References
- Abel, D. (1953, October). The Devil in Boston. Philological Quarterly, 32, 366- 81
- Abele, R. V. (1955). The Death of the Artist: A Study of Hawthorne's Disintegration. The Hague: Martinus, NIJHOFF.
- Ahmad, A. (1992). Qur'anic concepts of human psyche. International Institute of Islamic Thought. Islamabad.
- Boozer, J. (1960) Religion, the Id, and the Superego. Journal of Bible and Religion.28(3), 323-328. Retrieved from http://www.jstor. org/stable/1459453)
- Brodhead, R. H. (1976). Hawthorne, Melville, and the Novel. The University of Chicago Press. Chicago:
- Brooks, P. (1984). Reading for the Plot, Designs and Intentions in Narrative. Clarendon Press Oxford.
- Calinescu, M. (1994). Secrecy in Fiction: Textual and Intertextual Secrets in Hawthorne and Updike. Poetics Today, 15(3), 443-465.
- Crowley, J. D. (1971). Nathaniel Hawthorne. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. Culture.
- Davis, C. (2005).Hawthorne's Shyness: Ethics, Politics, and the Question of Engagement. JHU Press. ISBN 080188098X, 9780801880988
- Fairbanks, H. G. (1956, December). Sin, Free Will, and Pessimism in Hawthorne. PMLA. Modern Language Association. LXXI(71), 975-989. DOI: 10.2307/460522.
- Feidelson, C. (1953). Symbolism and American Literature. The University of Chicago Press. Chicago.
- Ghazali, A. H. (1993). Revival of Religious Learning. Ihya-ulum- Udin Book 3. Fazal-ul-Karim. Trans., Muhammad Ashraf, Lahore.
- Harper, R. A. (1959). Psychoanalysis and Psychotherapy. A Spectrum Book Prentice-Hall, U.S.A. Harvard University Press. ISBN 0674323351, 9780674323353
- Hisham, A. (2012). Toward a systematic Qura'nic theory of personality. Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 15(3), 217-233.
- Hjelle, L. A. & Ziegler, D. J. (1992). Personality Theories, Assumptions, Research and Applications. McGraw- Hill, Inc.
- James, H. (1967). Hawthorne. London: Macmillan.
- Khosravi, Z. (2006). Towards an Islamic Psychology: An Introduction to Remove Theoretical Barriers. Psychological Studies. Faculty of Education and Psychology. Al-Zahra University; 1(4 & 5), 161-172.
- Kilborne, B. (2005). Shame Conflicts and Tragedy in the Scarlet Letter. Journal of American Psychoanalytic Association, 53 (2), 465-483.
- Londhe, S. V. (2012). Sin, Guilt and Regeneration in The Scarlet Letter. Review of Research. 1(4).
- Hawthorne, N. (1992). The Scarlet Letter. Wordsworth Classics
- McMartin, J. (1995). Personality Psychology: A Student-Centered Approach. New Delhi: SAGE Publications.
- Mayers, O. J. (1988, Nov). The Power of the Pin: Sewing as an Act of Rootedness. American Literature. College English, 50 (6), 664-80. JSTOR. Web.
- Stein, W.B. (1953). Hawthorne's Faust: A Study in Mythmaking. Gainesville: University of Florida Press.
- Schwartz, L. & Solomon, P. (1974). Psychoanalysis. In Solomon & Patch (Eds), Handbook of Psychiatry (pp.489-522). Los Altos: Lange Medical Publications.
- Waggoner, H. H. (1963). Hawthorne: A Critical Study. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
- Abel, D. (1953, October). The Devil in Boston. Philological Quarterly, 32, 366- 81
- Abele, R. V. (1955). The Death of the Artist: A Study of Hawthorne's Disintegration. The Hague: Martinus, NIJHOFF.
- Ahmad, A. (1992). Qur'anic concepts of human psyche. International Institute of Islamic Thought. Islamabad.
- Boozer, J. (1960) Religion, the Id, and the Superego. Journal of Bible and Religion.28(3), 323-328. Retrieved from http://www.jstor. org/stable/1459453)
- Brodhead, R. H. (1976). Hawthorne, Melville, and the Novel. The University of Chicago Press. Chicago:
- Brooks, P. (1984). Reading for the Plot, Designs and Intentions in Narrative. Clarendon Press Oxford.
- Calinescu, M. (1994). Secrecy in Fiction: Textual and Intertextual Secrets in Hawthorne and Updike. Poetics Today, 15(3), 443-465.
- Crowley, J. D. (1971). Nathaniel Hawthorne. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. Culture.
- Davis, C. (2005).Hawthorne's Shyness: Ethics, Politics, and the Question of Engagement. JHU Press. ISBN 080188098X, 9780801880988
- Fairbanks, H. G. (1956, December). Sin, Free Will, and Pessimism in Hawthorne. PMLA. Modern Language Association. LXXI(71), 975-989. DOI: 10.2307/460522.
- Feidelson, C. (1953). Symbolism and American Literature. The University of Chicago Press. Chicago.
- Ghazali, A. H. (1993). Revival of Religious Learning. Ihya-ulum- Udin Book 3. Fazal-ul-Karim. Trans., Muhammad Ashraf, Lahore.
- Harper, R. A. (1959). Psychoanalysis and Psychotherapy. A Spectrum Book Prentice-Hall, U.S.A. Harvard University Press. ISBN 0674323351, 9780674323353
- Hisham, A. (2012). Toward a systematic Qura'nic theory of personality. Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 15(3), 217-233.
- Hjelle, L. A. & Ziegler, D. J. (1992). Personality Theories, Assumptions, Research and Applications. McGraw- Hill, Inc.
- James, H. (1967). Hawthorne. London: Macmillan.
- Khosravi, Z. (2006). Towards an Islamic Psychology: An Introduction to Remove Theoretical Barriers. Psychological Studies. Faculty of Education and Psychology. Al-Zahra University; 1(4 & 5), 161-172.
- Kilborne, B. (2005). Shame Conflicts and Tragedy in the Scarlet Letter. Journal of American Psychoanalytic Association, 53 (2), 465-483.
- Londhe, S. V. (2012). Sin, Guilt and Regeneration in The Scarlet Letter. Review of Research. 1(4).
- Hawthorne, N. (1992). The Scarlet Letter. Wordsworth Classics
- McMartin, J. (1995). Personality Psychology: A Student-Centered Approach. New Delhi: SAGE Publications.
- Mayers, O. J. (1988, Nov). The Power of the Pin: Sewing as an Act of Rootedness. American Literature. College English, 50 (6), 664-80. JSTOR. Web.
- Stein, W.B. (1953). Hawthorne's Faust: A Study in Mythmaking. Gainesville: University of Florida Press.
- Schwartz, L. & Solomon, P. (1974). Psychoanalysis. In Solomon & Patch (Eds), Handbook of Psychiatry (pp.489-522). Los Altos: Lange Medical Publications.
- Waggoner, H. H. (1963). Hawthorne: A Critical Study. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
Cite this article
-
APA : Mazhar, S., & Qadir, S. A. (2018). "What I am! A fiend!"- An Analysis of Chillingworth's Character in The Scarlet Letter in the light of Ghazalian Nafs e Ammara and Freudian Id. Global Social Sciences Review, III(III), 27-37. https://doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2018(III-III).03
-
CHICAGO : Mazhar, Shumaila, and Samina Amin Qadir. 2018. ""What I am! A fiend!"- An Analysis of Chillingworth's Character in The Scarlet Letter in the light of Ghazalian Nafs e Ammara and Freudian Id." Global Social Sciences Review, III (III): 27-37 doi: 10.31703/gssr.2018(III-III).03
-
HARVARD : MAZHAR, S. & QADIR, S. A. 2018. "What I am! A fiend!"- An Analysis of Chillingworth's Character in The Scarlet Letter in the light of Ghazalian Nafs e Ammara and Freudian Id. Global Social Sciences Review, III, 27-37.
-
MHRA : Mazhar, Shumaila, and Samina Amin Qadir. 2018. ""What I am! A fiend!"- An Analysis of Chillingworth's Character in The Scarlet Letter in the light of Ghazalian Nafs e Ammara and Freudian Id." Global Social Sciences Review, III: 27-37
-
MLA : Mazhar, Shumaila, and Samina Amin Qadir. ""What I am! A fiend!"- An Analysis of Chillingworth's Character in The Scarlet Letter in the light of Ghazalian Nafs e Ammara and Freudian Id." Global Social Sciences Review, III.III (2018): 27-37 Print.
-
OXFORD : Mazhar, Shumaila and Qadir, Samina Amin (2018), ""What I am! A fiend!"- An Analysis of Chillingworth's Character in The Scarlet Letter in the light of Ghazalian Nafs e Ammara and Freudian Id", Global Social Sciences Review, III (III), 27-37
-
TURABIAN : Mazhar, Shumaila, and Samina Amin Qadir. ""What I am! A fiend!"- An Analysis of Chillingworth's Character in The Scarlet Letter in the light of Ghazalian Nafs e Ammara and Freudian Id." Global Social Sciences Review III, no. III (2018): 27-37. https://doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2018(III-III).03