Gender Perception in Multi-cultural Classroom Discourse
Societies shape people in and outwards look with different connotations such as gender, attitude and behavior. Humans are the product of society, and each society is different in terms of the environment created by the dwellers. There are societal taboos that are common and similar in most societies of the world, but such cultural affinities are due to the geographical association and the impact of globalization. Common norm, which is practiced in one society is not acceptable in other society, whether it is within a country or in another country. For example, house chores and taking responsibility for the care of the husband is appreciated in Libya, but the same practice is not considered a stereotype in turkey. Women craze for ornaments in South Africa, similar to the customs in Libya and turkey. The discourse of the participants reveals a cultural perception that varies from person to person and culture to culture. Thoughts and behavior are made by society, and the same thoughts are changed with a wave of time.
-
Multicultural, Discourse, Gender, Society, Behavior, Respondent
-
(1) Samiullah Khan
Lasbela University of Agriculture Water and Marine Sciences, Uthal, Balochistan, Pakistan.
(2) Sanam Wagma Khattak
Lecturer, University of Peshawar, KP, Pakistan.
(3) Sarfaraz Ahmed Shaikh
Director, Indus Center for Sustainable Development, Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan.
- Ahn, J. H. (2012). Transforming Korea into a multicultural society: Reception of multiculturalism discourse and its discursive disposition in Korea. Asian Ethnicity, 13(1), 97-109.
- Ahn, J. H., & Eum, K. H. (2009). The difference in biological properties between parental and v-Ha-ras transformed NIH3T3 cells. Cancer Research and Treatment: Official Journal of Korean Cancer Association, 41(2), 93.
- Ahn, H. J., Zelner, D. J., Shaw, J. W., Sensibar, J. A., Kim, J. H., & Lee, C. (1996). Genetic change in transforming growth factor β (TGF-β) receptor type I gene correlates with insensitivity to TGF-β1 in human prostate cancer cells. Cancer Research, 56(1), 44-48.
- Braungart-Rieker, J. M., Zentall, S., Lickenbrock, D. M., Ekas, N. V., Oshio, T., & Planalp, E. (2014). Attachment in the making: Mother and father sensitivity and infants' responses during the Still-Face Paradigm. Journal of experimental child psychology, 125, 63-84.
- Burn, S. M. (1991). Social psychology and the stimulation of recycling behaviors: The block leader approach. Journal of applied social psychology, 21(8), 611-629.
- Burn, S. M. (1996). The social psychology of gender. McGraw-Hill.
- Burn, S. M. (2011). Burn, Shawn Meghan. Women across cultures: a global perspective. McGraw-Hill.
- Gokhale, A. A., Rabe-Hemp, C., Woeste, L., & Machina, K. (2015). Gender differences in attitudes toward science and technology among majors. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 24(4), 509-516.
- Gilbert-Gokhale, M. J. R., Aldarondo, E., S., & Shore, E. (2005). The role of insecure attachment and gender role stress in predicting controlling behaviors in men who batter. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 20(5), 617-631.
- Guiso, L., Sapienza, P., & Zingales, L. (2015). The value of corporate culture. Journal of Financial Economics, 117(1), 60-76.
- Guiso, L., Sapienza, P., & Zingales, L. (2015). Corporate culture, societal culture, and institutions. American Economic Review, 105(5), 336-39.
- Guiso, L., Sapienza, P., & Zingales, L. (2004). The role of social capital in financial development. American economic review, 94(3), 526-556.
- Jain, V. (2014). 3D model of attitude. International Journal of Advanced Research in Management and Social Sciences, 3(3), 1-12.
- Laver, J. (1959). Fashion: A Detective Story. Vogue. New York: Condé Nast Publications, Jan, 1.
- Reidel, L. (2015). Beyond a State-Centric Perspective on Norm Change: A multilevel governance analysis of the retreat from multiculturalism. Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations, 21(2), 317-336.
- Reidel, L. (2009). Religious opposition to same-sex marriage in Canada: Limits to multiculturalism. Human Rights Review, 10(2), 261-281.
- Stjernfelt, F. (2012). Liberal multiculturalism as political philosophy: Will Kymlicka. The Monist, 95(1), 49-71.
- Wilde, V. (1992). Controversial hypotheses on the relationship between researcher and informant in qualitative research. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 17(2), 234-242.
- Wharton, S. (2005). Invisible females, incapable males: Gender construction in a children's reading scheme. Language and Education, 19(3), 238-251.
- Wharton, A. S. (2009). The sociology of gender: An introduction to theory and research. John Wiley & Sons.
- Wharton, A. S. (1991). Structure and agency in socialist-feminist theory. Gender & Society, 5(3), 373- 389.
Cite this article
-
APA : Khan, S., Khattak, S. W., & Shaikh, S. A. (2020). Gender Perception in Multi-cultural Classroom Discourse. Global Social Sciences Review, V(III), 99-108. https://doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2020(V-III).11
-
CHICAGO : Khan, Samiullah, Sanam Wagma Khattak, and Sarfaraz Ahmed Shaikh. 2020. "Gender Perception in Multi-cultural Classroom Discourse." Global Social Sciences Review, V (III): 99-108 doi: 10.31703/gssr.2020(V-III).11
-
HARVARD : KHAN, S., KHATTAK, S. W. & SHAIKH, S. A. 2020. Gender Perception in Multi-cultural Classroom Discourse. Global Social Sciences Review, V, 99-108.
-
MHRA : Khan, Samiullah, Sanam Wagma Khattak, and Sarfaraz Ahmed Shaikh. 2020. "Gender Perception in Multi-cultural Classroom Discourse." Global Social Sciences Review, V: 99-108
-
MLA : Khan, Samiullah, Sanam Wagma Khattak, and Sarfaraz Ahmed Shaikh. "Gender Perception in Multi-cultural Classroom Discourse." Global Social Sciences Review, V.III (2020): 99-108 Print.
-
OXFORD : Khan, Samiullah, Khattak, Sanam Wagma, and Shaikh, Sarfaraz Ahmed (2020), "Gender Perception in Multi-cultural Classroom Discourse", Global Social Sciences Review, V (III), 99-108
-
TURABIAN : Khan, Samiullah, Sanam Wagma Khattak, and Sarfaraz Ahmed Shaikh. "Gender Perception in Multi-cultural Classroom Discourse." Global Social Sciences Review V, no. III (2020): 99-108. https://doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2020(V-III).11