ARTICLE

HOW AN INTELLIGENT ORGANIZATION BEHAVES ANALYZING THE ROLE OF PSYCHOLOGICAL OWNERSHIP AND CREATIVE DEVIANCE

  1. HOME
  2. ARTICLE

70 Pages : 577-585

http://dx.doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2019(IV-IV).70      10.31703/gssr.2019(IV-IV).70      Published : Dec 2019

How an intelligent Organization behaves? Analyzing the Role of Psychological Ownership and Creative Deviance

Abstract

    The study investigates the complex interplay among psychological ownership, creative deviance, and organizational intelligence, with a specific focus on the pharmaceutical sector of Pakistan. Utilizing a multidimensional conceptualization of psychological ownership, the research elucidates the implications of the construct on organizational intelligence. On the existing relevant literature, the study set the theoretical foundation testing proposed hypotheses. The study is quantitative in nature where statistical analysis including descriptive statistics as well as inferential statistics was carried out. The data a gathered to an adaptive What's your name and analyzed through SPSS. The findings reveal a significant positive relationship between psychological ownership and organizational intelligence, with creative deviance emerging as a crucial moderating variable. The study contributes to the existing body of knowledge and existing literature by identifying the role of the key dimensions of psychological ownership and creative deviance, thereby providing a better understanding of the behaviors and characteristics of intelligent organizations. The outcomes of the study have important implications for the development of strategies aimed at fostering innovation, informed decision-making, and organizational effectiveness.

    (1) Muhammad Zia-ur-Rehman
    Assistant Professor, Department of Department of Leadership and Management Studies (LMS), National Defence University, Islamabad, Pakistan.
    (2) Rizwana Saghar
    Independent Research Scholar, Pakistan.
    (3) Samara Javed
    Independent Research Scholar, UK.
Fulltext PDF

References

  • Ahmed, R. R., Nawaz, A., Khoso, I., Arif, K. A., & Palwishah, R. I. (2014). Competitive intelligence and marketing effectiveness of organizations: an investigation from Pakistan.

  • Akgün, A. E., Byrne, J., &Keskin, H. (2007). Organizational intelligence: a structuration view. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 20(3), 272-289.
  • Albrecht, K. (2002). Organizational intelligence & knowledge management: Thinking outside the silos. Executive white paper, Online at: http://www. KarlAlbrecht. com.
  • Ardrey, R. (1966). The territorial imperative (p. 48). New York: Atheneum.
  • Asad, N., & Khan, S. (2003). Relationship between job-stress and burnout: Organizational support and creativity as predictor variables. Pakistan Journal of Psychological Research, 18(3/4), 139.
  • Ashforth, B. E., &Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 20-39.
  • Avey, J. B., Luthans, F., & Jensen, S. M. (2009). Psychological capital: A positive resource for combating employee stress and turnover. Human resource management, 48(5), 677-693.
  • Bacon, A. M., Lenton-Maughan, L., & May, J. (2018). Trait emotional intelligence and social deviance in males and females. Personality and Individual Differences, 122, 79-86.
  • Barling, J., Weber, T., &Kelloway, E. K. (1996). Effects of transformational leadership training on attitudinal and financial outcomes: A field experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(6), 827.
  • Batson, C. D., Duncan, B. D., Ackerman, P., Buckley, T., & Birch, K. (1981). Is empathic emotion a source of altruistic motivation?. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40(2), 290.
  • Batson, C. D., Duncan, B. D., Ackerman, P., Buckley, T., & Birch, K. (1981). Is empathic emotion a source of altruistic motivation?. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40(2), 290.
  • Beaglehole, E. P. (1932). A Study in Social Psychology.
  • Beggan, J. K. (1992). On the social nature of nonsocial perception: The mere ownership effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62(2), 229.
  • Blake, S., & Burkett, C. M. (Eds.). (2017). Creativity in Workforce Development and Innovation: Emerging Research and Opportunities: Emerging Research and Opportunities.
  • Blau, G. J., &Boal, K. B. (1987). Conceptualizing how job involvement and organizational commitment affect turnover and absenteeism. Academy of Management Review, 288-300.
  • Burke, P. J., &Reitzes, D. C. (1991). An identity theory approach to commitment. Social Psychology Quarterly, 239-251.
  • Carayannis, E. G. (1998). The strategic management of technological learning in project/program management: the role of extranets, intranets, and intelligent agents in knowledge generation, diffusion, and leveraging. Technovation, 18(11), 697-703.
  • Chambré, S. M., &Fatt, N. (2002). Beyond the liability of newness: Nonprofit organizations in an emerging policy domain. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 31(4), 502-524.
  • Chirkov, V., Ryan, R. M., Kim, Y., & Kaplan, U. (2003). Differentiating autonomy from individualism and independence: a self-determination theory perspective on internalization of cultural orientations and well-being. Journal of personality and social psychology, 84(1), 97.
  • Choo, H. Y., &Ferree, M. M. (2010). Practicing intersectionality in sociological research: A critical analysis of inclusions, interactions, and institutions in the study of inequalities. Sociological theory, 28(2), 129-149.
  • de Resende, L. M. M., Volski, I., Betim, L. M., de Carvalho, G. D. G., De Barros, R., & Senger, F. P. (2018). Critical success factors in coopetition: Evidence on a business network. Industrial Marketing Management, 68, 177-187.
  • Gutworth, M. B., & Hunter, S. T. (2017). Ethical saliency: Deterring deviance in creative individuals. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 11(4), 428.
  • Hameed, Z., Khan, I. U., Sheikh, Z., Islam, T., Rasheed, M. I., & Naeem, R. M. (2019). Organizational justice and knowledge sharing behavior: The role of psychological ownership and perceived organizational support. Personnel Review, 48(3), 748-773.
  • Jeong, S., McLean, G. N., McLean, L. D., Yoo, S., & Bartlett, K. (2017). The moderating role of non-controlling supervision and organizational learning culture on employee creativity: The influences of domain expertise and creative personality. European Journal of Training and Development, 41(7), 647-666.
  • Kim, W., Kim, J., Woo, H., Park, J., Jo, J., Park, S. H., & Lim, S. Y. (2017). The relationship between work engagement and organizational commitment: Proposing research agendas through a review of empirical literature. Human Resource Development Review, 16(4), 350-376.
  • Möllering, G., & Sydow, J. (2019). Trust trap? Self-reinforcing processes in the constitution of inter-organizational trust. In Trust in Contemporary Society (pp. 141-160). Brill.
  • Riaz, S., Xu, Y., & Hussain, S. (2018). Understanding employee innovative behavior and thriving at work: A Chinese perspective. Administrative Sciences, 8(3), 46.
  • Shollo, A., & Galliers, R. D. (2016). Towards an understanding of the role of business intelligence systems in organisational knowing. Information Systems Journal, 26(4), 339-367.
  • Smith, G. T. (2017). Institutional Intelligence: How to Build an Effective Organization. InterVarsity Press.
  • Steers, R. M., & Sánchez‐Runde, C. J. (2017). Culture, motivation, and work behavior. The Blackwell handbook of cross‐cultural management, 190-216.
  • Ugoani, J. (2019). Management by emotional intelligence and why it matters in organizational excellence. American Journal of Marketing Research, 5(4), 42-53.
  • Yi, Z. (2019). A leader’s approaches to fostering a culture of knowledge sharing in an information organization. Library Management, 40(8/9), 593-600.

Cite this article

APA

    APA : Zia-ur-Rehman, M., Saghar, R., & Javed, S. (2019). How an intelligent Organization behaves? Analyzing the Role of Psychological Ownership and Creative Deviance. Global Social Sciences Review, IV(IV), 577-585. https://doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2019(IV-IV).70

CHICAGO

    CHICAGO : Zia-ur-Rehman, Muhammad, Rizwana Saghar, and Samara Javed. 2019. "How an intelligent Organization behaves? Analyzing the Role of Psychological Ownership and Creative Deviance." Global Social Sciences Review, IV (IV): 577-585 doi: 10.31703/gssr.2019(IV-IV).70

HARVARD

    HARVARD : ZIA-UR-REHMAN, M., SAGHAR, R. & JAVED, S. 2019. How an intelligent Organization behaves? Analyzing the Role of Psychological Ownership and Creative Deviance. Global Social Sciences Review, IV, 577-585.

MHRA

    MHRA : Zia-ur-Rehman, Muhammad, Rizwana Saghar, and Samara Javed. 2019. "How an intelligent Organization behaves? Analyzing the Role of Psychological Ownership and Creative Deviance." Global Social Sciences Review, IV: 577-585

MLA

    MLA : Zia-ur-Rehman, Muhammad, Rizwana Saghar, and Samara Javed. "How an intelligent Organization behaves? Analyzing the Role of Psychological Ownership and Creative Deviance." Global Social Sciences Review, IV.IV (2019): 577-585 Print.

OXFORD

    OXFORD : Zia-ur-Rehman, Muhammad, Saghar, Rizwana, and Javed, Samara (2019), "How an intelligent Organization behaves? Analyzing the Role of Psychological Ownership and Creative Deviance", Global Social Sciences Review, IV (IV), 577-585

TURABIAN

    TURABIAN : Zia-ur-Rehman, Muhammad, Rizwana Saghar, and Samara Javed. "How an intelligent Organization behaves? Analyzing the Role of Psychological Ownership and Creative Deviance." Global Social Sciences Review IV, no. IV (2019): 577-585. https://doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2019(IV-IV).70