China's Contemporary Foreign Policy Behavior: An Analysis through Realist, Liberal and Constructive Perspectives
China’s tremendous rise will certainly be one of the major turbulent of the current century. Chinese leadership has already astonished the world with its economic development and active diplomacy. It is apparent that there will be a greater increase in Chinese power, influence, and involvement in regional and global affairs in future decades. We cannot envisage the exact nature of Chinese objectives and intentions in near future, however, we can proclaim that Chinese aims will be more spacious than they now are. Some observers view this increasing Chinese enthusiasm in regional affairs as a step towards regional hegemony, while others regard it as promotion of mutual understandings and economic interdependence. Some regional states are viewing Chinese policies with cautions and concerns have been raised in international community. To discuss and elaborate all these aspects of Chinese foreign policy behavior; the major paradigms like realism, liberalism, and constructivism will be explored respectively.
-
(1) Asif Farooq
Ph.D. Scholar, Department of Political Science, University of the Punjab, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan.
(2) Umbreen Javaid
Professor, Department of Political Science, University of the Punjab, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan.
- Acharya, A. (2007). Theoretical Perspectives on International Relations in Asia. In Shambaugh, D., & Yahuda, M. (Eds.). (2008). International relations of Asia. Rowman & Littlefield.
- Art, R. J. (2010). The United States and the rise of China: implications for the long haul. Political Science Quarterly, 125(3), 359-391.
- Bernstein, R., & Munro, R. H. (1997). The coming conflict with America. Foreign Affairs, 76(2) 18-32.
- Chernoff, F. (2007). Theory and Metatheory in International Relations: concepts and contending accounts. Palgrave Macmillan.
- Doyle, M. W. (2005). Three pillars of the liberal peace. American political science review, 99(3), 463-466
- Funabashi, Y., Oksenberg, M. and Weiss, H., 1994. An Emerging China in a World of Interdependence, The Trilateral Commission, New York.
- Goswami, N. (2013). Power shifts in East Asia: Balance of Power vs Liberal Institutionalism. Perceptions, 18(1), 3.
- Griffith, S. B. (1963). Sun Tzu: The art of war (Vol. 39). London: Oxford University Press.
- Holsti, O. R. (2004). Theories of international relations. Explaining the history of American foreign relations, 2, 384.
- Hongyi, L. (2010). The domestic sources of China's foreign policy: Regimes, leadership, priorities and process. Routledge.
- Houghton, D. P. (2007). Reinvigorating the study of foreign policy decision making: toward a constructivist approach. Foreign policy analysis, 3(1), 24-45.
- Hudda, N. (2015). Interpreting the Rise of China: Realist and Liberalist Perspectives'. E International Relations.
- Jiechi, Y. (2013). Innovations in China's Diplomatic Theory and Practice under New Conditions. Ministry of Foreign Affairs website, August, 16.
- Kagan, D. (1969). The outbreak of the Peloponnesian War (Vol. 1). Cornell University Press
- Katzenstein, P. J. (Ed.). (1996). The culture of national security: Norms and identity in world politics. Columbia University Press.
- Kegley, C, W., & Blanton, S. L. (2011).
- Keohane, R. O., & Nye Jr, J. S. (1998). Power and interdependence in the information age. Foreign affairs, 81-94.
- Khan, A., Ahmad, A., & Dadda, A. A. (2017). Pak-US Relations: Understanding of the Misunderstandings. Global Social Science Review, 2(2), 1-23.
- Khan, A., & Ahmad, A. (January 2018). Organized Crimes and Governance Gap in the Conflict Affected NorthWestern Pakistan Pakistan Journal of Criminology, 10(1), 84-98
- Kissinger, H. (2012), On China. The Penguin Press, New York, USA.
- Kubalkova, V. (2015). Foreign policy in a constructed world. Routledge.
- Kubalkova, V., Onuf, N., & Kowert, P. (Eds.) (1998). Constructing constructivism. In International relations in a constructed world, M.E. Sharpe, Inc.
- Layne, C. (2008). China's challenge to US hegemony. Current History-New York Then Philadelphia 107(705), 13.
- Lee, J. (2007). The Rise of China: An Introduction. Indian Journal of Asian Affairs 20(1), 1-4.
- Lieberthal, K. (1995). A New China Strategy: The Challenge, Foreign Affairs, November/December 74(6): 35-49.
- Liu, Q. (2010). China's Rise and Regional Strategy: Power, Interdependence and Identity. Journal of Cambridge Studies.
- Mearsheimer, J. J. (2001). The future of the American pacifier. Foreign Affairs, 46-61.
- Mearsheimer, J. J. (2006). China's unpeaceful rise. Current History-New York Then Philadelphia, 105(690), 160.
- Morgenthau, H. J. (1965). We are deluding ourselves in Vietnam. New York Times Magazine, 18.
- Parks, T. (Trans.). (2009). Niccolò Machiavelli: The Prince. Penguin.
- Pugh, J. (2005). Democratic Peace Theory: A review and evaluation. CEMPROC Occasional Paper Series.
- Qin, Y. (2011). Development of International Relations theory in China: progress through debates. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 11(2), 231-257.
- Reus-smit, C. (2005). Constructivism. In Burchill, S. (et al.), Theories of International Relations, 3rd Ed. (p.199). Palgrave-Macmillan.
- Rosecrance, R. (1999). The Rise of the Virtual State: Wealth and Power in the Coming Century. New York, Basic Book.
- Roy, D. (2003). China's reaction to American predominance. Survival: Global Politics and Strategy, 45(3), 57-78.
- Russett, B. (1994). Grasping the democratic peace: Principles for a post-Cold War world. Princeton university press.
- Scott, D. (2008). 'The Chinese Century'?: The Challenge to Global Order. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Shambaugh, D., & Yahuda, M. (Eds.). (2008). International relations of Asia. Rowman & Littlefield.
- Slaughter, A. M. (2011). International relations, principal theories. In Wolfrum, R. (Ed.), Max Planck encyclopedia of public international Law (p.129). Oxford University Press.
- Thucydides, Warner, R., & Finley, M. I. (1972). Thucydides: History of the Peloponnesian war. Penguin.
- Wendt, A. (1992). Anarchy is what states make of it: the social construction of power politics. International organization, 46(2), 391-425.
- Wendt, A. (1994). Collective Identity Formation and the International State. American political science review, 88(2), 384-396.
- Wendt, A. (1995). Constructing international politics. International security, 20(1), 71-81.
- Wendt, A. (1999). Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge University Press.
Cite this article
-
APA : Farooq, A., & Javaid, U. (2019). China's Contemporary Foreign Policy Behavior: An Analysis through Realist, Liberal and Constructive Perspectives. Global Social Sciences Review, IV(II), 238-244. https://doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2019(IV-II).31
-
CHICAGO : Farooq, Asif, and Umbreen Javaid. 2019. "China's Contemporary Foreign Policy Behavior: An Analysis through Realist, Liberal and Constructive Perspectives." Global Social Sciences Review, IV (II): 238-244 doi: 10.31703/gssr.2019(IV-II).31
-
HARVARD : FAROOQ, A. & JAVAID, U. 2019. China's Contemporary Foreign Policy Behavior: An Analysis through Realist, Liberal and Constructive Perspectives. Global Social Sciences Review, IV, 238-244.
-
MHRA : Farooq, Asif, and Umbreen Javaid. 2019. "China's Contemporary Foreign Policy Behavior: An Analysis through Realist, Liberal and Constructive Perspectives." Global Social Sciences Review, IV: 238-244
-
MLA : Farooq, Asif, and Umbreen Javaid. "China's Contemporary Foreign Policy Behavior: An Analysis through Realist, Liberal and Constructive Perspectives." Global Social Sciences Review, IV.II (2019): 238-244 Print.
-
OXFORD : Farooq, Asif and Javaid, Umbreen (2019), "China's Contemporary Foreign Policy Behavior: An Analysis through Realist, Liberal and Constructive Perspectives", Global Social Sciences Review, IV (II), 238-244
-
TURABIAN : Farooq, Asif, and Umbreen Javaid. "China's Contemporary Foreign Policy Behavior: An Analysis through Realist, Liberal and Constructive Perspectives." Global Social Sciences Review IV, no. II (2019): 238-244. https://doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2019(IV-II).31