ARTICLE

EVOLUTION OF DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROCESSES FROM INFORMAL TO FORMAL AND BACK TO INFORMAL

31 Pages : 327-333

http://dx.doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2020(V-II).31      10.31703/gssr.2020(V-II).31      Published : Jun 2020

Evolution of Dispute Resolution Processes: From Informal to Formal and Back to Informal

    This article aims to provide information relating to Alternative Dispute Resolution (Informal Dispute Resolution) which is considered a new technique for the resolution of disputes in western countries. Still, from the study, it has been proven that it is not a new technique, and has been in practice in one form or other in different times and civilizations; it is a conversion to new title and system with some modification, but the aim is same as was in ancient time, i.e., the historical evolution of the system from Torah period to present time presents the whole picture of this system. The study highlighted both practices in ancient and present times which shows that the system has been working successfully in all the times. Therefore, it can be applied elsewhere in the world, so the researcher is of the view that this system is more sustainable in any form than the formal system because it reflects the friendly, amicable, long-lasting relationships between parties.

    (1) Abida Hassan
    PhD Scholar, Department of Law, University of South Asia, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan
    (2) Dil Muhammad Malik
    Dean, Department of Law, University of South Asia, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan.
  • Ali. N. K & Sfeir. V (2011). Arbitration & Mediation in the Arab World: A Growing Phenomenon, http://www.mediate.com/articles/AliKhasanwehN1.cfm
  • Barret. T. J & Barrett. P. J (2009). A history of ADR: The Story of Political, Social and Cultural Movement. Association for Conflict Resolution, 1st edition. http://www.adr.gov/events/2009/may7-2009 materials-history.pdf
  • Black. A, Esmaeili. H and Hosen. N. Modern Perspective on Islamic Law; Chapter 6: Mediation, arbitration and Islamic Alternative Dispute Resolution, http://www.elgaronline.com/view/9780857934468.00012.xml
  • Brown, H. J. and Marriott, A. L. (1999). ADR Principles and Practice, Chap. 16, Sweet & Maxwell, London, 2nd Edition, pp.352-376.
  • El-Ahdab, A. H. (2003). Arbitration with the Arab countries (2nd edition., Kluwer Law International, Hague, 1999), New Straits Times, p. 17
  • Enforcement Act, 2007 (UK)
  • Farlane, J. M (2008). The New Lawyer: How Settlements Transforming the Practice of Law, UBC Press, p. 10 -12
  • Farm Debt Mediation Act 1994 (NSW).
  • French, B (2007), 'Dispute Resolution in Australia - The Movement from Litigation to Mediation' Alternative Dispute Resolution Journal for a contextual account on the history of ADR in Australia, p. 213- 214 & 220
  • Gould. N & Partner (2012), Conflict avoidance and dispute resolution in construction, RICS guidance note, 1st edition, p. 3 https://www.rics.org
  • Gumbiner, Keneth (2000). Alternate Dispute Resolution, the Litigator's Handbook: An Overview of Alternate Dispute Resolution, Editor Atlas, F. Nancy; Hurber, Steven; Trachte, Wendy. H; Published by American Bar Association, 1st Edition, p. 2
  • Hornle J. (2009). Cross-border Internet Dispute Resolution. UK: Cambridge University Press, 1st edition, p. 48
  • Injury Management and Workers Compensation Act 1998 (NSW), section. 318-ALeases Act 1994 (NSW), section. 68
  • Jamil. A (2015). ADR in Islamic Law: the cases of UK & Singapore, NSU Working Paper
  • King. M, Freiberg. A, Batagol B. M & Hyams. R (2014). Non-Adversarial Justice, The Federation Press, 2nd edition, p. 88 & 91-94
  • KPK Local Government Act, 2013, section. 29
  • Lipner (2005). Methods of Dispute Resolution: Torah to Talmud to Today. V. 16 No. 2 Https://arbitrationlaw.com/pdf/methods-dispute-resolution-torah-talmud-today-aria-vol-16
  • Local Government Act, 2013
  • P.V Kane's 'History of Dharmashastras' vol. 3 En.wikipedia.org/History_ of_Dharmasatra
  • Pakistan Criminal Law Journal (2004), p. 1523
  • Rashid. S. K. (2015), Peculiarities & Religious Underlining of ADR in Islamic Law, http://www.asiapacificmediationforum.org/resources/2008/37-.pdf
  • Sen. P (1980). The General Principles of Hindu Jurisprudence.
  • Sourdin. T (2008). Alternative Dispute Resolution, Legal. Thomsonreuters.com, p. 13
  • The Ramayana and the Mahabharata: two epics of Asia, p.1-43 www.unesco.org
  • Wade, William and Forsyth, Christophe (2014). Principles of Administrative Law, 11th edition, Oxford books.google.com.pk
  • Zahoor. A, 'Muslims in India: An Overview', History of Muslims India https://www.indianmuslims.info

Cite this article

    APA : Hassan, A., & Malik, D. M. (2020). Evolution of Dispute Resolution Processes: From Informal to Formal and Back to Informal. Global Social Sciences Review, V(II), 327-333. https://doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2020(V-II).31
    CHICAGO : Hassan, Abida, and Dil Muhammad Malik. 2020. "Evolution of Dispute Resolution Processes: From Informal to Formal and Back to Informal." Global Social Sciences Review, V (II): 327-333 doi: 10.31703/gssr.2020(V-II).31
    HARVARD : HASSAN, A. & MALIK, D. M. 2020. Evolution of Dispute Resolution Processes: From Informal to Formal and Back to Informal. Global Social Sciences Review, V, 327-333.
    MHRA : Hassan, Abida, and Dil Muhammad Malik. 2020. "Evolution of Dispute Resolution Processes: From Informal to Formal and Back to Informal." Global Social Sciences Review, V: 327-333
    MLA : Hassan, Abida, and Dil Muhammad Malik. "Evolution of Dispute Resolution Processes: From Informal to Formal and Back to Informal." Global Social Sciences Review, V.II (2020): 327-333 Print.
    OXFORD : Hassan, Abida and Malik, Dil Muhammad (2020), "Evolution of Dispute Resolution Processes: From Informal to Formal and Back to Informal", Global Social Sciences Review, V (II), 327-333
    TURABIAN : Hassan, Abida, and Dil Muhammad Malik. "Evolution of Dispute Resolution Processes: From Informal to Formal and Back to Informal." Global Social Sciences Review V, no. II (2020): 327-333. https://doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2020(V-II).31