Abstract
This study explores the impact of reframing, a core technique of Neurolinguistic Programming (NLP), on second language learning (SLL), focusing on reducing language anxiety and enhancing learner confidence and motivation. A quasi-experimental pre-test/post-test design was applied to a sample of 30 middle school students aged 10 to 15. Participants received a one-week NLP-based training centered on reframing strategies. Data were collected through structured language tasks and psychological surveys and analyzed using SPSS. The results showed significant improvements in learners' confidence, emotional regulation, and participation, along with a notable decrease in anxiety. These findings suggest that reframing positively influences both the emotional and cognitive aspects of language learning. This research highlights the value of incorporating psychologically informed strategies into language teaching, offering practical insights for educators seeking to foster supportive and effective learning environments.
Key Words
Neurolinguistic Programming, Reframing, Second Language Learning, Language Anxiety, Motivation, Emotional Regulation
Introduction
Second language learning (SLL) is a multifaceted process that involves more than just mastering grammar, vocabulary, and pronunciation. It is deeply influenced by cognitive, emotional, and social factors that shape a learner’s ability to engage with and acquire a new language. Among these, language anxiety, fear of failure, lack of confidence, and negative self-perceptions have been widely recognized as major barriers to effective language acquisition. Learners who experience high levels of anxiety are often reluctant to participate in communicative tasks, which limits their language exposure and, consequently, their progress (Swinton, 2024).
While traditional teaching methods tend to emphasize cognitive strategies—such as rote memorization or grammar drills—they often overlook the emotional dimension of learning, which plays a critical role in learner motivation, engagement, and success. In response, educational research has increasingly turned toward psychological interventions that can help learners regulate their emotional responses and adopt more constructive attitudes toward learning (Manana et al., 2024).
One such intervention is Neurolinguistic Programming (NLP), a psychological approach developed by Richard Bandler and John Grinder in the 1970s. NLP explores how language and cognitive processes influence behavior and emotional states. Among its many techniques, reframing stands out as a powerful strategy that involves changing the way individuals interpret experiences to alter emotional outcomes. In the context of language learning, reframing helps students view mistakes not as failures but as necessary and valuable steps in the learning process. This shift in perception can reduce anxiety, increase self-confidence, and promote greater engagement (Purnama et al., 2023).
Despite its promise, the role of reframing in second language learning remains underexplored, particularly in empirical classroom settings. Most studies on NLP have focused on its use in therapy, coaching, or personal development, leaving a notable research gap in language education (Zhang et al., 2023).
This study seeks to address that gap by investigating the influence of reframing on learners’ emotional and cognitive responses to second language learning. It examines how a brief, targeted intervention using NLP-based reframing strategies can affect language anxiety, motivation, and confidence, ultimately impacting language performance.
Purpose of the Study
The purpose of this research is to explore how reframing, as an NLP technique, influences second language learners’ emotional responses, self-perception, and language performance. It aims to provide evidence-based insights for integrating reframing into language instruction to support emotionally resilient and motivated learners.
Research Questions
1. What are the effects of reframing on second language learning in individuals with different linguistic and cultural backgrounds?
2. How does reframing influence learners’ motivation, confidence, and emotional outcomes during the second language acquisition process?
3. How does reframing, when combined with other NLP techniques, affect language production in second-language learners?
Literature Review
Second Language Acquisition (SLA) is increasingly recognized as not only a cognitive endeavor but also an emotionally driven process. Traditional methods that emphasize grammar, vocabulary, and repetition often neglect affective factors that significantly impact language learning outcomes. Among these, language anxiety, fear of judgment, and lack of motivation have been found to hinder learners’ ability to fully engage in the learning process (Al-Khatib & Al-Khatib, 2023). Krashen’s Affective Filter Hypothesis posits that learners with high levels of anxiety or low self-esteem are less able to process and retain language input, effectively blocking acquisition (Hall, 2001). Similarly, Dörnyei emphasized that motivation, self-confidence, and emotional resilience are central to long-term success in SLA (Horwitz, 2001).
Understanding and addressing these emotional barriers is thus crucial for fostering effective language learning environments. This shift has led to the exploration of psychological and therapeutic strategies that support learners beyond traditional pedagogical approaches.
Reframing is a core concept in both cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and educational psychology, where it is used to alter individuals' perceptions of situations in order to change their emotional and behavioral responses. It involves shifting one’s interpretation of a challenge—such as failure or difficulty—from a negative threat to a positive opportunity for growth (LeDoux, 2003).
In educational contexts, reframing has been shown to enhance student resilience, self-efficacy, and emotional regulation. For instance, Beck’s work in cognitive restructuring suggests that challenging limiting beliefs and replacing them with constructive interpretations can significantly boost performance and confidence (Macintyre, 2007). Applied in classrooms, reframing can help learners perceive mistakes not as signs of inadequacy but as essential steps in the learning process (McCRAE et al., 2003).
Despite its potential, reframing has not been widely implemented in language education. The few existing studies tend to focus on general motivation strategies rather than specifically examining reframing as a standalone tool to tackle language anxiety or self-doubt in second language learners.
Neurolinguistic Programming (NLP) is a psychological approach developed by Bandler and Grinder in the 1970s that explores the relationship between language, thought patterns, and behavior (Meichenbaum, 1977)
. NLP has been successfully applied in coaching, therapy, and business communication, but its use in education—especially language learning—is still emerging.
One of NLP’s key strategies, reframing, offers a practical method to address emotional challenges in SLA. Research has suggested that NLP techniques such as anchoring, visualization, and reframing can help learners overcome anxiety, improve confidence, and develop a more positive outlook on language learning (O’Connor & Seymour, 1990)
. However, empirical research directly evaluating the impact of reframing in classroom-based SLA remains scant and fragmented.
Research Gap and Novelty
Although reframing is well-established in therapy and coaching, its specific application in second language learning remains underexplored. Few empirical studies have tested its direct impact on language anxiety, motivation, or performance in real classroom settings. This study addresses that gap by combining experimental design with NLP-based intervention, providing new evidence on how reframing can be leveraged as a powerful pedagogical tool in language education.
Methodology
Research Design
This study employed a quasi-experimental pre-
test/post-test design to investigate the influence of reframing, a Neurolinguistic Programming (NLP) technique, on second language learners' emotional and cognitive responses. The intervention consisted of a one-week training program in which participants received instruction in NLP-based reframing strategies aimed at reducing language anxiety and improving self-confidence and motivation. The research design allowed for a comparison of language learning attitudes and performance before and after the intervention.
Participants
The study sample consisted of 30 middle school students (aged 10 to 15) from a private English-medium school in Faisalabad, Pakistan. The participants included both male and female students with diverse linguistic and cultural backgrounds, reflecting a multilingual environment typical of South Asian educational contexts. All participants had prior exposure to English as a second language, and none had received prior training in NLP techniques.
Participants were selected using purposive sampling to ensure a consistent language learning environment. Informed consent was obtained from the school and guardians before data collection.
Data Collection Tools
Two primary tools were used for data collection:
1. Structured Surveys: Pre-test and post-test questionnaires were designed to assess language anxiety, self-confidence, motivation, and perceptions of language learning. The items included Likert-scale statements adapted from established language learning and psychology inventories.
2. Language Tasks: Simple oral and written language tasks were administered both before and after the intervention to observe changes in language production, fluency, and engagement.
The one-week intervention consisted of daily 40-minute sessions focused on NLP-based reframing exercises, including:
? Reinterpreting language mistakes as growth opportunities
? Positive self-talk practices
? Visualization of successful communication scenarios
Data Analysis
The collected data were analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS). Descriptive statistics were used to summarize participants' demographic information and pre/post-test scores. Paired sample t-tests were conducted to evaluate the statistical significance of changes in learners' emotional responses and language performance following the NLP-based intervention. The reliability of the survey instrument was tested using Cronbach's alpha.
The analysis focused on identifying:
? Reduction in language anxiety
? Improvement in learner confidence and motivation
? Enhancements in classroom participation and language use
Results
The purpose of this
study was to evaluate the effect of NLP-based reframing techniques on second
language learners' confidence, language anxiety, and overall engagement with
language tasks. Data were collected through pre- and post-intervention surveys
and language performance tasks.
Improvement
in Learner Confidence
Participants reported a
marked increase in self-confidence while speaking in English following the
intervention. As shown in Table 1, the mean confidence score increased from
2.78 (SD = 0.65) in the pre-test to 4.12 (SD = 0.59) in the post-test.
Table 1
Paired
t-test for Confidence Scores
Test |
Mean |
SD |
t-value |
p-value |
Pre-test |
2.78 |
0.65 |
11.23 |
< 0.001 |
Post-test |
4.12 |
0.59 |
This
increase was statistically significant (p < 0.001), suggesting that
reframing helped learners feel more comfortable and confident using the
language.
Reduction
in Language Anxiety
Language anxiety scores
also demonstrated a significant decrease. Pre-test scores averaged 4.35 (SD =
0.72), indicating high anxiety levels, while post-test scores dropped to 2.69
(SD = 0.68) after one week of NLP-based training.
Table 2
Paired
t-test for Language Anxiety
Test |
Mean |
SD |
t-value |
p-value |
Pre-test |
4.35 |
0.72 |
9.87 |
< 0.001 |
Post-test |
2.69 |
0.68 |
The results
confirm that reframing significantly reduced learners’ anxiety during language
tasks.
Enhanced
Language Use and Motivation
Learners demonstrated
greater fluency and willingness to participate in language activities.
Post-intervention responses showed a higher rate of agreement with statements
like "I enjoy finding new ways to express myself in English" and
"I feel encouraged to try again after I make a mistake."
Table 3
Motivation
and Engagement Indicators (Pre vs Post)
Indicator
(Likert Scale 1–5) |
Pre-test Mean |
Post-test Mean |
p-value |
Enjoy
expressing myself in English |
3.11 |
4.25 |
< 0.001 |
Try
again after mistakes |
2.96 |
4.08 |
< 0.001 |
Use
English outside the classroom (e.g., TV, books, conversations) |
2.73 |
3.89 |
< 0.01 |
The data indicates a
significant positive shift in learners' attitudes and behaviors following the
reframing-based intervention. Participants reported a marked increase in their
enjoyment of expressing themselves in English, with mean scores rising from
3.11 to 4.25 (p < 0.001), suggesting a boost in language confidence and communicative
willingness. Similarly, their tendency to try again after making mistakes
improved substantially, with the mean increasing from 2.96 to 4.08 (p <
0.001), highlighting enhanced emotional resilience and reduced fear of failure.
Additionally, there was a notable increase in learners' engagement with English
outside the classroom—from a mean of 2.73 to 3.89 (p < 0.01)—indicating that
reframing not only influenced classroom behavior but also encouraged learners
to integrate the language into their daily lives. These findings collectively
suggest that reframing helped foster a more motivated, confident, and proactive
approach to second language learning.
Figure 1
Discussion
The findings of this study demonstrate that reframing, as a technique rooted in Neurolinguistic Programming (NLP), has a significant and positive impact on second language learners' emotional responses, confidence, and engagement. These results align with existing literature that underscores the importance of addressing affective factors—such as anxiety, self-doubt, and fear of failure—in second language acquisition (SLA) (Nguyen et al., 2015).
The substantial increase in learner confidence and the reduction in language anxiety following the intervention highlight the effectiveness of reframing as an emotional regulation strategy. Consistent with Beck’s theory of cognitive restructuring (Savignon, 2002)
and Krashen’s Affective Filter Hypothesis (Schunk, 1995)
, reframing enabled learners to reinterpret their linguistic mistakes and challenges as opportunities for growth rather than indicators of failure. This shift in perspective likely reduced psychological barriers, thereby enhancing learners’ willingness to engage in language tasks.
Moreover, these findings reflect the constructivist view that learning is an active, socially and emotionally constructed process. By encouraging students to reconceptualize their learning experiences, reframing facilitated a more growth-oriented mindset, a concept closely related to Dweck’s theory (Smith, 2020)
, where learners believe their abilities can improve through effort and reflection.
This study supports earlier claims made by O’Connor and Seymour (Sweller, 1988), who emphasized that reframing improves emotional resilience and student performance. The increased motivation and reduced avoidance behavior observed in participants correspond with Bandura’s Social Cognitive Theory, particularly the concept of self-efficacy, which posits that learners with higher belief in their abilities are more likely to persist through challenges (Thompson, 2017)
The cognitive and emotional shifts observed in this study validate the assumption that emotional readiness is a prerequisite for effective second language learning. Students who were able to reframe their fears and anxieties engaged more deeply in language practice, reinforcing the idea that emotional scaffolding is just as crucial as cognitive support.
The study also offered insights into how cultural background influences the way learners perceive language learning challenges. Students from high-context cultures, such as those common in South Asia, often experience greater anxiety in public speaking or fear of making mistakes due to social pressure and fear of judgment (Vygotsky, 1978)
. Reframing helped mitigate these culturally embedded anxieties by normalizing error-making as part of the learning process. This suggests that reframing strategies may be especially beneficial in collectivist or hierarchical learning environments, where students may be less inclined to take risks without psychological support.
Despite the brevity of the intervention—a one-week training program—the statistically significant results indicate that even a short-term application of NLP-based reframing can have immediate benefits. This finding is promising for classroom teachers seeking time-efficient strategies to boost learner confidence and engagement.
Conclusion
This study explored the impact of reframing, a core technique within Neurolinguistic Programming (NLP), on second language learners’ emotional and cognitive outcomes, particularly focusing on confidence, anxiety, and motivation. The findings revealed that even a short-term, one-week intervention could bring about significant improvements in learners’ self-perception, willingness to engage, and emotional regulation. By helping students reinterpret their challenges as opportunities for growth, reframing enabled a positive shift in mindset that supported more effective participation in language learning. These results not only reinforce the role of emotional readiness in second language acquisition but also underscore the value of integrating psychological strategies into traditional pedagogical practices.
This study contributes to the field by demonstrating the practical benefits of reframing in classroom settings, where emotional barriers such as language anxiety and fear of failure often hinder progress. It also expands the limited but growing body of research on the application of NLP techniques in education, offering empirical evidence of reframing's usefulness in fostering learner resilience and motivation. For language instructors, this research provides a clear call to action: incorporating reframing into classroom practice can help create more supportive, empathetic, and productive learning environments. Teachers trained in basic NLP strategies may be better equipped to address learners' emotional needs and enhance their overall language learning experience.
Future research should investigate the long-term impact of reframing across different age groups and educational levels. Additionally, exploring the combined use of reframing with other NLP techniques—such as anchoring or visualization—could yield even more effective interventions. Larger, cross-cultural studies could also help uncover how individual learner traits or cultural factors influence responsiveness to reframing. Ultimately, this study highlights the transformative potential of reframing in second language learning, offering a promising pathway for more emotionally informed and learner-centered teaching practices.
References
-
Al-Khatib, B. A., & Al-Khatib, J. A. (2023). Exploring the efficacy of neuro-linguistic programming in alleviating school difficulties among elementary students. Advances in Pediatric Research.
- Hall, L. M. (2001). The user's manual for the brain: The complete manual for neuro-linguistic programming practitioner certification. Crown House Publishing.
- Horwitz, E. (2001). Language anxiety and achievement. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 21, 112–126. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0267190501000071
- LeDoux, J. E. (2003). Synaptic self: How our brains become who we are. Penguin Books.
- Macintyre, P. D. (2007). Willingness to communicate in the second language: understanding the decision to speak as a volitional process. Modern Language Journal, 91(4), 564–576. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2007.00623.x
- Manana, M., Tarhini, S., Ghanem, D., Assi, R. B., Awada, S., & Hatem, G. (2024). Assessment of the impact of neuro-linguistic programming on primary Schoolchildren’s intellectual capacity. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 10, 100966. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.100966
- McCRAE, R. R., Costa, P. T., & Jr, N. (2003). Personality in adulthood. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203428412
- Meichenbaum, D. (1977). Cognitive-behavior modification: An integrative approach. Springer.
- Nguyen, K., Stanley, N., Stanley, L., & Wang, Y. (2015). Resilience in language learners and the relationship to storytelling. Cogent Education, 2(1), 991160. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186x.2014.991160
Cite this article
-
APA : Rubab, T. A., Younus, N., & Fatima, M. (2025). The Influence of Reframing on Second Language Learning: A Study in Neurolinguistic Programming. Global Social Sciences Review, X(I), 150-156. https://doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2025(X-I).13
-
CHICAGO : Rubab, Tumsaal Amna, Noshaba Younus, and Munaem Fatima. 2025. "The Influence of Reframing on Second Language Learning: A Study in Neurolinguistic Programming." Global Social Sciences Review, X (I): 150-156 doi: 10.31703/gssr.2025(X-I).13
-
HARVARD : RUBAB, T. A., YOUNUS, N. & FATIMA, M. 2025. The Influence of Reframing on Second Language Learning: A Study in Neurolinguistic Programming. Global Social Sciences Review, X, 150-156.
-
MHRA : Rubab, Tumsaal Amna, Noshaba Younus, and Munaem Fatima. 2025. "The Influence of Reframing on Second Language Learning: A Study in Neurolinguistic Programming." Global Social Sciences Review, X: 150-156
-
MLA : Rubab, Tumsaal Amna, Noshaba Younus, and Munaem Fatima. "The Influence of Reframing on Second Language Learning: A Study in Neurolinguistic Programming." Global Social Sciences Review, X.I (2025): 150-156 Print.
-
OXFORD : Rubab, Tumsaal Amna, Younus, Noshaba, and Fatima, Munaem (2025), "The Influence of Reframing on Second Language Learning: A Study in Neurolinguistic Programming", Global Social Sciences Review, X (I), 150-156
-
TURABIAN : Rubab, Tumsaal Amna, Noshaba Younus, and Munaem Fatima. "The Influence of Reframing on Second Language Learning: A Study in Neurolinguistic Programming." Global Social Sciences Review X, no. I (2025): 150-156. https://doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2025(X-I).13