast’ in Malakand Division in 2009. After failing to influence
the Taliban to vacate Buner, Dir, and Swat, where the militants had combined
control in the first several months of 2009. Outcomes of this military
operation were intense and were faced with strong resistance from militants or
non-state actors. The circles of these militants were religions grouping from
different districts of Malakand Division though the head of the militancy began
in Swat.
Military Operation was launched against
the religious extremist non state armed actors in the some areas of Malakand
Division which included Swat, Buner and Dir Lower. However the military
operation was started to establish the writ of the government and provide safe and
prosperous life to people of the region. At the same time it caused lots of difficulties
such as the economy loses poor health and education, increased unemployment,
Internally Displaced Persons (IDPs) and more other relevant problems.
Pakistan
military launched a massive offensive against Taliban groups in Malakand region
of KP in the last week of April 2009. The operation was chosen as a last alternative
after the failure of two peace agreements of the provincial government. The
first peace accord conducted with Mullah Fazlullah a local Taliban leader in
Swat and the second with TNSM head Sufi Muhammad. But Taliban had refused the
agreements and violated the peace accords, to lay down their arms. The basic
reason of this failure was; the government of KP signed agreement with a
function less leader Sufi Muhammad and it was true that Sufi Muhammad had no
commands on local Taliban of Swat. Taliban did not stop their attacks against security
forces including Pakistan army, Frontier Corps (FC) and local police either (Islam,
2014).
“Almost all previous operations had
eventually ended with the government reaching a peace agreement or truce with
Taliban. After every agreement, the government declared its victory. Taliban,
nonetheless, used these agreements strategically to their advantage. These
deals had not only consolidated their control in certain areas but also helped
them make new recruitments, vital for making further advances” (Rana, 2009;
Butt et al, 2011).
Table 02: Shows Terrorists attack in
FATA and KP (2009)
Region |
No. of Attacks |
Killed |
Injured |
Khyber Pakhtunkhwa |
1,137 |
1,439 |
3,616 |
FATA |
559 |
644 |
1,046 |
Source:
Arshad
Ali. (2010). Economic Cost of Terrorism: A case Study of Pakistan. Institute
of Strategic Studies Islamabad.
Emergence of Militant Groups in KP
After the incident of 9/11 there are more challenges for Muslim states like Iraq and Afghanistan which results war and conflicts. The both countries paid enough and still paying the people losing their lives many people have been paralyzed, disabled and injured due to various attack of allied forces and terrorists. Pakistan is also one of them and facing much more difficulties, death and destruction because of frontline ally non NATO ally (Rahman, 2011). The Malakand Division is provincially administrated tribal area (PATA). The Supreme Court of Pakistan gives order in 1994 that Malakand division to be administering under regular Pakistani law and no any kind of special provisions for the region. But the decision is not very effected, because the head of TNSM Sufi Muhammad call for exclusive Shariah jurisdiction. However in 2002 president Musharraf was trying to establish the local governance which has work for security aspects in the PATA districts (Aziz, 2010).
KP region Malakand division and especially Swat where the extremism took place has no shared border with Afghanistan even with FATA. But then what were the causes of terrorism in KP. The so called Islamic extremist group was active before 9/11 with the name of TNSM. During Afghan Jihad Sufi Muhammad supported Hikmatyar Hizbi-e-Islami (HI) financially and through man-power. In 1989 TNSM leader Mulana Sufi Muhammad started a campaign, the objective of which was the implementation of Shariah. Foundation of Tehreek-i-Nifaz-i-Shariat-i-Muhammadi was laid down in June 1989 in lower Dir. Mulana Sufi Muhammad’s activities were limited to Malakand division districts like Swat, Lower Dir, Upper Dir, Shangla, Malakand, Buner, Kohistan district of Hazara division and Bajaur Agency in FATA. Soon TNSM got strong support of people in that regions and Sufi Muhammad demanded implementation of Islamic law (Khan, 2010).
The people of KP and FATA are committed to religion; therefore they supported Sufi Muhammad’s campaign. The people not only followed him in that campaign before 9/11 but they were supporting him in November 2001 as well, when he called people for “Jihad” against US and NATO allies in Afghanistan. Sufi Muhammad was active and prominent member of Jamat-e-Islami (JI) in Lower Dir. Some people are of the view that opponent political parties also tried to break the hold of JI in that region. They used Sufi Muhammad as a weapon holder because he was against the democracy and current political system of Pakistan (Aziz, 2010). In 1991 Sufi Muhammad started his campaign in Lower Dir’s head-quarter Temergarah along with many supporters. He demanded enforcement of Shariah in Malakand division. At that time the sitting Chief Minister (CM) of North West Frontier Province (NWFP) (now KP) was Mir Afzal Khan. He assured that government will fulfill Sufi’s demands. The case of implementation of Shariah was filed in Supreme Court of Pakistan on 14 February 1991. Supreme Court ordered the government of KP that Malakand division will usually be governed by common law and no kind of special provisions would be given to Malakand Division. (Aziz, 2010).
Supreme Court’s decision increased the support for TNSM campaign whereas the local Khans, Maliks and the bureaucracy facilitated Sufi Muhammad. In May, 1994 the Sufi Muhammad called his campaign against the government. In November 1994, his supporters started an armed campaign for their demands and took control of many government buildings in Swat District. In 1999 after the long protest of TNSM, the provincial government regulated “Shari-Nizam-e-Adal Regulation” in Malakand division KP (Ali and Khan 2010). But that “Shari-Nizam-e-Adal Regulation” was not acted upon properly. The government wanted to settle the trouble on temporary basis and gain some time. New legal administrative institutions of 1994 indirectly suspended the legal rights of peoples of Malakand. That legislation did not meet the criteria of Islamic law not followed proper Pakistani law. Therefore interim government policies dragged circumstances to awful circumstances.
The Khyber Pakhtunkhwa situation overall was different from FATA. In KP Malakand division the anti-government extremist group TNSM was active before 9/11. As we know Sufi protested several times in 1991, 1994 and 1999 at Dir, Temergarah and Swat with thousands of supporters. They demanded the enforcement of Shariah but whenever government rejected Sufi’s demands he protested and launched armed campaign for that purpose. So it is true that Malakand has no close nexus with Afghanistan but the weak administration did not minimize the influence of organizations like TNSM even they supported those organizations for some short term benefits. These administrative weaknesses and their policies paved the way to strengthen these organizations. In future, it resulted in strong opposition to the government of Pakistan after 9/11. Sufi Muhammad later mobilized the people in Malakand division for war against NATO forces in Afghanistan. He organized a protest demonstration in Swat, Mingora in September, 2001 for raising a “voluntary army” for anti-US Jihad in Afghanistan. He collected 10000 persons equipped poorly with weapons and crossed the Pak-Afghan border in 2001 to wage war against the US and their allies.
When the then US president George W. Bush announced to invade Afghanistan against Taliban, Sufi Muhammad once again motivated people to support Afghan Taliban and sent many people to “Jihad.” After that Sufi Muhammad was sentenced to imprisonment with his son in law Mulana Fazllulah. Fazllulah was released from jail. He established unauthorized FM radio channel in his native village Imamdheri (three kilometers away from Saidu Sharif). He started the preaching Islam from the channel. In the beginning he was supported by the TNSM members. He motivated people through polite speeches. Every night at 8 p.m. he used to start his (dars) speeches. Up to 2005, he was preaching peacefully. In 2007 he established his own Taliban organization and started strong anti-state campaign. The Lal Masjid military operation provided him strong social and economic support. The people of Malakand division gave him every possible financial support. The females donated their jewelry, money and other financial assets to the cause Jihad followers of Fazllulah. Actually Red Mosque operation increased Mulana Fazllulah support and thousands of people joined Swat Taliban, to them the Lal Masjid Operation presented government as an anti-Islamic and unjust institution. After the death of Hakeem Ullah Mehsud he (Fazllulah) appeared as TTP leader (Firdous, 2014; Aziz, 2010; Khan, 2009; Mayo, 2011; Kakar, 2009).
Causes of Terrorism in Malakand Division
S. No |
Losses in
Sectors |
Losses |
1 |
Schools Completely Damaged |
Above 200 |
2 |
Schools Partially Damaged |
Above 180 |
3 |
Tuorism Sector |
Rs 9 Billion |
4 |
Agriculture Sector |
Above Rs 51 Billion |
5 |
Livestock |
Above Rs 62 Billion |
6 |
Rehabilitation for other losses i.e. Hospitals, roads,
properties, IDPs funds etc |
Needed $2 Billion |
Conclusion
Terrorism and military operations both suffered Malakand Division and its people. It affected thousands of innocent people, thousands of population got physical, economic, psychological and educational disabilities. The infrastructure of Malakand Division i.e. hospital, schools, offices of civil authorities, houses, mosques, roads, farming fields and many other places of the government and peoples were damaged. But at the same time terrorism had many causes in Malakand Division that why it occupied in the region. During the research it is examined that the main factors which prompted terrorism in the region were weak administration and their policies, lack of sound governance weakens the loyalty of locals for the government. The illegal activities of non-state armed actors like Tehrik-e-Nifaz Shariat Muhammadi and Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan in the region caused militancy in the region. However that was government negligence which provide proper and possible gap to these non-state actors to have footing in Malakand Division. Government negligence and fragile policies of political administration in the Malakand Division also reason for terrorism. Illegal FM broadcasting by the militants is also a vital cause of terrorism in the region. The FM broadcasting played its role to change the mind of the people of Malakand Division towards social instability and extremism. Economic dislocation and illiteracy also cause terrorism and militancy in the Malakand division. These all elements open room for extremism, militancy and terrorism in the region.
References
- Aftab. A. M. (accessed Seotember 6, 2013).
- Ali. L. A., and Khan. N. I. (2010). The Rise of Tehreek - e - Nifaz - e - Shariat - e- Mohammadi in Malakand Division, NWFP: A Case Study of the Process of
- Aziz, K., and Helge, L. (2010). Swat Main Causes of the Rise of Militancy. Norwegian Institute of International Affairs.
- Aziz. K. (2010). SWAT: The Main Causes of the Breakdown of Governance and Rise of Militancy. Peshawar: Regional Institute of Policy Research and Training.
- Baylis. J., and et al. (2008) Globalization of World Politics An Introduction to International Relations. London: Oxford, 2008.
- Bari, F. (2010). Gendered Perceptions and Impact of Terrorism / Talibanization in Pakistan. Islamabad: Heiurich Boll Stiftung Pakistan.
- BBC. Pakistan hunting Swat militants. December 8, 2007. (accessed September 5, 2013).
- Bantekas. I. and., Nash, S. (2003). International Criminal Law. London: Cavendish Publishing Limited.
- Bilal, S. M.
- Brown.J.
- Brown. J. available at
- Butt, U., and Elahi. N.. (2011). Pakistan's Quagmire : Security, Strategy, and the Future of the Islamic-Nuclear Nation. Londan: Continuum International Publication.
- Charles. W., and Kegly. Jr. (2008). World Politics Trend and transformation. United State: Thomson Wadsworth.
- Daily Times, (Islamabad)June 15, 2009 Dawn available at
- Din. N. (2010). Internal Displacement in Pakistan:Contemporary Challenges. NGO Report, Lahore: Human Rights Commission of Pakistan.
- Fidous. K. (2014). Militancy in Pakistan. Institute of Strategic Studies Islamabad. 112-129.
- Glantz. D. M. (1991). Soviet Military Operational Art: In Pursuit of Deep Battle. Abingdon: Frank cass and company limitted.
Cite this article
-
APA : Yousufi, M., & Islam, F. U. (2017). A Critical Analysis of Terrorism and Military Operations in Malakand Division (Khyber Pakhtunkhwa). Global Social Sciences Review, II(II), 109-121. https://doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2017(II-II).06
-
CHICAGO : Yousufi, Musab, and Fakhr Ul Islam. 2017. "A Critical Analysis of Terrorism and Military Operations in Malakand Division (Khyber Pakhtunkhwa)." Global Social Sciences Review, II (II): 109-121 doi: 10.31703/gssr.2017(II-II).06
-
HARVARD : YOUSUFI, M. & ISLAM, F. U. 2017. A Critical Analysis of Terrorism and Military Operations in Malakand Division (Khyber Pakhtunkhwa). Global Social Sciences Review, II, 109-121.
-
MHRA : Yousufi, Musab, and Fakhr Ul Islam. 2017. "A Critical Analysis of Terrorism and Military Operations in Malakand Division (Khyber Pakhtunkhwa)." Global Social Sciences Review, II: 109-121
-
MLA : Yousufi, Musab, and Fakhr Ul Islam. "A Critical Analysis of Terrorism and Military Operations in Malakand Division (Khyber Pakhtunkhwa)." Global Social Sciences Review, II.II (2017): 109-121 Print.
-
OXFORD : Yousufi, Musab and Islam, Fakhr Ul (2017), "A Critical Analysis of Terrorism and Military Operations in Malakand Division (Khyber Pakhtunkhwa)", Global Social Sciences Review, II (II), 109-121
-
TURABIAN : Yousufi, Musab, and Fakhr Ul Islam. "A Critical Analysis of Terrorism and Military Operations in Malakand Division (Khyber Pakhtunkhwa)." Global Social Sciences Review II, no. II (2017): 109-121. https://doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2017(II-II).06