ARTICLE

EFFECT OF LEADERSHIP STYLES OF SECONDARY SCHOOL HEADS ON SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT

  1. HOME
  2. ARTICLE

53 Pages : 519-527

http://dx.doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2020(V-I).53      10.31703/gssr.2020(V-I).53      Published : Mar 2020

Effect of Leadership Styles of Secondary School Heads on School Improvement

Abstract

    This research.is designed to assess the effects of the leadership style of the secondary school principals on the school improvement. It was basically descriptive research in nature and for the collection of data survey method was used. Twenty senior school leaders from the AJ&k Mirpur department and 60 senior teachers from the public sector were selected as subjects. Samples were selected using simple random sampling techniques. Two questionnaires were prepared, one for the principal and the other for the senior teachers. Mean, standard deviation, and linear regression analysis were used to analyze the data. The result revealed that the leadership style of the school heads greatly contributed to the progress of the school. It is recommended that the principal must understand the level of learning in his department and the ability to share leadership style with the faculty and staff in order to get the most out of the academic process

    (1) Maria Noureen
    PhD Scholar, Department of Education, Mohi-ud-Din Islamic University, Nerian Sharif, AJ&K, Pakistan.
    (2) Nazir Haider Shah
    Assistant Professor, Department of Education, Mohi-ud-Din Islamic University, Nerian Sharif, AJ&K, Pakistan.
    (3) Shazia Zamir
    Assistant Professor, Department of Education, National University of Modern Languages, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Fulltext PDF

References

  • Armandi, B., Oppedisano, J. & Sherman, H. (2003).
  • Avolio, (2000). The full range leadership development manual for the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire. Redwood City, CA: Mindgarden Inc.
  • Crum, K.S. & Sherman, W.H. (2008). Facilitating high achievement: high school principals' reflections on their successful leadership practices. Journal of Educational Administration, 46 (5), 562-80.
  • De Grauwe A., 2000, Improving school management: A promise and a challenge,
  • Dinham, S. (2005). Principal leadership for outstanding educational outcomes. Journal of Educational Administration, 43 (4), 338-56.
  • Eyal, O. & Roth, G. (2011). Principals' leadership and teachers' motivation: self- determination theory analysis. Journal of Educational Administration, 49 (3), 256-275
  • Gandolfi, F. & Stone, S. (2016).
  • Gandolfi, F. (2016).
  • Haq, S. (2011). Ethics and leadership skills in the public service. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 27922796.
  • Hargreaves, A., Lieberman, A.,Fullan, M., & Hopkins, D. (2000). The international handbook of educational change (Vol. 4). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
  • Iqbal, M. (2005). A comparative study of organizational structure, leadership style and physical facilities of public and private secondary schools in Punjab and their effect on school effectiveness. Unpublished Doctor Dissertation, Lahore: Institute of Education and Research, University of the Punjab.
  • Kunwar, F.S. (2001). School leadership and school effectiveness: Reflection and research. ahore: Nawa Publication.
  • Kythreotis, A., Pashiardis, P. &Kyriakides, L. (2010). The influence of school leadership styles and culture on students' achievement in Cyprus primary schools. Journal of Educational Administration 48 (2), 218-240.
  • Leithwood, K. &Mascall, B. (2008). Collective leadership effects on student achievement. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44 (4), 529-61.
  • Liwin, (2000). Decentralization of educational management: Experience from South Asia (Research Report 107). Paris: International Institute for Educational Planning
  • Marks, H., Louis, K., &Printy, S. (2000). The capacity for organisational learning: Implications for pedagogical quality and student achievement. In K. Leithwood. (ed). Understanding schools as intelligent systems. Stamford, CONN: JAI Press.Pp.239-265. Moorman,H(2008).ImprovingSchoolLeadership.RetrievedDecember18,2017 from https://www.oecd.org/edu/school/44374889.pdf
  • Mehmood, S. (1995). A study of leadership behaviour and effectiveness of secondary school heads in Pakistan. Unpublished Doctor Dissertation, Lahore: Institute of Education and Research, University of the Punjab.
  • Mulford, B. (2002). General secondary education in the twenty-first century: Trends, challenges and priorities. Paris: UNESCO
  • Murphy, J., Elliott, S.N., Goldring, E. & Porter, A.C. (2007). Leadership for learning: a research- based model and taxonomy of behaviors. School Leadership and Management, 27( 2), 179-201.
  • James, K. (2015). Leadership Special Interest Group: What is leadership? Canadian Oncology Nursing Journal/Revue Canadienne de Soins Infirmiers en Oncologie, 25(1), 114-115.
  • Nusche, D (2008). Improving School Leadership. Retrieved December 18 ,2017 from https:// www.oecd.org/edu/school/44374889.pdf
  • Pont, B., Nusche, D., & Moorman, H. (2008). Improving School Leadership. Retrieved December 18 , 2017 from https:// www.oecd.org/edu/school/44374889.pdf
  • Rooke, D. &Torbert, W.R. (2005). https://hbr.org/2005/04/seventransformations- of- leadership.
  • Shah, D. (2003). Decentralization in the education system of Pakistan: Policies and strategies. Islamabad: Academy of Educational Planning and Management, Ministry of Education,Government of Pakistan . Retrieved on March16, 2007from http:// www.untref.edu.ar/Pakist
  • Silins, 2002, Recruitment and retention of new teachers: Focus groups and surveys of current and retired teachers, Denver, CO, Ciruli Associates.
  • Silva, A. (2014). What do we really know about leadership? Journal of Business Studies Quarterly, 5(4), 1-4.
  • Thertkildsen, (2000). Relationship of administrative style toward attitudes and implementation of arts education (CD-ROM), Abstract from:Pro Quest File: Dissertation Abstract International Item: 57/01.
  • Townsend, T. (ed.) (2007). International handbook of school effectiveness and improvement. Dordrecht: Springer.
  • Wallace, M. (2002). Modelling distributed leadership and management effectiveness: Primary school senior management teams in England and Wales. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 13(2), 163- 186.
  • Winston, B., & Patterson, K. (2006). An Integrative Definition of Leadership. School of Leadership Studies, Regent University.

Cite this article

APA

    APA : Noureen, M., Shah, N. H., & Zamir, S. (2020). Effect of Leadership Styles of Secondary School Heads on School Improvement. Global Social Sciences Review, V(I), 519-527. https://doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2020(V-I).53

CHICAGO

    CHICAGO : Noureen, Maria, Nazir Haider Shah, and Shazia Zamir. 2020. "Effect of Leadership Styles of Secondary School Heads on School Improvement." Global Social Sciences Review, V (I): 519-527 doi: 10.31703/gssr.2020(V-I).53

HARVARD

    HARVARD : NOUREEN, M., SHAH, N. H. & ZAMIR, S. 2020. Effect of Leadership Styles of Secondary School Heads on School Improvement. Global Social Sciences Review, V, 519-527.

MHRA

    MHRA : Noureen, Maria, Nazir Haider Shah, and Shazia Zamir. 2020. "Effect of Leadership Styles of Secondary School Heads on School Improvement." Global Social Sciences Review, V: 519-527

MLA

    MLA : Noureen, Maria, Nazir Haider Shah, and Shazia Zamir. "Effect of Leadership Styles of Secondary School Heads on School Improvement." Global Social Sciences Review, V.I (2020): 519-527 Print.

OXFORD

    OXFORD : Noureen, Maria, Shah, Nazir Haider, and Zamir, Shazia (2020), "Effect of Leadership Styles of Secondary School Heads on School Improvement", Global Social Sciences Review, V (I), 519-527

TURABIAN

    TURABIAN : Noureen, Maria, Nazir Haider Shah, and Shazia Zamir. "Effect of Leadership Styles of Secondary School Heads on School Improvement." Global Social Sciences Review V, no. I (2020): 519-527. https://doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2020(V-I).53