References

• Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000). Improving Science Teachers’ Conceptions of Nature of Science: A critical Review of the Literature. International Journal of Science Education, 665–701.
• Aggarwal, Y. P (2004). Statistical Method, Concept, Application and Computation. Sterling Publisher, New Delhi, India, 28-54.
• hmed, A., Clark-Jeavons, A., & Oldknow, A. (2004). How Can Teaching Aids Improve the Quality of Mathematics Education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 56(2), 313–328.
• Arends, R. I. (2004). Learning to Teach. (6th Ed) New York: McGraw Hill Company. 13, 26, 267, 271, 278.
• Atkins, J. M. & Karplus, R. (1962).Discovery of Invention? Science Teacher 29(5),
• Barrett, P. P., & Zhang, Y. (2009). Optimal learning spaces: design implications for primary schools. SCRI Research Report, (October), 47.
• Boruch, R. (2005). Beyond the laboratory or classroom: The empirical basis of educational policy. In G. D. Phye, D. H. Robinson, & J. Levin (Eds.), Empirical methods for evaluating educational interventions, 177–192, San Diego: Elsevier Academic Press.
• Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.). (1999). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
• BSCS. (2006). BSCS Biology: A Human Approach (third edition). Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company toward achieving the educational objectives.
• Burtless, G. (2002). Randomized field trials for policy evaluation: Why not in education? In F. Mosteller& R. Boruch (Eds.), Evidence matters: Randomized trials in educational research, 179–197. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
• Bybee et.al. (2006). A Report for Science Education National Institutes of Health BSCS 5415 Mark Dabling Boulevard Colorado CO 80918 (719) 531-5550.
• Carlson Powell, J. (1999). A Study of Teacher Beliefs and the Implementation of Reform-oriented Curricula. Unpublished dissertation: University of Colorado.
• Chen, Z., & Klahr, D. (1999). All other Things being Equal: Acquisition and Transfer of the Control of Variables Strategy. Child Development, 70(5), 1098-1120.
• Ciftci, S. K., & Karadag, E. (2016). Developing a Mathematics Education Quality Scale. Africa Education Review, 13(3–4), 211–234.
• CONSORT Transparent Reporting of Trials. (2008).
• Constas, M. A. (2007). Reshaping the methodological identity of education research. Evaluation Review, 31(4), 391–399.
• Duschl, R. A., Ellenbogen, K. M. & Erduran, S. (1999). Understanding Dialogic Argumentation among Middle School Science Students. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada.
• Erickson, F., & Gutierrez, K. (2002). Culture, rigor, and science in educational research. Educational Researcher, 31(8), 21–24.
• Finn, J. D., & Achilles, C. M. (1999). Tennessee's class size study: Findings, implications, misconceptions. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 21, 97–109.
• Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410–8415.
• Gawron, P., Ostaszewski, M., Satagopam, V., Gebel, S., Mazein, A., Kuzma, M., & Schneider, R. (2016). MINERVA - a platform for visualization and curation of molecular interaction networks (in revision). Systems Biology and Applications, 2(January), 1–6.
• Gay, L. R. (2000). Educational Research. (6th Ed).National Book Foundation Islamabad, Pakistan. (148-149,439).
• Gomez, R. (2012). Users’ Perceptions of the Impact of Public Access Computing in Colombia: Libraries, Tele centers and Cybercafés (Links to an external site.). Information Technologies & International Development, 8(3). pp. 19-33
• Goodrum, D., Hackling, M., & Rennie, L. (2001).The Status and Quality of Teaching and Learning of Science in Australian schools. Canberra City: Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs.
• Goodrun, D., Hackling, M., &Rennie, L. (2000). The Status and Quality of Teaching and Learning of Science in Australian schools: A Research Report Prepared for the Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs. Canberra, Australia: Department of Ed.
• Grayson H. W, (2006).Teaching Resource Center. The University of Tennessee at Chattanooga; 401 Hunter Hall- Mail Codes, 4354.TennesseeGueron, J. M. (2002). The politics of random assignment: Implementing studies and affecting policy. In F. Mosteller & R. Boruch (Eds.), Evidence matters: Randomized trials in educational research (pp. 15–49). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
• Hackling, M.(2005).Working Scientifically: Implementing and assessing open investigation work in science, Western Australia Department of Education and Training.
• Healy, B. (2006, September 11). Who says what's best? U.S. News and World Report, 141.9. 75.
• How Teachers Can Motivate Students of Any Age | MindShift | KQED News. (n.d.).