ARTICLE

EVALUATIVE STUDY OF PLAGIARISM IN POST GRADUATE RESEARCH IN PUNJAB PAKISTAN

  1. HOME
  2. ARTICLE

02 Pages : 10-21

http://dx.doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2020(V-II).02      10.31703/gssr.2020(V-II).02      Published : Jun 2020

Evaluative Study of Plagiarism in Post Graduate Research in Punjab, Pakistan

Abstract

    The purpose of the present study is to highlight the seriousness and explore the level of awareness of postgraduate students regarding plagiarism, HEC plagiarism policy and practice. The research design used in the study was convergent mixed method. The population of the study was comprised of all the postgraduate students and supervisors of the public sector universities of Punjab. The sample of this study consisted of 64 supervisor and 272 postgraduate students from Punjab. Three research instruments; questionnaires, semi-structured interview and focus group discussion guidelines (FGDs) were used to collect the data. The results of the study indicated that students were aware about plagiarism but unaware of the plagiarism policy except that the similarity index of the dissertation. Study recommends arranging awareness about plagiarism to the teachers, students and administrators through orientations, various workshops, trainings and seminars.

    (1) Muhammad Moin
    PhD Scholar, Department of Education, PMAS-Arid Agriculture University, Rawalpindi, Punjab, Pakistan.
    (2) Muhammad Arshad Dahar
    Assistant Professor, Department of Education, PMAS-Arid Agriculture University, Rawalpindi, Punjab, Pakistan.
    (3) Muhammad Imran Yousuf
    Associate Professor, Department of Education, PMAS-Arid Agriculture University, Rawalpindi, Punjab, Pakistan.
Fulltext PDF

References

  • Anney, V. N., & Mosha, M. A. (2015). Student's plagiarisms in higher learning institutions in the era of improved internet access: case study of developing countries. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(13), 203-216.
  • Bloomfield, R., Nelson, M. W., & Soltes, E. (2016). Gathering data for archival, field, survey, and experimental accounting research. Journal of Accounting Research, 54(2), 341-395.
  • Bruton, S., & Childers, D. (2016). The ethics and politics of policing plagiarism: a qualitative study of faculty views on student plagiarism and Turnitin®. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(2), 316-330.
  • Casey, K., Casey, M., & Griffin, K. (2018). Academic integrity in the online environment: teaching strategies and software that encourage ethical behavior. Institute for Global Business Research, 2(3), 58-66.
  • Cheema, Z. A., Mahmood, S. T., Mahmood, A., & Shah, M. A. (2011). Conceptual awareness of research scholars about plagiarism at higher education level: Intellectual property right and patent. International Journal of Academic Research, 3(1), 664-670.
  • Collins, K. M., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Jiao, Q. G. (2007). A mixed methods investigation of mixed methods sampling designs in social and health science research. Journal of mixed methods research, 1(3), 267-294.
  • Colnerud, G., & Rosander, M. (2009). Academic dishonesty, ethical norms and learning. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 34(5), 505-517.
  • Dawson, M. M., & Overfield, J. A. (2006). Plagiarism: Do students know what it is? Bioscience Education, 8(1), 1-15.
  • Espinoza, A., & Najera, M. (2015). How to correct teaching methods that favour plagiarism: recommendations from teachers and students in a Spanish language distance education university. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 40(8), 1070-1078.
  • Gullifer, J. M., & Tyson, G. A. (2014). Who has read the policy on plagiarism? Unpacking students' understanding of plagiarism. Studies in Higher Education, 39(7), 1202-1218.
  • Heckler, N. C., & Forde, D. R. (2015). The role of cultural values in plagiarism in higher education. Journal of Academic Ethics, 13(1), 61-75.
  • Jones, M., & Sheridan, L. (2015). Back translation: an emerging sophisticated cyber strategy to subvert advances in plagiarism detection and prevention. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 40(5), 712-724.
  • Kayaoglu, M. N., Erbay, Åž., Flitner, C., & SaltaÅŸ, D. (2016). Examining students' perceptions of plagiarism: A cross-cultural study at tertiary level. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 40(5), 682-705.
  • Levine, J., & Pazdernik, V. (2018). Evaluation of a four-prong anti-plagiarism program and the incidence of plagiarism: a five-year retrospective study. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(7), 1094-1105.
  • Maxwell, A., Curtis, G. J., & Vardanega, L. (2008). Does culture influence understanding and perceived seriousness of plagiarism? International Journal for Educational Integrity, 4(2), 26-40.
  • Meo, S. A., & Talha, M. (2019). Turnitin: Is it a text matching or plagiarism detection tool? Saudi journal of anaesthesia, 13(1), 48-51.
  • Morris, E. J. (2018). Academic integrity matters: five considerations for addressing contract cheating. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 14(1), 15-29.
  • Obeid, R., & Hill, D. B. (2017). An intervention designed to reduce plagiarism in a research methods classroom. Teaching of Psychology, 44(2), 155-159.
  • Okere, S., Adam, M. E., & Sanusi, B. O. (2017). Awareness of Plagiarism as Copyright Violation with Implications for Intellectual Property Education in Tertiary Learning. Journal of Research and Development, 187(5726), 1-7.
  • Ramzan, M., Munir, M. A., Siddique, N., & Asif, M. (2012). Awareness about plagiarism amongst university students in Pakistan. Higher education, 64(1), 73-84.
  • Sarwar, M., Moin, M., & Jabeen, M. (2016). Role of plagiarism detecting software in reducing academic dishonesty at M. Phil level. Dialogue (Pakistan), 11(4), 412-426.
  • Shirazi, B., Jafarey, A. M., & Moazam, F. (2010). Plagiarism and the medical fraternity: A study of knowledge and attitudes. The Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association, 60(4), 269-295.
  • Tayraukham, S. (2009). Academic ethics in research methodology. The Social Sciences, 4(6), 573- 577.
  • Wasay, M., & Siddiqui, A. (2015). Plagiarism penalties. Pakistan Journal of Neurological Sciences, 10(4), 37-39.

Cite this article

APA

    APA : Moin, M., Dahar, M. A., & Yousuf, M. I. (2020). Evaluative Study of Plagiarism in Post Graduate Research in Punjab, Pakistan. Global Social Sciences Review, V(II), 10-21. https://doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2020(V-II).02

CHICAGO

    CHICAGO : Moin, Muhammad, Muhammad Arshad Dahar, and Muhammad Imran Yousuf. 2020. "Evaluative Study of Plagiarism in Post Graduate Research in Punjab, Pakistan." Global Social Sciences Review, V (II): 10-21 doi: 10.31703/gssr.2020(V-II).02

HARVARD

    HARVARD : MOIN, M., DAHAR, M. A. & YOUSUF, M. I. 2020. Evaluative Study of Plagiarism in Post Graduate Research in Punjab, Pakistan. Global Social Sciences Review, V, 10-21.

MHRA

    MHRA : Moin, Muhammad, Muhammad Arshad Dahar, and Muhammad Imran Yousuf. 2020. "Evaluative Study of Plagiarism in Post Graduate Research in Punjab, Pakistan." Global Social Sciences Review, V: 10-21

MLA

    MLA : Moin, Muhammad, Muhammad Arshad Dahar, and Muhammad Imran Yousuf. "Evaluative Study of Plagiarism in Post Graduate Research in Punjab, Pakistan." Global Social Sciences Review, V.II (2020): 10-21 Print.

OXFORD

    OXFORD : Moin, Muhammad, Dahar, Muhammad Arshad, and Yousuf, Muhammad Imran (2020), "Evaluative Study of Plagiarism in Post Graduate Research in Punjab, Pakistan", Global Social Sciences Review, V (II), 10-21

TURABIAN

    TURABIAN : Moin, Muhammad, Muhammad Arshad Dahar, and Muhammad Imran Yousuf. "Evaluative Study of Plagiarism in Post Graduate Research in Punjab, Pakistan." Global Social Sciences Review V, no. II (2020): 10-21. https://doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2020(V-II).02