ARTICLE

EFFECTIVENESS OF 5ES LEARNING CYCLE MODEL ON STUDENTS LEARNING IN PHYSICS AT SECONDARY SCHOOL LEVEL IN PAKISTAN

  1. HOME
  2. ARTICLE

48 Pages : 469-478

http://dx.doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2020(V-I).48      10.31703/gssr.2020(V-I).48      Published : Mar 1

Effectiveness of 5 Es Learning Cycle Model on Students Learning in Physics at Secondary School Level in Pakistan

Abstract

    This study is designed to find the effectiveness of Learning Cycle Model (LCM) on students learning in physics at the secondary school level. To achieve this objective, null hypotheses were tested. All physics students of Haripur district Khyber Pukhtunkhwah Pakistan at secondary level were included as the population. Eighty (80) physics learners of grade 9th of Hazara Public School and College (HPSC) were chosen as sample of the study. True experimental research design was employed. The pupils were divided uniformly into experimental and control groups such that 40 students included in each group. Physics Academic Achievement Test (PAAT) of reliability coefficient 0.82 was utilized. Experimental and control groups were instructed through LCM and Traditional Teaching Method (TTM) for twelve (12) workweeks. Statistical outcomes showed that pupils instructed via LCM were found more effective learners in Physics than the pupils instructed via TTM.

    Effectiveness, Learning Cycle Model, Learning Physics, Learning Skills, Experimental Group, Control Group

    (1) Kifayat Khan
    Assistant Professor, Department of Education, The University of Haripur, KP, Pakistan.
    (2) Wajeeha Aurangzeb
    Assistant Professor, Department of Education, NUML, Islamabad, Pakistan.
    (3) Tehsin Tahir
    Assistant Professor, Department of Education, University of Haripur, KP, Pakistan.
Fulltext PDF

References

  • Ahmad, A., Samiullah, M., & Khan, A. M. (2019) Development of Scientific Knowledge and Science Comprehension through Activities at the Elementary Level Schools in Pakistan. Global Regional Review (GRR). 4(4); 424 ‒ 431. DOI: 10.31703/grr.2019(IV-IV).46.
  • Amann, G. (2005).
  • Aydin, S., & Hanuscin, D.L. (2011). Secret in the margin: Rutherford's Gold foil experiment. Science Teacher, 78(7), 56-60.
  • Buntod, P. C., Suksringam, P. & Singseevo, A. (2010). Effects of learning environmental education on science process skills and critical thinking of Mathayomsuksa: Three students with different learning achievements. Journal of Social Sciences, 6, 60-63.
  • Bybee, R. W., & Loucks-Horsley., S. (2002). Implement The National Science Education Standarts. Sci. Teach., 22(3), 26-34.
  • Bybee, R. W. (1997). Improving Instruction. In Achieving Scientific Literacy: From Purposes to Practice. Porsmouth, Heinemann, NH.
  • Bybee, R.W., Taylor, J.A., Gardner, A., Van Scotter, P., Powell, J.C., & Westbrook, A. (2006). The BSCS 5E instructional model: origins, effectiveness and applications. Retrieved from www.bscs.org.
  • Campbell, D. T., Julian, C., & Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and Quasi Experimental Design for Research on Teaching. Chicago: Rand Mcnally, 171-246.
  • Campbell, M. A. (2000). The Effects of The 5E Learning Cycle Model On Students' Understanding of Force And Motion Concepts. (Pp. 1-137). M.Ed Thesis submitted at the University of Central Florida Orlando, Florida.
  • Carin, A. A., & Bass, J. E. (2000). Teaching Science as Inquiry. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.
  • Ceylan, E., & Geban, O. (2009). Facilitating conceptual change in understanding states of matter and solubility concept by using 5E learning cycle model. Hacetteppe University journal of education, Retrieved from ERIC database
  • Education Management Information System. (2012-13). Annual statistics report of Government schools. Government of Khyber Pukhtunkhwah, Pakistan: Elementary & Secondary Education Department.
  • Ergin, I. (2006). 5E Scientific Research and Statistical Techniques. New York: Tekısık Web Offset Plants.
  • Farooq, R. A. (2001). Understanding Research in Education Published by University Institute of Education and Research University of Arid Agriculture, Rawalpindi Pakistan.
  • Gay, A. S. (1992). Is Problem Solving in Middle School Mathematics
  • Hokkanen, S. L. (2011). Improving student achievement, interest and confidence in science through the implementation of the 5E Learning Cycle in the middle grades of an urban school. Retrieved from http://www.scholarworks.montana.edu/xmlui/bitstream/.../1/.../HokkanenS0811.pdf
  • Kevin. (2003). Explored the effect of the constructivist learning cycle on students' achievement in studying the law of mechanics. Journal of Science Education, 12(3): 65-79.
  • Kinqir, S., & Akqemeir, E. (2013). Using the learning cycle method to improve college students understanding of gases concepts. European Educational Research Association, 2013.
  • Lorsbach, A.W. (2006). The Learning Cycle as a Tool for Planning Science Instruction.
  • Madu, B. C. & Amaechi, C.C. (2012). Effect of Five-Step Learning Cycle Model on Students' Understanding of Concepts Related to Elasticity. Journal of Education and Practice, 3 (9), 1- 180. www.iiste.org.
  • Martin, D. J. (2000). Elementary Science Methods: A Constructivist Approach. Wadsworth Thomson Learning, Belmont, USA.
  • McElhaney, K. A. (1998). Student outcomes of community service learning: A comparative analysis of curriculum based and non-curriculum based alternative spring break programs. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Michigan Education, Ann Arbor, MI.
  • Morse, G., Roberts, D., Szesze, M., & Wayne, V. (2004). Science Teacher's Handbook. Montgomery; Country Public School.
  • Mulongo, G. (2013). Effect of active learning teaching methodology on learner participation. Journal of Education and Practice 4 (4). www.iiste.org.
  • Newby, D. E. (2004). Using inquiry to connect young learners to science. National Charter Schools Institute Learning Resources. Online article.
  • Olaoluwa, A. M & Olufunke, B. T. (2015). Relative Effectiveness of Learning-Cycle Model and InquiryTeaching Approaches in Improving Students' Learning Outcomes in Physics. Journal of Education and Human Development, 4 (3), 169-180. DOI: 10.15640/jehd.v4n3a18
  • Osawaru, A. P., & Eravwoke, U. (2012). Effects of 5E Learning Cycle Model on student's achievement in Biology and Chemistry.Cypriot Journal of educational Sciences, 7(3).
  • Özmen, H. (2004). Teaching of Science and Technology Assisted Constructivist Learning Theory (Constructivist) Learning. The Turkish Online J. Educ. Technol. - TOJET, January. ISSN: 1303- 6521, 3(1).
  • Raninga, N. C. (2009). The Effectiveness of Different Revision Approaches in Science on Achievement and Retention of Learners Having Different Learning Styles (PhD thesis). Saurashtra University.
  • Rasul, S., Shahzad, A., & Iqbal, Z. (2019). Teachers' Misconceptions in Science: Implications for Developing a Remedial Teacher Training Program. Global Social Sciences Review (GSSR). 4(3): 221- 228. DOI: 10.31703/gssr.2019(IV-III).28
  • Shaheen, N., Alam, T., Mushtaq, M. & Bukhari, M. A. (2015). Effects of Inquiry Based Learning on the Performance of students' At Elementary Level in Rawalpindi City: An Experimental Study. Academic Research International, 6(2), 382-397. www.journals.savap.org.pk
  • Soomro, A. Q., Qaisrani, M.Q., Rawat, K. J., & Mughal, S.H. (2010). Teaching Physics through Learning Cycle Model: An Experimental Study. Journal of Educational Research Department of Education IUB, Pakistan, 13(2), 5-18.
  • Tabassum, R. (2004). Effect of Computer Assisted Instruction (CAI) on the Secondary School Students Achievement in Science (Ph.D thesis). University of Arid Agriculture Rawalpindi Pakistan.
  • Tinker, R. (1997). Thinking About Science. The Concord Consortium Educational Technology Lab, 37 Thoreau Street Concord, MA 01742. URL: http://www.concord.org/resources/files/ThAbSci.pdf.
  • Vincent, D., Cassel, D., & Milligam, J. (2008). Will it float
  • Wılder M., & Shuttle, W. P. (2005). Cell Inquiry: A 5E Learning Cycle Lesson. Science. Activities winter, 41(4), 37-43.
  • Wilson, C. D., Taylor, J.A., Kowalski, S. M. & Carlson, J. (2010). The Relative Effects and Equity of Inquiry-Based and Commonplace Science Teaching on Students' Knowledge, Reasoning, and Argumentation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(3), 276-301.
  • Yalcin, F. A. & Bayrakceken, S. (2010). The effect of 5E learning model on pre-service science teachers' achievement of acids-bases subject. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 2, 508-531.

Cite this article

APA

    APA : Khan, K., Aurangzeb, W., & Tahir, T. (2020). Effectiveness of 5 Es Learning Cycle Model on Students Learning in Physics at Secondary School Level in Pakistan. Global Social Sciences Review, V(I), 469-478. https://doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2020(V-I).48

CHICAGO

    CHICAGO : Khan, Kifayat, Wajeeha Aurangzeb, and Tehsin Tahir. 2020. "Effectiveness of 5 Es Learning Cycle Model on Students Learning in Physics at Secondary School Level in Pakistan." Global Social Sciences Review, V (I): 469-478 doi: 10.31703/gssr.2020(V-I).48

HARVARD

    HARVARD : KHAN, K., AURANGZEB, W. & TAHIR, T. 2020. Effectiveness of 5 Es Learning Cycle Model on Students Learning in Physics at Secondary School Level in Pakistan. Global Social Sciences Review, V, 469-478.

MHRA

    MHRA : Khan, Kifayat, Wajeeha Aurangzeb, and Tehsin Tahir. 2020. "Effectiveness of 5 Es Learning Cycle Model on Students Learning in Physics at Secondary School Level in Pakistan." Global Social Sciences Review, V: 469-478

MLA

    MLA : Khan, Kifayat, Wajeeha Aurangzeb, and Tehsin Tahir. "Effectiveness of 5 Es Learning Cycle Model on Students Learning in Physics at Secondary School Level in Pakistan." Global Social Sciences Review, V.I (2020): 469-478 Print.

OXFORD

    OXFORD : Khan, Kifayat, Aurangzeb, Wajeeha, and Tahir, Tehsin (2020), "Effectiveness of 5 Es Learning Cycle Model on Students Learning in Physics at Secondary School Level in Pakistan", Global Social Sciences Review, V (I), 469-478

TURABIAN

    TURABIAN : Khan, Kifayat, Wajeeha Aurangzeb, and Tehsin Tahir. "Effectiveness of 5 Es Learning Cycle Model on Students Learning in Physics at Secondary School Level in Pakistan." Global Social Sciences Review V, no. I (2020): 469-478. https://doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2020(V-I).48