http://dx.doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2019(IV-I).59
10.31703/gssr.2019(IV-I).59
Published : Mar 1
Targeted Killings by Drones and Legality of Deployment of CIA Operatives
Since October 2001, the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) employed a predator drone armed with missiles to carry out an operation in Afghanistan that targeted suspected al-Qaeda members. These missile attacks continued to hit targets in Yemen, Afghanistan, and the Pakistani territory bordering Afghanistan. It has been proven that missile-equipped drones are uncertain when used in covert operations. Drone strikes raise legal questions under International Law, Human Rights Law (HRL) and International Humanitarian Law (IHL). IHL prohibits civilian organisations from participating in direct hostilities unless the government notifies them of their incorporation into the regular armed forces. The explanation for why the CIA does not have the authorisation to carry out drone strikes is given in the article. The deployment of the CIA rather than regular armed forces is a violation of both accepted norms of war and HRL regulations.
-
Central Intelligence Agency, Combatants, Lieber Code, Non- Regular Armed Forces, Military Manuals, Lethal Force, Drone
-
(1) Shakeel Ahmad
Department of International Relations, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan, Punjab, Pakistan.
(2) Fozia Naseem
Assistant Professor, College of Law, GC University, Faisalabad, Punjab, Pakistan
(3) Ahsan Riaz
PhD Scholar, Department of Political Science, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan, Punjab, Pakistan
- Addicott, J. F. (2002). Proposal for a new executive order on assassination. University of Richmond Law Review Index . 37(3), 751-785.
- hmad, S. (2013). A legal assessment of the US drone strikes in Pakistan. International Criminal Law Review, 13(4), 917-930.
- Alston, Philip. (2010). Report of the Special Rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions, Philip Alston: Addendum - Study on targeted killings (A/HRC/14/24/Add.6). https://reliefweb.int/report/russian- federation/report-special-rapporteur-extrajudicial-summary-or-arbitrary-executions.
- Amnesty International. (July 4 2003). Israel and the Occupied Territories: Israel must end its policy of assassinations. https://www.amnesty.org/en/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/mde150562003en.pdf.
- Anderson, Kenneth. (April 28, 2010). Rise Of The Drones II: Examining the Legality Of Unmanned Targeting. https://irp.fas.org/congress/2010_hr/drones2.pdf.
- ASIL. (2011). American Society of International Law ‘Targeting Operations with Drone Technology. https://www.law.columbia.edu/sites/default/files/microsites/human-rights- institute/files/Targeting%20Operations%20ASIL%20background%20paper.pdf.
- Daily Dawn. (July 24, 20120. US drone kills 12 suspected militants in N Waziristan, https://www.dawn.com/news/736833/us-drone-kills-12-suspected-militants-in-n-waziristan.
- Department of Army. (2014). Insurgency and Countering Insurgency, Field Manual, No 3-24, Washington DC, FM 3-24 MCWP 3-33.5, https://www.marines.mil/Portals/1/MCWP%203-33.5_Part1.pdf.
- Department of Defense, Directive 2311.01E. www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/corres/pdf/231101e.pdf.
- Department of State. (October 21, 2005). Second and Third Periodic Report of the United States of America to the UN Committee on Human Rights Concerning the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights Annex 1. http://www.state.gov/g/drl/rls/55504.htm
- Doswald-Beck, L. (2006). The right to life in armed conflict: does international humanitarian law provide all the answers?. International Review of the Red Cross, 88(864), 881-904.
- Downes, C. (2004). ‘Targeted killings’ in an age of terror: the legality of the Yemen strike. Journal of Conflict and Security Law, 9(2), 277-294.
- Glazier, D. W. (2010). Rise of the Drones II: Examining the Legality of Unmanned Targeting. Hearing before Subcommittee on National Security and Foreign Affairs, 28.
- Henckaerts, J. M. (2006). Customary International Humanitarian Law--A Rejoinder to Judge Aldrich. The British Year Book of International Law, 76(1), 525.
- ICRC. Commentary of 1987. (1987). Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions, June 8 1977. http://www.icrc.org/ihl.nsf/COM/470-750001?OpenDocument
- ICRC. (2009). Direct participation in hostilities: questions & answers. https://www.icrc.org/en/doc/resources/documents/faq/direct-participation-ihl-faq-020609.htm.
- ICRC. (2009). The ICRC regards these provisions as customary law, governing both international and non- international armed conflict. See ICRC Customary Law Database, Rule 142.
- IHL Database. (2005). ICRC’s study on customary international humanitarian law (IHL), Rule 4. https://ihl- databases.icrc.org/customary-ihl/eng/docs/home.
- International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC). (8 Ju zne 1977). Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of August 12 1949, and relating to the Protection of Victims of Non-International Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), (June 8 1977). 1125 UNTS 609, available at: https://www.refworld.org/docid/3ae6b37f40.htm
- International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC). (May 2009). Interpretive guidance on the notion of direct participation in hostilities under international humanitarian law, https://www.refworld.org/docid/4a670dec2.html
- International Conferences (The Hague). (October 18 1907). Hague Convention (IV) Respecting the Laws and Customs of War on Land and Its Annex: Regulations Concerning the Laws and Customs of War on Land. https://www.refworld.org/docid/4374cae64.html
- International Law Commission (ILC). (2001), Draft articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts, with commentaries. https://legal.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/commentaries/9_6_2001.pdf
- Lewis, Michael. (April 28, 2010). Rise of The Drones II: Examining the Legality Of Unmanned Targeting. https://irp.fas.org/congress/2010_hr/drones2.pdf
- Lieber, F. (1863). Instructions for the Government of Armies of the United States in the Field (No. 100). D. van Nostrand.
- Lubell, N. (2010). Extraterritorial use of force against non-state actors. Oxford University Press.
- Melzer, N. (2008). Targeted killing in international law. OUP Oxford.
- Melzer, Nils. ed. (2009). ICRC, Interpretive Guidance on the Notion of Direct Participation in Hostilities under. International Humanitarian Law. https://www.icrc.org/en/doc/assets/files/other/icrc-002-0990.pdf
- O'Connell, M. E. (2009). Unlawful killing with combat drones: a case study of Pakistan, 2004-2009. SHOOTING TO KILL: THE LAW GOVERNING LETHAL FORCE IN CONTEXT, Simon Bronitt, ed., Forthcoming, Notre Dame Legal Studies Paper, (09-43).
- Priest, Dana. (December 30 2005). Covert CIA Program Withstands New Furor, Washington Post, December 30 2005. https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/2005/12/30/covert-cia-program-withstands-new- furor/1caa6093-48b4-471a-8338-215c872c4af6/
- Radsan, A. J. (2010). Loftier standards for the CIA’s remote-control killing. Statement to House Subcommittee on National Security & Foreign Affairs, William Mitchell Legal Studies Research Paper, (2010-11).
- Robertson Jr, H. B. (1991). Law of Naval Operations.
- Schmitt, M. N. (1999). The Principle of Discrimination in 21 Century Warfare. Yale Hum. Rts. & Dev. LJ, 2, 143.
- Schmitt, M. N. (2004). Humanitarian law and direct participation in hostilities by private contractors or civilian employees. Chi. J. Int'l L., 5, 511.
- Shamsi, H. (2010). “ Rise of the Drones II: Examining the Legality of Unmanned Targetingâ€. https://irp.fas.org/congress/2010_hr/drones2.pdf
- The Commander's Handbook on the Law of Naval Operations and the Contemporary Law of the Sea, https://digital- commons.usnwc.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1753&context=ils
- United States Code. (2014). War and National Defense, National Security: Presidential Approval and Reporting of Covert Actions, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCODE-2014-title50/html/USCODE-2014-title50- chap44-subchapIII-sec3093.htm
- Woods, C. (2009). ‘A Journey into Moral Depravity’ US Congressman Dennis Kucinich on Covert Wars. Bureau of Investigative Journalism, 29.
- Zengel, P. (1991). Assassination and the law of armed conflict. Mil. L. Rev., 134, 123-133.
Cite this article
-
APA : Ahmad, S., Naseem, F., & Riaz, A. (2019). Targeted Killings by Drones and Legality of Deployment of CIA Operatives. Global Social Sciences Review, IV(I), 456-463. https://doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2019(IV-I).59
-
CHICAGO : Ahmad, Shakeel, Fozia Naseem, and Ahsan Riaz. 2019. "Targeted Killings by Drones and Legality of Deployment of CIA Operatives." Global Social Sciences Review, IV (I): 456-463 doi: 10.31703/gssr.2019(IV-I).59
-
HARVARD : AHMAD, S., NASEEM, F. & RIAZ, A. 2019. Targeted Killings by Drones and Legality of Deployment of CIA Operatives. Global Social Sciences Review, IV, 456-463.
-
MHRA : Ahmad, Shakeel, Fozia Naseem, and Ahsan Riaz. 2019. "Targeted Killings by Drones and Legality of Deployment of CIA Operatives." Global Social Sciences Review, IV: 456-463
-
MLA : Ahmad, Shakeel, Fozia Naseem, and Ahsan Riaz. "Targeted Killings by Drones and Legality of Deployment of CIA Operatives." Global Social Sciences Review, IV.I (2019): 456-463 Print.
-
OXFORD : Ahmad, Shakeel, Naseem, Fozia, and Riaz, Ahsan (2019), "Targeted Killings by Drones and Legality of Deployment of CIA Operatives", Global Social Sciences Review, IV (I), 456-463
-
TURABIAN : Ahmad, Shakeel, Fozia Naseem, and Ahsan Riaz. "Targeted Killings by Drones and Legality of Deployment of CIA Operatives." Global Social Sciences Review IV, no. I (2019): 456-463. https://doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2019(IV-I).59