ARTICLE

AN EXPLORATION OF UNDERGRADUATES WRITING MOTIVATIONAL STRATEGIES

08 Pages : 67-75

http://dx.doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2020(V-IV).08      10.31703/gssr.2020(V-IV).08      Published : Dec 2020

An Exploration of Undergraduates Writing Motivational Strategies

    The development of SRL strategies is an important challenge for teachers and learners in the context of academic writing. In addition, research in the essential field of academic writing is lacking, which adheres to traditional teaching methods and techniques for language teaching. The current study tends to fill the gap by exploring the undergraduates writing motivational strategies and gender differences. This project aims to analyze the contextual factors, including the cultural impact of their choice of techniques used in English writing tasks. Data was collected via self-reported questionnaires on motivational writing strategies (Teng & Zhang, 2015). The results revealed mixed findings in the use of motivational writing strategies and gender disparities concerning motivational techniques.

    (1) Samreen Zaheer
    PhD. Scholar, Air University Islamabad, Pakistan.
    (2) Wasima Shehzad
    Dean, Faculty of Social Sciences, Air University Islamabad, Pakistan.
  • Bai, R., Hu, G. W., & Gu, Y. (2014). The relationship between writing strategies and English proficiency in Singapore primary schools.
  • Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 1 - 26.
  • Boscolo, P., & Hidi, S. (2007). The multiple meanings of motivation to write. In S. Hidi & P. Boscolo (Eds.), Writing and motivation (pp. 1-14). Oxford, U.K.: Elsevier.
  • Cavana, R., Delahaye, B., & Sekeran, U. (2001). Applied business research: Qualitative and quantitative methods. John Wiley & Sons.
  • Chamot, A. U., & El-Dinary, P. B. (1999). Children's learning strategies in language immersion classrooms. The Modern Language Journal, 83, 319e338
  • Chang, C. Y., Liu, S. C., & Lee, Y. N. (2007). A study of language learning strategies used by college EFL learners in Taiwan. Ming-Dao Journal of General Education, 2, 235-261.
  • Chang, M. (2007). Enhancing web-based language learning through self-monitoring. Journal of Computer-Assisted Learning, 23, 187- 196.
  • Chen, Y. (2011). Study of the writing strategies used by Chinese non-English majors. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 1, 245e251.
  • Chien, S. C. (2012). Students' use of writing strategies and their English writing achievements in Taiwan. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 32, 93e112.
  • Covington, M. J. (2009). Self-worth theory: Retrospection and prospects. In K. R. Wentzel & A. Wigfield (Eds.), Handbook of motivation at school (pp. 141-170). New York: Routledge.
  • Dembo, M. H., Junge, L. G., & Lynch, R. (2006). Becoming a self-regulated learner: Implications for the web- based education. Web-based learning: Theory, research, and practice, 185-202.
  • Dörnyei, Z., & Otto, I. (1998). Motivation in action: A process model of L2 motivation. Working Papers in Applied Linguistics (Thames Valley University), 4, 43-69.
  • Ghee, T. T., Ismail, H. N., & Kabilan, M. K. (2010). Language learning strategies used by MFL students based on genders and achievement groups. US-China Foreign Language, 8(1), 50-58.
  • Hayes, J. R. (1996). A new framework for understanding cognition and affect in writing. In C. M. Levy & S. Ransdell (Eds.), The science of writing: Theories, methods, individual differences, and applications (pp. 1-27). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum
  • Harris, K. R., Graham, S., MacArthur, C. A., Reid, R., & Mason, L. (2011). SRL processes and children's writing. In B. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 187-202). New York, NY: Routledge
  • Hayes, J. R., & Flower, L. S. (1980). Identifying the organization of writing processes. In L. Gregg & E. Steinberg (Eds.), Cognitive processes in writing (pp. 3-30). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
  • Hong-Nam, K., & Leavell, A. (2006). Language learning strategy use of ESL students in an intensive English learning context. System, 34(3), 399-415. doi: 10.1016/j.system.2006.02.002.
  • Jarvela, S., Jarvenoja, H., Malmberg, J., Isohatala, J., & Sobocinski, M. (2016). How do types of interaction and phases of self-regulated learning set a stage for collaborative engagement? Learning and Instruction, 1-13. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.01.005.
  • Kavasoglu, M. (2009). Learning strategy use of pre-service teachers of English language at Mersin University. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1(1), 993-997. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2009.01.177
  • Khalil, A. (2005). Assessment of language learning strategies used by Palestinian EFL learners. Foreign Language Annals, 38(1), 108-119. doi: 10.1111/j.1944-9720.2005. tb02458. x.
  • Kirmizi. (2014). Self-regulated Learning Strategies Employed by Regular, Evening, and Distance Education English Language and Literature Students, The Anthropologist, 18:2, 447-460, DOI: 10.1080/09720073.2014.11891563.
  • Kormos, J., & Csizer, K. (2014). The interaction of motivation, self-regulatory strategies, and autonomous learning behavior in different learner groups. TESOL Quarterly, 48(2), 275-299.
  • Li, K. (2009). A study on motivational regulation strategies of Chinese EFL college students. Modern Foreign Languages, 32(3), 305-313.
  • Li, L. Y., & Tsai, C. C. (2017). Accessing online learning material: Quantitative behavior patterns and their effects on motivation and learning performance. Computers & Education, 114, 286-297. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.07.007
  • Lust, G., Elen, J., & Clarebout, G. (2013). Students' tool-use within a web enhanced course: Explanatory mechanisms of students' tool-use pattern. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(5).
  • Meece, J. L., Anderman, E. M., & Anderman, L. H. (2006). Classroom goal structure, student motivation, and academic achievement. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 487-503.
  • Nausheen, M. (2016). An Adaptation of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ) for Postgraduate Students in Pakistan: Results of an Exploratory Factor Analysis. Bulletin of Education and Research, 38(1), 1-16.
  • Naz, S., & Majoka I. (2016). A Study of Students' Self-Efficacy and Academic Achievement in Mathematics at University Level. Journal of Arts and Social Sciences 3(1), 5- 25.
  • Neuman, W., L. (2003). Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches (5th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
  • Niemi, H., Nevgi, A., & Virtanen, P. (2003). Towards self-regulation in web-based learning. Journal of Educational Media, 28, 49-71.
  • Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. Boston, Mass.: Newbury House.
  • Pajares, F., & Valiante, G. (2001). Gender differences in writing motivation and achievement of middle school students: A function of gender orientation? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 26(3), 366-381.
  • Perry, N. E. (1998). Young children's self-regulated learning and contexts that support it. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 715-729.
  • Pintrich, P. R., & Schunk, D. H. (2002). Motivation in education: Theory, research and applications. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Merrill.
  • Pintrich, P. R. (2003). A motivational science perspective on the role of student motivation in learning and teaching contexts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(4), 667- 686.
  • Pintrich, P. R. (2000).
  • Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 33-40.
  • Radwan, A. A. (2011). Effects of L2 proficiency and gender on choice of language learning strategies by university students majoring in English. The Asian EFL Journal, 13(1), 114-162. Retrieved from http://www.asian-efl-journal.com/PDF/March-2011-aar.pdf.
  • Roca de Larios, J., Manchon, R., Murphy, L., & Marin, J. (2008). The foreign language writer's strategic behavior in the allocation of time to writing processes. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17, 30-47. doi:10.1016/ j. jslw.2007.08.005.
  • Safdari, F., & Maftoon, P. (2016). EFL learners' deployment of motivational self-regulatory strategies and their academic achievement. Issues in Language Teaching, 5(1), 25-50.
  • Santangelo, T., Harris, K., & Graham, S. (2007). Self-regulated strategy development: A validated model to support students who struggle with writing. Learning Disability: A Contemporary Journal, 5(1), 1-20.
  • Schwinger, M., Steinmayr, R., & Spinath, B. (2009). How do motivational regulation strategies affect achievement: Mediated by effort management and moderated by intelligence? Learning and Individual Differences, 19(4), 621-627.
  • Smit, K., de Brabander, C. J., Boekaerts, M., & Martens, R. L. (2017). The self-regulation of motivation: Motivational strategies as mediator between motivational beliefs and engagement for learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 82, 124-134.
  • Teng, L. & Zhang. (2015). Fostering Strategic Learning: The Development and Validation of the Writing Strategies for Motivational Regulation Questionnaire (WSMRQ). DOI:10.1007/s40299-015- 0243-4.
  • Turner, J. C. (2006). Measuring Self-Regulation: A Focus on Activity. Educ Psychol Rev (2006) 8:293- 296 DOI: 10.1007/s10648-006-9022-3.
  • Ushioda, E. (1996). Learner autonomy 5: The role of motivation. Dublin: Authentik.
  • Ushioda, E. (2008). Motivation and good language learners. In C. Griffiths (Ed.), Lessons from good language learners (pp. 19-34). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Wolters, C. A. (1999). College students' motivational regulation during a brief study period. Journal of Staff, Program, and Organization Development, 16, 103 -111.
  • Wolters, C. A. (1999). The relation between high school students' motivational regulation and their use of learning strategies, effort, and classroom performance. Learning and Individual Differences, 11(3), 281-299.
  • Wolters, C. A., & Benzon, M. B. (2013). Assessing and predicting college students' use of strategies for the self-regulation of motivation. Journal of Experimental Education, 81(2), 199-221.
  • Wolters, C. A., Shirley, L. Y., & Pintrich, P. R. (1996). The relation between goal orientation and students' motivational beliefs and self-regulated learning. Learning and Individual Differences, 8(3), 211-238.
  • Zhou, C., & Intaraprasert, C. (2015). Language learning strategies employed by Chinese English-major pre-service teachers in relation to gender and personality types. English Language Teaching, 8(1), 155-169. doi:10.5539/elt. v8n1p155.
  • Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social-cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13-39). San Diego, CA: Academic Press
  • Zimmerman, B. J. (2011). Motivational sources and outcomes of self-regulated learning and performance. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 49-64). New York: Taylor Francis
  • Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1990). Student difference in self-regulated learning: Relating grade, sex, and giftedness to self-efficacy and strategy use. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 51-59
  • Zimmerman, B. J., & Risemberg, R. (1997). Becoming a self-regulated writer: A social cognitive perspective. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 22, 73- 101.
  • Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (2008). Motivation: An essential dimension of self-regulated learning. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Motivation and self-regulated learning: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 1-30). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum
  • Zimmerman, B. N., & Bandura, A. (1994). Impact of self-regulatory influences on writing course attainment. American Educational Research Journal, 31, 845-862.

Cite this article

    CHICAGO : Zaheer, Samreen, and Wasima Shehzad. 2020. "An Exploration of Undergraduates Writing Motivational Strategies." Global Social Sciences Review, V (IV): 67-75 doi: 10.31703/gssr.2020(V-IV).08
    HARVARD : ZAHEER, S. & SHEHZAD, W. 2020. An Exploration of Undergraduates Writing Motivational Strategies. Global Social Sciences Review, V, 67-75.
    MHRA : Zaheer, Samreen, and Wasima Shehzad. 2020. "An Exploration of Undergraduates Writing Motivational Strategies." Global Social Sciences Review, V: 67-75
    MLA : Zaheer, Samreen, and Wasima Shehzad. "An Exploration of Undergraduates Writing Motivational Strategies." Global Social Sciences Review, V.IV (2020): 67-75 Print.
    OXFORD : Zaheer, Samreen and Shehzad, Wasima (2020), "An Exploration of Undergraduates Writing Motivational Strategies", Global Social Sciences Review, V (IV), 67-75
    TURABIAN : Zaheer, Samreen, and Wasima Shehzad. "An Exploration of Undergraduates Writing Motivational Strategies." Global Social Sciences Review V, no. IV (2020): 67-75. https://doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2020(V-IV).08