ARTICLE

USING IAT TO MEASURE IMPLICIT BIASES TOWARDS MENTAL ILLNESS

40 Pages : 435-442

http://dx.doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2023(VIII-II).40      10.31703/gssr.2023(VIII-II).40      Published : Jun 2

Using IAT to Measure Implicit Biases towards Mental Illness

    Mental illness for many years has been perceived in a negative light, greatly impacting the degree of treatment-seeking behaviour, the public attitude towards mental illness, laws and policies and the negative attitudes and associations that are formed towards mental illness. Therefore the research study investigates the attitude of psychology students; given their psychological knowledge about mental illness and evaluates the attributions they make towards mental illness. Participants from different institutions in Lahore participated in this research study and attempted Implicit Association Test to assess whether psychology students are implicitly biased towards the mentally ill or not.Quantitative data were collected and statistically analyzed with the help of SPSS; Independent samples t-test, paired samples test, One-way ANOVA and Pearson Correlation were applied to analyze the data. The study concluded that regardless of knowledge and exposure, students of psychology have an implicit bias towards mental illness.

    Attributions, Implicit Biases, IAT, Mental Illness, Mental Health Facilities, Negative Attitude. Public Attitude, Psychology
    (1) Sarima Baig
    Visiting Lecturer, Department of Psychology, Forman Christian College, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan.
    (2) Elizabeth Schwaiger
    Assistant Professor, Department of Psychology, Forman Christian College, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan.
  • Antonio, R. J. (1975). On ignoring the subtle dimensions of labeling: the case of mental disorder. The Kansas Journal of Sociology, 11(1), 3-13. https://doi.org/10.17161/str.1808.6093
  • Asendorpf, J. B., Banse, R., & Mücke, D. (2002). Double dissociation between implicit and explicit personality self-concept: The case of shy behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(2), 380-393. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022- 3514.83.2.380
  • Blanton, H., Jaccard, J., Gonzales, P. M., & Christie, C. (2006). Decoding the implicit association test: Implications for criterion prediction. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42(2), 192-212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2005.07.00 3
  • Brendl, C. M., Markman, A. B., & Messner, C. (2001). How do indirect measures of evaluation work? Evaluating the inference of prejudice in the Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(5), 760-773. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022- 3514.81.5.760
  • Cohen, J., & Struening, E. L. (1962). Opinions about mental illness in the personnel of two large mental hospitals. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 64(5), 349– 360. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0045526
  • Collins, R.L., Wong, E. C., Cerully, J. L., Schultz, D., & Eberhart, N. K. (2012). Interventions to Reduce Mental Health Stigma and Discrimination. A Literature Review to Guide Evaluation of California’s Mental Health Prevention and Early Intervention Initiative. RAND Corporation
  • Corrigan, P. W., Markowitz, F. E., Watson, A. C., Rowan, D., & Kubiak, M. A. (2003). An Attribution Model of Public Discrimination Towards Persons with Mental Illness. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 44(2), 162. https://doi.org/10.2307/1519806
  • Dasgupta, N., & Greenwald, A. G. (2001). On the malleability of automatic attitudes: Combating automatic prejudice with images of admired and disliked individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(5), 800–814. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022- 3514.81.5.800
  • Dasgupta, N., Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (2003). The First Ontological Challenge to the IAT: Attitude or Mere Familiarity? Psychological Inquiry, 14(3), 238– 243. https://faculty.washington.edu/agg/I ATmaterials/PDFs/Dasgupta&al.PsyInq(20 03).pdf
  • Glock, S., & Kovacs, C. (2013). Educational Psychology: Using Insights from Implicit Attitude Measures. Educational Psychology Review, 25(4), 503-522. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43546825
  • Goodfellow, B., Defromont, L., Calandreau, F., & Roelandt, J.-L. (2010). Images of the “Insane,” the “Mentally Ill,” and the “Depressed” in Nouméa, New Caledonia: A Mental Health Survey in the General Population. International Journal of Mental Health, 39(1), 82–98. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41345312
  • Greenwald, A. G. (2020). Implicit Association Test Materials [Website]. https://faculty.washington.edu/agg/iat_ma terials.htm
  • Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. (1998b). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(6), 1464–1480. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022- 3514.74.6.1464
  • Hatzenbuehler, M. L., Nolen-Hoeksema, S., & Dovidio, J. F. (2009). How Does Stigma “Get Under the Skin”? Psychological Science, 20(10), 1282–1289. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467- 9280.2009.02441.x
  • Hofstede, G. (2011). Dimensionalizing Cultures: The Hofstede Model in Context. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1014
  • Howard, J. a. K., & Levinson, R. (1985). The Overdue Courtship of Attribution and Labeling. Social Psychology Quarterly, 48(3), 191. https://doi.org/10.2307/3033680
  • Jakubczyk, A., Suszek, H., Bonar, E. E., Myszka, M., Gmaj, B., Ilgen, M. A., & Wojnar, M. (2014). Evaluating Explicit and Implicit Stigma of Mental Illness in Mental Health Professionals and Medical Students. Community Mental Health Journal, 51(5), 628–634. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597- 014-9796-6
  • Kroska, A., & Harkness, S. K. (2006). Stigma Sentiments and Self-Meanings: Exploring the Modified Labeling Theory of Mental Illness. Social Psychology Quarterly, 69(4), 325– 348. https://doi.org/10.1177/0190272506 06900403
  • Levinson, R. M. (1975). Teaching Labeling Theory: Four Experiences in Illness Attribution. Teaching Sociology. https://doi.org/10.2307/131687 2
  • Martin, J. K., Pescosolido, B. A., Olafsdottir, S., & McLeod, J. D. (2007). The Construction of Fear: Americans’ Preferences for Social Distance from Children and Adolescents with Mental Health Problems. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 48(1), 50–67. http://www.jstor.org/stable/27638690
  • Meesner, C., & Vosgerau, J. (2010). Cognitive Inertia and the Implicit Association Test. Journal of Marketing Research, 47(2), 374- 386. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25674434
  • Phelan, J. C., & Link, B. G. (2004). Fear of People with Mental Illnesses: The Role of Personal and Impersonal Contact and Exposure to Threat or Harm. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 45(1), 68–80. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3653805
  • Steffens, M. C. (2004). Is the Implicit Association Test Immune to Faking? Experimental Psychology, 51(3), 165– 179. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618- 3169.51.3.165
  • Wallach, H. S. (2004). Changes in Attitudes towards Mental Illness Following Exposure. Community Mental Health Journal, 40(3), 235– 248. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:comh.0000 026997.92083.4d

Cite this article

    CHICAGO : Baig, Sarima, and Elizabeth Schwaiger. 2023. "Using IAT to Measure Implicit Biases towards Mental Illness." Global Social Sciences Review, VIII (II): 435-442 doi: 10.31703/gssr.2023(VIII-II).40
    HARVARD : BAIG, S. & SCHWAIGER, E. 2023. Using IAT to Measure Implicit Biases towards Mental Illness. Global Social Sciences Review, VIII, 435-442.
    MHRA : Baig, Sarima, and Elizabeth Schwaiger. 2023. "Using IAT to Measure Implicit Biases towards Mental Illness." Global Social Sciences Review, VIII: 435-442
    MLA : Baig, Sarima, and Elizabeth Schwaiger. "Using IAT to Measure Implicit Biases towards Mental Illness." Global Social Sciences Review, VIII.II (2023): 435-442 Print.
    OXFORD : Baig, Sarima and Schwaiger, Elizabeth (2023), "Using IAT to Measure Implicit Biases towards Mental Illness", Global Social Sciences Review, VIII (II), 435-442