ARTICLE

THE DETERMINANTS INFLUENCING THE INFLUX OF COUNTERFEIT LUXURY GOODS IN PAKISTAN

  1. HOME
  2. ARTICLE

28 Pages : 211-221

http://dx.doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2019(IV-II).28      10.31703/gssr.2019(IV-II).28      Published : Jun 2019

The Determinants Influencing the Influx of Counterfeit Luxury Goods in Pakistan

Abstract

    The demand for counterfeit goods has exponentially grown and counterfeit goods trade has consequently emerged as a global problem. The present study investigates the determinants that encourage consumers to acquire counterfeit luxury goods. This research further analyzes purchase intention as mediator and gender role as a moderator between the contextual factors and consumer behavior. A quantitative approach was applied through a questionnaire to gather data from 380 Pakistani respondents. The measurement and structural model assessed through Smart PLS. The results confirmed that purchase intention acts as a mediator between hedonic motives, materialism and consumer behavior. However, purchase intention has no mediating effect on economic benefits. Similarly, gender role as moderator was insignificant.

    (1) Abid Saeed
    PhD Scholar, Department of Management Sciences,COMSATS University, Islamabad, Pakistan.
    (2) Osman Sadiq Paracha
    Assistant Professor, Department of Management Sciences,COMSATS University, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Fulltext PDF

References

  • Ahmad, N., Yousif, M., Shabeer, K., & Imran, M. (2014). A Comprehensive Model on Consumer's Purchase Intention towards Counterfeit Mobiles in Pakistan. Journal of Basic and Applied Scientific Research, 4(5), 131-140.
  • Amaral, N. B., & Loken, B. (2016). Viewing usage of counterfeit luxury goods: Social identity and social hierarchy effects on dilution and enhancement of genuine luxury brands. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 26(4), 483-495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2016.02.004
  • Ang, S. H., Cheng, P. S., & Lim, E. A. C. (2001). Spot the difference : consumer responses towards counterfeits. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 18(3), 219-235.
  • Babin, B. J., Darden, W. R., & Griffin, M. (1994). Work and/or Fun : Shopping Measuring Value Hedonic and Utilitarian Shopping Value. Journal of Consumer Research, 20(4), 644-656. https://doi.org/0093-5301
  • Beck, L., & Ajzen, I. (1991). Predicting dishonest actions using the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Research in Personality, 25(3), 285-301. https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-6566(91)90021-H
  • Belk. (1985). Materialism: Trait Aspects of Living in the Material World. Journal of Consumer Research, 12(3), 265-280. https://doi.org/10.1086/208515
  • Bian, X. (2006). An examination of factors influencing the formation of the consideration set and consumer purchase intention in the context of non-deceptive counterfeiting. PhD Thesis, (October 2006).
  • Bian, X., & Moutinho, L. (2009). An investigation of determinants of counterfeit purchase consideration. Journal of Business Research, 62(3), 368-378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2008.05.012
  • Bian, X., Wang, K. Y., Smith, A., & Yannopoulou, N. (2016). New insights into unethical counterfeit consumption. Journal of Business Research, 69(10), 4249-4258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.02.038
  • Bloch, P. H., Bush, R. F., & Campbell, L. (1993). Consumer https://doi.org/10 .1108/0736 3769310047374
  • Butler, J. (2011). Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. Routledge 270 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10016. https://doi.org/10.1057/fr.1991.33
  • Cordell, V. V, Wongtada, N., & Kieschnick, R. L. J. (1996). Counterfeit Purchase Intentions
  • De Matos, C. A., Ituassu, C. T., & Rossi, C. A. V. (2007). Consumer attitudes toward counterfeits: A review and extension. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 24(1), 36-47. https://doi.org/10.1108/07363760710720975
  • Eisend, M., & Schuchert-Guler, P. (2006). Explaining counterfeit purchases: A review and preview. Academy of Marketing Science Review, 12(6), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-23112012000200002
  • Ergın, E. A. (2010). The rise in the sales of counterfeit brands: The case of Turkish consumers. African Journal of Business Management, 4(10), 2181-2186. https://doi.org/10.1108/07363760310464596
  • Fan, W., Lan, C., Huang, Y., & Chang, R. (2013). A study on purchasing behavior of teenagers in Taiwan : example of counterfeit goods. Journal OfApplied Social Psychology 2013, 43, 1289-1300. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12092
  • Fitzmaurice, J., & Comegys, C. (2006). Materialism and Social Consumption. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 14(4), 287-299. https://doi.org/10.2753/mtp1069-6679140403
  • Garson, G. D. (2016). Partial Least Squares: Regression and Structural Equation Models. Statistical Publishing Associates. 274 Glenn Drive Asheboro, NC 27205 USA. Retrieved from http://info.smartpls.com/data/uploads/ebook_on_pls-sem.pdf
  • Gentry, J. W., Putrevu, S., & Shultz, C. J. (2006). The effects of counterfeiting on consumer search. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 256(June), 245-256. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.176
  • Gravetter, F. J., & Wallnau, L. B. (2014). Essentials of Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences (8th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
  • Hair, Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2016). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (2nd ed.). Sage publications, inc.
  • Hegarty, W. H., & Sims, H. P. (1978). Some determinants of unethical decision behavior: An experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63(4), 451-457. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.63.4.451
  • Kang, J., & Park-Poaps, H. (2010). Hedonic and utilitarian shopping motivations of fashion leadership. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 14(2), 312-328. https://doi.org/10.1108/13612021011046138
  • Kaufmann, H. R., Petrovici, D. A., Filho, C. G., & Ayres, A. (2016). Identifying moderators of brand attachment for driving customer purchase intention of original vs counterfeits of luxury brands. Journal of Business Research, 69(12), 5735-5747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.05.003
  • Kwong, K. K., Yau, O. H. M., Lee, J. S. Y., Sin, L. Y. M., & Tse, A. C. B. (2003). The Effects of Attitudinal and Demographic Factors on Intention to Buy Pirated CDs: The Case of Chinese Consumers. Journal of Business Ethics, 47(3), 223-235.
  • Lee, S. H., & Yoo, B. (2009). A Review of the Determinants of Counterfeiting and Piracy and the Proposition for Future Research. The Korean Journal of Policy Studies, 24(1), 1-38. Retrieved from http://sspace.snu.ac.kr/handle/10371/69831
  • Li, E. P. H., Lam, M., & Liu, W. S. (2018). Consuming counterfeit: A study of consumer moralism in China. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 42(3), 367-377. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12428
  • Lianto, V. T. (2015). The Impact of Past Behavior , Attitude towards Counterfeit , Self Characteristic , and Purchase Intention of Original Crocs towards Consumer Purchase Intention of Counterfeit Crocs. IBuss Management, 3(2), 119-130.
  • Nia, A., & Zaichkowsky, J. L. (2000). Do counterfeits devalue the ownership of luxury brands ? Journal of Product & Brand Management, 9(7), 485-497. Retrieved from http://www.emerald-library.com
  • OECD/EUIPO. (2016). Trade in counterfeit and pirated goods: Mapping the economic impact. Paris. https://doi.org/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/ 9789264252653-en
  • Pakistan Penal Code Act (1860). Retrieved from http://www.fmu.gov. pk/docs/laws/Pakistan Penal Code.pdf
  • Penz, E., & Stottinger, B. (2008). Original brands and counterfeit brands - do they have anything in common ? Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 7, 146-163. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.243
  • Phau, I., & Teah, M. (2009). Devil wears (counterfeit) Prada: a study of antecedents and outcomes of attitudes towards counterfeits of luxury brands. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 26(1), 15-27.
  • Research and Markets. (2018). Global Brand Counterfeiting Report, 2018 (1st ed.). Dublin: Research and Markets, Guinness Centre, Taylors Lane, Dublin 8, Ireland. Retrieved from https://www.researchandmarkets. com/reports/4438394/global-brand-counterfeiting-report-2018
  • Richins, M. L. (1994). Special Possessions and the Expression of Material Values. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(3), 522-533. https://doi. org/ 10.1086/209415
  • Schiffman, L. G., & Kanuk, L. L. (2004). Consumer Behavior. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
  • Singhapakdi, A. (2004). Important Factors Underlying Ethical Intentions of Students: Implications for Marketing Education. Journal of Marketing Education, 26(3), 261-270. https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475304268781
  • Singhapakdi, A., & Vitell, S. J. (1990). Marketing Ethics: Factors Influencing Perceptions of Ethical Problems and Alternatives. Journal of Macromarketing, 10(4), 4-18. https://doi.org/10. 1177/0276 14679001000102
  • Stravinskiene, J., Dovaliene, A., & Ambrazeviciute, R. (2013). Factors Influencing Intent to Buy Counterfeits of Luxury Goods. Economics and Management, 18(4), 761-768.

Cite this article

APA

CHICAGO

    CHICAGO : Saeed, Abid, and Osman Sadiq Paracha. 2019. "The Determinants Influencing the Influx of Counterfeit Luxury Goods in Pakistan." Global Social Sciences Review, IV (II): 211-221 doi: 10.31703/gssr.2019(IV-II).28

HARVARD

    HARVARD : SAEED, A. & PARACHA, O. S. 2019. The Determinants Influencing the Influx of Counterfeit Luxury Goods in Pakistan. Global Social Sciences Review, IV, 211-221.

MHRA

    MHRA : Saeed, Abid, and Osman Sadiq Paracha. 2019. "The Determinants Influencing the Influx of Counterfeit Luxury Goods in Pakistan." Global Social Sciences Review, IV: 211-221

MLA

    MLA : Saeed, Abid, and Osman Sadiq Paracha. "The Determinants Influencing the Influx of Counterfeit Luxury Goods in Pakistan." Global Social Sciences Review, IV.II (2019): 211-221 Print.

OXFORD

    OXFORD : Saeed, Abid and Paracha, Osman Sadiq (2019), "The Determinants Influencing the Influx of Counterfeit Luxury Goods in Pakistan", Global Social Sciences Review, IV (II), 211-221

TURABIAN

    TURABIAN : Saeed, Abid, and Osman Sadiq Paracha. "The Determinants Influencing the Influx of Counterfeit Luxury Goods in Pakistan." Global Social Sciences Review IV, no. II (2019): 211-221. https://doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2019(IV-II).28